Middle-dimensional surgery kernel (Ex)

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
m
m
Line 2: Line 2:
The goal of this exercise is to prove the following statement which will be indispensible in defining the surgery obstruction.
The goal of this exercise is to prove the following statement which will be indispensible in defining the surgery obstruction.
{{beginthm|Proposition}} Let $f:M\rightarrow X$ be a degree 1 normal map from a $2k$-dimensional (resp. $(2k+1)$-dimensional manifold to a geometric Poincaré complex, inducing the isomorphism $f_\ast:\pi_1(M)\cong\pi_1(X)=:\pi$. Denote by $K_i(M)=K_i(\widetilde{M})$ the homology surgery kernel $\mathbb{Z}[\pi]$-module. If $f$ is $k$-connected the kernel module $K_k(M)$ is finitely generated and stably free.
+
{{beginthm|Proposition}} Let $f:M\rightarrow X$ be a degree 1 normal map from a $2k$-dimensional (resp. $(2k+1)$-dimensional) manifold to a geometric Poincaré complex, inducing the isomorphism $f_\ast:\pi_1(M)\cong\pi_1(X)=:\pi$. Denote by $K_i(M)=K_i(\widetilde{M})$ the homology surgery kernel $\mathbb{Z}[\pi]$-module. If $f$ is $k$-connected the kernel module $K_k(M)$ is finitely generated and stably free.
{{endthm|Proposition}}
{{endthm|Proposition}}
The statement essentially follows from the technical lemma which you are asked to prove.
The statement essentially follows from the technical lemma which you are asked to prove.

Revision as of 10:46, 19 March 2012

The goal of this exercise is to prove the following statement which will be indispensible in defining the surgery obstruction.

Proposition 0.1. Let f:M\rightarrow X be a degree 1 normal map from a 2k-dimensional (resp. (2k+1)-dimensional) manifold to a geometric Poincaré complex, inducing the isomorphism f_\ast:\pi_1(M)\cong\pi_1(X)=:\pi. Denote by K_i(M)=K_i(\widetilde{M}) the homology surgery kernel \mathbb{Z}[\pi]-module. If f is k-connected the kernel module K_k(M) is finitely generated and stably free.

The statement essentially follows from the technical lemma which you are asked to prove.

Lemma 0.2 [Ranicki2002, Lemma 10.26]. Let R be a ring with involution and C=C_\ast a finite chain complex of finitely generated projective (left) R-modules.

1) If for i<n, H_i(C)=0 for some integer n then the R-module H_n(C) is finitely generated and
\displaystyle H^n(C)\rightarrow H_n(C)^\ast, \quad  f\mapsto (x\mapsto f(x)).
is an isomorphism.


2) If in addition for j>n, H^j(C)=0 for the same integer n then H_n(C) and H^n(C) are dual, and there are isomorphisms
\displaystyle H_n(C)\oplus\sum_{i\in\mathbb{Z}}C_{n+2i+1}\cong\sum_{j\in\mathbb{Z}}C_{n+2j},
\displaystyle H^n(C)\oplus\sum_{i\in\mathbb{Z}}C^{n+2i+1}\cong\sum_{j\in\mathbb{Z}}C^{n+2j},
where under further assumption that C is a chain complex of free modules, the latter isomorphism implies that H_n(C) and H^n(C) are stably free.

The proposition is given as lemma 4.19 in [Lück2001], however the proof is incomplete. Alternatively a good proof can be found in [Wall1999] and a more detailed one in [Ranicki2002].

Personal tools
Namespaces
Variants
Actions
Navigation
Interaction
Toolbox