Talk:Spin bordism

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
(Created page with "There seems to be an issue in section 4.2, in particular the basis for $\Omega^{Spin}_*\otimes\mathbb{Z}_2$. The third dot point reads "$M_J\times\omega_8^k$ with $k \geq 0$, ...")
Line 1: Line 1:
There seems to be an issue in section 4.2, in particular the basis for $\Omega^{Spin}_*\otimes\mathbb{Z}_2$. The third dot point reads "$M_J\times\omega_8^k$ with $k \geq 0$, $n(J)$ odd". But $M_J$ is only defined for $n(J)$ even.
+
Throughout section 4.2, we should still have the condition that <math>J</math> doesn't contain <math>1</math>. Right?
+
+
There also seems to be an issue with the basis for <math>\Omega^{Spin}_*\otimes\mathbb{Z}_2</math>. The third dot point reads "<math>M_J\times\omega_8^k</math> with <math>k \geq 0</math>, <math>n(J)</math> odd". But <math>M_J</math> is only defined for <math>n(J)</math> even.
I can think of two possibilities of what was meant:
I can think of two possibilities of what was meant:
1. "$n(J)$ odd" should be "$n(J)$ even". If this was what was intended, then this is covered by the first dot point with $i = 0$ so the third dot point is unnecessary.
+
1. "<math>n(J)</math> odd" should be "<math>n(J)</math> even". If this was what was intended, then this is covered by the first dot point with <math>i = 0</math> so the third dot point is unnecessary.
2. $M_J$ should be $N_J$. If this is the case, then the fifth dot point is no longer needed (just take $k = 0$).
+
2. <math>M_J</math> should be <math>N_J</math>. If this is the case, then the fifth dot point is no longer needed (just take <math>k = 0</math>).

Revision as of 17:01, 19 March 2019

Throughout section 4.2, we should still have the condition that Failed to parse (Missing texvc executable; please see math/README to configure.): J

doesn't contain Failed to parse (Missing texvc executable; please see math/README to configure.): 1

. Right?

There also seems to be an issue with the basis for Failed to parse (Missing texvc executable; please see math/README to configure.): \Omega^{Spin}_*\otimes\mathbb{Z}_2 . The third dot point reads "Failed to parse (Missing texvc executable; please see math/README to configure.): M_J\times\omega_8^k

with Failed to parse (Missing texvc executable; please see math/README to configure.): k \geq 0

, Failed to parse (Missing texvc executable; please see math/README to configure.): n(J)

odd". But Failed to parse (Missing texvc executable; please see math/README to configure.): M_J
is only defined for Failed to parse (Missing texvc executable; please see math/README to configure.): n(J)
even. 

I can think of two possibilities of what was meant:

1. "Failed to parse (Missing texvc executable; please see math/README to configure.): n(J)

odd" should be "Failed to parse (Missing texvc executable; please see math/README to configure.): n(J)
even". If this was what was intended, then this is covered by the first dot point with Failed to parse (Missing texvc executable; please see math/README to configure.): i = 0
so the third dot point is unnecessary. 

2. Failed to parse (Missing texvc executable; please see math/README to configure.): M_J

should be Failed to parse (Missing texvc executable; please see math/README to configure.): N_J

. If this is the case, then the fifth dot point is no longer needed (just take Failed to parse (Missing texvc executable; please see math/README to configure.): k = 0 ).

Personal tools
Namespaces
Variants
Actions
Navigation
Interaction
Toolbox