Embeddings just below the stable range: classification
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
− | + | == Introduction == | |
+ | <wikitex>; | ||
− | == | + | For notation and conventions see [[High_codimension_embeddings|high codimension embeddings]]. |
+ | |||
+ | {{beginthm|Classification Theorem}}\label{th4} | ||
+ | Let $N$ be a closed connected $n$-manifold. The Whitney invariant | ||
+ | $$W:E^{2n}(N)\to \cases H_1(N;\Zz_{(n-1)})& | ||
+ | \text{either $n$ is odd or $N$ is orientable}\\ | ||
+ | \Zz\oplus\Zz_2^{s-1}&\text{$n$ is even, $N$ is non-orientable and } | ||
+ | H_1(N,\zZ_2)\cong\Zz_2^s,\endcases$$ | ||
+ | is bijective if either $n\ge4$ or $n=3$ and CAT=PL \cite{HaefligerHirsch1963}, \cite{Bausum75}, \cite{Vrabec77}, cf. \cite{Hudson1969} | ||
+ | {{endthm}} | ||
+ | |||
+ | [[Classification of smooth embeddings of 3-manifolds in the 6-space]] is more complicated. | ||
+ | </wikitex> | ||
+ | |||
+ | == Definition of the Whitney invariant (for either n odd or N orientable) == | ||
<wikitex>; | <wikitex>; | ||
− | {{# | + | |
+ | Fix orientations on $\R^{2n}$ and, if $N$ is even, on $N$. Fix an embedding $f_0:N\to\Rr^{2n}$. For an embedding $f:N\to\Rr^{2n}$ | ||
+ | the restrictions of $f$ and $f_0$ to $N_0$ are regular homotopic \cite{Hirsch1960}. Since $N_0$ has an $(n-1)$-dimensional spine, it follows that these restrictions are isotopic, cf. \cite{HaefligerHirsch1963}, 3.1.b, \cite{Takase2006}, Lemma 2.2. So we can make an isotopy of $f$ and assume that $f=f_0$ on $N_0$. Take a general position homotopy $F:B^n\times I\to\Rr^{2n}$ relative to | ||
+ | $\partial B^n$ between the restrictions of $f$ and $g$ to $B^n$. Then $f\cap F:=(f|_{N-B^n})^{-1}F(B^n\times I)$ (i.e. `the intersection of this homotopy with $f(N-B^n)$') is a 1-manifold (possibly non-compact) without boundary. Define $W(f)$ to be the homology class of the closure of this 1-manifold: | ||
+ | $$W(f):=[\Cl(f\cap F)]\in H_1(N_0,\partial N_0;\Zz_{(n)})\cong H_1(N;\Zz_{(n)}).$$ | ||
+ | The orientation on $f\cap F$ is defined for $N$ orientable as follows. (This orientation is defined for each $n$ but used only for odd $n$.) For each point $x\in f\cap F$ take a vector at $x$ tangent to $f\cap F$. Complete this vector to a positive base tangent to $N$. Since $n+2(n+1)>2\cdot2n$, by general position there is a unique point $y\in B^n\times I$ such that $Fy=fx$. The tangent vector at $x$ thus gives a tangent vector at $y$ to $B^n\times I$. Complete this vector to a positive base tangent to $B^n\times I$, where the orientation on $B^n$ comes from $N$. The union of the images of the constructed two bases is a base at $Fy=fx$ of $\Rr^{2n}$. If this base is positive, then call the initial vector of $f\cap F$ positive. Since a change of the orientation on $f\cap F$ forces a change of the orientation of the latter base of $\Rr^{2n}$, it follows that this condition indeed defines an orientation on $f\cap F$. | ||
+ | |||
+ | {{beginthm|Remark}}\label{re5} | ||
+ | *The Whitney invariant is well-defined, i.e. independent of the choice of $F$ and of the isotopy making $f=f_0$ outside $B^n$. This is so because the above definition is clearly equivalent to the following: $W(f)$ is the homology class of the algebraic sum of the top-dimensional simplices of the self-intersection set $\Sigma(H):=Cl\{x\in N\times I\ |\ \#H^{-1}Hx>1\}$ of a general position homotopy $H$ between $f$ and $f_0$. | ||
+ | (For details and definition of the signs of the simplices see \cite{Hudson1969}, \S12, \cite{Vrabec1977}, p. 145, \cite{Skopenkov2006}, \S2, \cite{Skopenkov2010}.) | ||
+ | It is for being well-defined that we need $\Zz_2$-coefficients when $n$ is even. | ||
+ | *Clearly, $W(f_0)=0$. The definition of $W$ depends on the choice of $f_0$, but we write $W$ not $W_{f_0}$ for brevity. | ||
+ | *Since a change of the orientation on $N$ forces a change of the orientation on $B^n$, the class $W(f)$ is independent of the choice of the orientation on $N$. For the reflection $\sigma:\Rr^{2n}\to\Rr^{2n}$ with respect to a hyperplane we have $W(\sigma\circ f)=-W(f)$ (because we may assume that $f=f_0=\sigma\circ f$ on $N_0$ and because a change of the orientation of $\Rr^{2n}$ forces a change of the orientation of $f\cap F$). | ||
+ | *The above definition makes sense for each $n$, not only for $n\ge3$. | ||
+ | *Clearly, $W(\Hud_n(a))$ is $a$ or $a\mod2$ for $n\ge2$ for the [[Hudson_tori|Hudson tori]]. | ||
+ | *$W(f\#g)=W(f)$ for each embeddings $f:N\to\Rr^{2n}$ and $g:S^n\to\Rr^{2n}$. | ||
+ | {{endthm}} | ||
+ | |||
+ | </wikitex> | ||
+ | |||
+ | == Construction of the embedding <wikitex>; $f_a:N\to\R^{2n}$ from an embedding | ||
+ | $f_0:N\to\R^{2n}$ and $a\in H_1(N)$ (for orientable $N$ and $n\ge3$) </wikitex>== | ||
+ | <wikitex>; | ||
+ | |||
+ | Represent $a$ by an embedding $a:S^1\to N$. Since any orientable bundle over $S^1$ is trivial, $\nu_{f_0}^{-1}a(S^1)\cong S^1\times S^{n-1}$. Identify $\nu_{f_0}^{-1}a(S^1)$ with $S^1\times S^{n-1}$. It remains to make an embedded surgery of | ||
+ | $S^1\times*\subset S^1\times S^{n-1}$ to obtain an $n$-sphere $\Sigma\subset C_{f_0}$, and then we set $f_a:=f_0\# \Sigma$. | ||
+ | |||
+ | Take a vector field on $S^1\times*$ normal to $S^1\times S^{n-1}$. Extend $S^1\times*$ along this vector field to a smooth map | ||
+ | $\overline a:D^2\to S^{2n}$. Since $2n>4$ and $n+2<2n$, by general position we may assume that $\overline a$ is an embedding and $\overline a(\Int D^2)$ misses $f_0(N)\cup S^1\times S^{n-1}$. Since $n-1>1$, we have $\pi_1(V_{2n-2,n-1})=0$. | ||
+ | Hence the standard framing of $S^1\times*$ in $S^1\times S^{n-1}$ extends to an $(n-1)$-framing on $\overline a(D^2)$ in $\Rr^{2n}$. | ||
+ | Thus $\overline a$ extends to an embedding | ||
+ | $$\widehat a:D^2\times D^{n-1}\to C_{f_0}\quad\text{such that}\quad | ||
+ | \widehat a(\partial D^2\times D^{n-1})\subset S^1\times S^{n-1}$$ | ||
+ | $$\text{Let}\qquad | ||
+ | \Sigma:\ =\ S^1\times S^{n-1}-\widehat a(\partial D^2\times\Int D^{n-1}) | ||
+ | \bigcup\limits_{\widehat a(\partial D^2\times\partial D^{n-1})} | ||
+ | \widehat a(D^2\times\partial D^{n-1})\ \cong\ S^n.$$ | ||
+ | Note that | ||
+ | * This construction generalizes the construction of $\Hud_n(a)$ (from $\Hud_n(0)$). | ||
+ | * Clearly, $W(f_a)$ is $a$ or $a\mod2$. Thus all isotopy classes of embedings $N\to\Rr^{2n}$ can be obtained (from a certain given embedding $f_0$) by the above construction. Hence unless $n=3$ and CAT=DIFF, the above construction defines an action | ||
+ | $H_1(N;\Zz_{(n-1)})\to E^{2n}(N)$. | ||
</wikitex> | </wikitex> | ||
+ | |||
+ | == References == | ||
+ | {{#RefList:}} | ||
+ | |||
+ | [[Category:Manifolds]] | ||
+ | {{Stub}} |
Revision as of 15:39, 14 February 2010
This page has been accepted for publication in the Bulletin of the Manifold Atlas. |
Contents |
1 Introduction
For notation and conventions see high codimension embeddings.
Classification Theorem 1.1. Let be a closed connected -manifold. The Whitney invariant
Tex syntax error
is bijective if either or and CAT=PL [HaefligerHirsch1963], [Bausum75], [Vrabec77], cf. [Hudson1969]
Classification of smooth embeddings of 3-manifolds in the 6-space is more complicated.
2 Definition of the Whitney invariant (for either n odd or N orientable)
Fix orientations on and, if is even, on . Fix an embedding . For an embedding the restrictions of and to are regular homotopic [Hirsch1960]. Since has an -dimensional spine, it follows that these restrictions are isotopic, cf. [HaefligerHirsch1963], 3.1.b, [Takase2006], Lemma 2.2. So we can make an isotopy of and assume that on . Take a general position homotopy relative to between the restrictions of and to . Then (i.e. `the intersection of this homotopy with ') is a 1-manifold (possibly non-compact) without boundary. Define to be the homology class of the closure of this 1-manifold:
Tex syntax error
The orientation on is defined for orientable as follows. (This orientation is defined for each but used only for odd .) For each point take a vector at tangent to . Complete this vector to a positive base tangent to . Since , by general position there is a unique point such that . The tangent vector at thus gives a tangent vector at to . Complete this vector to a positive base tangent to , where the orientation on comes from . The union of the images of the constructed two bases is a base at of . If this base is positive, then call the initial vector of positive. Since a change of the orientation on forces a change of the orientation of the latter base of , it follows that this condition indeed defines an orientation on .
Remark 2.1.
- The Whitney invariant is well-defined, i.e. independent of the choice of and of the isotopy making outside . This is so because the above definition is clearly equivalent to the following: is the homology class of the algebraic sum of the top-dimensional simplices of the self-intersection set of a general position homotopy between and .
(For details and definition of the signs of the simplices see [Hudson1969], \S12, [Vrabec1977], p. 145, [Skopenkov2006], \S2, [Skopenkov2010].) It is for being well-defined that we need -coefficients when is even.
- Clearly, . The definition of depends on the choice of , but we write not for brevity.
- Since a change of the orientation on forces a change of the orientation on , the class is independent of the choice of the orientation on . For the reflection with respect to a hyperplane we have (because we may assume that on and because a change of the orientation of forces a change of the orientation of ).
- The above definition makes sense for each , not only for .
- Clearly, is or for for the Hudson tori.
- for each embeddings and .
Construction of the embedding ; Tex syntax errorf a:N\to\R^{2n} from an embedding
Tex syntax errorf 0:N\to\R^{2n} and a\in H 1(N) (for orientable N and n\ge3) 3 Construction of the embedding ; Tex syntax error
from an embedding
Tex syntax error
and (for orientable and )
Represent by an embedding . Since any orientable bundle over is trivial, . Identify with . It remains to make an embedded surgery of to obtain an -sphere , and then we set .
Take a vector field on normal to . Extend along this vector field to a smooth map
. Since and , by general position we may assume that is an embedding andTex syntax errormisses . Since , we have .
Hence the standard framing of in extends to an -framing on in . Thus extends to an embedding
Tex syntax error
Note that
- This construction generalizes the construction of (from ).
- Clearly, is or . Thus all isotopy classes of embedings can be obtained (from a certain given embedding ) by the above construction. Hence unless and CAT=DIFF, the above construction defines an action
.
4 References
- [Bausum75] Template:Bausum75
- [HaefligerHirsch1963] Template:HaefligerHirsch1963
- [Hirsch1960] Template:Hirsch1960
- [Hudson1969] J. F. P. Hudson, Piecewise linear topology, W. A. Benjamin, Inc., New York-Amsterdam, 1969. MR0248844 (40 #2094) Zbl 0189.54507
- [Skopenkov2006] A. Skopenkov, Embedding and knotting of manifolds in Euclidean spaces, in: Surveys in Contemporary Mathematics, Ed. N. Young and Y. Choi, London Math. Soc. Lect. Notes, 347 (2008) 248-342. Available at the arXiv:0604045.
- [Skopenkov2010] A. Skopenkov, Embeddings of k-connected n-manifolds into , Proc. AMS, 138 (2010) 3377--3389. Available at the arXiv:0812.0263.
- [Takase2006] M. Takase, Homology 3-spheres in codimension three, Internat. J. Math. 17 (2006), no.8, 869–885.
arxiv:math/0506464 MR2261638 (2007g:57049) Zbl 1113.57013
- [Vrabec1977] J. Vrabec, Knotting a -connected closed -manifold in , Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 233 (1977), 137–165. MR0645405 (58 #31097) Zbl 386.57013
- [Vrabec77] Template:Vrabec77
This page has not been refereed. The information given here might be incomplete or provisional. |