Some calculations involving configuration spaces of distinct points

From Manifold Atlas
(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
m (Introduction)
(Uniqueness theorems)
(14 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
<!-- COMMENT:
To achieve a unified layout, along with using the template below, please OBSERVE the following: besides, $...$ and $$...$$, you should use two environments:
- For statements like Theorem, Lemma, Definition etc., use e.g.
{{beginthm|Theorem 1|(Milnor)}} ... ... ... {{endthm}}.
- For references, use e.g. {{cite|Milnor1958b}}.
END OF COMMENT
-->
{{Stub}}
{{Stub}}
== Introduction ==
== Introduction ==
<wikitex>;
<wikitex>;
‘The complement of the diagonal’ and ‘the Gauss map’ ideas play a great role in different branches of mathematics<!-- [Gl68, Va92]-->. The Haefliger-Wu invariant is a manifestation of these ideas in the theory of embeddings. The complement to the diagonal idea originated from two celebrated theorems: the Lefschetz Fixed Point Theorem and the Borsuk-Ulam Antipodes Theorem.
+
‘The complement of the diagonal’ and ‘the Gauss map’ ideas play a great role in different branches of mathematics<!-- [Gl68, Va92]-->. The Haefliger-Wu invariant is a manifestation of these ideas in the theory of embeddings. The complement to the diagonal idea originated from two celebrated theorems: the Lefschetz Fixed Point Theorem and the Borsuk-Ulam Antipodes Theorem. See \cite{Vassiliev1992}.
+
+
In introducing notation and definitions we follow \cite{Skopenkov2020a}.
+
+
If the category is omitted, then a result stated below holds in both the smooth and piecewise-linear (PL) category.
The ''deleted product''
The ''deleted product''
Line 21: Line 12:
This is the configuration space of ordered pairs of distinct points of $K$.
This is the configuration space of ordered pairs of distinct points of $K$.
Suppose that $f:K\to\R^d$ is an embedding of a subset $K\subset \mathbb R^m$.
+
Suppose that $f:K\to\R^m$ is an embedding of a subset $K\subset \mathbb R^N$.
Then the map $\widetilde f:\widetilde K\to S^{d-1}$ is well-defined by the Gauss formula
+
Then the map $\widetilde f:\widetilde K\to S^{m-1}$ is well-defined by the Gauss formula
$$\widetilde f(x,y)=\frac{f(x)-f(y)}{|f(x)-f(y)|}.$$
$$\widetilde f(x,y)=\frac{f(x)-f(y)}{|f(x)-f(y)|}.$$
We have $\widetilde f(y,x)=-\widetilde f(x,y)$, i.e. this map is equivariant with respect to the `exchanging factors' involution
We have $\widetilde f(y,x)=-\widetilde f(x,y)$, i.e. this map is equivariant with respect to the `exchanging factors' involution
$(x,y)\mapsto(y,x)$ on $\widetilde K$ and the antipodal involution on $S^{d-1}$.
+
$(x,y)\mapsto(y,x)$ on $\widetilde K$ and the antipodal involution on $S^{m-1}$.
Thus the existence of an equivariant map $\widetilde K\to S^{d-1}$ is a necessary condition for the embeddability of $K$ in $\R^d$.
+
Thus the existence of an equivariant map $\widetilde K\to S^{m-1}$ is a necessary condition for the embeddability of $K$ in $\R^m$.
{{beginthm|Definition}}[of the Haefliger-Wu invariant $\alpha$]
+
Denote by $\mathrm{Emb}^{m}K$ the set embeddings of $K$ into $\mathbb R^{m}$ up to isotopy.
\label{DefHaef}
+
Let $\pi_{\mathrm{eq}}^{m}(\widetilde K) = [\widetilde K;S^{m}]_{\mathrm{eq}}$ be the set of equivariant maps $\widetilde K \to S^m$ up to equivariant homotopy. By $[·]$ we denote the isotopy class of an embedding or the homotopy class of a map.
'''The Haefliger-Wu invariant'''
+
$\alpha:\mathrm{Emb}^{k}K\to \pi_{\mathrm{eq}}^{k-1}(\widetilde{K})$
+
<!--Definition of the Haefliger-Wu invariant $\alpha$-->
is induced by the Gauss map.
+
'''The Haefliger-Wu invariant'''
<!-- The Haefliger-Wu invariant and the Gauss map are analogously defined for $N_0$; we will denote them by $\alpha_0$ in this case.-->
+
$\alpha:\mathrm{Emb}^{m}K\to \pi_{\mathrm{eq}}^{m-1}(\widetilde{K})$ is defined by formula
+
<!--is induced by the Gauss map.-->
+
$\alpha([f]) = [\widetilde f]$.
+
<!-- The Haefliger-Wu invariant and the Gauss map are analogously defined for $N_0$; we will denote them by $\alpha_0$ in this case.-->
{{beginthm|Theorem}}
{{beginthm|Theorem}}
The Haefliger-Wu invariant $\alpha:\mathrm{Emb}^m K\to\pi^{m-1}_{\mathrm{eq}}( \widetilde K)$ is one-to-one for $2m\ge 3n+4$.
+
The Haefliger-Wu invariant $\alpha:\mathrm{Emb}^m K\to\pi^{m-1}_{\mathrm{eq}}( \widetilde K)$ is one-to-one either
+
+
(a) $K$ is a compact connected $n$-complex and $2m\ge 3n+4$ or
+
+
<!--(b) $K$ is a compact connected $n$-manifold with nonempty boundary and $2m\ge 3n+4$ or-->
+
(b) $K$ is a compact $n$-manifold with nonempty boundary, $(K, \partial K)$ is $k$-connected, $\pi_1(\partial K) = 0$,
+
$k + 3 \le n$, $(n, k) \notin \{(5, 2), (4, 1)\}$ and $2m\ge 3n+2-k$.
{{endthm}}
{{endthm}}
+
+
See \cite[$\S$ 5]{Skopenkov2006} and \cite[6.4]{Haefliger1963}, \cite[Theorem 1.1$\alpha\partial$]{Skopenkov2002} for the DIFF case and \cite[Theorem 1.3$\alpha\partial$]{Skopenkov2002} for the PL case.
</wikitex>
</wikitex>
Line 49: Line 51:
(b) $N$ is connected and $m \ge 2n+1 \ge 5$.
(b) $N$ is connected and $m \ge 2n+1 \ge 5$.
Then every two every two equivariant maps $f, g:\widetilde N\to S^{m-1}$ are equivariantly homotopic.
+
Then each two equivariant maps from $\widetilde N$ to $S^{m-1}$ are equivariantly homotopic.
{{endthm}}
{{endthm}}
+
+
Hereafter denote by $\widetilde K$ the product $K\times K$ minus tubular neighborhood of the diagonal.
''Proof.''
''Proof.''
Take an arbitrary equivariant triangulation $T$ of $\widetilde N$.
+
Given two equivariant maps $\phi, \psi\colon\widetilde N \to S^{m-1}$ take an arbitrary equivariant triangulation $T$ of $\widetilde N$.
(a) One can easily construct an equivariant homotopy between restrictions of $f$ and $g$
+
(a) One can easily construct an equivariant homotopy between restrictions of $\phi$ and $\psi$
on vertices of $T$.
on vertices of $T$.
By general position a homotopy of $f, g$ on the boundary of a $k$-simplex can be extended to a homotopy on the whole $k$-simplex since $k<2n+1$.
+
By general position a homotopy between $\phi$ and $\psi$ on the boundary of a simplex can be extended to a homotopy on the whole simplex since the dimension of the simplex does not exceed $2n+1$.
We extend equivariant homotopy on symmetric simplices in the symmetric way, so we obtain an equivariant homotopy.
We extend equivariant homotopy on symmetric simplices in the symmetric way, so we obtain an equivariant homotopy.
(b) Since $\widetilde{N}$ has non-empty boundary, there exists an equivariant deformational retraction of $\widetilde{N}$ to an equivariant $(2n-1)$-subcomplex of $T$. A homotopy on the subcomplex can by constructed similarly to case~(a). This homotopy can be extended to a homotopy on $\widetilde{N}$.
+
(b) Since $\widetilde{N}$ has non-empty boundary, there exists an equivariant deformational retraction of $\widetilde{N}$ to an equivariant $(2n-1)$-subcomplex of $T$. A homotopy between $\phi$ and $\psi$ on the subcomplex can by constructed similarly to case (a). This homotopy can be extended to a homotopy on $\widetilde{N}$.
QED
QED
+
+
{{beginthm|Lemma}}\label{th::unknotting}
+
Assume that $N$ is a closed $k$-connected $n$-manifold and $m-1 \ge 2n-k$.
+
+
Then each two equivariant maps from $\widetilde N$ to $S^{m-1}$ are equivariantly homotopic.
+
{{endthm}}
</wikitex>
</wikitex>
== Invariants ==
+
<!--== Invariants ==
<wikitex>;
<wikitex>;
...
...
Line 78: Line 88:
...
...
</wikitex>
</wikitex>
<!-- == Acknowledgments ==
+
== Acknowledgments ==
...
...

Latest revision as of 14:42, 8 January 2021

This page has not been refereed. The information given here might be incomplete or provisional.

[edit] 1 Introduction

‘The complement of the diagonal’ and ‘the Gauss map’ ideas play a great role in different branches of mathematics. The Haefliger-Wu invariant is a manifestation of these ideas in the theory of embeddings. The complement to the diagonal idea originated from two celebrated theorems: the Lefschetz Fixed Point Theorem and the Borsuk-Ulam Antipodes Theorem. See [Vassiliev1992].

In introducing notation and definitions we follow [Skopenkov2020a].

If the category is omitted, then a result stated below holds in both the smooth and piecewise-linear (PL) category.

The deleted product

\displaystyle \widetilde K=K^{\underline2}:=\{(x,y)\in K\times K\ :\ x\ne y\}.

This is the configuration space of ordered pairs of distinct points of K.

Suppose that f:K\to\R^m is an embedding of a subset K\subset \mathbb R^N. Then the map \widetilde f:\widetilde K\to S^{m-1} is well-defined by the Gauss formula

\displaystyle \widetilde f(x,y)=\frac{f(x)-f(y)}{|f(x)-f(y)|}.

We have \widetilde f(y,x)=-\widetilde f(x,y), i.e. this map is equivariant with respect to the `exchanging factors' involution (x,y)\mapsto(y,x) on \widetilde K and the antipodal involution on S^{m-1}. Thus the existence of an equivariant map \widetilde K\to S^{m-1} is a necessary condition for the embeddability of K in \R^m.

Denote by \mathrm{Emb}^{m}K the set embeddings of K into \mathbb R^{m} up to isotopy. Let \pi_{\mathrm{eq}}^{m}(\widetilde K) = [\widetilde K;S^{m}]_{\mathrm{eq}} be the set of equivariant maps \widetilde K \to S^m up to equivariant homotopy. By [·] we denote the isotopy class of an embedding or the homotopy class of a map.

The Haefliger-Wu invariant \alpha:\mathrm{Emb}^{m}K\to \pi_{\mathrm{eq}}^{m-1}(\widetilde{K}) is defined by formula \alpha([f]) = [\widetilde f].

Theorem 1.1. The Haefliger-Wu invariant \alpha:\mathrm{Emb}^m K\to\pi^{m-1}_{\mathrm{eq}}( \widetilde K) is one-to-one either

(a) K is a compact connected n-complex and 2m\ge 3n+4 or

(b) K is a compact n-manifold with nonempty boundary, (K, \partial K) is k-connected, \pi_1(\partial K) = 0, k + 3 \le n, (n, k) \notin \{(5, 2), (4, 1)\} and 2m\ge 3n+2-k.

See [Skopenkov2006, \S 5] and [Haefliger1963, 6.4], [Skopenkov2002, Theorem 1.1\alpha\partial] for the DIFF case and [Skopenkov2002, Theorem 1.3\alpha\partial] for the PL case.

[edit] 2 Uniqueness theorems

Lemma 2.1. Assume that N is a compact n-manifold and either

(a) m \ge 2n+2 or

(b) N is connected and m \ge 2n+1 \ge 5.

Then each two equivariant maps from \widetilde N to S^{m-1} are equivariantly homotopic.

Hereafter denote by \widetilde K the product K\times K minus tubular neighborhood of the diagonal.

Proof. Given two equivariant maps \phi, \psi\colon\widetilde N \to S^{m-1} take an arbitrary equivariant triangulation T of \widetilde N.

(a) One can easily construct an equivariant homotopy between restrictions of \phi and \psi on vertices of T. By general position a homotopy between \phi and \psi on the boundary of a simplex can be extended to a homotopy on the whole simplex since the dimension of the simplex does not exceed 2n+1. We extend equivariant homotopy on symmetric simplices in the symmetric way, so we obtain an equivariant homotopy.

(b) Since \widetilde{N} has non-empty boundary, there exists an equivariant deformational retraction of \widetilde{N} to an equivariant (2n-1)-subcomplex of T. A homotopy between \phi and \psi on the subcomplex can by constructed similarly to case (a). This homotopy can be extended to a homotopy on \widetilde{N}. QED

Lemma 2.2. Assume that N is a closed k-connected n-manifold and m-1 \ge 2n-k.

Then each two equivariant maps from \widetilde N to S^{m-1} are equivariantly homotopic.


[edit] 3 References

V. A. Vassiliev, Complements of discriminants of smooth maps: Topology and applications., Amer. Math. Soc., Providence, RI, (1992).

Personal tools
Namespaces
Variants
Actions
Navigation
Interaction
Toolbox