Orientation covering

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
(Properties)
m
Line 17: Line 17:
As a set $\hat M$ is the set of pairs $(x, o_x)$, where $o_x$ is a local orientation of $M$ at $x$, either given by a generator of $H_n(M, M-x;\mathbb Z)$ or by an orientation of $T_xM$ in the smooth case (for the equivalence of these data see the atlas page on orientation of manifold). The map $p$ assigns $x$ to $(x,o_x)$. Since there are precisely two local orientations, the fibers of this map have cardinality $2$.
As a set $\hat M$ is the set of pairs $(x, o_x)$, where $o_x$ is a local orientation of $M$ at $x$, either given by a generator of $H_n(M, M-x;\mathbb Z)$ or by an orientation of $T_xM$ in the smooth case (for the equivalence of these data see the atlas page on orientation of manifold). The map $p$ assigns $x$ to $(x,o_x)$. Since there are precisely two local orientations, the fibers of this map have cardinality $2$.
Next we define a topology on this set. Let $\varphi : U \to V\subset \mathbb R^n$ be a chart of $M$ (smooth, if $M$ is smooth). We orient $\mathbb R^n$ by the standard orientation given by the standard basis $e_1$, $e_2$, ..., $e_n$, from which we define a continuous local orientation by identifying the tangent space with $\mathbb R^n$. Since for a smooth manifold a tangential orientation defines a homological orientation, this also gives a homological orientation (see atlas page on orientation of manifolds). We call the standard local orientation at $x \in \mathbb R^n$ by $sto_x$. Using the chart we transport this standard orientation to $U$ by the induced map on homology or the differential in the case of tangential orientations. The local orientations given by this orientation of $U$ is a subset of $\hat M$, which we require to be open. Doing the same starting with the non-standard orientation of $\mathbb R^n$ we obtain another subset, which we also call open. We give $\hat M$ the topology generated by these open subsets, where we vary over all [[charts]] of $M$ (smooth charts, if $M$ is smooth). By construction these open subsets are homeomorphic to an open subset of $\mathbb R^n$, and so we obtain an atlas of $\hat M$. In the smooth case this is a smooth atlas making $\hat M$ a smooth manifold. The map $p$ is by construction a $2$-fold covering, smooth, if $M$ is smooth. By construction $\hat M$ is oriented in a tautological way. Thus we have constructed a $2$-fold covering of $M$ by an oriented manifold $\hat M$, which is smooth, if $M$ is smooth.
+
Next we define a topology on this set. Let $\varphi : U \to V\subset \mathbb R^n$ be a [[Wikipedia:hart_(topology)#Charts|chart]] of $M$ (smooth, if $M$ is smooth). We orient $\mathbb R^n$ by the standard orientation given by the standard basis $e_1$, $e_2$, ..., $e_n$, from which we define a continuous local orientation by identifying the tangent space with $\mathbb R^n$. Since for a smooth manifold a tangential orientation defines a homological orientation, this also gives a homological orientation (see atlas page on orientation of manifolds). We call the standard local orientation at $x \in \mathbb R^n$ by $sto_x$. Using the chart we transport this standard orientation to $U$ by the induced map on homology or the differential in the case of tangential orientations. The local orientations given by this orientation of $U$ is a subset of $\hat M$, which we require to be open. Doing the same starting with the non-standard orientation of $\mathbb R^n$ we obtain another subset, which we also call open. We give $\hat M$ the topology generated by these open subsets, where we vary over all charts of $M$ (smooth charts, if $M$ is smooth). By construction these open subsets are homeomorphic to an open subset of $\mathbb R^n$, and so we obtain an atlas of $\hat M$. In the smooth case this is a smooth atlas making $\hat M$ a smooth manifold. The map $p$ is by construction a $2$-fold covering, smooth, if $M$ is smooth. By construction $\hat M$ is oriented in a tautological way. Thus we have constructed a $2$-fold covering of $M$ by an oriented manifold $\hat M$, which is smooth, if $M$ is smooth.
{{endproof}}
{{endproof}}
</wikitex>
</wikitex>
Line 24: Line 24:
<wikitex include="TeXInclude:">;
<wikitex include="TeXInclude:">;
In this section we record the key properties of the orientation cover are given in Proposition \ref{prop:properties} below.
In this section we record the key properties of the orientation cover are given in Proposition \ref{prop:properties} below.
The orientation covering of a manifold $M$ is very closely related to the [[orientation character]] of $M$. This is a homomorphism
+
The orientation covering of a manifold $M$ is very closely related to the [[Wikipedia:Orientation_characater|orientation character]] of $M$. This is a homomorphism
$$ w \colon \pi_1(M) \to \Z/2 $$
$$ w \colon \pi_1(M) \to \Z/2 $$
which may be defined as follows. Fix a base-point $x \in M$ with lifts $\tilde x_1$ and $\tilde x_{-1}$ in $\hat M$. For a loop
which may be defined as follows. Fix a base-point $x \in M$ with lifts $\tilde x_1$ and $\tilde x_{-1}$ in $\hat M$. For a loop
Line 45: Line 45:
(2.) Follows immediately from (1.) since a two-fold cover of a connected space is non-trivial if and only if the total space of the covering is disconnected.
(2.) Follows immediately from (1.) since a two-fold cover of a connected space is non-trivial if and only if the total space of the covering is disconnected.
(3.) Follows from (1.) since $w$ classifies the orientation cover: see the page [[orientation character]].
+
(3.) Follows from (1.) since $w$ classifies the orientation cover: see the page [[Wikipedia:Orientation_character|orientation character]].
(4.) Is true by construciton as stated.
(4.) Is true by construciton as stated.
Line 53: Line 53:
<!-- By the considerations above, $M$ is orientable if and only if this covering is trivial, or $M$ is non-orientable if and only if $N$ is connected. -->
<!-- By the considerations above, $M$ is orientable if and only if this covering is trivial, or $M$ is non-orientable if and only if $N$ is connected. -->
{{endproof}}
{{endproof}}
</wikitex>
</wikitex>
== Examples ==
== Examples ==
<wikitex>;
<wikitex>;

Revision as of 16:17, 2 January 2013

An earlier version of this page was published in the Definitions section of the Bulletin of the Manifold Atlas: screen, print.

You may view the version used for publication as of 18:40, 7 March 2014 and the covering&diff=cur&oldid=11510 changes since publication.

This page has not been refereed. The information given here might be incomplete or provisional.

The user responsible for this page is Matthias Kreck. No other user may edit this page at present.

Contents

1 Construction

The orientation covering of a topological manifold
Tex syntax error
is a canonical two-fold covering of
Tex syntax error
.

Theorem 1.1 c.f. [Dold1995, VIII 2.11].

Let
Tex syntax error
be a n-dimensional topological manifold.

There is an oriented manifold \hat M and a 2-fold covering p \colon \hat M \to M called the orientation covering.

If
Tex syntax error
is a smooth, resp. piecewise linear, manifold then \hat M and the covering map p are smooth, resp. piecewise linear.

Remark 1.2. The covering p \colon \hat M \to M is called the orientation covering. For more information, see [Dold1995, VIII § 2].

Proof.

As a set \hat M is the set of pairs (x, o_x), where o_x is a local orientation of
Tex syntax error
at x, either given by a generator of H_n(M, M-x;\mathbb Z) or by an orientation of T_xM in the smooth case (for the equivalence of these data see the atlas page on orientation of manifold). The map p assigns x to (x,o_x). Since there are precisely two local orientations, the fibers of this map have cardinality 2. Next we define a topology on this set. Let \varphi : U \to V\subset \mathbb R^n be a chart of
Tex syntax error
(smooth, if
Tex syntax error
is smooth). We orient \mathbb R^n by the standard orientation given by the standard basis e_1, e_2, ..., e_n, from which we define a continuous local orientation by identifying the tangent space with \mathbb R^n. Since for a smooth manifold a tangential orientation defines a homological orientation, this also gives a homological orientation (see atlas page on orientation of manifolds). We call the standard local orientation at x \in \mathbb R^n by sto_x. Using the chart we transport this standard orientation to U by the induced map on homology or the differential in the case of tangential orientations. The local orientations given by this orientation of U is a subset of \hat M, which we require to be open. Doing the same starting with the non-standard orientation of \mathbb R^n we obtain another subset, which we also call open. We give \hat M the topology generated by these open subsets, where we vary over all charts of
Tex syntax error
(smooth charts, if
Tex syntax error
is smooth). By construction these open subsets are homeomorphic to an open subset of \mathbb R^n, and so we obtain an atlas of \hat M. In the smooth case this is a smooth atlas making \hat M a smooth manifold. The map p is by construction a 2-fold covering, smooth, if
Tex syntax error
is smooth. By construction \hat M is oriented in a tautological way. Thus we have constructed a 2-fold covering of
Tex syntax error
by an oriented manifold \hat M, which is smooth, if
Tex syntax error
is smooth.
\square

2 Properties

In this section we record the key properties of the orientation cover are given in Proposition \ref{prop:properties} below.

The orientation covering of a manifold
Tex syntax error
is very closely related to the orientation character of
Tex syntax error
. This is a homomorphism
\displaystyle  w \colon \pi_1(M) \to \Z/2

which may be defined as follows. Fix a base-point x \in M with lifts \tilde x_1 and \tilde x_{-1} in \hat M. For a loop \gamma \colon ([0, 1], \{0, 1\}) \to (M, x) based at x, let \tilde \gamma \colon [0, 1] \to M be the lift of \gamma with \tilde{\gamma}(0) = 1 and define w on the homotopy class of \gamma by

\displaystyle  w([\gamma]) := \left\{ \begin{array}{rc} 1 & \text{if $\tilde{\gamma}(1) = x_1$} \\ -1 & \text{if $\tilde{\gamma}(1) = x_{-1}$} \end{array} \right.

Proposition 2.1.

Let p \colon \hat M \to M be the orientation covering of a topological manifold
Tex syntax error
.
  1. Tex syntax error
    is orientable if and only if \hat M = M \times \Z/2 and p is the projection to
    Tex syntax error
    .
  2. Converely, if
    Tex syntax error
    is connected then
    Tex syntax error
    is non-orientable if and only if \hat M is connected.
  3. Tex syntax error
    is orientable if and only if w \colon \pi_1(M) \to \Z/2 is the zero homomorphism.
  4. By construction, the deck transformation of orientation covering is orientation reversing.
  5. If N is an oriented manifold and p: N \to M is a 2-fold covering with orientation reversing deck transformation, then p \colon N \to M is isomorphic to the orientation covering.

Proof.

(1.) If
Tex syntax error
is orientable, we pick an orientation and see that \hat M is the disjoint union of \{(x,o_x)| \,\, o_x \,\, is \,\, the \,\, local \,\, orientation \,\, given \,\, by \,\, the \,\, orientation \,\, of \,\, M\} and its complement, so it is isomorphic to the trivial covering M \times \mathbb Z/2. In turn if the orientation covering is trivial it decomposes \hat M into to open (and thus oriented) subsets homeomorphic to
Tex syntax error
and so
Tex syntax error
is orientable.

(2.) Follows immediately from (1.) since a two-fold cover of a connected space is non-trivial if and only if the total space of the covering is disconnected.

(3.) Follows from (1.) since w classifies the orientation cover: see the page orientation character.

(4.) Is true by construciton as stated.

(5.) We have a map N \to \hat M by mapping y \in N to (p(y), orientation \,\, induced \,\, by \,\, p). It is easily checked that his is an isomorphism of these two coverings.

\square

3 Examples

We give a list of basic in interesting orientation double coverings.

  1. If
    Tex syntax error
    is orientable then p \colon \hat M \to M is isomorphic to the projection M \times \Z/2 \to M.
  2. If n is even, \Rr P^n is non-orienable and with orientation cover S^n \to \Rr P^n. The deck transformation

is the antipodal map on S^n.

  1. The orientation cover of the Klein bottle K^2 is the projection from the [[2-torus]]; T^2 \to K^2.
  2. The orientation of the open Möbius strip Mö is the cylinder; S^1 \times \Rr \to Mö.

4 References

5 External links

Personal tools
Namespaces
Variants
Actions
Navigation
Interaction
Toolbox