Whitehead torsion V (Ex)

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
m
m
Line 1: Line 1:
<wikitex>;
<wikitex>;
In the following we use the notation of {{citeD|Lück2001|Section 1.1}}. In particular, if $W$ is an $n$-manifold with boundary component $\partial_i W$ and
$$\phi^q \colon S^{q-1} \times D^{n-q} \to \partial_i W$$
is an embedding then $W + (\phi^q)$ denotes the manifold of obtained from $W$ by attaching a $q$-handle along $\phi^q$:
$$ W + (\phi^q) \cong W \cup_{\phi^q} (D^q \times D^{n-q}).$$
{{beginthm|Exercise}}
Let $(W; \partial_0 W, \partial_1 W)$ be an $n$-dimensional cobordism, and suppose that, relative to $\partial_0 W$, we have
$$ W
\cong \partial_0 W \times [0,1]
+ \sum_{i=1}^{p_0} (\phi^0_i)
+ \ldots
+ \sum_{i=1}^{p_n} (\phi^n_i).
$$
Show that there is another diffeomorphism, relative to $\partial_1W$, which is of the following form:
$$
W
\cong \partial_1 W \times [0,1]
+ \sum_{i=1}^{p_n} (\psi^0_i)
+ \ldots
+ \sum_{i=1}^{p_0} (\psi^n_i).
$$
The important part is that for each $q$-handle in the first handlebody decomposition, we have an $(n-q)$-handle in the second, dual handlebody decomposition.
{{endthm}}
{{beginrem|Comment}} If one approaches this exercise using Morse functions (and their relation to handlebody decompositions), the above is almost trivial (Question: Why?). The actual intention of this exercise is to go through the details of the rather direct approach outlined in {{citeD|Lück2001|pp.17-18}}. While this is a bit tedious, it provides a good opportunity to get more familiar with handlebody attachments and the like.
{{endrem}}
{{beginthm|Exercise}}
{{beginthm|Exercise}}
# Show that the operations (1)-(5) from {{citeD|Lück2001|Section 1.4}} used in the definition of the Whitehead group in fact yield equivalence classes of invertible matrices of arbitrary size.
# Show that the operations (1)-(5) from {{citeD|Lück2001|Section 1.4}} used in the definition of the Whitehead group in fact yield equivalence classes of invertible matrices of arbitrary size.

Revision as of 12:14, 24 March 2012

Exercise 0.1.

  1. Show that the operations (1)-(5) from [Lück2001, Section 1.4] used in the definition of the Whitehead group in fact yield equivalence classes of invertible matrices of arbitrary size.
  2. Show that Wh(e) is trivial.

The exercises and hints on this page were sent by Alex Koenen and Arkadi Schelling.

Personal tools
Namespaces
Variants
Actions
Navigation
Interaction
Toolbox