Classifying spaces for families of subgroups

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 26: Line 26:
such that:
such that:
# a set $C \subseteq X$ is closed if and only if $C \cap X_n$ is closed for every $n\geq 0$;
# a set $C \subseteq X$ is closed if and only if $C \cap X_n$ is closed for every $n\geq 0$;
# for each $n\geq 0$, $X_n$ is obtained from $X_{n-1}$ by attaching $n$-dimensional $G$-cells. That is, there exists a $G$-pushout
+
# for each $n\geq 0$, $X_n$ is obtained from $X_{n-1}$ by attaching $n$-dimensional $G$-cells. That is, there exists a $G$-pushout $$
$$
+
\xymatrix{
\xymatrix{
\coprod_{i \in I_n}G/H_i \times S^{n-1}
\coprod_{i \in I_n}G/H_i \times S^{n-1}
\ar[d] \ar[r] & X_{n-1} \ar[d] \\
\ar[d] \ar[r] & X_{n-1} \ar[d] \\
\coprod_{i \in I_n}G/H_i \times D^{n} \ar[r] & X
\coprod_{i \in I_n}G/H_i \times D^{n} \ar[r] & X
}
+
} $$ where $\{ H_i\;|\; i\in I_n \}$ is a collection of subgroups of $G$.
$$
+
where $\{ H_i\;|\; i\in I_n \}$ is a collection of subgroups of $G$.
+
{{endthm}}
{{endthm}}
+
'''Examples'''
+
# $\mathbb{R}$ with the translation action is a $\mathbb{Z}$-CW complex with one equivariant $0$-cell, namely the integers, and one equivariant $1$-cell, namely the orbit of the interval $[0,1]$.
+
# $S^\infty$...
+
# Let $D_\infty=\langle a,b \;|\; a^2=1, aba^{-1}=b^{-1} \rangle$ be the infinite dihedral group. A model for $\underbar{E}D_\infty$ is $\mathbb{R}$, where $a$ acts by reflection through zero and $b$ acts by translation by 1. (Notice that the nontrivial finite subgroups of $D_\infty$ are of the form $\langle ab^i \rangle$, where $i\in \mathbb{Z}$, and for each $i$, $\langle ab^i \rangle$ fixes $-i/2\in \mathbb{R}$.)
+
# (non-classifying example)
+
+
In the first two examples above, the action of $G$ was free...(leads to families)
{{beginthm|Definition (Family of subgroups)}}\label{def:family}
{{beginthm|Definition (Family of subgroups)}}\label{def:family}
Line 52: Line 56:
{{endthm}}
{{endthm}}
Such a space always exists.
+
{{beginthm|Theorem}}
+
(Such a space always exists.)
+
{{endthm}}
An important fact that follows from the Generalized Whitehead Theorem (\cite{Lück2005|Theorem 1.6}) is:
An important fact that follows from the Generalized Whitehead Theorem (\cite{Lück2005|Theorem 1.6}) is:
Line 63: Line 69:
A $G$-CW complex $X$ is a model for $E_\mathcal{F}G$ if and only if $X^H$ is weakly contractible for every $H\in \mathcal{F}$ and is empty otherwise.
A $G$-CW complex $X$ is a model for $E_\mathcal{F}G$ if and only if $X^H$ is weakly contractible for every $H\in \mathcal{F}$ and is empty otherwise.
{{endthm}}
{{endthm}}
+
+
'''Examples'''
+
* (use above)
+
* ... non-example
'''Examples of classifying spaces:'''
'''Examples of classifying spaces:'''
* A model for the classifying space of $\mathbb{Z}$ for the trivial family is $\mathbb{R}$ on which $\mathbb{Z}$ acts by translation.
+
* The classifying space of $G$ for the trivial family (i.e., for free actions) is just $EG$, the universal cover of the classifying space $BG$. (Recall that $BG$ is a CW complex whose fundamental group is $G$ and whose higher homotopy groups are all zero. It is unique up to homotopy.)
* More generally, the classifying space of $G$ for the trivial family (i.e., for free actions) is just $EG$, the universal cover of the classifying space $BG$. (Recall that $BG$ is a CW complex whose fundamental group is $G$ and whose higher homotopy groups are all zero. It is unique up to homotopy.)
+
* For any group, a point is a model for the classifying space for the family of all subgroups.
* For any group, a point is a model for the classifying space for the family of all subgroups.
*$E_\mathcal{FIN}G$ is also known as the ''classifying space (or universal space) for proper $G$-actions'', and is commonly written as $\underbar{E}G$. There are typically "nice" models for $\underbar{E}G$, as the next several examples show. They appear in the statement of the ''Baum-Connes Conjecture''.
+
*$E_\mathcal{FIN}G$ is also known as the ''classifying space (or universal space) for proper $G$-actions'', and is commonly written as $\underbar{E}G$. There are typically "nice" models for $\underbar{E}G$, as the next few examples show. They appear in the statement of the ''Baum-Connes Conjecture''.
* Let $D_\infty=\langle a,b \;|\; a^2=1, aba^{-1}=b^{-1} \rangle$ be the infinite dihedral group. A model for $\underbar{E}D_\infty$ is $\mathbb{R}$, where $a$ acts by reflection through zero and $b$ acts by translation by 1. (Notice that the nontrivial finite subgroups of $D_\infty$ are of the form $\langle ab^i \rangle$, where $i\in \mathbb{Z}$, and for each $i$, $\langle ab^i \rangle$ fixes $-i/2\in \mathbb{R}$.)
+
* Let $G$ be a discrete subgroup of a Lie group $L$ with finitely many path components. If $K$ is a maximal compact subgroup of $L$, then $G/K$ is a finite dimensional model for $\underbar{E}G$ \cite{Lück2005}.
* Let $G$ be a discrete subgroup of a Lie group $L$ with finitely many path components. If $K$ is a maximal compact subgroup of $L$, then $G/K$ is a finite dimensional model for $\underbar{E}G$ \cite{Lück2005}.
* Let $G$ be a ''word hyperbolic group'' in the sense of Gromov. Then the ''Rips complex'', $P_d(G)$, is a finite model for $\underbar{E}G$ ( i.e., there are only finitely many $G$-cells), provided $d$ is sufficiently large \cite{Meintrup&Schick2002}.
* Let $G$ be a ''word hyperbolic group'' in the sense of Gromov. Then the ''Rips complex'', $P_d(G)$, is a finite model for $\underbar{E}G$ ( i.e., there are only finitely many $G$-cells), provided $d$ is sufficiently large \cite{Meintrup&Schick2002}.

Revision as of 15:13, 8 June 2010

This page has not been refereed. The information given here might be incomplete or provisional.

1 Introduction

Given a discrete group G and a family of subgroups \mathcal{F} of G (see Definition 2.2 below), there is a G-CW complex, E_\mathcal{F}G, that classifies G-CW complexes with isotropy contained in \mathcal{F}. That is, the isotropy subgroups of E_\mathcal{F}G are contained in \mathcal{F} and for every G-CW complex X, there is a G-equivariant map X \to E_\mathcal{F}G that is unique up to G-equivariant homotopy. There can be many models for E_\mathcal{F}G, but the universal property implies that they are all G-homotopy equivalent. For this reason E_\mathcal{F}G is known as the classifying space (or universal space) of G for the family \mathcal{F}. A useful characterization of E_\mathcal{F}G is given below (Corollary 2.6).

Classifying spaces for families of subgroups play an important role in the classification of manifolds with a given fundamental group G. The Farrell-Jones Conjecture relates the K- and L-theory of groups rings RG to certain equivariant homology theories evaluated at E_\mathcal{VCYC}G, the classifying space of G for the family of virtually cyclic subgroups. Similarly, the Baum-Connes Conjecture relates the topological K-theory of the reduced C^*-algebra of G to an appropriate equivariant homology theory evaluated at \underbar{E}G, the classifying space for proper G-actions. (In the case of a discrete group, this means that the isotropy is contained in the family of finite subgroups, i.e., all of the stabilizer subgroups are finite.) From the point of view of computations it is also important to find nice models for these spaces, and in particular for \underbar{E}G, since in many cases calculations can be reduced to working with the family of finite subgroups.

2 Construction and examples

Definition (G-CW complex) 2.1. A G-CW complex X is a G-space with a G-invariant filtration of spaces

\displaystyle \emptyset=X_{-1} \subseteq X_0 \subseteq X_1 \subseteq \cdots \subseteq X_n \subseteq \cdots \subseteq \bigcup_{n\geq 0} X_n = X

such that:

  1. a set C \subseteq X is closed if and only if C \cap X_n is closed for every n\geq 0;
  2. for each n\geq 0, X_n is obtained from X_{n-1} by attaching n-dimensional G-cells. That is, there exists a G-pushout
    \displaystyle    \xymatrix{   \coprod_{i \in I_n}G/H_i \times S^{n-1}   \ar[d] \ar[r] & X_{n-1} \ar[d] \\   \coprod_{i \in I_n}G/H_i \times D^{n} \ar[r] & X   }
    where \{ H_i\;|\; i\in I_n \} is a collection of subgroups of G.

Examples

  1. \mathbb{R} with the translation action is a \mathbb{Z}-CW complex with one equivariant 0-cell, namely the integers, and one equivariant 1-cell, namely the orbit of the interval [0,1].
  2. S^\infty...
  3. Let D_\infty=\langle a,b \;|\; a^2=1, aba^{-1}=b^{-1}  \rangle be the infinite dihedral group. A model for \underbar{E}D_\infty is \mathbb{R}, where a acts by reflection through zero and
    Tex syntax error
    acts by translation by 1. (Notice that the nontrivial finite subgroups of D_\infty are of the form \langle ab^i \rangle, where i\in \mathbb{Z}, and for each i, \langle ab^i \rangle fixes -i/2\in \mathbb{R}.)
  4. (non-classifying example)

In the first two examples above, the action of G was free...(leads to families)

Definition (Family of subgroups) 2.2. A family \mathcal{F} of subgroups of a discrete group G is a collection of subgroups of G that is closed under conjugation and taking subgroups.

Examples of families:

  • The family containing only the trivial subgroup.
  • The family of all subgroups.
  • The family of finite subgroups, \mathcal{FIN}.
  • The family of virtually cyclic subgroups, \mathcal{VCYC}.

Definition (Classifying space for a family of subgroups 2.3. Let \mathcal{F} be a family of subgroups of a discrete group G. The classifying space of G for \mathcal{F} is a G-CW complex E_\mathcal{F}G whose isotropy groups are contained in \mathcal{F} and has the property that for any G-CW complex X with isotropy in \mathcal{F}, there is a G-equivariant map X \to E_\mathcal{F}G that is unique up to G-homotopy.

Theorem 2.4. (Such a space always exists.)

An important fact that follows from the Generalized Whitehead Theorem ([Lück2005, Theorem 1.6]) is:

Theorem 2.5. Let f: X \to Y be a G-equivariant map of G-CW complexes. Then f is a G-homotopy equivalence if and only if for every subgroup H of G, f^H: X^H \to Y^H is a weak homotopy equivalence (i.e., induces an isomorphism on homotopy groups).

Theorem 2.5 gives us a way to determine whether or not a given G-CW complex is a model for E_\mathcal{F}G.

Corollary 2.6. A G-CW complex X is a model for E_\mathcal{F}G if and only if X^H is weakly contractible for every H\in \mathcal{F} and is empty otherwise.

Examples

  • (use above)
  • ... non-example

Examples of classifying spaces:

  • The classifying space of G for the trivial family (i.e., for free actions) is just EG, the universal cover of the classifying space BG. (Recall that BG is a CW complex whose fundamental group is G and whose higher homotopy groups are all zero. It is unique up to homotopy.)
  • For any group, a point is a model for the classifying space for the family of all subgroups.
  • E_\mathcal{FIN}G is also known as the classifying space (or universal space) for proper G-actions, and is commonly written as \underbar{E}G. There are typically "nice" models for \underbar{E}G, as the next few examples show. They appear in the statement of the Baum-Connes Conjecture.
  • Let G be a discrete subgroup of a Lie group L with finitely many path components. If K is a maximal compact subgroup of L, then G/K is a finite dimensional model for \underbar{E}G [Lück2005].
  • Let G be a word hyperbolic group in the sense of Gromov. Then the Rips complex, P_d(G), is a finite model for \underbar{E}G ( i.e., there are only finitely many G-cells), provided d is sufficiently large [Meintrup&Schick2002].
  • If X is a G-CW complex with the structure of a CAT(0)-space with respect to which G acts by isometries, then X is a model for \underbar{E}G [Bridson&Haefliger1999].
  • Models for E_\mathcal{VCYC}G are hard to construct, but are needed in the formulation of the Farrell-Jones Conjecture.

Classical sources are: [Bredon1967] [Bredon1972] [Tom Dieck1987]



3 References

Personal tools
Namespaces
Variants
Actions
Navigation
Interaction
Toolbox