Simple closed curves in surfaces (Ex)

From Manifold Atlas
(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
(Created page with "<wikitex>; Let $\Sigma_g$ be a closed oriented surface of genus $g$ and let $\alpha_1, \dots, \alpha_g \subset \Sigma_g$ be pair-wise disjoint simple closed curves. Prove tha...")
m
Line 1: Line 1:
<wikitex>;
<wikitex>;
Let $\Sigma_g$ be a closed oriented surface of genus $g$ and let $\alpha_1, \dots, \alpha_g \subset \Sigma_g$ be pair-wise disjoint simple closed curves. Prove that the homology classes $\{[\alpha_1], \dots [\alpha_g]\} \subset H_1(\Sigma_g; \Z/2)$ are linearly independent if the complement $\Sigma_g \setminus \cup_{i=1}^g \alpha_i$ is connected.
+
Let $\Sigma_g$ be a closed oriented surface of genus $g$ and let $\alpha_1, \dots, \alpha_g \subset \Sigma_g$ be pair-wise disjoint simple closed curves. Prove that the set of homology classes $\{[\alpha_1], \dots [\alpha_g]\} \subset H_1(\Sigma_g; \Z/2)$ is linearly independent if the complement $\Sigma_g \setminus \cup_{i=1}^g \alpha_i$ is connected.
+
+
Does the converse hold?
</wikitex>
</wikitex>
[[Category:Exercises]]
[[Category:Exercises]]
[[Category:Exercises without solution]]
[[Category:Exercises without solution]]

Latest revision as of 04:46, 7 January 2019

Let \Sigma_g be a closed oriented surface of genus g and let \alpha_1, \dots, \alpha_g \subset \Sigma_g be pair-wise disjoint simple closed curves. Prove that the set of homology classes \{[\alpha_1], \dots [\alpha_g]\} \subset H_1(\Sigma_g; \Z/2) is linearly independent if the complement \Sigma_g \setminus \cup_{i=1}^g \alpha_i is connected.

Does the converse hold?

Personal tools
Namespaces
Variants
Actions
Navigation
Interaction
Toolbox