Classifying spaces for families of subgroups
(→Construction and examples) |
(→Construction and examples) |
||
Line 35: | Line 35: | ||
An important fact that follows from the Generalized Whitehead Theorem is: | An important fact that follows from the Generalized Whitehead Theorem is: | ||
{{beginthm|Theorem}}\label{thm:GCW} | {{beginthm|Theorem}}\label{thm:GCW} | ||
− | Let $f: X \to Y$ be a $G$-equivariant map of $G$-CW complexes. Then $f$ is a $G$-equivariant homotopy equivalence if and only if $f^H: X^H \to Y^H$ is a weak homotopy equivalence (i.e., induces an isomorphism on homotopy groups) | + | Let $f: X \to Y$ be a $G$-equivariant map of $G$-CW complexes. Then $f$ is a $G$-equivariant homotopy equivalence if and only if for every subgroup $H$ of $G$, $f^H: X^H \to Y^H$ is a weak homotopy equivalence (i.e., induces an isomorphism on homotopy groups). |
{{endthm}} | {{endthm}} | ||
Revision as of 15:53, 7 June 2010
Contents |
1 Introduction
Given a discrete group and a family of subgroups (see Definition 2.1 below) of , there is a -CW complex, , that classifies -CW complexes with isotropy contained in . That is, for every -CW complex , there is a -equivariant map that is unique up to -equivariant homotopy. This universal property implies that is unique up to -homotopy. For this reason is known as the classifying space (or universal space) of for the family .
2 Construction and examples
Definition (Family of Subgroups) 2.1. A family of subgroups of a discrete group is a collection of subgroups of that is closed under conjugation and taking subgroups.
Examples of families:
- The family containing only the trivial subgroup, .
- The family of all subgroups, .
- The family of finite subgroups, .
- The family of virtually cyclic subgroups, .
An important fact that follows from the Generalized Whitehead Theorem is:
Theorem 2.2. Let be a -equivariant map of -CW complexes. Then is a -equivariant homotopy equivalence if and only if for every subgroup of , is a weak homotopy equivalence (i.e., induces an isomorphism on homotopy groups).
Theorem 2.2 implies that any two models for are -equivariantly homotopy equivalent.
Examples of classifying spaces:
- A model for is on which acts by translation.
More generally, , the universal cover of the classifying space . (Recall that is a CW complex whose fundamental group is and whose higher homotopy groups are all zero. It is unique up to homotopy.)
- For any , is -equivariantly homotopy equivalent to a point.
3 Invariants
...
4 Classification/Characterization
...
5 Further discussion
...
6 References
This page has not been refereed. The information given here might be incomplete or provisional. |