Handlebody decompositions of bordisms (Ex)

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
m
m
Line 38: Line 38:
$$[\tilde{f}]=\pm\gamma\cdot[\phi^q_{i_0}] \in \pi_q(\tilde W). ??$$
$$[\tilde{f}]=\pm\gamma\cdot[\phi^q_{i_0}] \in \pi_q(\tilde W). ??$$
{{endthm}}
{{endthm}}
+
The exercises and comments on this page were sent by Alex Koenen, Farid Madani, Mihaela Pilca and Arkadi Schelling.
</wikitex>
</wikitex>
== References ==
== References ==
{{#RefList:}}
{{#RefList:}}
[[Category:Exercises]]
[[Category:Exercises]]

Revision as of 12:31, 24 March 2012

In the following we use the notation of [Lück2001, Section 1.1]. In particular, if W is an n-manifold with boundary component \partial_i W and

\displaystyle \phi^q \colon S^{q-1} \times D^{n-q} \to \partial_i W

is an embedding then W + (\phi^q) denotes the manifold of obtained from W by attaching a q-handle along \phi^q:

\displaystyle  W + (\phi^q) \cong W \cup_{\phi^q} (D^q \times D^{n-q}).

Exercise 0.1. Let (W; \partial_0 W, \partial_1 W) be an n-dimensional cobordism, and suppose that, relative to \partial_0 W, we have

\displaystyle  W      \cong \bigl(\partial_0 W \times [0,1] \bigr)     + \sum_{i=1}^{p_0} (\phi^0_i)     + \ldots     + \sum_{i=1}^{p_n} (\phi^n_i).

Show that there is another diffeomorphism, relative to \partial_1W, which is of the following form:

\displaystyle      W     \cong \bigl( \partial_1 W \times [0,1] \bigr)     + \sum_{i=1}^{p_n} (\psi^0_i)     + \ldots     + \sum_{i=1}^{p_0} (\psi^n_i).

The important part is that for each q-handle in the first handlebody decomposition, we have an (n-q)-handle in the second, dual handlebody decomposition.

Comment 0.2. If one approaches this exercise using Morse functions (and their relation to handlebody decompositions), the above is almost trivial (Question: Why?). The actual intention of this exercise is to go through the details of the rather direct approach outlined in [Lück2001, pp.17-18]. While this is a bit tedious, it provides a good opportunity to get more familiar with handlebody attachments and the like.

Exercise 0.3.

Let W be an n-dimensional manifold whose boundary \partial W is the disjoint sum \partial_0 W\sqcup\partial_1 W and let \phi^q:S^{q-1} \times D^{n-q}\to \partial_1 W be a trivial embedding i.e. an embedding which is given by the restriction of an embedding of the disk D^{n-1}\to \partial_1 W via a fixed standard embedding S^{q-1} \times D^{n-q} \to D^{n-1}.

Show that there exists an embedding \phi^{q+1}:S^q\times D^{n-1-q}\to \partial_1(W+(\phi^q)), such that \phi^{q+1}(S^q\times\{0\}) meets the transverse sphere of the handle (\phi^q) transversally in exactly one point. Conclude by the Cancellation Lemma [Lück2001, Lemma 1.12] that W and W+(\phi^q)+(\phi^{q+1}) are diffeomorphic relative to \partial_0 W.

Exercise 0.4. Let (W,\partial_0 W,\partial_1 W) be an h-cobordism with n\geq 6, which is written as follows:

\displaystyle W\cong \bigl(\partial_0W\times[0,1] \bigr) + \underset{i=1}{\overset{p_2}{\sum}}(\phi_i^2)+\cdots +\underset{i=1}{\overset{p_n}{\sum}}(\phi_i^n).

For 0 \leq q \leq n let W_q \subset W be the result of attaching all the j-handles of W to \partial_0W \times [0, 1] for j \leq q. Fix 2\leq q\leq n-3 and assume that f:S^q\to \partial_1 W_q is an embedding which meets the transverse sphere of (\phi^q_{i_0}) transversally in exactly one point and is disjoint from the transverse spheres of the handles (\phi^q_i) for i\neq i_0. Show that there is \gamma \in \pi_1(W) with

\displaystyle [\tilde{f}]=\pm\gamma\cdot[\phi^q_{i_0}] \in \pi_q(\tilde W). ??

The exercises and comments on this page were sent by Alex Koenen, Farid Madani, Mihaela Pilca and Arkadi Schelling.

References

\leq q \leq n$ let $W_q \subset W$ be the result of attaching all the $j$-handles of $W$ to $\partial_0W \times [0, 1]$ for $j \leq q$. Fix \leq q\leq n-3$ and assume that $f:S^q\to \partial_1 W_q$ is an embedding which meets the transverse sphere of $(\phi^q_{i_0})$ transversally in exactly one point and is disjoint from the transverse spheres of the handles $(\phi^q_i)$ for $i\neq i_0$. Show that there is $\gamma \in \pi_1(W)$ with $$[\tilde{f}]=\pm\gamma\cdot[\phi^q_{i_0}] \in \pi_q(\tilde W). ??$$ {{endthm}} == References == {{#RefList:}} [[Category:Exercises]]W is an n-manifold with boundary component \partial_i W and

\displaystyle \phi^q \colon S^{q-1} \times D^{n-q} \to \partial_i W

is an embedding then W + (\phi^q) denotes the manifold of obtained from W by attaching a q-handle along \phi^q:

\displaystyle  W + (\phi^q) \cong W \cup_{\phi^q} (D^q \times D^{n-q}).

Exercise 0.1. Let (W; \partial_0 W, \partial_1 W) be an n-dimensional cobordism, and suppose that, relative to \partial_0 W, we have

\displaystyle  W      \cong \bigl(\partial_0 W \times [0,1] \bigr)     + \sum_{i=1}^{p_0} (\phi^0_i)     + \ldots     + \sum_{i=1}^{p_n} (\phi^n_i).

Show that there is another diffeomorphism, relative to \partial_1W, which is of the following form:

\displaystyle      W     \cong \bigl( \partial_1 W \times [0,1] \bigr)     + \sum_{i=1}^{p_n} (\psi^0_i)     + \ldots     + \sum_{i=1}^{p_0} (\psi^n_i).

The important part is that for each q-handle in the first handlebody decomposition, we have an (n-q)-handle in the second, dual handlebody decomposition.

Comment 0.2. If one approaches this exercise using Morse functions (and their relation to handlebody decompositions), the above is almost trivial (Question: Why?). The actual intention of this exercise is to go through the details of the rather direct approach outlined in [Lück2001, pp.17-18]. While this is a bit tedious, it provides a good opportunity to get more familiar with handlebody attachments and the like.

Exercise 0.3.

Let W be an n-dimensional manifold whose boundary \partial W is the disjoint sum \partial_0 W\sqcup\partial_1 W and let \phi^q:S^{q-1} \times D^{n-q}\to \partial_1 W be a trivial embedding i.e. an embedding which is given by the restriction of an embedding of the disk D^{n-1}\to \partial_1 W via a fixed standard embedding S^{q-1} \times D^{n-q} \to D^{n-1}.

Show that there exists an embedding \phi^{q+1}:S^q\times D^{n-1-q}\to \partial_1(W+(\phi^q)), such that \phi^{q+1}(S^q\times\{0\}) meets the transverse sphere of the handle (\phi^q) transversally in exactly one point. Conclude by the Cancellation Lemma [Lück2001, Lemma 1.12] that W and W+(\phi^q)+(\phi^{q+1}) are diffeomorphic relative to \partial_0 W.

Exercise 0.4. Let (W,\partial_0 W,\partial_1 W) be an h-cobordism with n\geq 6, which is written as follows:

\displaystyle W\cong \bigl(\partial_0W\times[0,1] \bigr) + \underset{i=1}{\overset{p_2}{\sum}}(\phi_i^2)+\cdots +\underset{i=1}{\overset{p_n}{\sum}}(\phi_i^n).

For 0 \leq q \leq n let W_q \subset W be the result of attaching all the j-handles of W to \partial_0W \times [0, 1] for j \leq q. Fix 2\leq q\leq n-3 and assume that f:S^q\to \partial_1 W_q is an embedding which meets the transverse sphere of (\phi^q_{i_0}) transversally in exactly one point and is disjoint from the transverse spheres of the handles (\phi^q_i) for i\neq i_0. Show that there is \gamma \in \pi_1(W) with

\displaystyle [\tilde{f}]=\pm\gamma\cdot[\phi^q_{i_0}] \in \pi_q(\tilde W). ??

The exercises and comments on this page were sent by Alex Koenen, Farid Madani, Mihaela Pilca and Arkadi Schelling.

References

Personal tools
Namespaces
Variants
Actions
Navigation
Interaction
Toolbox