Petrie conjecture

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
m
m
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Stub}}== Introduction ==
{{Stub}}== Introduction ==
<wikitex>;
<wikitex>;
The Petrie conjecture was formulate in the following context: suppose that a Lie group $G$ acts on a closed smooth manifold $M$, what constraints does this place on the topology of $M$ in general and on the Pontrjagin classes of $M$ in particular.
+
The Petrie conjecture was formulated in the following context: suppose that a Lie group $G$ acts on a closed smooth manifold $M$, what constraints does this place on the topology of $M$ in general and on the Pontrjagin classes of $M$ in particular.
Petrie restricted his attention to actions of the Lie group $S^1$ on manifolds $M$ which are [[Fake complex projective spaces|homotopy equivalent to $\CP^n$]]. He formulate the following
+
Petrie restricted his attention to actions of the Lie group $S^1$ on manifolds $M$ which are [[Fake complex projective spaces|homotopy equivalent to $\CP^n$]]. He formulated the following
{{beginthm|Conjecture|{{cite|Petrie1972}}}}
{{beginthm|Conjecture|{{cite|Petrie1972}}}}

Revision as of 16:06, 26 November 2010

This page has not been refereed. The information given here might be incomplete or provisional.

1 Introduction

The Petrie conjecture was formulated in the following context: suppose that a Lie group G acts on a closed smooth manifold M, what constraints does this place on the topology of M in general and on the Pontrjagin classes of M in particular.

Petrie restricted his attention to actions of the Lie group S^1 on manifolds M which are homotopy equivalent to \CP^n. He formulated the following

Conjecture 0.1 [Petrie1972]. Suppose that M is a closed smooth manifold homotopy equivalent to \CP^n and that S^1 acts effectively on M. Then the total Pontrjagin class of M agrees with that of \CP^n.

2 References

Personal tools
Namespaces
Variants
Actions
Navigation
Interaction
Toolbox