Talk:Elementary invariants of Heegaard diagrams (Ex)

From Manifold Atlas
Revision as of 06:00, 9 January 2019 by Maggie Miller (Talk | contribs)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to: navigation, search

The Heegaard diagram (\Sigma_g,\alpha,\beta) naturally gives a handle structure on Y. The handlebody H_\alpha consists of the 0-handle and g 1-handles, whose belt spheres are the \alpha curves. The handlebody H_\beta consists of the 3-handle and g 2-handles (this is a relative handle decomposition of H_\beta). The attaching spheres of the 2-handles are the \beta curves.

We will give group presentations for H_1(Y;\mathbb{Z}) and \pi_1(Y) with generators corresponding to the \alpha curves (which are in correspondence with the 1-handles). We obtain a relation for each 2-handle (which are in correspondence with the \beta curves). The \beta curves describe the attaching maps of the 2-handles; thus we can compute H_1(Y;\mathbb{Z}) and \pi_1(Y) by investigating the intersections of the \alpha and \beta curves, as each intersection marks a 2-handle attaching circle traveling geometrically once over a 1-handle.

Let \gamma_{ij}=\gamma([\alpha_i],[\beta_j]) indicate the algebraic intersection of \alpha_i with \beta_j. Then H_1(Y;\mathbb{Z})\cong\langle x_1,\ldots, x_g\mid [x_i,x_j]\forall(i,j), \sum_{i=1}^g\gamma_{ij}x_i\forall j\rangle.

Now pick a basepoint b_i for each \beta_i. Traveling once around \beta_i starting at b_i, say that \beta_i intersects \alpha_{i_1},\alpha_{i_2},\ldots,\alpha_{i_{n_i}} in order (with each entry indicating one intersection), with sign \epsilon_{i_j}\in\{1,-1\}. Let w_i=y_{i_1}^{\epsilon_{i_1}}y_{i_2}^{\epsilon_{i_2}}\cdots y_{i_n}^{\epsilon_{i_n}}. Then \pi_1(Y)\cong\langle y_1,\ldots, y_g\mid w_1,\ldots, w_g\rangle.

In particular, under these identifications of H_1(Y;\mathbb{Z}) and \pi_1(Y) with group presentations, we can write the Hurewicz map \rho:\pi_1(Y)\to H_1(Y;\mathbb{Z}) as the map
\displaystyle \rho:\left\langle x_1,\ldots, x_g\mid [x_i,x_j]\forall(i,j), \sum_{i=1}^g\gamma_{ij}x_i\forall j\right\rangle\to\langle y_1,\ldots, y_g\mid w_1,\ldots, w_g\rangle
given by x_i\mapsto y_i For each i=1,\ldots, g.


$-handle and $g$ (\Sigma_g,\alpha,\beta) naturally gives a handle structure on Y. The handlebody H_\alpha consists of the 0-handle and g 1-handles, whose belt spheres are the \alpha curves. The handlebody H_\beta consists of the 3-handle and g 2-handles (this is a relative handle decomposition of H_\beta). The attaching spheres of the 2-handles are the \beta curves.

We will give group presentations for H_1(Y;\mathbb{Z}) and \pi_1(Y) with generators corresponding to the \alpha curves (which are in correspondence with the 1-handles). We obtain a relation for each 2-handle (which are in correspondence with the \beta curves). The \beta curves describe the attaching maps of the 2-handles; thus we can compute H_1(Y;\mathbb{Z}) and \pi_1(Y) by investigating the intersections of the \alpha and \beta curves, as each intersection marks a 2-handle attaching circle traveling geometrically once over a 1-handle.

Let \gamma_{ij}=\gamma([\alpha_i],[\beta_j]) indicate the algebraic intersection of \alpha_i with \beta_j. Then H_1(Y;\mathbb{Z})\cong\langle x_1,\ldots, x_g\mid [x_i,x_j]\forall(i,j), \sum_{i=1}^g\gamma_{ij}x_i\forall j\rangle.

Now pick a basepoint b_i for each \beta_i. Traveling once around \beta_i starting at b_i, say that \beta_i intersects \alpha_{i_1},\alpha_{i_2},\ldots,\alpha_{i_{n_i}} in order (with each entry indicating one intersection), with sign \epsilon_{i_j}\in\{1,-1\}. Let w_i=y_{i_1}^{\epsilon_{i_1}}y_{i_2}^{\epsilon_{i_2}}\cdots y_{i_n}^{\epsilon_{i_n}}. Then \pi_1(Y)\cong\langle y_1,\ldots, y_g\mid w_1,\ldots, w_g\rangle.

In particular, under these identifications of H_1(Y;\mathbb{Z}) and \pi_1(Y) with group presentations, we can write the Hurewicz map \rho:\pi_1(Y)\to H_1(Y;\mathbb{Z}) as the map
\displaystyle \rho:\left\langle x_1,\ldots, x_g\mid [x_i,x_j]\forall(i,j), \sum_{i=1}^g\gamma_{ij}x_i\forall j\right\rangle\to\langle y_1,\ldots, y_g\mid w_1,\ldots, w_g\rangle
given by x_i\mapsto y_i For each i=1,\ldots, g.


$-handles, whose belt spheres are the $\alpha$ curves. The handlebody $H_\beta$ consists of the $-handle and $g$ $-handles (this is a relative handle decomposition of $H_\beta$). The attaching spheres of the $-handles are the $\beta$ curves. We will give group presentations for $H_1(Y;\mathbb{Z})$ and $\pi_1(Y)$ with generators corresponding to the $\alpha$ curves (which are in correspondence with the (\Sigma_g,\alpha,\beta) naturally gives a handle structure on Y. The handlebody H_\alpha consists of the 0-handle and g 1-handles, whose belt spheres are the \alpha curves. The handlebody H_\beta consists of the 3-handle and g 2-handles (this is a relative handle decomposition of H_\beta). The attaching spheres of the 2-handles are the \beta curves.

We will give group presentations for H_1(Y;\mathbb{Z}) and \pi_1(Y) with generators corresponding to the \alpha curves (which are in correspondence with the 1-handles). We obtain a relation for each 2-handle (which are in correspondence with the \beta curves). The \beta curves describe the attaching maps of the 2-handles; thus we can compute H_1(Y;\mathbb{Z}) and \pi_1(Y) by investigating the intersections of the \alpha and \beta curves, as each intersection marks a 2-handle attaching circle traveling geometrically once over a 1-handle.

Let \gamma_{ij}=\gamma([\alpha_i],[\beta_j]) indicate the algebraic intersection of \alpha_i with \beta_j. Then H_1(Y;\mathbb{Z})\cong\langle x_1,\ldots, x_g\mid [x_i,x_j]\forall(i,j), \sum_{i=1}^g\gamma_{ij}x_i\forall j\rangle.

Now pick a basepoint b_i for each \beta_i. Traveling once around \beta_i starting at b_i, say that \beta_i intersects \alpha_{i_1},\alpha_{i_2},\ldots,\alpha_{i_{n_i}} in order (with each entry indicating one intersection), with sign \epsilon_{i_j}\in\{1,-1\}. Let w_i=y_{i_1}^{\epsilon_{i_1}}y_{i_2}^{\epsilon_{i_2}}\cdots y_{i_n}^{\epsilon_{i_n}}. Then \pi_1(Y)\cong\langle y_1,\ldots, y_g\mid w_1,\ldots, w_g\rangle.

In particular, under these identifications of H_1(Y;\mathbb{Z}) and \pi_1(Y) with group presentations, we can write the Hurewicz map \rho:\pi_1(Y)\to H_1(Y;\mathbb{Z}) as the map
\displaystyle \rho:\left\langle x_1,\ldots, x_g\mid [x_i,x_j]\forall(i,j), \sum_{i=1}^g\gamma_{ij}x_i\forall j\right\rangle\to\langle y_1,\ldots, y_g\mid w_1,\ldots, w_g\rangle
given by x_i\mapsto y_i For each i=1,\ldots, g.


$-handles). We obtain a relation for each $-handle (which are in correspondence with the $\beta$ curves). The $\beta$ curves describe the attaching maps of the $-handles; thus we can compute $H_1(Y;\mathbb{Z})$ and $\pi_1(Y)$ by investigating the intersections of the $\alpha$ and $\beta$ curves, as each intersection marks a $-handle attaching circle traveling geometrically once over a (\Sigma_g,\alpha,\beta) naturally gives a handle structure on Y. The handlebody H_\alpha consists of the 0-handle and g 1-handles, whose belt spheres are the \alpha curves. The handlebody H_\beta consists of the 3-handle and g 2-handles (this is a relative handle decomposition of H_\beta). The attaching spheres of the 2-handles are the \beta curves.

We will give group presentations for H_1(Y;\mathbb{Z}) and \pi_1(Y) with generators corresponding to the \alpha curves (which are in correspondence with the 1-handles). We obtain a relation for each 2-handle (which are in correspondence with the \beta curves). The \beta curves describe the attaching maps of the 2-handles; thus we can compute H_1(Y;\mathbb{Z}) and \pi_1(Y) by investigating the intersections of the \alpha and \beta curves, as each intersection marks a 2-handle attaching circle traveling geometrically once over a 1-handle.

Let \gamma_{ij}=\gamma([\alpha_i],[\beta_j]) indicate the algebraic intersection of \alpha_i with \beta_j. Then H_1(Y;\mathbb{Z})\cong\langle x_1,\ldots, x_g\mid [x_i,x_j]\forall(i,j), \sum_{i=1}^g\gamma_{ij}x_i\forall j\rangle.

Now pick a basepoint b_i for each \beta_i. Traveling once around \beta_i starting at b_i, say that \beta_i intersects \alpha_{i_1},\alpha_{i_2},\ldots,\alpha_{i_{n_i}} in order (with each entry indicating one intersection), with sign \epsilon_{i_j}\in\{1,-1\}. Let w_i=y_{i_1}^{\epsilon_{i_1}}y_{i_2}^{\epsilon_{i_2}}\cdots y_{i_n}^{\epsilon_{i_n}}. Then \pi_1(Y)\cong\langle y_1,\ldots, y_g\mid w_1,\ldots, w_g\rangle.

In particular, under these identifications of H_1(Y;\mathbb{Z}) and \pi_1(Y) with group presentations, we can write the Hurewicz map \rho:\pi_1(Y)\to H_1(Y;\mathbb{Z}) as the map
\displaystyle \rho:\left\langle x_1,\ldots, x_g\mid [x_i,x_j]\forall(i,j), \sum_{i=1}^g\gamma_{ij}x_i\forall j\right\rangle\to\langle y_1,\ldots, y_g\mid w_1,\ldots, w_g\rangle
given by x_i\mapsto y_i For each i=1,\ldots, g.


$-handle. Let $\gamma_{ij}=\gamma([\alpha_i],[\beta_j])$ indicate the algebraic intersection of $\alpha_i$ with $\beta_j$. Then $H_1(Y;\mathbb{Z})\cong\langle x_1,\ldots, x_g\mid [x_i,x_j]\forall(i,j), \sum_{i=1}^g\gamma_{ij}x_i\forall j\rangle$. Now pick a basepoint $b_i$ for each $\beta_i$. Traveling once around $\beta_i$ starting at $b_i$, say that $\beta_i$ intersects $\alpha_{i_1},\alpha_{i_2},\ldots,\alpha_{i_{n_i}}$ in order (with each entry indicating one intersection), with sign $\epsilon_{i_j}\in\{1,-1\}$. Let $w_i=y_{i_1}^{\epsilon_{i_1}}y_{i_2}^{\epsilon_{i_2}}\cdots y_{i_n}^{\epsilon_{i_n}}$. Then $\pi_1(Y)\cong\langle y_1,\ldots, y_g\mid w_1,\ldots, w_g\rangle$. In particular, under these identifications of $H_1(Y;\mathbb{Z})$ and $\pi_1(Y)$ with group presentations, we can write the Hurewicz map $\rho:\pi_1(Y)\to H_1(Y;\mathbb{Z})$ as the map $$\rho:\left\langle x_1,\ldots, x_g\mid [x_i,x_j]\forall(i,j), \sum_{i=1}^g\gamma_{ij}x_i\forall j\right\rangle\to\langle y_1,\ldots, y_g\mid w_1,\ldots, w_g\rangle$$ given by $x_i\mapsto y_i$ For each $i=1,\ldots, g$. (\Sigma_g,\alpha,\beta) naturally gives a handle structure on Y. The handlebody H_\alpha consists of the 0-handle and g 1-handles, whose belt spheres are the \alpha curves. The handlebody H_\beta consists of the 3-handle and g 2-handles (this is a relative handle decomposition of H_\beta). The attaching spheres of the 2-handles are the \beta curves.

We will give group presentations for H_1(Y;\mathbb{Z}) and \pi_1(Y) with generators corresponding to the \alpha curves (which are in correspondence with the 1-handles). We obtain a relation for each 2-handle (which are in correspondence with the \beta curves). The \beta curves describe the attaching maps of the 2-handles; thus we can compute H_1(Y;\mathbb{Z}) and \pi_1(Y) by investigating the intersections of the \alpha and \beta curves, as each intersection marks a 2-handle attaching circle traveling geometrically once over a 1-handle.

Let \gamma_{ij}=\gamma([\alpha_i],[\beta_j]) indicate the algebraic intersection of \alpha_i with \beta_j. Then H_1(Y;\mathbb{Z})\cong\langle x_1,\ldots, x_g\mid [x_i,x_j]\forall(i,j), \sum_{i=1}^g\gamma_{ij}x_i\forall j\rangle.

Now pick a basepoint b_i for each \beta_i. Traveling once around \beta_i starting at b_i, say that \beta_i intersects \alpha_{i_1},\alpha_{i_2},\ldots,\alpha_{i_{n_i}} in order (with each entry indicating one intersection), with sign \epsilon_{i_j}\in\{1,-1\}. Let w_i=y_{i_1}^{\epsilon_{i_1}}y_{i_2}^{\epsilon_{i_2}}\cdots y_{i_n}^{\epsilon_{i_n}}. Then \pi_1(Y)\cong\langle y_1,\ldots, y_g\mid w_1,\ldots, w_g\rangle.

In particular, under these identifications of H_1(Y;\mathbb{Z}) and \pi_1(Y) with group presentations, we can write the Hurewicz map \rho:\pi_1(Y)\to H_1(Y;\mathbb{Z}) as the map
\displaystyle \rho:\left\langle x_1,\ldots, x_g\mid [x_i,x_j]\forall(i,j), \sum_{i=1}^g\gamma_{ij}x_i\forall j\right\rangle\to\langle y_1,\ldots, y_g\mid w_1,\ldots, w_g\rangle
given by x_i\mapsto y_i For each i=1,\ldots, g.


Personal tools
Namespaces
Variants
Actions
Navigation
Interaction
Toolbox