Talk:Structured chain complexes IV (Ex)

From Manifold Atlas
Jump to: navigation, search

Recall the suspension maps

\displaystyle  S : \Sigma W(C) \to W(\Sigma C)

where W can mean W_{\%}, W^{\%}, or \widehat{W}^{\%} defined in TM L-Theory II. We wish to compute

Tex syntax error

Consider the exact sequence

\displaystyle  \xymatrix{ 0 \ar[r] & W^{\%}(C) \ar[r] & \widehat{W}^{\%}(C) \ar[r] &  \Sigma W_{\%} (C) \ar[r] & 0 }

By functoriality, we get maps W(C) \to \Sigma^{-1} W(\Sigma^1 C) for all different brands of W, and these are the maps that represent the above colimit. These maps induce a diagram

\displaystyle  \xymatrix{ 0 \ar[r] & W^{\%}(C) \ar[d] \ar[r] & \widehat{W}^{\%} \ar[r] \ar[d] & \Sigma W_{\%}(C) \ar[d] \ar[r] & 0 \\ 0 \ar[r] & \Sigma^{-k} W^{\%}(\Sigma^k C) \ar[r] & \Sigma^{-k}\widehat{W}^{\%}(\Sigma^k C) \ar[r] & \Sigma^{-k+1} W_{\%}(\Sigma^k C) \ar[r] & 0 . \\ }

We have seen that the suspension map

\displaystyle  S : \Sigma \widehat{W}^{\%} (C) \to \widehat{W}^{\%}(\Sigma C)

is a homotopy equivalence. Iterating this we see hocolim \Sigma^{-k} \widehat{W}^{\%}(\Sigma^k C) = \widehat{W}^{\%}(C).

Now, note that for chain complexes \Sigma(A \otimes B) = (\Sigma A) \otimes B = A \otimes (\Sigma B). Thus

\displaystyle  \Sigma^{-k} W_{\%}(\Sigma^k C) \simeq \Sigma^k(W \otimes_{\mathbb{Z}[\mathbb{Z}/2]} (C \otimes C))

This complex increases linearly in connectivity as k increases, hence its homotopy colimit is contractible. That is

Tex syntax error

By exactness of the short exact sequences in our diagram, and the remarks above, we conclude that

Tex syntax error
Personal tools
Namespaces
Variants
Actions
Navigation
Interaction
Toolbox