Embeddings in Euclidean space: an introduction to their classification
This page is being refereed under the supervision of the editorial board. Hence the page may not be edited at present. As always, the discussion page remains open for observations and comments. |
The user responsible for this page is Askopenkov. No other user may edit this page at present. |
Contents |
1 Introduction
This page is intended not only for specialists in embeddings, but also for mathematicians from other areas who want to apply or to learn the theory of embeddings.
According to [Zeeman93, p. 3], three major classical problems of topology are the following.
- Homeomorphism Problem: Classify -manifolds.
- Embedding Problem: Find the least dimension such that given space admits an embedding into -dimensional Euclidean space .
- Knotting Problem: Classify embeddings of a given space into another given space up to isotopy.
The Embedding and Knotting Problems have played an outstanding role in the development of topology. Various methods for the investigation of these problems were created by such classical figures as G. Alexander, H. Hopf, E. van Kampen, K. Kuratowski, S. MacLane, L. S. Pontryagin, R. Thom, H. Whitney, M. Atiyah, F. Hirzebruch, R. Penrose, J. H. C. Whitehead, C. Zeeman, W. Browder, J. Levine, S. P. Novikov, A. Haefliger, M. Hirsch, J. F. P. Hudson, M. Irwin and others.
This article gives a short guide to the Knotting Problem of compact manifolds in Euclidean spaces and in spheres. After making general remarks we record some of the dimension ranges where no knotting is possible, i.e. where any two embeddings of are isotopic. We then establish notation and conventions and give references to other pages on the Knotting Problem, to which this page serves as an introduction. We conclude by introducing connected sum and making some comments on codimension 1 and 2 embeddings.
The most interesting and very much studied case concerns embeddings (classical knots), or more generally, codimension 2 embeddings of spheres. Although there have been great results in the last 100 years, these results were not directly aiming at a complete classification which remains widely open. Almost nothing is said here about this, but see Wikipedia article on knot theory and Remark 6 for more information.
Even in general, the Knotting Problem is known to be hard: at the time of writing there are only a few cases in which complete readily calculable classification results describing all isotopy classes for embeddings of a closed manifold into Euclidean space . Cf. Remark 1.1. Such classification results are the unknotting theorems in 2, the results on the pages listed below in 4 and in 7. Their statements, although not the proofs, are simple and accessible to non-specialists. This page and the pages listed in 4 concern only such classification results, so we have to leave out another material, in particular in codimension and also for all codimensions.
The results and remarks in 2,4,6,7 show that
- the complete classification of embeddings into of closed connected -manifolds is non-trivial but presently accessible only for or for .
- the farther we go from to , the more complicated classification is.
The lowest dimensional cases, i.e. all such pairs with , are (6,3), (4,3), (8,4), (7,4), (5,4). For known information on the cases (6,3), (8,4), (7,4) see [Skopenkov2016t], [Skopenkov2016e], [Skopenkov2016f].
Remark 1.1 (Readily calculable classification). A `readily calculable classification' is an informal expression. In the best case this is a classification in terms of homology of a manifold (and certain structures in homology like intersection, characteristic classes etc). A readily calculable classification is also a reduction to calculation of stable homotopy groups of spheres when these are known (or to another standard algebraic problem involving only the homology of the manifold, which is solved in particular cases, although may be unsolved in general). An important feature of a useful classification is accessibility of statement to general mathematical audience which is only familiar with basic notions of the area; this in turn is an approximation to beauty. Another important feature is whether the classification gives an algorithm and how complex the algorithm is.
Many readily calculable classification results are presented in these pages. On the other hand, in some cases `geometric problems are reduced to algebraic problems which are even harder to solve' [Wall1999], and such results do not give a readily calculable classification. E.g. so far an interesting approach of [Weiss96], [Goodwillie&Weiss1999] did not give any new complete readily calculable classification results. (However, it gives a modern abstract proof of certain earlier known results; it also gives explicit results on higher homotopy groups of the space of embeddings [Weiss].)
Remark 1.2 (Embeddings into the sphere and Euclidean space). (a) Embeddings given by and are not isotopic. On the other hand, any two embeddings are isotopic (this intuitively clear assertion is non-trivial, see 7).
(b) For the classifications of embeddings of -manifolds into and into are the same.
Let us prove this for the smooth category. It suffices to show that if the compositions with the inclusion of two embeddings of a compact -manifold are isotopic, then and are isotopic (in spite of the existence of orientation-preserving diffeomorphisms not isotopic to the identity). For showing that assume that and are isotopic. Then by general position and are non-ambiently isotopic. Since every non-ambient isotopy extends to an ambient one [Hirsch1976], Theorem 1.3, and are isotopic.
2 Unknotting theorems
If the category is omitted, then a result stated below holds in both the smooth and piecewise-linear (PL) category.
General Position Theorem 2.1 ([Hirsch1976], [Rourke&Sanderson1972]). For each compact -manifold and , every two embeddings are isotopic.
The case is called a `stable range' (for the classification problem; for the existence problem there is analogous result with [Skopenkov2006, 2]).
The restriction in Theorem 2.1 is sharp for non-connected manifolds, as the Hopf linking shows [Skopenkov2016h] [Skopenkov2006, Figure 2.1.a].
Whitney-Wu Unknotting Theorem 2.2. For each compact connected -manifold , and , every two embeddings are isotopic.
This is proved in [Wu1958], [Wu1958a] and [Wu1959] using Whitney trick.
All the three assumptions in this result are indeed necessary:
- the assumption because of the existence of non-trivial knots ;
- the connectedness assumption because of the existence of the Hopf link [Skopenkov2016h];
- the assumption because of the example of Hudson tori [Skopenkov2016e].
Unknotting Spheres Theorem 2.3. For , or even for a homology -sphere, or in the PL or smooth category, respectively, every two embeddings are isotopic.
This result is proved in [Zeeman1960] or [Haefliger1961] in the PL or smooth category, respectively. This result is also true for in the topological locally flat category [Stallings1963], [Gluck1963], [Rushing1973, Flattening Theorem 4.5.1], [Scharlemann1977].
The case is called a `metastable range' (for the classification problem; for the existence problem there are analogous results with [Skopenkov2006, 2, 5]).
Knots in codimension 2 and the the Haefliger trefoil knot show that the dimension restrictions are sharp (even for ) in the Unknotting Spheres Theorem 2.3.
Theorems 2.2 and 2.3 may be generalized as follows.
The Haefliger-Zeeman Unknotting Theorem 2.4. For each , and closed -connected -manifold , every two embeddings are isotopic.
This was proved in [Penrose&Whitehead&Zeeman1961], [Haefliger1961], [Zeeman1962], [Irwin1965], [Hudson1969]. The proofs in [Haefliger&Hirsch1963], [Vrabec1977], [Weber1967], [Adachi1993, 7] work for homologically -connected manifolds (see 3 for definition).
So the case can be called a `stable range for -connected manifolds'.
Note that if , then every closed -connected -manifold is a sphere, so the analogue of the Haefliger-Zeeman Unknotting Theorem 2.4 in the smooth category is wrong, and in the PL category gives nothing more than the Unknotting Spheres Theorem 2.3.
For generalizations of the Haefliger-Zeeman Unknotting Theorem 2.4 see [Skopenkov2016e, 5] or [Hudson1967], [Hacon1968], [Hudson1972], [Gordon1972], [Kearton1979]. See also Theorem 7.1.
3 Notation and conventions
The following notations and conventions will be used in some other pages about embeddings, including those listed in 4.
For a manifold let or denote the set of smooth or piecewise-linear (PL) embeddings up to smooth or PL isotopy. If a category is omitted, then the result holds (or a definition or a construction is given) in both categories.
All manifolds are tacitly assumed to be compact.
Let be a closed -ball in a closed connected -manifold . Denote .
Let be for even and for odd, so that is for even and for odd.
Denote by the Stiefel manifold of orthonormal -frames in .
We omit -coefficients from the notation of (co)homology groups.
For a manifold denote .
A closed manifold is called homologically -connected, if is connected and for each . This condition is equivalent to for each , where are reduced homology groups. A pair is called homologically -connected, if for each .
The self-intersection set of a map is
For a smooth embedding denote by
- the closure of the complement in to a tight enough tubular neighborhood of and
- the restriction of the linear normal bundle of to the space of unit length vectors identified with .
- and homological Alexander duality isomorphisms, see well-known Alexander Duality Lemmas of [Skopenkov2008], [Skopenkov2005].
4 References to information on the classification of embeddings
Below we list references to information about the classification of embeddings of manifolds into Euclidean space.
The first list is structured by the dimension of the source manifold and the target Euclidean space:
Information structured by the `complexity' of the source manifold:
For more information see e.g. [Skopenkov2006].
5 Embedded connected sum
Suppose that is a closed connected -manifold and, if is orientable, an orientation of is chosen. Let us define the embedded connected sum operation of on .
Represent isotopy classes and by embeddings and whose images are contained in disjoint balls. Join the images of by an arc whose interior misses the images. Let be the isotopy class of the embedded connected sum of and along this arc (compatible with the orientation, if is orientable), cf. [Haefliger1966, Theorem 1.7], [Avvakumov2016, 1].
This operation is well-defined, i.e. the isotopy class of class of the embedded connected sum depends only on the the isotopy classes and , and is independent of the choice of the path and of the representatives . The proof of this fact is based on the construction of embedded connected sum of isotopies. Although this fact is presumably classical, a proof was not written, cf. [Skopenkov2015a, Remark 2.3.a]. The proof is written for in [Skopenkov2015a, 3, proof of the Standardization Lemma 2.1.b and beginning of proof of the Group structure Lemma 2.2 for a point]. The proof for arbitrary closed connected -manifold is analogous.
Moreover, for (embedded) connected sum defines a group structure on [Haefliger1966], and an action of on .
6 Some remarks on codimension 2 embeddings
Let be a closed connected -manifold. The case is the most deeply studied and reveals an overwhelming multitude of isotopy classes of embeddings. We present some speculations as to why the classification in codimension 2 should not be accessible for manifolds, not only for spheres. Using embedded connected sum (5) we can apparently produce an overwhelming multitude of embeddings from the overwhelming multitude of embeddings . However, note that there are embeddings and such that is not isotopic to but is isotopic to [Viro1973]. One can also apply Artin's spinning construction [Artin1928] for . Thus the description of is a very hard open problem. It would be interesting to give a more formal (e.g. algorithmic) illustration of the hardness of this problem.
For studies of codimension 2 embeddings of manifolds up to the weaker relation of concordance see e.g. [Cappell&Shaneson1974].
7 Codimension 1 embeddings
Theorem 7.1. (a) Every two smooth embeddings are smoothly isotopic for [Smale1961], [Smale1962a], [Barden1965].
(b) Every two smooth embeddings are smoothly isotopic for each [Kosinski1961], [Wall1965], [Lucas&Neto&Saeki1996], cf. [Goldstein1967].
The analogue of part (a) holds
- for in the PL or topological category (Schöenfliess Theorem, 1912) [Rushing1973, 1.8].
- for in the PL category (Alexander Theorem, 1923) [Rushing1973, 1.8].
- for every in the topological locally flat category (Brown-Mazur-Moise Theorem, 1960) [Rushing1973, Generalized Schöenfliess Theorem 1.8.2].
The famous counterexample to the analogue of part (a) for in the topological category is Alexander horned sphere. The well-known very hard Schöenfliess Problem asks if every two PL embeddings are isotopic for (this is equivalent to the description of ).
Every embedding extends to an embedding either or [Alexander1924]. Clearly, only the standard embedding extends to both.
If it could be proven that this extension respects isotopy, this would give a 1-1 correspondence . So the description of would be as hopeless as that of . Thus the description of for a sphere with handles is apparently hopeless.
Let be the set of PL locally flat embeddings up to PL locally flat isotopy. Note that could admit complete readily calculable classification even when does not [Goldstein1967].
For more on higher-dimensional codimension 1 embeddings see e.g. [Lucas&Saeki2002].
8 References
- [Adachi1993] M. Adachi, Embeddings and immersions, Translated from the Japanese by Kiki Hudson. Translations of Mathematical Monographs, 124. Providence, RI: American Mathematical Society (AMS), 1993. MR1225100 (95a:57039) Zbl 0810.57001
- [Alexander1924] J. W. Alexander, On the subdivision of 3-space by polyhedron, Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA, 10, (1924) 6–8. Zbl 50.0659.01
- [Artin1928] E. Artin, Zur Isotopie zwei-dimensionaler Flaechen im , Abh. Math. Sem. Hamburg Univ. 4 (1928) 174–177.
- [Avvakumov2016] S. Avvakumov, The classification of certain linked 3-manifolds in 6-space, Moscow Mathematical Journal, 16:1 (2016) 1-25. http://arxiv.org/abs/1408.3918.
- [Barden1965] D. Barden, Simply connected five-manifolds, Ann. of Math. (2) 82 (1965), 365–385. MR0184241 (32 #1714) Zbl 0136.20602
- [Cappell&Shaneson1974] S. E. Cappell and J. L. Shaneson, The codimension two placement problem and homology equivalent manifolds, Ann. of Math. (2) 99 (1974), 277–348. MR0339216 (49 #3978) Zbl 0279.57011
- [Gluck1963] H. Gluck, Unknotting in ., Bull. Am. Math. Soc. 69 (1963), 91-94. MR0142114 (25 #5507) Zbl 0108.36503
- [Goldstein1967] R. Z. Goldstein, Piecewise linear unknotting of in , Michigan Math. J. 14 (1967), 405–415. MR0220299 (36 #3365) Zbl 0157.54801
- [Goodwillie&Weiss1999] T. Goodwillie and M. Weiss, Embeddings from the point of view of immersion theory, II, Geometry and Topology, 3 (1999), 103-118. MR1694812 (2000c:57055a) Zbl 0927.57028
- [Gordon1972] C. Gordon, Embedding piecewise linear manifolds with boundary., Proc. Camb. Philos. Soc. 72 (1972), 21-25. MR0295359 (45 #4425) Zbl 0236.57009
- [Hacon1968] D. Hacon, Embeddings of in in the metastable range., Topology 7 (1968), 1-10. MR0222903 (36 #5953) Zbl 0153.53902
- [Haefliger&Hirsch1963] A. Haefliger and M. W. Hirsch, On the existence and classification of differentiable embeddings, Topology 2 (1963), 129–135. MR0149494 (26 #6981) Zbl 0113.38607
- [Haefliger1961] A. Haefliger, Plongements différentiables de variétés dans variétés., Comment. Math. Helv.36 (1961), 47-82. MR0145538 (26 #3069) Zbl 0102.38603
- [Haefliger1966] A. Haefliger, Differential embeddings of in for , Ann. of Math. (2) 83 (1966), 402–436. MR0202151 (34 #2024) Zbl 0151.32502
- [Hirsch1976] M. W. Hirsch, Differential topology., Graduate Texts in Mathematics, No. 33. Springer-Verlag., New York-Heidelberg, 1976. MR0448362 (56 #6669) Zbl 0356.57001
- [Hudson1967] J. Hudson, Piecewise linear embeddings, Ann. of Math. (2) 85 (1967) 1–31. MR0215308 (35 #6149) Zbl 0153.25601
- [Hudson1969] J. F. P. Hudson, Piecewise linear topology, W. A. Benjamin, Inc., New York-Amsterdam, 1969. MR0248844 (40 #2094) Zbl 0189.54507
- [Hudson1972] J. Hudson, Embeddings of bounded manifolds., Proc. Camb. Philos. Soc. 72 (1972), 11-20. MR0298679 (45 #7728) Zbl 0241.57006
- [Irwin1965] M. Irwin, Embeddings of polyhedral manifolds, Ann. of Math. (2) 82 (1965) 1–14. MR0182978 (32 #460) Zbl 0132.20003
- [Kearton1979] C. Kearton, Obstructions to embedding and isotopy in the metastable range, Math. Ann. 243 (1979), 103-113. MR0543720 (82k:57012) Zbl 0401.57033
- [Kosinski1961] A. Kosinski, On Alexander's theorem and knotted tori, In: Topology of 3-Manifolds, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, Ed. M.~K.~Fort, N.J., 1962, 55--57. Cf. \cite{Fort1962}.
- [Lucas&Neto&Saeki1996] L. A. Lucas, O. M. Neto and O. Saeki, A generalization of Alexander's torus theorem to higher dimensions and an unknotting theorem for embedded in , Kobe J. Math. 13 (1996), no.2, 145–165. MR1442202 (98e:57041) Zbl 876.57045
- [Lucas&Saeki2002] L. A. Lucas and O. Saeki, Embeddings of in , Pacific J. Math. 207 (2002), no.2, 447–462. MR1972255 (2004c:57045) Zbl 1058.57022
- [Penrose&Whitehead&Zeeman1961] R. Penrose, J. Whitehead and E. Zeeman, Imbedding of manifolds in Euclidean space., Ann. of Math. 73 (1961) 613–623. MR0124909 (23 #A2218) Zbl 0113.38101
- [Rourke&Sanderson1972] C. Rourke and B. Sanderson, Introduction to piecewise-linear topology., Ergebnisse der Mathematik und ihrer Grenzgebiete. Band 69. Berlin-Heidelberg-New York: Springer-Verlag. VIII, 1972. MR0665919 (83g:57009) Zbl 0254.57010
- [Rushing1973] T. Rushing, Topological embeddings., {Pure and Applied Mathematics, 52. New York-London: Academic Press. XIII, 316 p. \$ 18.50 }, 1973. MRMR0348752 (50 #1247) Zbl 0295.57003
- [Scharlemann1977] M. Scharlemann, Isotopy and cobordism of homology spheres in spheres., J. Lond. Math. Soc., II. Ser. 16 (1977), 559-567. MRMR0464246 (57 #4180) Zbl 0375.57003
- [Skopenkov2005] A. Skopenkov, A classification of smooth embeddings of 4-manifolds in 7-space, Topol. Appl., 157 (2010) 2094-2110. Available at the arXiv:0512594.
- [Skopenkov2006] A. Skopenkov, Embedding and knotting of manifolds in Euclidean spaces, in: Surveys in Contemporary Mathematics, Ed. N. Young and Y. Choi, London Math. Soc. Lect. Notes, 347 (2008) 248--342. Available at the arXiv:0604045.
- [Skopenkov2008] A. Skopenkov, A classification of smooth embeddings of 3-manifolds in 6-space, Math. Z. 260 (2008), no.3, 647–672. Available at the arXiv:0603429MR2434474 (2010e:57028) Zbl 1167.57013
- [Skopenkov2015a] A. Skopenkov, A classification of knotted tori, http://arxiv.org/abs/1502.04470
- [Skopenkov2016e] A. Skopenkov, Embeddings just below the stable range: classification, submitted to Bull. Man. Atl.
- [Skopenkov2016f] A. Skopenkov, 4-manifolds in 7-space, submitted to Bull. Man. Atl.
- [Skopenkov2016h] A. Skopenkov, High codimension links, submitted to Bull. Man. Atl.
- [Skopenkov2016k] A. Skopenkov, Knotted tori, preprint.
- [Skopenkov2016t] A. Skopenkov, 3-manifolds in 6-space, submitted to Boll. Man. Atl.
- [Smale1961] S. Smale, Generalized Poincaré's conjecture in dimensions greater than four, Ann. of Math. (2) 74 (1961), 391–406. MR0137124 (25 #580) Zbl 0099.39202
- [Smale1962a] S. Smale, On the structure of manifolds, Amer. J. Math. 84 (1962), 387–399. MR0153022 (27 #2991) Zbl 0109.41103
- [Stallings1963] J. Stallings, On topologically unknotted spheres., (1963). MRMR0149458 (26 #6946) Zbl 0121.18202
- [Viro1973] O. J. Viro, Local knotting of sub-manifolds, Mat. Sb. (N.S.) 90(132) (1973), 173–183, 325. MR0370606 (51 #6833)
- [Vrabec1977] J. Vrabec, Knotting a -connected closed -manifold in , Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 233 (1977), 137–165. MR0645405 (58 #31097) Zbl 386.57013
- [Wall1965] C. T. C. Wall, Unknotting tori in codimension one and spheres in codimension two., Proc. Camb. Philos. Soc. 61 (1965), 659-664. MR0184249 (32 #1722) Zbl 0135.41602
- [Wall1999] C. T. C. Wall, Surgery on compact manifolds, American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 1999. MR1687388 (2000a:57089) Zbl 0935.57003
- [Weber1967] C. Weber, Plongements de polyedres dans le domaine metastable, Comment. Math. Helv. 42 (1967), 1-27. MR0238330 (38 #6606) Zbl 0152.22402
- [Weiss] M. Weiss, private communication
- [Weiss96] M. Weiss, Calculus of Embeddings, Bull. Amer. Math. Soc. 33 (1996), 177-187
- [Wu1958] W. Wu, On the realization of complexes in euclidean spaces. I, Sci. Sinica 7 (1958), 251–297. MR0099026 (20 #5471) Zbl 0183.28302
- [Wu1958a] W. Wu, On the realization of complexes in euclidean spaces. I, Sci. Sinica 7 (1958), 251–297. MR0099026 (20 #5471) Zbl 0183.28302
- [Wu1959] W. Wu, On the realization of complexes in euclidean spaces. III, Sci. Sinica 8 (1959), 133–150. MR0098365 (20 #4825b) Zbl 0207.53104
- [Zeeman1960] E. Zeeman, Unknotting spheres, Bull. Amer. Math. Soc. 66 (1960) 198. MR0117737 (22 #8512a) Zbl 0117.40904
- [Zeeman1962] E. C. Zeeman, Isotopies and knots in manifolds, Topology of 3-manifolds and related topics (Proc. The Univ. of Georgia Institute, 1961), Prentice-Hall (1962), 187–193. MR0140097 (25 #3520)
- [Zeeman93] E.C. Zeeman, A Brief History of Topology, UC Berkeley, October 27, 1993, On the occasion of Moe Hirsch's 60th birthday, http://www.mccme.ru/circles/oim/foto2014/l_ht.html