Prime decomposition theorem in high dimensions

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
m
(Problem)
Line 11: Line 11:
Nevertheless, the decomposition is not unique.
Nevertheless, the decomposition is not unique.
In \url{https://www.him.uni-bonn.de/lueck/data/kneser2.pdf}, Kreck, Lueck and Teichner prove a $4$-dimensional stable version of Kneser's conjecture on the splitting of three-manifolds as connected sums. The result clearly doesn't work non-stably in dimension $4$ and this paper gives some counterexamples. Another counterexample to the uniqueness of the decomposition is as follows.
+
In {{cite|Kreck&Lück&Teichner1994}} it is proven that a $4$-dimensional stable version of Kneser's conjecture on the splitting of three-manifolds as connected sums. The result clearly doesn't work non-stably in dimension $4$ and this paper gives some counterexamples. Another counterexample to the uniqueness of the decomposition is as follows.
{{beginthm|Example|}}
{{beginthm|Example|}}
$\mathbb{C}P^2$ has a homotopy equivalent twin $\star \mathbb{C}P^2$. The following decompositions provide a counterexample to uniqueness.
$\mathbb{C}P^2$ has a homotopy equivalent twin $\star \mathbb{C}P^2$. The following decompositions provide a counterexample to uniqueness.
Line 17: Line 17:
{{endthm}}
{{endthm}}
</wikitex>
</wikitex>
+
== References ==
== References ==
{{#RefList:}}
{{#RefList:}}

Revision as of 06:53, 8 January 2019

1 Problem

Every closed topological oriented manifold M has a prime decomposition

\displaystyle M \cong N_1  \sharp \dots \sharp N_k,

where the N_i are prime manifolds. Recall that a manifold is prime if for any decomposition as a connected sum M_0 \sharp M_1 one of the summands M_0 or M_1 is homeomorphic to S^3.

For 3-manifolds, it was shown in [Milnor1962a] that the decomposition is unique. For high-dimensional manifolds, there is no notion of prime decomposition of smooth manifolds, but there is a notion of prime decomposition for topological manifolds. Nevertheless, the decomposition is not unique.

In [Kreck&Lück&Teichner1994] it is proven that a 4-dimensional stable version of Kneser's conjecture on the splitting of three-manifolds as connected sums. The result clearly doesn't work non-stably in dimension 4 and this paper gives some counterexamples. Another counterexample to the uniqueness of the decomposition is as follows.

Example 1.1. \mathbb{C}P^2 has a homotopy equivalent twin \star \mathbb{C}P^2. The following decompositions provide a counterexample to uniqueness.

\displaystyle \star \mathbb{C}P^2 \sharp \star \mathbb{C}P^2 \cong \mathbb{C}P^2 \sharp  \mathbb{C}P^2.

2 References

Personal tools
Namespaces
Variants
Actions
Navigation
Interaction
Toolbox