Whitehead torsion V (Ex)

From Manifold Atlas
(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
(Created page with "<wikitex>; In the following we use the notation of {{citeD|Lück2001|Section 1.1}}. In particular, if $W$ is an $n$-manifold with boundary component $\partial_i W$ and $$\ph...")
m
(6 intermediate revisions by one user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
<wikitex>;
<wikitex>;
In the following we use the notation of {{citeD|Lück2001|Section 1.1}}. In particular, if $W$ is an $n$-manifold with boundary component $\partial_i W$ and
$$\phi^q \colon S^{q-1} \times D^{n-q} \to \partial_i W$$
is an embedding then $W + (\phi^q)$ denotes the manifold of obtained from $W$ by attaching a $q$-handle along $\phi^q$:
$$ W + (\phi^q) \cong W \cup_{\phi^q} (D^q \times D^{n-q}).$$
{{beginthm|Exercise}}
{{beginthm|Exercise}}
Let $(W; \partial_0 W, \partial_1 W)$ be an $n$-dimensional cobordism, and suppose that, relative to $\partial_0 W$, we have
+
# Show that the operations (1)-(5) from {{citeD|Lück2001|Section 1.4}} used in the definition of the Whitehead group in fact yield equivalence classes of invertible matrices of arbitrary size.
$$ W
+
# Show that addition is well-defined in the Whitehead group via
\cong \partial_0 W \times [0,1]
+
$$ [A] + [B] = \left [\begin{array}{cc} A & 0 \\ 0 & B \end{array} \right] = [A \cdot (B \oplus \text{Id}_{n-m})].$$
+ \sum_{i=1}^{p_0} (\phi^0_i)
+
Here $A$ and $B$ are invertible matricies over the group ring $\Zz[\pi]$, $A$ is an $n \times n$ matrix, $B$ is an $m \times m$ matrix with $n \geq m$, $O$ denotes the zero $n \times m$ and $m \times n$ matricies and $\cdot$ denotes matrix multiplication.
+ \ldots
+
# Show that $Wh(e)$ is trivial.
+ \sum_{i=1}^{p_n} (\phi^n_i).
+
$$
+
Show that there is another diffeomorphism, relative to $\partial_1W$, which is of the following form:
+
$$
+
W
+
\cong \partial_1 W \times [0,1]
+
+ \sum_{i=1}^{p_n} (\psi^0_i)
+
+ \ldots
+
+ \sum_{i=1}^{p_0} (\psi^n_i).
+
$$
+
The important part is that for each $q$-handle in the first handlebody decomposition, we have an $(n-q)$-handle in the second, dual handlebody decomposition.
+
{{endthm}}
+
+
{{beginrem|Comment}} If one approaches this exercise using Morse functions (and their relation to handlebody decompositions), the above is almost trivial (Question: Why?). The actual intention of this exercise is to go through the details of the rather direct approach outlined in {{citeD|Lück2001|pp.17-18}}. While this is a bit tedious, it provides a good opportunity to get more familiar with handlebody attachments and the like.
+
{{endrem}}
+
+
{{beginthm|Exercise}}
+
* Show that the operations (1)-(5) from {{citeD|Lück2001|Section 1.4}} used in the definition of the Whitehead group in fact yield equivalence classes of invertible matrices of arbitrary size.
+
* Show that $Wh(e)$ is trivial.
+
{{endthm}}
{{endthm}}
</wikitex>
</wikitex>
[[Category:Exercises]]
[[Category:Exercises]]
+
[[Category:Exercises without solution]]

Latest revision as of 15:05, 1 April 2012

Exercise 0.1.

  1. Show that the operations (1)-(5) from [Lück2001, Section 1.4] used in the definition of the Whitehead group in fact yield equivalence classes of invertible matrices of arbitrary size.
  2. Show that addition is well-defined in the Whitehead group via
\displaystyle  [A] + [B] = \left [\begin{array}{cc} A & 0 \\ 0 & B \end{array} \right] = [A \cdot (B \oplus \text{Id}_{n-m})].

Here A and B are invertible matricies over the group ring \Zz[\pi], A is an n \times n matrix, B is an m \times m matrix with n \geq m, O denotes the zero n \times m and m \times n matricies and \cdot denotes matrix multiplication.

  1. Show that Wh(e) is trivial.
Personal tools
Namespaces
Variants
Actions
Navigation
Interaction
Toolbox