Embeddings of manifolds with boundary: classification

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
m
m (Introduction)
Line 15: Line 15:
== Introduction ==
== Introduction ==
<wikitex>;
<wikitex>;
+
For a [[Embeddings_in_Euclidean_space:_an_introduction_to_their_classification#Introduction|general introduction to embeddings]] as well as the [[Embeddings_in_Euclidean_space:_an_introduction_to_their_classification#Notation and conventions|notation and conventions]] used on this page, we refer to \cite[$\S$1, $\S$3]{Skopenkov2016c}.
<!--Most of this page is intended not only for specialists in embeddings, but also for mathematician from other areas who want to apply or to learn the theory of embeddings.-->
<!--Most of this page is intended not only for specialists in embeddings, but also for mathematician from other areas who want to apply or to learn the theory of embeddings.-->
Recall that some [[Embeddings_in_Euclidean_space:_an_introduction_to_their_classification#Unknotting theorems|Unknotting Theorems]] hold for manifolds with boundary \cite[$\S$3]{Skopenkov2016c}, \cite[$\S$2]{Skopenkov2006}. In this page we present results peculiar for manifold with non-empty boundary.
Recall that some [[Embeddings_in_Euclidean_space:_an_introduction_to_their_classification#Unknotting theorems|Unknotting Theorems]] hold for manifolds with boundary \cite[$\S$3]{Skopenkov2016c}, \cite[$\S$2]{Skopenkov2006}. In this page we present results peculiar for manifold with non-empty boundary.
For a [[Embeddings_in_Euclidean_space:_an_introduction_to_their_classification#Introduction|general introduction to embeddings]] as well as the [[Embeddings_in_Euclidean_space:_an_introduction_to_their_classification#Notation and conventions|notation and conventions]] used on this page, we refer to \cite[$\S$1, $\S$3]{Skopenkov2016c}.
If the category is omitted, then a result stated below holds in both the smooth and piecewise-linear (PL) category.
If the category is omitted, then a result stated below holds in both the smooth and piecewise-linear (PL) category.
<!--We state the results below in piecewise-linear (PL) category.-->
<!--We state the results below in piecewise-linear (PL) category.-->
We state only the results that can be deduced from Haefliger-Weber theorem, see \cite[$\S$ 5]{Skopenkov2006}. Note that the deleted product approach do not give the most short proofs possible.
+
We state only the results that can be deduced from Haefliger-Weber deleted product criterion, see \cite[$\S$ 5]{Skopenkov2006}. Note that the deleted product approach do not give the most short proofs possible.
Sometimes we give references to direct proofs but we do not claim to provide references to the original proofs of stated results.
Sometimes we give references to direct proofs but we do not claim to provide references to the original proofs of stated results.

Revision as of 13:54, 29 March 2020


This page has not been refereed. The information given here might be incomplete or provisional.

Contents

1 Introduction

For a general introduction to embeddings as well as the notation and conventions used on this page, we refer to [Skopenkov2016c, \S1, \S3].

Recall that some Unknotting Theorems hold for manifolds with boundary [Skopenkov2016c, \S3], [Skopenkov2006, \S2]. In this page we present results peculiar for manifold with non-empty boundary.

If the category is omitted, then a result stated below holds in both the smooth and piecewise-linear (PL) category.

We state only the results that can be deduced from Haefliger-Weber deleted product criterion, see [Skopenkov2006, \S 5]. Note that the deleted product approach do not give the most short proofs possible. Sometimes we give references to direct proofs but we do not claim to provide references to the original proofs of stated results.

Theorem 1.1. Every n-manifold N with nonempty boundary PL embeds into \R^{2n-1}.

This result can be found in [Horvatic1971, theorem 5.2]

2 Unknotting Theorems

Theorem 2.1. Assume that N is a compact n-manifold and either

(a) m \ge 2n+2 or

(b) N is connected and m \ge 2n+1 \ge 5.

Then any two embeddings of N into \R^m are isotopic.

The condition (a) stands for General Position Theorem and the condition (b) stands for Whitney-Wu Unknotting Theorem, see theorems 2.1 and 2.2 respectively of [Skopenkov2016c, \S 2].

Theorem 2.2. Assume that N is a compact connected n-manifold with non-empty boundary and one of the following conditions holds:

(a) m \ge 2n

(b) N is 1-connected, m \ge 2n - 1\ge3

Then any two embeddings of N into \R^m are isotopic.

Part (a) of this theorem in case n>2 can be found in [Edwards1968, \S 4, corollary 5]. Case n=1 is clear. Case n=2 has a short direct proof or can be deduced from Haefliger-Weber deleted square criterion [Skopenkov2006, \S 5].

Theorem 2.2 is a special cases of the following result, see [Penrose&Whitehead&Zeeman1961, Theorem 1.2b] and [Skopenkov2006].

Theorem 2.3. [The Haefliger-Zeeman unknotting Theorem] Assume that N is a closed k-connected n-manifold. Then for each n\ge2k + 2, m \ge 2n - k + 1 any two embeddings of N into \R^m are isotopic.

Theorem 2.4. Assume that N is a k-connected n-manifold with non-empty boundary. Then for every m-k\ge3 and m\ge2n-k any two embeddings of N into \R^m are isotopic.

This result can be found in [Hudson1969, Theorem 10.3]


3 Construction and examples

...

4 Invariants

...

5 Classification

Theorem 5.1.[Becker-Glover] Let N be a closed homologically k-connected n-manifold and m\ge 3n/2+2. The cone map \Lambda: \mathrm{Emb}^m (N_0)\to\mathrm{Emb}^{m+1}(N) is one-to-one for m\ge 2n-2k and is surjective for m=2n-2k-1.

[Becker&Glover1971]

6 Further discussion

...

7 References

, $\S]{Skopenkov2016c}. If the category is omitted, then a result stated below holds in both the smooth and piecewise-linear (PL) category. We state only the results that can be deduced from Haefliger-Weber theorem, see \cite[$\S$ 5]{Skopenkov2006}. Note that the deleted product approach do not give the most short proofs possible. Sometimes we give references to direct proofs but we do not claim to provide references to the original proofs of stated results. {{beginthm|Theorem}} Every $n$-manifold $N$ with nonempty boundary PL embeds into $\R^{2n-1}$. {{endthm}} This result can be found in \cite[theorem 5.2]{Horvatic1971} == Unknotting Theorems == ; {{beginthm|Theorem}}\label{th::unknotting} Assume that $N$ is a compact $n$-manifold and either (a) $m \ge 2n+2$ or (b) $N$ is connected and $m \ge 2n+1 \ge 5$. Then any two embeddings of $N$ into $\R^m$ are isotopic. {{endthm}} The condition (a) stands for General Position Theorem and the condition (b) stands for Whitney-Wu Unknotting Theorem, see [[Embeddings_in_Euclidean_space:_an_introduction_to_their_classification#Unknotting theorems|theorems 2.1 and 2.2]] respectively of \cite[$\S$ 2]{Skopenkov2016c}. {{beginthm|Theorem}} \label{thm::special_Haef_Zem} Assume that $N$ is a compact connected $n$-manifold with non-empty boundary and one of the following conditions holds: (a) $m \ge 2n$ (b) $N$ is \S1, \S3].

Recall that some Unknotting Theorems hold for manifolds with boundary [Skopenkov2016c, \S3], [Skopenkov2006, \S2]. In this page we present results peculiar for manifold with non-empty boundary.

If the category is omitted, then a result stated below holds in both the smooth and piecewise-linear (PL) category.

We state only the results that can be deduced from Haefliger-Weber deleted product criterion, see [Skopenkov2006, \S 5]. Note that the deleted product approach do not give the most short proofs possible. Sometimes we give references to direct proofs but we do not claim to provide references to the original proofs of stated results.

Theorem 1.1. Every n-manifold N with nonempty boundary PL embeds into \R^{2n-1}.

This result can be found in [Horvatic1971, theorem 5.2]

2 Unknotting Theorems

Theorem 2.1. Assume that N is a compact n-manifold and either

(a) m \ge 2n+2 or

(b) N is connected and m \ge 2n+1 \ge 5.

Then any two embeddings of N into \R^m are isotopic.

The condition (a) stands for General Position Theorem and the condition (b) stands for Whitney-Wu Unknotting Theorem, see theorems 2.1 and 2.2 respectively of [Skopenkov2016c, \S 2].

Theorem 2.2. Assume that N is a compact connected n-manifold with non-empty boundary and one of the following conditions holds:

(a) m \ge 2n

(b) N is 1-connected, m \ge 2n - 1\ge3

Then any two embeddings of N into \R^m are isotopic.

Part (a) of this theorem in case n>2 can be found in [Edwards1968, \S 4, corollary 5]. Case n=1 is clear. Case n=2 has a short direct proof or can be deduced from Haefliger-Weber deleted square criterion [Skopenkov2006, \S 5].

Theorem 2.2 is a special cases of the following result, see [Penrose&Whitehead&Zeeman1961, Theorem 1.2b] and [Skopenkov2006].

Theorem 2.3. [The Haefliger-Zeeman unknotting Theorem] Assume that N is a closed k-connected n-manifold. Then for each n\ge2k + 2, m \ge 2n - k + 1 any two embeddings of N into \R^m are isotopic.

Theorem 2.4. Assume that N is a k-connected n-manifold with non-empty boundary. Then for every m-k\ge3 and m\ge2n-k any two embeddings of N into \R^m are isotopic.

This result can be found in [Hudson1969, Theorem 10.3]


3 Construction and examples

...

4 Invariants

...

5 Classification

Theorem 5.1.[Becker-Glover] Let N be a closed homologically k-connected n-manifold and m\ge 3n/2+2. The cone map \Lambda: \mathrm{Emb}^m (N_0)\to\mathrm{Emb}^{m+1}(N) is one-to-one for m\ge 2n-2k and is surjective for m=2n-2k-1.

[Becker&Glover1971]

6 Further discussion

...

7 References

$-connected, $m \ge 2n - 1\ge3$ Then any two embeddings of $N$ into $\R^m$ are isotopic. {{endthm}} Part (a) of this theorem in case $n>2$ can be found in \cite[$\S$ 4, corollary 5]{Edwards1968}. Case $n=1$ is clear. Case $n=2$ has a short direct proof or can be deduced from Haefliger-Weber deleted square criterion \cite[$\S$ 5]{Skopenkov2006}. Theorem \ref{thm::special_Haef_Zem} is a special cases of the following result, see \cite[Theorem 1.2b]{Penrose&Whitehead&Zeeman1961} and \cite{Skopenkov2006}. {{beginthm|Theorem}} [The Haefliger-Zeeman unknotting Theorem] Assume that $N$ is a closed $k$-connected $n$-manifold. Then for each $n\ge2k + 2$, $m \ge 2n - k + 1$ any two embeddings of $N$ into $\R^m$ are isotopic. {{endthm}} {{beginthm|Theorem}} Assume that $N$ is a $k$-connected $n$-manifold with non-empty boundary. Then for every $m-k\ge3$ and $m\ge2n-k$ any two embeddings of $N$ into $\R^m$ are isotopic. {{endthm}} This result can be found in \cite[Theorem 10.3]{Hudson1969}
== Construction and examples == ; ... == Invariants == ; ... == Classification == ; {{beginthm|Theorem}}[Becker-Glover] Let $N$ be a closed homologically $k$-connected $n$-manifold and $m\ge 3n/2+2$. The cone map $\Lambda: \mathrm{Emb}^m (N_0)\to\mathrm{Emb}^{m+1}(N)$ is one-to-one for $m\ge 2n-2k$ and is surjective for $m=2n-2k-1$. {{endthm}} \cite{Becker&Glover1971} == Further discussion == ; ... == References == {{#RefList:}} [[Category:Manifolds]] [[Category:Embeddings of manifolds]]\S1, \S3].

Recall that some Unknotting Theorems hold for manifolds with boundary [Skopenkov2016c, \S3], [Skopenkov2006, \S2]. In this page we present results peculiar for manifold with non-empty boundary.

If the category is omitted, then a result stated below holds in both the smooth and piecewise-linear (PL) category.

We state only the results that can be deduced from Haefliger-Weber deleted product criterion, see [Skopenkov2006, \S 5]. Note that the deleted product approach do not give the most short proofs possible. Sometimes we give references to direct proofs but we do not claim to provide references to the original proofs of stated results.

Theorem 1.1. Every n-manifold N with nonempty boundary PL embeds into \R^{2n-1}.

This result can be found in [Horvatic1971, theorem 5.2]

2 Unknotting Theorems

Theorem 2.1. Assume that N is a compact n-manifold and either

(a) m \ge 2n+2 or

(b) N is connected and m \ge 2n+1 \ge 5.

Then any two embeddings of N into \R^m are isotopic.

The condition (a) stands for General Position Theorem and the condition (b) stands for Whitney-Wu Unknotting Theorem, see theorems 2.1 and 2.2 respectively of [Skopenkov2016c, \S 2].

Theorem 2.2. Assume that N is a compact connected n-manifold with non-empty boundary and one of the following conditions holds:

(a) m \ge 2n

(b) N is 1-connected, m \ge 2n - 1\ge3

Then any two embeddings of N into \R^m are isotopic.

Part (a) of this theorem in case n>2 can be found in [Edwards1968, \S 4, corollary 5]. Case n=1 is clear. Case n=2 has a short direct proof or can be deduced from Haefliger-Weber deleted square criterion [Skopenkov2006, \S 5].

Theorem 2.2 is a special cases of the following result, see [Penrose&Whitehead&Zeeman1961, Theorem 1.2b] and [Skopenkov2006].

Theorem 2.3. [The Haefliger-Zeeman unknotting Theorem] Assume that N is a closed k-connected n-manifold. Then for each n\ge2k + 2, m \ge 2n - k + 1 any two embeddings of N into \R^m are isotopic.

Theorem 2.4. Assume that N is a k-connected n-manifold with non-empty boundary. Then for every m-k\ge3 and m\ge2n-k any two embeddings of N into \R^m are isotopic.

This result can be found in [Hudson1969, Theorem 10.3]


3 Construction and examples

...

4 Invariants

...

5 Classification

Theorem 5.1.[Becker-Glover] Let N be a closed homologically k-connected n-manifold and m\ge 3n/2+2. The cone map \Lambda: \mathrm{Emb}^m (N_0)\to\mathrm{Emb}^{m+1}(N) is one-to-one for m\ge 2n-2k and is surjective for m=2n-2k-1.

[Becker&Glover1971]

6 Further discussion

...

7 References

Personal tools
Namespaces
Variants
Actions
Navigation
Interaction
Toolbox