Petrie conjecture

Revision as of 23:41, 30 November 2010 (view source) Krzysztof Pawałowski (Talk | contribs) ← Older edit		Revision as of 23:43, 30 November 2010 (view source) Krzysztof Pawałowski (Talk | contribs) Newer edit →
Line 8:		Line 8:
	Suppose that $M$ is a closed smooth manifold homotopy equivalent to $\CP^n$ and that $S^1$ acts smoothly and non-trivially on $M$. Then the total Pontrjagin class $p(M)$ of $M$ agrees with that of $\CP^n$, i.e., for a generator $x \in H^2(M; \mathbb{Z})$, $$p(M) = (1+x^2)^{n+1}.$$		Suppose that $M$ is a closed smooth manifold homotopy equivalent to $\CP^n$ and that $S^1$ acts smoothly and non-trivially on $M$. Then the total Pontrjagin class $p(M)$ of $M$ agrees with that of $\CP^n$, i.e., for a generator $x \in H^2(M; \mathbb{Z})$, $$p(M) = (1+x^2)^{n+1}.$$
	{{endthm}}		{{endthm}}
−	</wikitex>
	The Petrie conjecture has not been confirmed in general (no counterexample is know at the moment). However, if $\dim M \leq 8$, the total Pontrjagin class of $M$ agrees with that of $\CP^n$		The Petrie conjecture has not been confirmed in general (no counterexample is know at the moment). However, if $\dim M \leq 8$, the total Pontrjagin class of $M$ agrees with that of $\CP^n$
Line 20:		Line 19:
	[[Category:Problems]]		[[Category:Problems]]
	[[Category:Group actions on manifolds]]		[[Category:Group actions on manifolds]]
		+	</wikitex>

---

Revision as of 23:43, 30 November 2010

This page has not been refereed. The information given here might be incomplete or provisional.

Introduction

The Petrie conjecture was formulated in the following context: suppose that a Lie group ${{Stub}}== Introduction == <wikitex>; The Petrie conjecture was formulated in the following context: suppose that a Lie group $G$ acts smoothly on a closed smooth manifold $M$, what constraints does this place on the topology of $M$ in general and on the Pontrjagin classes of $M$ in particular. Petrie restricted his attention to smooth actions of the Lie group $S^1$ {{cite|Petrie1972}} (or more generally, the torus $T^k$ for $k \geq 1$ {{cite|Petrie1973}}) on closed smooth manifolds $M$ which are [[Fake complex projective spaces|homotopy equivalent to $\CP^n$]]. He has formulated the following conjecture. {{beginthm|Conjecture|{{cite|Petrie1972}}}} Suppose that $M$ is a closed smooth manifold homotopy equivalent to $\CP^n$ and that $S^1$ acts smoothly and non-trivially on $M$. Then the total Pontrjagin class $p(M)$ of $M$ agrees with that of $\CP^n$, i.e., for a generator $x \in H^2(M; \mathbb{Z})$, $$p(M) = (1+x^2)^{n+1}.$$ {{endthm}} </wikitex> The Petrie conjecture has not been confirmed in general (no counterexample is know at the moment). However, if $\dim M \leq 8$, the total Pontrjagin class of $M$ agrees with that of $\CP^n$ by the work of {{cite|Dejter1976}} and {{cite|James1978}}. {{cite|Iberkleid1978}}, {{cite|Tsukada&Washiyama1979}}, {{cite|Dessai2002}},{{cite|Dessai&Wilking2004}}, and {{cite|Tolman2010}}. == References == {{#RefList:}} [[Category:Problems]] [[Category:Group actions on manifolds]]G$ acts smoothly on a closed smooth manifold

Tex syntax error

$M$, what constraints does this place on the topology of

Tex syntax error

$M$ in general and on the Pontrjagin classes of

Tex syntax error

$M$ in particular. Petrie restricted his attention to smooth actions of the Lie group $S^1$ [Petrie1972] (or more generally, the torus $T^k$ for $k \geq 1$ [Petrie1973]) on closed smooth manifolds

Tex syntax error

$M$ which are homotopy equivalent to $\CP^n$. He has formulated the following conjecture. The Petrie conjecture has not been confirmed in general (no counterexample is know at the moment). However, if $\dim M \leq 8$, the total Pontrjagin class of

Tex syntax error

$M$ agrees with that of $\CP^n$

by the work of [Dejter1976] and [James1978].

[Iberkleid1978], [Tsukada&Washiyama1979], [Dessai2002],[Dessai&Wilking2004], and [Tolman2010].

References

• [Dejter1976] I. J. Dejter, Smooth $S^1$-manifolds in the homotopy type of $CP^3$, Michigan Math. J. 23 (1976), no.1, 83–95. MR0402789 (53 #6603) Zbl 0326.57009
• [Dessai&Wilking2004] A. Dessai and B. Wilking, Torus actions on homotopy complex projective spaces, Math. Z. 247 (2004), no.3, 505–511. MR2114425 (2006c:57033) Zbl 1068.57034
• [Dessai2002] A. Dessai, Homotopy complex projective spaces with $Pin(2)$-action, Topology Appl. 122 (2002), no.3, 487–499. MR1911696 (2003f:58048) Zbl 0998.57048
• [Iberkleid1978] W. Iberkleid, Pseudolinear spheres, Michigan Math. J. 25 (1978), no.3, 359–370. MR512906 (80d:57023) Zbl 0377.57008
• [James1978] Template:James1978
• [Petrie1972] T. Petrie, Smooth $S^1$-actions on homotopy complex projective spaces and related topics, Bull. Amer. Math. Soc. 78 (1972), 105–153. MR0296970 Zbl 0247.57010
• [Petrie1973] T. Petrie, Torus actions on homotopy complex projective spaces, Invent. Math. 20 (1973), 139–146. MR0322893 (48 #1254) Zbl 0262.57021
• [Tolman2010] S. Tolman, On a symplectic generalization of Petrie's conjecture, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 362 (2010), no.8, 3963–3996. MR2638879 Zbl 1216.53074
• [Tsukada&Washiyama1979] E. Tsukada and R. Washiyama, $S^1$-actions on cohomology complex projective spaces with three components of the fixed point sets, Hiroshima Math. J. 9 (1979), no.1, 41–46. MR529325 (80j:57043) Zbl 0411.57037