Stiefel-Whitney characteristic classes

From Manifold Atlas
(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
(The Wu formula)
(Whitney-Wu formula)
(14 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 7: Line 7:
Let $G_k=G_{k,N}$ be $\Zz$ if either $k=n$ or $k>1$ is odd, and $\Zz_2$ if either $k=1$ or $k<n$ is even.
Let $G_k=G_{k,N}$ be $\Zz$ if either $k=n$ or $k>1$ is odd, and $\Zz_2$ if either $k=1$ or $k<n$ is even.
Stiefel defined ''the homology Stiefel-Whitney class'' $PDW_k(N)\in H_{n-k}(N,\partial N;G_k)$ of $N$ to be the homology class of a degeneracy subset of a general position collection of $n+1-k$ ''tangent'' vector fields on $N$.
+
Stiefel defined ''the homology Stiefel-Whitney class'' $PDW_k(N)\in H_{n-k}(N,\partial N;G_k)$ of $N$ to be the homology class of a degeneracy subset of a general position collection of $n+1-k$ ''tangent'' vector fields on $N$. Let $w_k(N)$ be the reduction of $W_k(N)$ modulo 2.
Whitney defined ''the homology normal Stiefel-Whitney class'' $PD\overline{W}_k(N)\in H_{n-k}(N,\partial N;G_k)$ of $N$ to be the homology class of a degeneracy subset of a general position collection of $n+1-k$ ''normal'' vector fields on $N\subset\Rr^m$.
+
Whitney defined ''the homology normal Stiefel-Whitney class'' $PD\overline{W}_k(f)\in H_{n-k}(N,\partial N;G_k)$ of $N$ to be the homology class of a degeneracy subset of a general position collection of $n+1-k$ ''normal'' vector fields on an immersion $f:N\subset\Rr^m$.
+
By the Whitney-Wu formula \ref{t:wu} the reduction modulo 2 of this class (but not this class itself!) is independent of $f$ and depends only on $N$.
Let $w_k(N)$ and $\overline{w}_k(N)$ be the reductions of $W_k(N)$ and $\overline{W}_k(N)$ modulo 2.
+
So this reduction is denoted by $\overline{w}_k(N)$.
Let $w_0(N)=\overline w_0(N)=[N]$.
Let $w_0(N)=\overline w_0(N)=[N]$.
Line 22: Line 22:
</wikitex>
</wikitex>
== The Wu formula ==
+
== Whitney-Wu formula ==
<wikitex>;
<wikitex>;
+
In this section we abbreviate $PDw_i(N)$ to just $w_i$ and $PDw_i(f)$ to just $\overline w_i$.
{{beginthm|Theorem|(Wu formula)}}\label{t:wu}
+
If $N$ is a closed smooth $n$-submanifold of $\R^m$ and $k>0$ is an integer, then
+
{{beginthm|Theorem|(Whitney-Wu formula)}}\label{t:wu}
$$\sum_{i=0}^{k}\overline w_{k-i}(N)\cap w_i(N)=0.$$
+
If $N$ is a closed smooth $n$-manifold, $f:N\to\R^m$ an immersion and $k>0$ is an integer, then $$\sum_{i=0}^{k}\overline w_{k-i}\cap w_i=0.$$
{{endthm}}
{{endthm}}
Line 33: Line 33:
(This proof should be known but is absent from textbooks. This text is written by M. Fedorov and A. Skopenkov in frame of the course `Algebraic topology of manifolds in interesting results'.)
(This proof should be known but is absent from textbooks. This text is written by M. Fedorov and A. Skopenkov in frame of the course `Algebraic topology of manifolds in interesting results'.)
Denote by $x_k(N)$ the obstruction to existence of $m-k+1$ linearly independent fields on $N$. Clearly $x_k(N)=0$. So it suffices to show that $x_k(N) = \sum_{i=0}^{k}\overline w_{k-i}(N)\cap w_i(N)$.
+
Denote by $x_k$ the obstruction to existence of $m-k+1$ linearly independent fields on $N$.
+
Clearly $x_k=0$.
+
So it suffices to show that $x_k=\sum_{i=0}^k\overline w_{k-i}\cap w_i$.
Take general position collection of normal fields $u_1,\ldots,u_{m-n}$ on $N$ such that for each $i=1,\ldots,k$ the collection $u_1,\ldots,u_{m-n-i+1}$ is linearly dependent on $n-i$ subcomplex $\omega^*_i$ representing $\overline w_i(N)$.
+
Take a general position collection of normal fields $u_1,\ldots,u_{m-n}$ on $N$ such that for each $i=1,\ldots,k$ the collection $u_1,\ldots,u_{m-n-i+1}$ is linearly dependent on some $(n-i)$-subcomplex $\omega^*_i$ representing $\overline w_i$.
Take general position collection of tangent fields $v_1,\ldots,v_n$ on $N$ such that for each $i=1,\ldots,k$ the collection $u_i,\ldots,u_n$ is linearly dependent on $n-i$ subcomplex $\omega_i$ representing $w_i(N)$.
+
Take a general position collection of tangent fields $v_1,\ldots,v_n$ on $N$ such that for each $i=1,\ldots,k$ the collection $v_i,\ldots,v_n$ is linearly dependent on some $(n-i)$-subcomplex $\omega_i$ representing $w_i$.
Define $\alpha_i:=\mathrm{vol}(u_1,\ldots,u_i)$ and $\beta_i := \mathrm{vol}(v_i, \ldots v_n)$.
Define $\alpha_i:=\mathrm{vol}(u_1,\ldots,u_i)$ and $\beta_i := \mathrm{vol}(v_i, \ldots v_n)$.
Denote by $C$ the following collection $C$ of $m-k+1$ vector fields on $N$
+
Denote by $C$ the following collection of $m-k+1$ vector fields on $N$:
$$u_1,\ldots,u_{m-n-k+1},\ \ \alpha_{m-n-k+2}u_{m-n-k+2}+\beta_1v_1,\ \ldots,
$$u_1,\ldots,u_{m-n-k+1},\ \ \alpha_{m-n-k+2}u_{m-n-k+2}+\beta_1v_1,\ \ldots,
\ \alpha_{m-n}u_{m-n}+\beta_{k-1}v_{k-1},\ \ v_k,\ldots,v_n.$$
\ \alpha_{m-n}u_{m-n}+\beta_{k-1}v_{k-1},\ \ v_k,\ldots,v_n.$$
This is a general position collection, so $x_k(N)$ is represented by set where $C$ is linearly dependent. Clearly, all non-zero vectors among
+
This is a general position collection, so $x_k$ is represented by the set set on which $C$ is linearly dependent. Clearly, all non-zero vectors among
$\alpha_1u_1,\ldots,\alpha_{m-n}u_{m-n},\beta_1v_1,\ldots,\beta_nv_n$ are linearly independent. Hence $C(x)$ is linearly dependent if and only if either $C(x)$ contains zero vector or $u_1,\ldots,u_{m-n-k+1}$ are linearly dependent at $x$ or $v_k,\ldots,v_n$ are linearly dependent at $x$.
+
$\alpha_1u_1,\ldots,\alpha_{m-n}u_{m-n},\beta_1v_1,\ldots,\beta_nv_n$ are linearly independent. Hence $C(x)$ is linearly dependent if and only if either:
The collection $C(x)$ contains a zero vector if and only if $\alpha_{m-n-k+1+j}=\beta_j=0$ at $x$ for some $j$.
+
* $u_1,\ldots,u_{m-n-k+1}$ are linearly dependent at $x$ (which happens on $\omega^*_k$) or
Thus ??? $x_k(N)$ is represented by $\bigcup_{i=0}^{k}(\omega^*_{k-i}\cap\omega_i)$.
+
* $v_k,\ldots,v_n$ are linearly dependent at $x$ (which happens on $\omega_k$) or
+
* $C(x)$ contains a zero vector (which happens if and only if $\alpha_{m-n-k+1+i}=\beta_i=0$ at $x$ for some $i = 1,\ldots, k-1$).
+
+
Thus $x_k$ is represented by $\bigcup_{i=0}^{k}(\omega^*_{k-i}\cap\omega_i)$.
</wikitex>
</wikitex>
== References ==
== References ==
{{#RefList:}}
{{#RefList:}}
+
[[Category:Theory]]
[[Category:Definitions]]
[[Category:Definitions]]
[[Category:Forgotten in Textbooks]]
[[Category:Forgotten in Textbooks]]

Latest revision as of 18:53, 19 February 2021

This page has not been refereed. The information given here might be incomplete or provisional.

[edit] 1 Definition

Let N be a compact smooth n-manifold (possibly with boundary). Denote by PD=PD_G:H^k(N;G)\to H_{n-k}(N,\partial N;G) the Poincaré duality isomorphism. Here for non-orientable N the coefficients in cohomology are twisted (by the orientation double covering) and the coefficients in homology are non-twisted. Let G_k=G_{k,N} be \Zz if either k=n or k>1 is odd, and \Zz_2 if either k=1 or k<n is even.

Stiefel defined the homology Stiefel-Whitney class PDW_k(N)\in H_{n-k}(N,\partial N;G_k) of N to be the homology class of a degeneracy subset of a general position collection of n+1-k tangent vector fields on N. Let w_k(N) be the reduction of W_k(N) modulo 2.

Whitney defined the homology normal Stiefel-Whitney class PD\overline{W}_k(f)\in H_{n-k}(N,\partial N;G_k) of N to be the homology class of a degeneracy subset of a general position collection of n+1-k normal vector fields on an immersion f:N\subset\Rr^m. By the Whitney-Wu formula 2.1 the reduction modulo 2 of this class (but not this class itself!) is independent of f and depends only on N. So this reduction is denoted by \overline{w}_k(N).

Let w_0(N)=\overline w_0(N)=[N].

See details e.g. in [Milnor&Stasheff1974, \S12], [Fomenko&Fuchs2016, \S19.C], [Skopenkov2015b, \S\S 9,11,12].

There is an alternative definition of PD\overline{W}_k(N) [Skopenkov2006, \S2.3 `the Whitney obstruction'] analogous to definition of the Whitney invariant.

See also Wikipedia article.

[edit] 2 Whitney-Wu formula

In this section we abbreviate PDw_i(N) to just w_i and PDw_i(f) to just \overline w_i.

Theorem 2.1 (Whitney-Wu formula).

If N is a closed smooth n-manifold, f:N\to\R^m an immersion and k>0 is an integer, then
\displaystyle \sum_{i=0}^{k}\overline w_{k-i}\cap w_i=0.

Proof. (This proof should be known but is absent from textbooks. This text is written by M. Fedorov and A. Skopenkov in frame of the course `Algebraic topology of manifolds in interesting results'.)

Denote by x_k the obstruction to existence of m-k+1 linearly independent fields on N. Clearly x_k=0. So it suffices to show that x_k=\sum_{i=0}^k\overline w_{k-i}\cap w_i.

Take a general position collection of normal fields u_1,\ldots,u_{m-n} on N such that for each i=1,\ldots,k the collection u_1,\ldots,u_{m-n-i+1} is linearly dependent on some (n-i)-subcomplex \omega^*_i representing \overline w_i.

Take a general position collection of tangent fields v_1,\ldots,v_n on N such that for each i=1,\ldots,k the collection v_i,\ldots,v_n is linearly dependent on some (n-i)-subcomplex \omega_i representing w_i.

Define \alpha_i:=\mathrm{vol}(u_1,\ldots,u_i) and \beta_i := \mathrm{vol}(v_i, \ldots v_n). Denote by C the following collection of m-k+1 vector fields on N:

\displaystyle u_1,\ldots,u_{m-n-k+1},\ \ \alpha_{m-n-k+2}u_{m-n-k+2}+\beta_1v_1,\ \ldots, \ \alpha_{m-n}u_{m-n}+\beta_{k-1}v_{k-1},\ \ v_k,\ldots,v_n.

This is a general position collection, so x_k is represented by the set set on which C is linearly dependent. Clearly, all non-zero vectors among \alpha_1u_1,\ldots,\alpha_{m-n}u_{m-n},\beta_1v_1,\ldots,\beta_nv_n are linearly independent. Hence C(x) is linearly dependent if and only if either:

  • u_1,\ldots,u_{m-n-k+1} are linearly dependent at x (which happens on \omega^*_k) or
  • v_k,\ldots,v_n are linearly dependent at x (which happens on \omega_k) or
  • C(x) contains a zero vector (which happens if and only if \alpha_{m-n-k+1+i}=\beta_i=0 at x for some i = 1,\ldots, k-1).

Thus x_k is represented by \bigcup_{i=0}^{k}(\omega^*_{k-i}\cap\omega_i).

[edit] 3 References

  • [Fomenko&Fuchs2016] A. T. Fomenko and D. B. Fuks, Homotopical Topology. Translated from the Russian. Graduate Texts in Mathematics, 273. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 2016. DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-23488-5.

Personal tools
Namespaces
Variants
Actions
Navigation
Interaction
Toolbox