Middle-dimensional surgery kernel (Ex)

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
(Created page with "<wikitex>; The goal of the following exercise is to prove the following statement which will be indispensible in defining the surgery obstruction. {{beginthm|Proposition}} ...")
m
Line 1: Line 1:
<wikitex>;
<wikitex>;
The goal of the following exercise is to prove the following statement which will be indispensible in defining the surgery obstruction.
+
The goal of this exercise is to prove the following statement which will be indispensible in defining the surgery obstruction.
{{beginthm|Proposition}} Let $f:M\rightarrow X$ be a degree 1 normal map from a $2k$-dimensional (resp. $(2k+1)$-dimensional manifold to a geometric Poincaré complex, inducing the isomorphism $f_\ast:\pi_1(M)\cong\pi_1(X)=:\pi$. Denote by $K_i(M)=K_i(\widetilde{M})$ the homology surgery kernel $\mathbb{Z}[\pi]$-module. If $f$ is $k$-connected the kernel module $K_k(M)$ is finitely generated and stably free.
{{beginthm|Proposition}} Let $f:M\rightarrow X$ be a degree 1 normal map from a $2k$-dimensional (resp. $(2k+1)$-dimensional manifold to a geometric Poincaré complex, inducing the isomorphism $f_\ast:\pi_1(M)\cong\pi_1(X)=:\pi$. Denote by $K_i(M)=K_i(\widetilde{M})$ the homology surgery kernel $\mathbb{Z}[\pi]$-module. If $f$ is $k$-connected the kernel module $K_k(M)$ is finitely generated and stably free.
{{endthm|Proposition}}
{{endthm|Proposition}}
The statement essentially follows from the technical lemma which is stated here as an exercise.
+
The statement essentially follows from the technical lemma which you are asked to prove.
+
{{beginthm|Lemma|{{citeD|Ranicki2002|Lemma 10.26}}}}
Let $R$ be a ring with involution and $C=C_\ast$ a finite chain complex of finitely generated projective (left) $R$-modules.
Let $R$ be a ring with involution and $C=C_\ast$ a finite chain complex of finitely generated projective (left) $R$-modules.
Line 12: Line 13:
'''2)''' If in addition for $j>n$, $H^j(C)=0$ for the same integer $n$ then $H_n(C)$ and $H^n(C)$ are dual, and there are isomorphisms$$H_n(C)\oplus\sum_{i\in\mathbb{Z}}C_{n+2i+1}\cong\sum_{j\in\mathbb{Z}}C_{n+2j}, $$$$H^n(C)\oplus\sum_{i\in\mathbb{Z}}C^{n+2i+1}\cong\sum_{j\in\mathbb{Z}}C^{n+2j},$$where under further assumption that $C$ is a chain complex of free modules, the latter isomorphism implies that $H_n(C)$ and $H^n(C)$ are stably free.
'''2)''' If in addition for $j>n$, $H^j(C)=0$ for the same integer $n$ then $H_n(C)$ and $H^n(C)$ are dual, and there are isomorphisms$$H_n(C)\oplus\sum_{i\in\mathbb{Z}}C_{n+2i+1}\cong\sum_{j\in\mathbb{Z}}C_{n+2j}, $$$$H^n(C)\oplus\sum_{i\in\mathbb{Z}}C^{n+2i+1}\cong\sum_{j\in\mathbb{Z}}C^{n+2j},$$where under further assumption that $C$ is a chain complex of free modules, the latter isomorphism implies that $H_n(C)$ and $H^n(C)$ are stably free.
+
{{endthm|Lemma}}
The proposition is given as lemma 4.19 in {{citeD|Lück2001}}, however the proof is incomplete. Alternatively a good proof can be found in {{citeD|Wall1999}} and a more detailed one in {{citeD|Ranicki2002}}. In fact the exercise is borrowed from the latter where it is stated verbatim as a lemma.
+
The proposition is given as lemma 4.19 in {{citeD|Lück2001}}, however the proof is incomplete. Alternatively a good proof can be found in {{citeD|Wall1999}} and a more detailed one in {{citeD|Ranicki2002}}.
</wikitex>
</wikitex>
[[Category:Exercises]]
[[Category:Exercises]]

Revision as of 10:40, 19 March 2012

The goal of this exercise is to prove the following statement which will be indispensible in defining the surgery obstruction.

Proposition 0.1. Let f:M\rightarrow X be a degree 1 normal map from a 2k-dimensional (resp. (2k+1)-dimensional manifold to a geometric Poincaré complex, inducing the isomorphism f_\ast:\pi_1(M)\cong\pi_1(X)=:\pi. Denote by K_i(M)=K_i(\widetilde{M}) the homology surgery kernel \mathbb{Z}[\pi]-module. If f is k-connected the kernel module K_k(M) is finitely generated and stably free.

The statement essentially follows from the technical lemma which you are asked to prove.

Lemma 0.2 [Ranicki2002, Lemma 10.26]. Let R be a ring with involution and C=C_\ast a finite chain complex of finitely generated projective (left) R-modules.

1) If for i<n, H_i(C)=0 for some integer n then the R-module H_n(C) is finitely generated and
\displaystyle H^n(C)\rightarrow H_n(C)^\ast, \quad  f\mapsto (x\mapsto f(x)).
is an isomorphism.


2) If in addition for j>n, H^j(C)=0 for the same integer n then H_n(C) and H^n(C) are dual, and there are isomorphisms
\displaystyle H_n(C)\oplus\sum_{i\in\mathbb{Z}}C_{n+2i+1}\cong\sum_{j\in\mathbb{Z}}C_{n+2j},
\displaystyle H^n(C)\oplus\sum_{i\in\mathbb{Z}}C^{n+2i+1}\cong\sum_{j\in\mathbb{Z}}C^{n+2j},
where under further assumption that C is a chain complex of free modules, the latter isomorphism implies that H_n(C) and H^n(C) are stably free.

The proposition is given as lemma 4.19 in [Lück2001], however the proof is incomplete. Alternatively a good proof can be found in [Wall1999] and a more detailed one in [Ranicki2002].

Personal tools
Namespaces
Variants
Actions
Navigation
Interaction
Toolbox