B-Bordism

From Manifold Atlas
Revision as of 19:14, 21 January 2010 by Crowley (Talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search

This page has not been refereed. The information given here might be incomplete or provisional.

Contents

1 Introduction

On this page we recall the definition of the bordism groups of closed manifolds, with extra topological structure: orientation, spin-structure, weak complex structure etc. The ideas here date back to [Lashof1965]. There is a deatiled treatment in [Stong1968, Chapter II] and a summary in [Kreck1999, Section 1] as well as [Kreck&Lück2005, 18.10].

We specify extra topological structure universally by means of a fibration \gamma : B \to BO where BO denotes the classifying space of the stable orthogonal group and B is homotopy equivalent to a CW complex of finite type. Abusing notation, one writes B for the fibraion \gamma. A B-manifold is a compact manifold
Tex syntax error
together with a lift of a classifying map for the stable normal bundle of
Tex syntax error
to B:
\displaystyle  \xymatrix{  & B \ar[d]^{\gamma} \\ W \ar[r]_{\nu_W} \ar[ur]^{\bar \nu} & BO.}

The n-dimensional B-bordism group is defined to be the set of closed B-manifolds up modulo the relation of B-bordism and addition given by disjoint union

\displaystyle  \Omega_n^B := \{ (M, \bar \nu) \}/\simeq.

Alternative notations are \Omega_n(B) and also \Omega_n^G when B \to BO = BG \to BO for G \to O a stable represenation of a topological group G. Details of the definition and some important theorems for computing \Omega_n^B follow.

2 B-structures

In this section we give a compressed accont of [Stong1968, Chapter II]. Let G_{r, m} denote the Grassman manifold of unoriented r-planes in \Rr^n and let BO(r) = lim_{m \to \infty} G_{r, m} be the infinite Grassman and fix a fibration \gamma_r : B_r \to BO(r).

Definition 2.1. Let \xi: E \to X be a rank r vector bundle classified by \xi : X \to BO(r). A B_r-structure on \xi is a vertical homotopy class of maps \bar \xi : X \to B_r such that \gamma_r \circ \bar \xi = \xi.

Note that if \xi_0 and \xi_1 are isomorphic vector bundles over X then the sets of B_r-structures on each are in bijective equivalence. However B_r-structures are defined on specific bundles, not isomorphism classes of bundles: a specific isomorphism, up to appropriate equivalence, is required to give a bijection between the set of B_r structures. Happily this is the case for the normal bundle of an embedding as we now explain.

Let
Tex syntax error
be a compact manifold and let i_0 : M \to \Rr^{n+r} be an embedding. Equipping \Rr^{n+r} with the standard metric, the normal bundle of i_0 is a rank r vector bundle over classified by its normal Gauss map \nu(i_0) : M \to G_{r, n+r} \subset BO(r). If i_1 is another such embedding and r >> n, then i_1 is regularly homotopic to i_0 and all regular homotopies are regularly homotopic relative to their endpoints. A regular homotopy H defines an isomorphism \alpha_H :\nu(i_0) \cong \nu(i_1) and a regular homotopy of regular homotopies gives a homotopy between these isomorphisms. Taking care one proves the following

Lemma 2.2 [Stong1968, p 15]. For r sufficiently large, (depending only on n) there is a 1-1 correspondence between the B_r structures of the normal bundles of any two embeddings i_0, i_1 : M \to \Rr^{n+r}.

Now let (B_r, \gamma_r) be a sequence of fibrations over BO(r) with maps g_r : B_r \to B_{r+1} fitting into the following commutative diagram

\displaystyle  \xymatrix{  B_r \ar[r]^{g_r} \ar[d]^{\gamma_r} & B_{r+1} \ar[d]^{\gamma_{r+1}} \\ BO(r) \ar[r]^{j_r} & BO(r+1) }

where j_r is the standard inclusion and let B = lim_{r \to \infty}(B_r). A B_r-structure on the normal bundle of an embedding i: M \to \Rr^{n+r} defines a unique B_{r+1}-structure on the composition of i with the standard inclusion \Rr^{n+r} \to \Rr^{n+r+1}.

Defition 2.3 [Stong1968, p 15].

A B-structure on
Tex syntax error
is an equivalence class of B_r-structure on
Tex syntax error
where two such structures are equivalent if they become equivalent for r sufficiently large. A B-manifold is a pair (M, \bar \nu) where
Tex syntax error
is a compact manifold and \bar \nu is a B-structure on
Tex syntax error
.

If W is a compact manifold with boundary \partial W then by choosing the inward-pointing normal vector along \partial W, a B-structure on W restricts to a B-structure on \partial W. In particular, if (M, \bar \nu_M) is a closed B manifold then W = M \times [0, 1] has a canonical B-structure \bar \nu_{M \times [0, 1]} such that restricting to (M, \bar \nu_M) on M \times \{ 0 \}. The restriction of this B-structure to M \times \{ 1 \} is denoted -\bar \nu: by construction (M \sqcup M, \bar \nu \sqcup - \bar \nu) is the boundary of (M \times [0, 1], \bar \nu_{M \times [0, 1]}).

Definition 2.4. Closed B-manifolds (M_0, \bar \nu_0) and (M_1, \bar \nu_1) are B-bordant if there is a compact B-manifold (W, \bar \nu) such that \partial(W, \bar \nu) = (M_0 \sqcup M_1, \bar \nu_0 \sqcup -\bar \nu_1). We write [M, \bar \nu] for the bordism class of (M, \bar \nu).

Proposition 2.5 [Stong1968, p 17]. The set of B-borism class of closed n-manifolds with B-structure,

\displaystyle  \Omega_n^B := \{ [M, \bar \nu ] \},

forms an abelian group under the operation of disjoint union with inverse -[M,\bar \nu] = [M, -\bar \nu].

3 The Pontrjagin Thom isomorphism

If E is a vector bundle, let T(E) denote its Thom space. Recall that B = (B_r, \gamma_r, g_r) is a sequence of fibrations \gamma_r : B_r \to BO(r) with compatible maps g_r : B_r \to B_{r+1}. These data give rise to a stable vector bundle as defined in [Kreck&Lück2005, 18.10] with E_r \to B_r equal to the pullback bundle \gamma_r^*(EO(r)) where EO(r) is the universal r-plane bundle over BO(r). This stable vector bundle defines a Thom spectrum which we denote MB. The r-th space of MB is T(E_r).

By definition a B-manifold (M, \bar \nu) is an equivalence class of B_r-structures on \nu(i), the normal bundle of an embedding i : M \to \Rr^{n+r}. Hence (M, \bar \nu) gives rise to the collapse map S^{n+r} \to T(E_r) where we identify S^{n+r} with the one-point compatificiation of \Rr^{n+r}, we map via \bar \nu_r on a tubular neighbourhood of i(M) \subset \Rr^{n+r} and we map all other points to the base-point of T(E_r). As r increases these maps are compatibly related by suspension and the structure maps of the spectrum MB. Hence we obtain a homotopy class

\displaystyle P((M, \bar \mu)) \in lim_{r \to \infty}(\pi_{n+r}(T(E_r)) = \pi_n(MB).

The celebrated theorem of Pontrjagin and Thom states in part that P((M, \bar \nu)) depends only on the bordism class of (M, \bar \nu).

Theorem 3.1. There is an isomorphism of abelian groups

\displaystyle  P : \Omega_n^B \cong \pi_n^S(MB), ~~~[M, \bar \nu] \longmapsto PT([M, \bar \nu]).

For example, if B_r = pt is the one-point space for each r, then MB is the sphere spectrum S and \pi_n(S) = \pi_n^S is the n-th stable homotopy group. On the other hand, in this case \Omega_n^B = \Omega_n^{fr} is the framed bordism group and as special case we have

Theorem 3.2. There is an isomorphism P : \Omega_n^{fr} \cong \pi_n^S.

4 Spectral sequences

\displaystyle  H_p(B; \pi_q^S) \Longrightarrow \Omega_{p+q}^B


5 References

Personal tools
Namespaces
Variants
Actions
Navigation
Interaction
Toolbox