5-manifolds: 1-connected

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
(Classification)
Line 11: Line 11:
* $X_{-1} \coloneq \SU_3/\SO_3$, the Wu-manifold, is the homogeneous space obtained from the standadard inclusion of $\SO_3 \rightarrow SU_3$.
* $X_{-1} \coloneq \SU_3/\SO_3$, the Wu-manifold, is the homogeneous space obtained from the standadard inclusion of $\SO_3 \rightarrow SU_3$.
Next we present a construction of Spin 5-manifolds. Note that all homology groups are with integer coefficients. Given a finitely generated abelian group $G$, let $X_G$ denote the degree 2 Moore space with $H_2(X_G) = G$. The space $X_G$ may be realised as a finite CW-complex and so there is an embedding $X_G\to\Rr^6$. Let $N(G)$ be a [[regularneighbourhood|regular neighbourhood]] of $X_G\subset\Rr^6$ and let $M_G$ be the boundary of $N(G)$. Then $M_G$ is a closed, smooth, simply-connected, spinable 5-manifold with $H_2(M_G)\cong G \oplus TG$ where $TG$ is the torsion subgroup of $G$. For example, $M_{\Zz^r} \cong \sharp_r S^2 \times S^3$ where $\sharp_r$ denotes the $r$-fold connected sum.
+
* Next we present a construction of Spin 5-manifolds. Note that all homology groups are with integer coefficients. Given a finitely generated abelian group $G$, let $X_G$ denote the degree 2 Moore space with $H_2(X_G) = G$. The space $X_G$ may be realised as a finite CW-complex and so there is an embedding $X_G\to\Rr^6$. Let $N(G)$ be a [[regularneighbourhood|regular neighbourhood]] of $X_G\subset\Rr^6$ and let $M_G$ be the boundary of $N(G)$. Then $M_G$ is a closed, smooth, simply-connected, spinable 5-manifold with $H_2(M_G)\cong G \oplus TG$ where $TG$ is the torsion subgroup of $G$. For example, $M_{\Zz^r} \cong \sharp_r S^2 \times S^3$ where $\sharp_r$ denotes the $r$-fold connected sum.
For the non-Spin case let $(G, w)$ be a pair with $w\co G \to\Zz_2$ a surjective homomorphism and $G$ as above. We shall construct a non-Spin 5-manifold $M_{(G, w)}$ with $H_2(M_{(G, w)}) \cong G \oplus TG$ and [[#Invariants|second Stiefel-Whitney class]] $w_2$ given by $w$ composed with the projection $G \oplus TG \to G$. If $(G, w) = (\Zz, 1)$ let $N_{(\Zz, 1)}$ be the non-trivial $D^4$-bundle over $S^2$ with boundary $\partial N_{(\Zz, 1)} = M_{(\Zz, 1)} = X_{\infty}$. If $(G, w) = (\Zz, 1) \oplus (\Zz^r, 0)$ let $N_{(G, w)}$ be the boundary connected sum $N_{(\Zz, 1)} \natural_r S^2 \times D^4$ with boundary $M_{(G, w)} = X_{\infty} \sharp_r S^2 \times S^3$. In the general case, present $G = F/i(R)$ where $i \co R \to F$ is an injective homomorphism between free abelian groups. Lift $(G, w)$ to $(F, \bar w)$ and observe that there is a canonical identification $F = H_2(M_{(F, \bar w)})$. If $\{r_1, \dots, r_n \}$ is a basis for $R$ note that each $i(r_i) \in H_2(M_{(F, \bar w)})$ is represented by a an embedded 2-sphere with trivial normal bundle. Let $N_{(G, w)}$ be the manifold obtained by attaching 3-handles to $N_{(F, \bar w)}$ along spheres representing $i(r_i)$ and let $M_{(G, w)} = \partial N_{(G, w)}$. One may check that $M_{(G, w)}$ is a non-Spin manifold as described above.
+
* For the non-Spin case let $(G, w)$ be a pair with $w\co G \to\Zz_2$ a surjective homomorphism and $G$ as above. We shall construct a non-Spin 5-manifold $M_{(G, w)}$ with $H_2(M_{(G, w)}) \cong G \oplus TG$ and [[#Invariants|second Stiefel-Whitney class]] $w_2$ given by $w$ composed with the projection $G \oplus TG \to G$. If $(G, w) = (\Zz, 1)$ let $N_{(\Zz, 1)}$ be the non-trivial $D^4$-bundle over $S^2$ with boundary $\partial N_{(\Zz, 1)} = M_{(\Zz, 1)} = X_{\infty}$. If $(G, w) = (\Zz, 1) \oplus (\Zz^r, 0)$ let $N_{(G, w)}$ be the boundary connected sum $N_{(\Zz, 1)} \natural_r S^2 \times D^4$ with boundary $M_{(G, w)} = X_{\infty} \sharp_r S^2 \times S^3$. In the general case, present $G = F/i(R)$ where $i \co R \to F$ is an injective homomorphism between free abelian groups. Lift $(G, w)$ to $(F, \bar w)$ and observe that there is a canonical identification $F = H_2(M_{(F, \bar w)})$. If $\{r_1, \dots, r_n \}$ is a basis for $R$ note that each $i(r_i) \in H_2(M_{(F, \bar w)})$ is represented by a an embedded 2-sphere with trivial normal bundle. Let $N_{(G, w)}$ be the manifold obtained by attaching 3-handles to $N_{(F, \bar w)}$ along spheres representing $i(r_i)$ and let $M_{(G, w)} = \partial N_{(G, w)}$. One may check that $M_{(G, w)}$ is a non-Spin manifold as described above.
+
* Reference for the Barden construction as twisted doubles.
* !!! To do: determine which 1-connected 5-manifolds appear as Brieskorn varieties.
* !!! To do: determine which 1-connected 5-manifolds appear as Brieskorn varieties.
</wikitex>
</wikitex>

Revision as of 11:53, 1 September 2009

An earlier version of this page was published in the Bulletin of the Manifold Atlas: screen, print.

You may view the version used for publication as of 09:22, 1 April 2011 and the changes since publication.
Let \mathcal{M}_{5}(e) be the set of diffeomorphism classes of closed, oriented, smooth, simply-connected 5-manifolds
Tex syntax error
and let \mathcal{M}_5^{\Spin}(e)\subset \mathcal{M}_5(e) be the subset of diffeomorphism classes of spinable manifolds. In this article we report the calculation of \mathcal{M}_5^{\Spin}(e) first obtained in [Smale1962] and of \mathcal{M}_{5}(e) first obtained in general in [Barden1965].

Contents

1 Constructions and examples

We first list some familiar 5-manifolds using Barden's notation:

  • X_0 \coloneq S^5
  • M_\infty \coloneq S^2 \times S^3
  • X_\infty \coloneq S^2 \times_{\gamma} S^3, the total space of the non-trivial S^3-bundle over S^2
  • X_{-1} \coloneq \SU_3/\SO_3, the Wu-manifold, is the homogeneous space obtained from the standadard inclusion of \SO_3 \rightarrow SU_3.
  • Next we present a construction of Spin 5-manifolds. Note that all homology groups are with integer coefficients. Given a finitely generated abelian group G, let X_G denote the degree 2 Moore space with H_2(X_G) = G. The space X_G may be realised as a finite CW-complex and so there is an embedding X_G\to\Rr^6. Let N(G) be a regular neighbourhood of X_G\subset\Rr^6 and let M_G be the boundary of N(G). Then M_G is a closed, smooth, simply-connected, spinable 5-manifold with H_2(M_G)\cong G \oplus TG where TG is the torsion subgroup of G. For example, M_{\Zz^r} \cong \sharp_r S^2 \times S^3 where \sharp_r denotes the r-fold connected sum.
  • For the non-Spin case let (G, w) be a pair with w\co G \to\Zz_2 a surjective homomorphism and G as above. We shall construct a non-Spin 5-manifold M_{(G, w)} with H_2(M_{(G, w)}) \cong G \oplus TG and second Stiefel-Whitney class w_2 given by w composed with the projection G \oplus TG \to G. If (G, w) = (\Zz, 1) let N_{(\Zz, 1)} be the non-trivial D^4-bundle over S^2 with boundary \partial N_{(\Zz, 1)} = M_{(\Zz, 1)} = X_{\infty}. If (G, w) = (\Zz, 1) \oplus (\Zz^r, 0) let N_{(G, w)} be the boundary connected sum N_{(\Zz, 1)} \natural_r S^2 \times D^4 with boundary M_{(G, w)} = X_{\infty} \sharp_r S^2 \times S^3. In the general case, present G = F/i(R) where i \co R \to F is an injective homomorphism between free abelian groups. Lift (G, w) to (F, \bar w) and observe that there is a canonical identification F = H_2(M_{(F, \bar w)}). If \{r_1, \dots, r_n \} is a basis for R note that each i(r_i) \in H_2(M_{(F, \bar w)}) is represented by a an embedded 2-sphere with trivial normal bundle. Let N_{(G, w)} be the manifold obtained by attaching 3-handles to N_{(F, \bar w)} along spheres representing i(r_i) and let M_{(G, w)} = \partial N_{(G, w)}. One may check that M_{(G, w)} is a non-Spin manifold as described above.
  • Reference for the Barden construction as twisted doubles.
  • !!! To do: determine which 1-connected 5-manifolds appear as Brieskorn varieties.

2 Invariants

Consider the following invariants of a closed simply-connected 5-manifold
Tex syntax error
.
  • Tex syntax error
    be the second integral homology group of
    Tex syntax error
    , with torsion subgroup TH_2(M).
  • w_2 \co H_2(M) \rightarrow \Zz_2, the homomorphism defined by evaluation with the second Stiefel-Whitney class of
    Tex syntax error
    , w_2 \in H^2(M; \Zz_2).
  • h(M) \in \Nn \cup \{\infty\}, the smallest extended natural number r such that x^{2^r} = e and x \in w_2^{-1}(1). If
    Tex syntax error
    is Spin we set h(M) = 0.
  • b_M \co TH_2(M) \times TH_2(M) \rightarrow \Qq/\Zz, the linking form of
    Tex syntax error
    which is a non-singular anti-symmetric bi-linear pairing on TH_2(M).

By [Wall1962, Proposition 1 & 2] the linking form satisfies the identity b_M(x, x) = w_2(x) where we regard w_2(x) as an element of \{0, 1/2\} \subset \Qq/\Zz.

For example, the Wu-manifold X_{-1} has H_2(X_{-1}) = \Zz_2, non-trivial w_2 and h(X_{-1}) = 1.

An abstract non-singular, anti-symmetric linking form b \co H \times H \rightarrow \Qq/\Zz on a finite group H is a bi-linear function such that
Tex syntax error
and
Tex syntax error
for all
Tex syntax error
if and only if
Tex syntax error
. By [Wall1963] such linking forms are classified up to isomorphism by the homomorphism H \rightarrow \Zz_2, x \mapsto b(x, x). Moreover H must be isomorphic to
Tex syntax error
or
Tex syntax error
for some finite group T with
Tex syntax error
if
Tex syntax error
generates the \Zz_2 summand. In particular the second Stiefel-Whitney class of a 5-manifold
Tex syntax error
determines the isomorphism class of the linking form
Tex syntax error
and we see that the torsion subgroup of
Tex syntax error
is of the form
Tex syntax error
if
Tex syntax error
or
Tex syntax error
if
Tex syntax error
in which case the \Zz_2 summand is an orthogonal summand of
Tex syntax error
.

3 Classification

We first present the most economical classifications of \mathcal{M}^{\Spin}_5(e) and \mathcal{M}_5(e). Let {\mathcal Ab}^{T \oplus T \oplus *} be the set of isomorphism classes finitely generated abelian groups G with torsion subgroup TG \cong H \oplus H \oplus C where C is trivial or C \cong \Zz_2 and write {\mathcal Ab}^{T \oplus T} and {\mathcal Ab}^{T \oplus T \oplus \Zz_2} for the obvious subsets.

Theorem 3.1 [Smale1962,]. There is a bijective correspondence
\displaystyle \mathcal{M}_5^{\Spin}(e) \rightarrow {\mathcal Ab}^{T\oplus T}, \quad [M] \mapsto [H_2(M)].

Theorem 3.2 [Barden1965]. The mapping

\displaystyle \mathcal{M}_{5}(e) \rightarrow {\mathcal Ab}^{T \oplus T \oplus *} \times (\Nn \cup \{ \infty \}) , \quad [M] \mapsto ([H_2(M)], h(M))

is an injection onto the subset of pairs ([G], n) where [G] \in {\mathcal Ab}^{T \oplus T \oplus \Zz_2} if and only if n = 1.

The above theorems follow from the following theorem of Barden and the classification of anti-symmetric linking forms.

Theorem 3.3 [Barden1965, Theorem 2.2]. Let M_0 and M_1 be simply-connected, closed, smooth 5-manifolds and let A\co H_2(M_0) \cong H_2(M_1) be an isomorphism preserving the linking form and the second Stiefel-Whitney class. Then A is realised by a diffeomorphism.

This theorem can re-phrased in categorical language as follows: let \mathcal{Q}_5(e) be a small category, in fact groupoid, with objects (G, b, w) where G is a finitely generated abelian group, b \co TG \times TG \to \Qq/\Zz is a anti-symmetric non-singular linking form and w\co G \to \Zz_2 is a homomorphism such that w(x) = b(x, x) for all x \in TG. The morphisms of \mathcal{W}_5(e) are isomorphisms of abelian groups commuting with both w and b.

Now let \widetilde{\mathcal{M}}_5(e) be a small category, actually groupoid, with objects simply-connected, closed, smooth 5-manifolds and morphisms isotopy diffeomorphisms. Let (b, w_2) \co \widetilde{\mathcal{M}}_5(e) \to \mathcal{Q}_5(e) be the funtor which maps
Tex syntax error
to (H_2(M), b_M, w_2(M)) and f \co M_0 \cong M_1 to the induced map on H_2.

Theorem 3.4 [Barden1965]. The functor

\displaystyle  (b, w_2)\co \widetilde{\mathcal{M}}_5(e) \to \mathcal{Q}_5(e)

is a detecting functor. That is, it is surjective on objects and M_0 \cong M_1 if and only if (b, w_2)(M_0) \cong (b, w_2)(M_1).

3.1 Enumeration

We give Barden's enumeration of the set \mathcal{M}^{}_5(e), [Barden1965, Theorem 2.3].

  • X_0 \coloneq S^5, M_\infty\coloneq S^2 \times S^3, X_\infty\coloneq S^2 \times_{\gamma} S^3, X_{-1} \coloneq \SU_3/\SO_3.
  • For 1 < k < \infty, M_k = M_{\Zz_k} is the Spin manifold with H_2(M) = \Zz_k \oplus \Zz_k constructed above.
  • For 1 < j < \infty let X_j = M_{(\Zz_{2^j}, 1)} constructed above be the non-Spin manifold with H_2(X_j) \cong \Zz_{2^j} \oplus \Zz_{2^j}.

With this notation [Barden1965, Theorem 2.3] states that a complete list of diffeomorphism classes of simply-connected 5-manifolds is given by

\displaystyle  X_{j, k_1, \dots , k_n} = X_j \sharp M_{k_1} \sharp \dots \sharp M_{k_n}

where -1 \leq j \leq \infty, 1 < k_i, k_i divides k_{i+1} or k_{i+1} = \infty and \sharp denotes the connected sum of oriented manifolds. The manifold X_{j', k_1', \dots k_n'} is diffeomorphic to X_{j, k_1, \dots, k_n} if and only if (j', k'_1, \dots, k'_n) = (j, k_1, \dots, k_n).

An alternative complete enumeration is obtained by writing \mathcal{M}_5(e) as a disjoint union

\displaystyle  \mathcal{M}_5(e) = \mathcal{M}_5^{\Spin}(e) \sqcup \mathcal{M}_5^{w_2, = \partial}(e) \sqcup \mathcal{M}_5^{w_2,\neq \partial}(e)
where the last two sets denote the diffeomorphism classes of non-Spinable 5-manifolds which are respectively boundaries and not boundaries. Then
\displaystyle  \mathcal{M}_5^{\Spin}(e) = \{ [M_G] \}, ~~\mathcal{M}_5^{w_2, = \partial}(e) = \{ [M_{(G, \omega)}] \} ~~\text{and}~~ \mathcal{M}_5^{w_2, \neq \partial}(e) = \{ [ X_{-1} \sharp M_G] \}.

4 Further discussion

  • As the invariants which classify closed, oriented 5-manifolds are homotopy invariants, we see that the same classification holds up to homotopy, homeomorphism and piecewise linear homeomorphism.
  • The classification of simply-connected Spin 5-manifolds was one of the first applications of the h-cobordism theorem.
  • By the construction above every simply-connected, closed, smooth, Spin 5-manifold embedds into \Rr^6.
  • As the invariants for -M are isomorphic to the invariants of
    Tex syntax error
    we see that every smooth 5-manifold admits an orientation reversing diffeomorphism: i.e. all 5-manifolds are smoothly amphicheiral.

4.1 Bordism groups

As \mathcal{M}_5^{\Spin}(e) = \{[M_G]\} and M_G = \partial N_G we see that every closed, Spin 5-manifold bounds a Spin 6-manifold. Hence the bordism group \Omega_5^{\Spin} vanishes.

The bordism group \Omega_5^{\SO} is isomorphic to \Zz_2 and is detected by the Stiefel-Whitney number \langle w_2(M)w_3(M), [M] \rangle \in \Zz_2. The Wu-manifold has cohomology groups

\displaystyle H^*(X_{-1}; \Zz_2) = \Zz_2, 0, \Zz_2, \Zz_2, 0, \Zz_2
and w_2(X_{-1}) \neq 0. It follows that w_3(X_{-1}) = \Sq^1(w_2(X_{-1})) \neq 0 and that \langle w_2(X_{-1})w_3(X_{-1}), [X_{-1}] \rangle \neq 0. We see that [X_{-1}] is the generator of \Omega_5^{\SO} and that a closed, smooth 5-manifold
Tex syntax error
is not a boundary if and only if it is diffeomorphic to X_{-1} \sharp M_0 where M_0 is a Spin manifold.
  • !!! Add references here.

4.2 Curvature and contact structures

  • Every manifold \sharp_r(S^2 \times S^3) admits a metric of positive Ricci curvature [Boyer&Galicki2006].

4.3 Mapping class groups

Let \pi_0\Diff_{+}(M) denote the group of isotopy classes of orientation preserving diffeomorphisms f\co M \cong M and let \Aut(H_2(M)) be the group of isomorphisms of
Tex syntax error
preserving the linking form and the second Stiefel-Whitney class. Applying the second statement of Barden's classification above

we obtain an exact sequence

\displaystyle 0 \rightarrow \pi_0\SDiff(M) \rightarrow \pi_0\Diff_+(M) \rightarrow \Aut(H_2(M)) \rightarrow 0

where \pi_0\SDiff(M) is the group of isotopy classes of diffeomorphisms inducing the identity on H_*(M).

  • Open problem: as of writing there is no computation of \pi_0\SDiff(M) for a general simply-connected 5-manifold.
  • The isotopy group \pi_0\Diff_{+}(S^5) is known to be the trivial group [[[#|]]].
  • In the homotopy category, \mathcal{E}_{+}(M), the group of homotopy classes of orientation preserving homotopy equivalences of
    Tex syntax error
    , has been extensively investigated by [Baues&Buth1996] and is already seen to be relatively complex.

5 References

< k < \infty$, $M_k = M_{\Zz_k}$ is the Spin manifold with $H_2(M) = \Zz_k \oplus \Zz_k$ constructed [[#Examples_and_constructions|above]]. * For \mathcal{M}_{5}(e) be the set of diffeomorphism classes of closed, oriented, smooth, simply-connected 5-manifolds
Tex syntax error
and let \mathcal{M}_5^{\Spin}(e)\subset \mathcal{M}_5(e) be the subset of diffeomorphism classes of spinable manifolds. In this article we report the calculation of \mathcal{M}_5^{\Spin}(e) first obtained in [Smale1962] and of \mathcal{M}_{5}(e) first obtained in general in [Barden1965].

Contents

1 Constructions and examples

We first list some familiar 5-manifolds using Barden's notation:

  • X_0 \coloneq S^5
  • M_\infty \coloneq S^2 \times S^3
  • X_\infty \coloneq S^2 \times_{\gamma} S^3, the total space of the non-trivial S^3-bundle over S^2
  • X_{-1} \coloneq \SU_3/\SO_3, the Wu-manifold, is the homogeneous space obtained from the standadard inclusion of \SO_3 \rightarrow SU_3.
  • Next we present a construction of Spin 5-manifolds. Note that all homology groups are with integer coefficients. Given a finitely generated abelian group G, let X_G denote the degree 2 Moore space with H_2(X_G) = G. The space X_G may be realised as a finite CW-complex and so there is an embedding X_G\to\Rr^6. Let N(G) be a regular neighbourhood of X_G\subset\Rr^6 and let M_G be the boundary of N(G). Then M_G is a closed, smooth, simply-connected, spinable 5-manifold with H_2(M_G)\cong G \oplus TG where TG is the torsion subgroup of G. For example, M_{\Zz^r} \cong \sharp_r S^2 \times S^3 where \sharp_r denotes the r-fold connected sum.
  • For the non-Spin case let (G, w) be a pair with w\co G \to\Zz_2 a surjective homomorphism and G as above. We shall construct a non-Spin 5-manifold M_{(G, w)} with H_2(M_{(G, w)}) \cong G \oplus TG and second Stiefel-Whitney class w_2 given by w composed with the projection G \oplus TG \to G. If (G, w) = (\Zz, 1) let N_{(\Zz, 1)} be the non-trivial D^4-bundle over S^2 with boundary \partial N_{(\Zz, 1)} = M_{(\Zz, 1)} = X_{\infty}. If (G, w) = (\Zz, 1) \oplus (\Zz^r, 0) let N_{(G, w)} be the boundary connected sum N_{(\Zz, 1)} \natural_r S^2 \times D^4 with boundary M_{(G, w)} = X_{\infty} \sharp_r S^2 \times S^3. In the general case, present G = F/i(R) where i \co R \to F is an injective homomorphism between free abelian groups. Lift (G, w) to (F, \bar w) and observe that there is a canonical identification F = H_2(M_{(F, \bar w)}). If \{r_1, \dots, r_n \} is a basis for R note that each i(r_i) \in H_2(M_{(F, \bar w)}) is represented by a an embedded 2-sphere with trivial normal bundle. Let N_{(G, w)} be the manifold obtained by attaching 3-handles to N_{(F, \bar w)} along spheres representing i(r_i) and let M_{(G, w)} = \partial N_{(G, w)}. One may check that M_{(G, w)} is a non-Spin manifold as described above.
  • Reference for the Barden construction as twisted doubles.
  • !!! To do: determine which 1-connected 5-manifolds appear as Brieskorn varieties.

2 Invariants

Consider the following invariants of a closed simply-connected 5-manifold
Tex syntax error
.
  • Tex syntax error
    be the second integral homology group of
    Tex syntax error
    , with torsion subgroup TH_2(M).
  • w_2 \co H_2(M) \rightarrow \Zz_2, the homomorphism defined by evaluation with the second Stiefel-Whitney class of
    Tex syntax error
    , w_2 \in H^2(M; \Zz_2).
  • h(M) \in \Nn \cup \{\infty\}, the smallest extended natural number r such that x^{2^r} = e and x \in w_2^{-1}(1). If
    Tex syntax error
    is Spin we set h(M) = 0.
  • b_M \co TH_2(M) \times TH_2(M) \rightarrow \Qq/\Zz, the linking form of
    Tex syntax error
    which is a non-singular anti-symmetric bi-linear pairing on TH_2(M).

By [Wall1962, Proposition 1 & 2] the linking form satisfies the identity b_M(x, x) = w_2(x) where we regard w_2(x) as an element of \{0, 1/2\} \subset \Qq/\Zz.

For example, the Wu-manifold X_{-1} has H_2(X_{-1}) = \Zz_2, non-trivial w_2 and h(X_{-1}) = 1.

An abstract non-singular, anti-symmetric linking form b \co H \times H \rightarrow \Qq/\Zz on a finite group H is a bi-linear function such that
Tex syntax error
and
Tex syntax error
for all
Tex syntax error
if and only if
Tex syntax error
. By [Wall1963] such linking forms are classified up to isomorphism by the homomorphism H \rightarrow \Zz_2, x \mapsto b(x, x). Moreover H must be isomorphic to
Tex syntax error
or
Tex syntax error
for some finite group T with
Tex syntax error
if
Tex syntax error
generates the \Zz_2 summand. In particular the second Stiefel-Whitney class of a 5-manifold
Tex syntax error
determines the isomorphism class of the linking form
Tex syntax error
and we see that the torsion subgroup of
Tex syntax error
is of the form
Tex syntax error
if
Tex syntax error
or
Tex syntax error
if
Tex syntax error
in which case the \Zz_2 summand is an orthogonal summand of
Tex syntax error
.

3 Classification

We first present the most economical classifications of \mathcal{M}^{\Spin}_5(e) and \mathcal{M}_5(e). Let {\mathcal Ab}^{T \oplus T \oplus *} be the set of isomorphism classes finitely generated abelian groups G with torsion subgroup TG \cong H \oplus H \oplus C where C is trivial or C \cong \Zz_2 and write {\mathcal Ab}^{T \oplus T} and {\mathcal Ab}^{T \oplus T \oplus \Zz_2} for the obvious subsets.

Theorem 3.1 [Smale1962,]. There is a bijective correspondence
\displaystyle \mathcal{M}_5^{\Spin}(e) \rightarrow {\mathcal Ab}^{T\oplus T}, \quad [M] \mapsto [H_2(M)].

Theorem 3.2 [Barden1965]. The mapping

\displaystyle \mathcal{M}_{5}(e) \rightarrow {\mathcal Ab}^{T \oplus T \oplus *} \times (\Nn \cup \{ \infty \}) , \quad [M] \mapsto ([H_2(M)], h(M))

is an injection onto the subset of pairs ([G], n) where [G] \in {\mathcal Ab}^{T \oplus T \oplus \Zz_2} if and only if n = 1.

The above theorems follow from the following theorem of Barden and the classification of anti-symmetric linking forms.

Theorem 3.3 [Barden1965, Theorem 2.2]. Let M_0 and M_1 be simply-connected, closed, smooth 5-manifolds and let A\co H_2(M_0) \cong H_2(M_1) be an isomorphism preserving the linking form and the second Stiefel-Whitney class. Then A is realised by a diffeomorphism.

This theorem can re-phrased in categorical language as follows: let \mathcal{Q}_5(e) be a small category, in fact groupoid, with objects (G, b, w) where G is a finitely generated abelian group, b \co TG \times TG \to \Qq/\Zz is a anti-symmetric non-singular linking form and w\co G \to \Zz_2 is a homomorphism such that w(x) = b(x, x) for all x \in TG. The morphisms of \mathcal{W}_5(e) are isomorphisms of abelian groups commuting with both w and b.

Now let \widetilde{\mathcal{M}}_5(e) be a small category, actually groupoid, with objects simply-connected, closed, smooth 5-manifolds and morphisms isotopy diffeomorphisms. Let (b, w_2) \co \widetilde{\mathcal{M}}_5(e) \to \mathcal{Q}_5(e) be the funtor which maps
Tex syntax error
to (H_2(M), b_M, w_2(M)) and f \co M_0 \cong M_1 to the induced map on H_2.

Theorem 3.4 [Barden1965]. The functor

\displaystyle  (b, w_2)\co \widetilde{\mathcal{M}}_5(e) \to \mathcal{Q}_5(e)

is a detecting functor. That is, it is surjective on objects and M_0 \cong M_1 if and only if (b, w_2)(M_0) \cong (b, w_2)(M_1).

3.1 Enumeration

We give Barden's enumeration of the set \mathcal{M}^{}_5(e), [Barden1965, Theorem 2.3].

  • X_0 \coloneq S^5, M_\infty\coloneq S^2 \times S^3, X_\infty\coloneq S^2 \times_{\gamma} S^3, X_{-1} \coloneq \SU_3/\SO_3.
  • For 1 < k < \infty, M_k = M_{\Zz_k} is the Spin manifold with H_2(M) = \Zz_k \oplus \Zz_k constructed above.
  • For 1 < j < \infty let X_j = M_{(\Zz_{2^j}, 1)} constructed above be the non-Spin manifold with H_2(X_j) \cong \Zz_{2^j} \oplus \Zz_{2^j}.

With this notation [Barden1965, Theorem 2.3] states that a complete list of diffeomorphism classes of simply-connected 5-manifolds is given by

\displaystyle  X_{j, k_1, \dots , k_n} = X_j \sharp M_{k_1} \sharp \dots \sharp M_{k_n}

where -1 \leq j \leq \infty, 1 < k_i, k_i divides k_{i+1} or k_{i+1} = \infty and \sharp denotes the connected sum of oriented manifolds. The manifold X_{j', k_1', \dots k_n'} is diffeomorphic to X_{j, k_1, \dots, k_n} if and only if (j', k'_1, \dots, k'_n) = (j, k_1, \dots, k_n).

An alternative complete enumeration is obtained by writing \mathcal{M}_5(e) as a disjoint union

\displaystyle  \mathcal{M}_5(e) = \mathcal{M}_5^{\Spin}(e) \sqcup \mathcal{M}_5^{w_2, = \partial}(e) \sqcup \mathcal{M}_5^{w_2,\neq \partial}(e)
where the last two sets denote the diffeomorphism classes of non-Spinable 5-manifolds which are respectively boundaries and not boundaries. Then
\displaystyle  \mathcal{M}_5^{\Spin}(e) = \{ [M_G] \}, ~~\mathcal{M}_5^{w_2, = \partial}(e) = \{ [M_{(G, \omega)}] \} ~~\text{and}~~ \mathcal{M}_5^{w_2, \neq \partial}(e) = \{ [ X_{-1} \sharp M_G] \}.

4 Further discussion

  • As the invariants which classify closed, oriented 5-manifolds are homotopy invariants, we see that the same classification holds up to homotopy, homeomorphism and piecewise linear homeomorphism.
  • The classification of simply-connected Spin 5-manifolds was one of the first applications of the h-cobordism theorem.
  • By the construction above every simply-connected, closed, smooth, Spin 5-manifold embedds into \Rr^6.
  • As the invariants for -M are isomorphic to the invariants of
    Tex syntax error
    we see that every smooth 5-manifold admits an orientation reversing diffeomorphism: i.e. all 5-manifolds are smoothly amphicheiral.

4.1 Bordism groups

As \mathcal{M}_5^{\Spin}(e) = \{[M_G]\} and M_G = \partial N_G we see that every closed, Spin 5-manifold bounds a Spin 6-manifold. Hence the bordism group \Omega_5^{\Spin} vanishes.

The bordism group \Omega_5^{\SO} is isomorphic to \Zz_2 and is detected by the Stiefel-Whitney number \langle w_2(M)w_3(M), [M] \rangle \in \Zz_2. The Wu-manifold has cohomology groups

\displaystyle H^*(X_{-1}; \Zz_2) = \Zz_2, 0, \Zz_2, \Zz_2, 0, \Zz_2
and w_2(X_{-1}) \neq 0. It follows that w_3(X_{-1}) = \Sq^1(w_2(X_{-1})) \neq 0 and that \langle w_2(X_{-1})w_3(X_{-1}), [X_{-1}] \rangle \neq 0. We see that [X_{-1}] is the generator of \Omega_5^{\SO} and that a closed, smooth 5-manifold
Tex syntax error
is not a boundary if and only if it is diffeomorphic to X_{-1} \sharp M_0 where M_0 is a Spin manifold.
  • !!! Add references here.

4.2 Curvature and contact structures

  • Every manifold \sharp_r(S^2 \times S^3) admits a metric of positive Ricci curvature [Boyer&Galicki2006].

4.3 Mapping class groups

Let \pi_0\Diff_{+}(M) denote the group of isotopy classes of orientation preserving diffeomorphisms f\co M \cong M and let \Aut(H_2(M)) be the group of isomorphisms of
Tex syntax error
preserving the linking form and the second Stiefel-Whitney class. Applying the second statement of Barden's classification above

we obtain an exact sequence

\displaystyle 0 \rightarrow \pi_0\SDiff(M) \rightarrow \pi_0\Diff_+(M) \rightarrow \Aut(H_2(M)) \rightarrow 0

where \pi_0\SDiff(M) is the group of isotopy classes of diffeomorphisms inducing the identity on H_*(M).

  • Open problem: as of writing there is no computation of \pi_0\SDiff(M) for a general simply-connected 5-manifold.
  • The isotopy group \pi_0\Diff_{+}(S^5) is known to be the trivial group [[[#|]]].
  • In the homotopy category, \mathcal{E}_{+}(M), the group of homotopy classes of orientation preserving homotopy equivalences of
    Tex syntax error
    , has been extensively investigated by [Baues&Buth1996] and is already seen to be relatively complex.

5 References

< j < \infty$ let $X_j = M_{(\Zz_{2^j}, 1)}$ constructed [[#Examples_and_constructions|above]] be the non-Spin manifold with $H_2(X_j) \cong \Zz_{2^j} \oplus \Zz_{2^j}$. With this notation {{cite|Barden1965|Theorem 2.3}} states that a complete list of diffeomorphism classes of simply-connected 5-manifolds is given by $$ X_{j, k_1, \dots , k_n} = X_j \sharp M_{k_1} \sharp \dots \sharp M_{k_n}$$ where $-1 \leq j \leq \infty$, \mathcal{M}_{5}(e) be the set of diffeomorphism classes of closed, oriented, smooth, simply-connected 5-manifolds
Tex syntax error
and let \mathcal{M}_5^{\Spin}(e)\subset \mathcal{M}_5(e) be the subset of diffeomorphism classes of spinable manifolds. In this article we report the calculation of \mathcal{M}_5^{\Spin}(e) first obtained in [Smale1962] and of \mathcal{M}_{5}(e) first obtained in general in [Barden1965].

Contents

1 Constructions and examples

We first list some familiar 5-manifolds using Barden's notation:

  • X_0 \coloneq S^5
  • M_\infty \coloneq S^2 \times S^3
  • X_\infty \coloneq S^2 \times_{\gamma} S^3, the total space of the non-trivial S^3-bundle over S^2
  • X_{-1} \coloneq \SU_3/\SO_3, the Wu-manifold, is the homogeneous space obtained from the standadard inclusion of \SO_3 \rightarrow SU_3.
  • Next we present a construction of Spin 5-manifolds. Note that all homology groups are with integer coefficients. Given a finitely generated abelian group G, let X_G denote the degree 2 Moore space with H_2(X_G) = G. The space X_G may be realised as a finite CW-complex and so there is an embedding X_G\to\Rr^6. Let N(G) be a regular neighbourhood of X_G\subset\Rr^6 and let M_G be the boundary of N(G). Then M_G is a closed, smooth, simply-connected, spinable 5-manifold with H_2(M_G)\cong G \oplus TG where TG is the torsion subgroup of G. For example, M_{\Zz^r} \cong \sharp_r S^2 \times S^3 where \sharp_r denotes the r-fold connected sum.
  • For the non-Spin case let (G, w) be a pair with w\co G \to\Zz_2 a surjective homomorphism and G as above. We shall construct a non-Spin 5-manifold M_{(G, w)} with H_2(M_{(G, w)}) \cong G \oplus TG and second Stiefel-Whitney class w_2 given by w composed with the projection G \oplus TG \to G. If (G, w) = (\Zz, 1) let N_{(\Zz, 1)} be the non-trivial D^4-bundle over S^2 with boundary \partial N_{(\Zz, 1)} = M_{(\Zz, 1)} = X_{\infty}. If (G, w) = (\Zz, 1) \oplus (\Zz^r, 0) let N_{(G, w)} be the boundary connected sum N_{(\Zz, 1)} \natural_r S^2 \times D^4 with boundary M_{(G, w)} = X_{\infty} \sharp_r S^2 \times S^3. In the general case, present G = F/i(R) where i \co R \to F is an injective homomorphism between free abelian groups. Lift (G, w) to (F, \bar w) and observe that there is a canonical identification F = H_2(M_{(F, \bar w)}). If \{r_1, \dots, r_n \} is a basis for R note that each i(r_i) \in H_2(M_{(F, \bar w)}) is represented by a an embedded 2-sphere with trivial normal bundle. Let N_{(G, w)} be the manifold obtained by attaching 3-handles to N_{(F, \bar w)} along spheres representing i(r_i) and let M_{(G, w)} = \partial N_{(G, w)}. One may check that M_{(G, w)} is a non-Spin manifold as described above.
  • Reference for the Barden construction as twisted doubles.
  • !!! To do: determine which 1-connected 5-manifolds appear as Brieskorn varieties.

2 Invariants

Consider the following invariants of a closed simply-connected 5-manifold
Tex syntax error
.
  • Tex syntax error
    be the second integral homology group of
    Tex syntax error
    , with torsion subgroup TH_2(M).
  • w_2 \co H_2(M) \rightarrow \Zz_2, the homomorphism defined by evaluation with the second Stiefel-Whitney class of
    Tex syntax error
    , w_2 \in H^2(M; \Zz_2).
  • h(M) \in \Nn \cup \{\infty\}, the smallest extended natural number r such that x^{2^r} = e and x \in w_2^{-1}(1). If
    Tex syntax error
    is Spin we set h(M) = 0.
  • b_M \co TH_2(M) \times TH_2(M) \rightarrow \Qq/\Zz, the linking form of
    Tex syntax error
    which is a non-singular anti-symmetric bi-linear pairing on TH_2(M).

By [Wall1962, Proposition 1 & 2] the linking form satisfies the identity b_M(x, x) = w_2(x) where we regard w_2(x) as an element of \{0, 1/2\} \subset \Qq/\Zz.

For example, the Wu-manifold X_{-1} has H_2(X_{-1}) = \Zz_2, non-trivial w_2 and h(X_{-1}) = 1.

An abstract non-singular, anti-symmetric linking form b \co H \times H \rightarrow \Qq/\Zz on a finite group H is a bi-linear function such that
Tex syntax error
and
Tex syntax error
for all
Tex syntax error
if and only if
Tex syntax error
. By [Wall1963] such linking forms are classified up to isomorphism by the homomorphism H \rightarrow \Zz_2, x \mapsto b(x, x). Moreover H must be isomorphic to
Tex syntax error
or
Tex syntax error
for some finite group T with
Tex syntax error
if
Tex syntax error
generates the \Zz_2 summand. In particular the second Stiefel-Whitney class of a 5-manifold
Tex syntax error
determines the isomorphism class of the linking form
Tex syntax error
and we see that the torsion subgroup of
Tex syntax error
is of the form
Tex syntax error
if
Tex syntax error
or
Tex syntax error
if
Tex syntax error
in which case the \Zz_2 summand is an orthogonal summand of
Tex syntax error
.

3 Classification

We first present the most economical classifications of \mathcal{M}^{\Spin}_5(e) and \mathcal{M}_5(e). Let {\mathcal Ab}^{T \oplus T \oplus *} be the set of isomorphism classes finitely generated abelian groups G with torsion subgroup TG \cong H \oplus H \oplus C where C is trivial or C \cong \Zz_2 and write {\mathcal Ab}^{T \oplus T} and {\mathcal Ab}^{T \oplus T \oplus \Zz_2} for the obvious subsets.

Theorem 3.1 [Smale1962,]. There is a bijective correspondence
\displaystyle \mathcal{M}_5^{\Spin}(e) \rightarrow {\mathcal Ab}^{T\oplus T}, \quad [M] \mapsto [H_2(M)].

Theorem 3.2 [Barden1965]. The mapping

\displaystyle \mathcal{M}_{5}(e) \rightarrow {\mathcal Ab}^{T \oplus T \oplus *} \times (\Nn \cup \{ \infty \}) , \quad [M] \mapsto ([H_2(M)], h(M))

is an injection onto the subset of pairs ([G], n) where [G] \in {\mathcal Ab}^{T \oplus T \oplus \Zz_2} if and only if n = 1.

The above theorems follow from the following theorem of Barden and the classification of anti-symmetric linking forms.

Theorem 3.3 [Barden1965, Theorem 2.2]. Let M_0 and M_1 be simply-connected, closed, smooth 5-manifolds and let A\co H_2(M_0) \cong H_2(M_1) be an isomorphism preserving the linking form and the second Stiefel-Whitney class. Then A is realised by a diffeomorphism.

This theorem can re-phrased in categorical language as follows: let \mathcal{Q}_5(e) be a small category, in fact groupoid, with objects (G, b, w) where G is a finitely generated abelian group, b \co TG \times TG \to \Qq/\Zz is a anti-symmetric non-singular linking form and w\co G \to \Zz_2 is a homomorphism such that w(x) = b(x, x) for all x \in TG. The morphisms of \mathcal{W}_5(e) are isomorphisms of abelian groups commuting with both w and b.

Now let \widetilde{\mathcal{M}}_5(e) be a small category, actually groupoid, with objects simply-connected, closed, smooth 5-manifolds and morphisms isotopy diffeomorphisms. Let (b, w_2) \co \widetilde{\mathcal{M}}_5(e) \to \mathcal{Q}_5(e) be the funtor which maps
Tex syntax error
to (H_2(M), b_M, w_2(M)) and f \co M_0 \cong M_1 to the induced map on H_2.

Theorem 3.4 [Barden1965]. The functor

\displaystyle  (b, w_2)\co \widetilde{\mathcal{M}}_5(e) \to \mathcal{Q}_5(e)

is a detecting functor. That is, it is surjective on objects and M_0 \cong M_1 if and only if (b, w_2)(M_0) \cong (b, w_2)(M_1).

3.1 Enumeration

We give Barden's enumeration of the set \mathcal{M}^{}_5(e), [Barden1965, Theorem 2.3].

  • X_0 \coloneq S^5, M_\infty\coloneq S^2 \times S^3, X_\infty\coloneq S^2 \times_{\gamma} S^3, X_{-1} \coloneq \SU_3/\SO_3.
  • For 1 < k < \infty, M_k = M_{\Zz_k} is the Spin manifold with H_2(M) = \Zz_k \oplus \Zz_k constructed above.
  • For 1 < j < \infty let X_j = M_{(\Zz_{2^j}, 1)} constructed above be the non-Spin manifold with H_2(X_j) \cong \Zz_{2^j} \oplus \Zz_{2^j}.

With this notation [Barden1965, Theorem 2.3] states that a complete list of diffeomorphism classes of simply-connected 5-manifolds is given by

\displaystyle  X_{j, k_1, \dots , k_n} = X_j \sharp M_{k_1} \sharp \dots \sharp M_{k_n}

where -1 \leq j \leq \infty, 1 < k_i, k_i divides k_{i+1} or k_{i+1} = \infty and \sharp denotes the connected sum of oriented manifolds. The manifold X_{j', k_1', \dots k_n'} is diffeomorphic to X_{j, k_1, \dots, k_n} if and only if (j', k'_1, \dots, k'_n) = (j, k_1, \dots, k_n).

An alternative complete enumeration is obtained by writing \mathcal{M}_5(e) as a disjoint union

\displaystyle  \mathcal{M}_5(e) = \mathcal{M}_5^{\Spin}(e) \sqcup \mathcal{M}_5^{w_2, = \partial}(e) \sqcup \mathcal{M}_5^{w_2,\neq \partial}(e)
where the last two sets denote the diffeomorphism classes of non-Spinable 5-manifolds which are respectively boundaries and not boundaries. Then
\displaystyle  \mathcal{M}_5^{\Spin}(e) = \{ [M_G] \}, ~~\mathcal{M}_5^{w_2, = \partial}(e) = \{ [M_{(G, \omega)}] \} ~~\text{and}~~ \mathcal{M}_5^{w_2, \neq \partial}(e) = \{ [ X_{-1} \sharp M_G] \}.

4 Further discussion

  • As the invariants which classify closed, oriented 5-manifolds are homotopy invariants, we see that the same classification holds up to homotopy, homeomorphism and piecewise linear homeomorphism.
  • The classification of simply-connected Spin 5-manifolds was one of the first applications of the h-cobordism theorem.
  • By the construction above every simply-connected, closed, smooth, Spin 5-manifold embedds into \Rr^6.
  • As the invariants for -M are isomorphic to the invariants of
    Tex syntax error
    we see that every smooth 5-manifold admits an orientation reversing diffeomorphism: i.e. all 5-manifolds are smoothly amphicheiral.

4.1 Bordism groups

As \mathcal{M}_5^{\Spin}(e) = \{[M_G]\} and M_G = \partial N_G we see that every closed, Spin 5-manifold bounds a Spin 6-manifold. Hence the bordism group \Omega_5^{\Spin} vanishes.

The bordism group \Omega_5^{\SO} is isomorphic to \Zz_2 and is detected by the Stiefel-Whitney number \langle w_2(M)w_3(M), [M] \rangle \in \Zz_2. The Wu-manifold has cohomology groups

\displaystyle H^*(X_{-1}; \Zz_2) = \Zz_2, 0, \Zz_2, \Zz_2, 0, \Zz_2
and w_2(X_{-1}) \neq 0. It follows that w_3(X_{-1}) = \Sq^1(w_2(X_{-1})) \neq 0 and that \langle w_2(X_{-1})w_3(X_{-1}), [X_{-1}] \rangle \neq 0. We see that [X_{-1}] is the generator of \Omega_5^{\SO} and that a closed, smooth 5-manifold
Tex syntax error
is not a boundary if and only if it is diffeomorphic to X_{-1} \sharp M_0 where M_0 is a Spin manifold.
  • !!! Add references here.

4.2 Curvature and contact structures

  • Every manifold \sharp_r(S^2 \times S^3) admits a metric of positive Ricci curvature [Boyer&Galicki2006].

4.3 Mapping class groups

Let \pi_0\Diff_{+}(M) denote the group of isotopy classes of orientation preserving diffeomorphisms f\co M \cong M and let \Aut(H_2(M)) be the group of isomorphisms of
Tex syntax error
preserving the linking form and the second Stiefel-Whitney class. Applying the second statement of Barden's classification above

we obtain an exact sequence

\displaystyle 0 \rightarrow \pi_0\SDiff(M) \rightarrow \pi_0\Diff_+(M) \rightarrow \Aut(H_2(M)) \rightarrow 0

where \pi_0\SDiff(M) is the group of isotopy classes of diffeomorphisms inducing the identity on H_*(M).

  • Open problem: as of writing there is no computation of \pi_0\SDiff(M) for a general simply-connected 5-manifold.
  • The isotopy group \pi_0\Diff_{+}(S^5) is known to be the trivial group [[[#|]]].
  • In the homotopy category, \mathcal{E}_{+}(M), the group of homotopy classes of orientation preserving homotopy equivalences of
    Tex syntax error
    , has been extensively investigated by [Baues&Buth1996] and is already seen to be relatively complex.

5 References

< k_i$, $k_i$ divides $k_{i+1}$ or $k_{i+1} = \infty$ and $\sharp$ denotes the [[wikipedia:Connected_sum|connected sum]] of oriented manifolds. The manifold $X_{j', k_1', \dots k_n'}$ is diffeomorphic to $X_{j, k_1, \dots, k_n}$ if and only if $(j', k'_1, \dots, k'_n) = (j, k_1, \dots, k_n)$. An alternative complete enumeration is obtained by writing $\mathcal{M}_5(e)$ as a disjoint union $$ \mathcal{M}_5(e) = \mathcal{M}_5^{\Spin}(e) \sqcup \mathcal{M}_5^{w_2, = \partial}(e) \sqcup \mathcal{M}_5^{w_2,\neq \partial}(e)$$ where the last two sets denote the diffeomorphism classes of non-Spinable 5-manifolds which are respectively boundaries and not boundaries. Then $$ \mathcal{M}_5^{\Spin}(e) = \{ [M_G] \}, ~~\mathcal{M}_5^{w_2, = \partial}(e) = \{ [M_{(G, \omega)}] \} ~~\text{and}~~ \mathcal{M}_5^{w_2, \neq \partial}(e) = \{ [ X_{-1} \sharp M_G] \}.$$ == Further discussion == ; * As the invariants which classify closed, oriented 5-manifolds are homotopy invariants, we see that the same classification holds up to homotopy, homeomorphism and piecewise linear homeomorphism. * The classification of simply-connected Spin 5-manifolds was one of the first applications of the [[wikipedia:H-cobordism|h-cobordism theorem]]. * By the construction [[#Examples_and_contructions|above]] every simply-connected, closed, smooth, Spin 5-manifold embedds into $\Rr^6$. * As the invariants for $-M$ are isomorphic to the invariants of $M$ we see that every smooth 5-manifold admits an orientation reversing diffeomorphism: i.e. all 5-manifolds are smoothly [[amphicheiral]]. === Bordism groups === ; As $\mathcal{M}_5^{\Spin}(e) = \{[M_G]\}$ and $M_G = \partial N_G$ we see that every closed, Spin 5-manifold bounds a Spin 6-manifold. Hence the [[wikipedia:Cobordism#Cobordism_classes|bordism group]] $\Omega_5^{\Spin}$ vanishes. The bordism group $\Omega_5^{\SO}$ is isomorphic to $\Zz_2$ and is detected by the Stiefel-Whitney number $\langle w_2(M)w_3(M), [M] \rangle \in \Zz_2$. The Wu-manifold has cohomology groups $$H^*(X_{-1}; \Zz_2) = \Zz_2, 0, \Zz_2, \Zz_2, 0, \Zz_2$$ and $w_2(X_{-1}) \neq 0$. It follows that $w_3(X_{-1}) = \Sq^1(w_2(X_{-1})) \neq 0$ and that $\langle w_2(X_{-1})w_3(X_{-1}), [X_{-1}] \rangle \neq 0$. We see that $[X_{-1}]$ is the generator of $\Omega_5^{\SO}$ and that a closed, smooth 5-manifold $M$ is not a boundary if and only if it is diffeomorphic to $X_{-1} \sharp M_0$ where $M_0$ is a Spin manifold. * !!! Add references here. === Curvature and contact structures === ; * Every manifold $\sharp_r(S^2 \times S^3)$ admits a metric of positive Ricci curvature {{cite|Boyer&Galicki2006}}. * Every Spin 5-manifold with the order of $TH_2(M)$ prime to 3 admits a [[wikipedia:Contact_manifold|contact structure]] {{cite|Thomas1986}}. === Mapping class groups === ; Let $\pi_0\Diff_{+}(M)$ denote the group of [[isotopy]] classes of orientation preserving diffeomorphisms $f\co M \cong M$ and let $\Aut(H_2(M))$ be the group of isomorphisms of $H_2(M)$ preserving the linking form and the second Stiefel-Whitney class. Applying the second statement of Barden's classification [[#Classification|above]] we obtain an exact sequence $ be the set of diffeomorphism classes of closed, oriented, smooth, simply-connected 5-manifolds
Tex syntax error
and let \mathcal{M}_5^{\Spin}(e)\subset \mathcal{M}_5(e) be the subset of diffeomorphism classes of spinable manifolds. In this article we report the calculation of \mathcal{M}_5^{\Spin}(e) first obtained in [Smale1962] and of \mathcal{M}_{5}(e) first obtained in general in [Barden1965].

Contents

1 Constructions and examples

We first list some familiar 5-manifolds using Barden's notation:

  • X_0 \coloneq S^5
  • M_\infty \coloneq S^2 \times S^3
  • X_\infty \coloneq S^2 \times_{\gamma} S^3, the total space of the non-trivial S^3-bundle over S^2
  • X_{-1} \coloneq \SU_3/\SO_3, the Wu-manifold, is the homogeneous space obtained from the standadard inclusion of \SO_3 \rightarrow SU_3.
  • Next we present a construction of Spin 5-manifolds. Note that all homology groups are with integer coefficients. Given a finitely generated abelian group G, let X_G denote the degree 2 Moore space with H_2(X_G) = G. The space X_G may be realised as a finite CW-complex and so there is an embedding X_G\to\Rr^6. Let N(G) be a regular neighbourhood of X_G\subset\Rr^6 and let M_G be the boundary of N(G). Then M_G is a closed, smooth, simply-connected, spinable 5-manifold with H_2(M_G)\cong G \oplus TG where TG is the torsion subgroup of G. For example, M_{\Zz^r} \cong \sharp_r S^2 \times S^3 where \sharp_r denotes the r-fold connected sum.
  • For the non-Spin case let (G, w) be a pair with w\co G \to\Zz_2 a surjective homomorphism and G as above. We shall construct a non-Spin 5-manifold M_{(G, w)} with H_2(M_{(G, w)}) \cong G \oplus TG and second Stiefel-Whitney class w_2 given by w composed with the projection G \oplus TG \to G. If (G, w) = (\Zz, 1) let N_{(\Zz, 1)} be the non-trivial D^4-bundle over S^2 with boundary \partial N_{(\Zz, 1)} = M_{(\Zz, 1)} = X_{\infty}. If (G, w) = (\Zz, 1) \oplus (\Zz^r, 0) let N_{(G, w)} be the boundary connected sum N_{(\Zz, 1)} \natural_r S^2 \times D^4 with boundary M_{(G, w)} = X_{\infty} \sharp_r S^2 \times S^3. In the general case, present G = F/i(R) where i \co R \to F is an injective homomorphism between free abelian groups. Lift (G, w) to (F, \bar w) and observe that there is a canonical identification F = H_2(M_{(F, \bar w)}). If \{r_1, \dots, r_n \} is a basis for R note that each i(r_i) \in H_2(M_{(F, \bar w)}) is represented by a an embedded 2-sphere with trivial normal bundle. Let N_{(G, w)} be the manifold obtained by attaching 3-handles to N_{(F, \bar w)} along spheres representing i(r_i) and let M_{(G, w)} = \partial N_{(G, w)}. One may check that M_{(G, w)} is a non-Spin manifold as described above.
  • Reference for the Barden construction as twisted doubles.
  • !!! To do: determine which 1-connected 5-manifolds appear as Brieskorn varieties.

2 Invariants

Consider the following invariants of a closed simply-connected 5-manifold
Tex syntax error
.
  • Tex syntax error
    be the second integral homology group of
    Tex syntax error
    , with torsion subgroup TH_2(M).
  • w_2 \co H_2(M) \rightarrow \Zz_2, the homomorphism defined by evaluation with the second Stiefel-Whitney class of
    Tex syntax error
    , w_2 \in H^2(M; \Zz_2).
  • h(M) \in \Nn \cup \{\infty\}, the smallest extended natural number r such that x^{2^r} = e and x \in w_2^{-1}(1). If
    Tex syntax error
    is Spin we set h(M) = 0.
  • b_M \co TH_2(M) \times TH_2(M) \rightarrow \Qq/\Zz, the linking form of
    Tex syntax error
    which is a non-singular anti-symmetric bi-linear pairing on TH_2(M).

By [Wall1962, Proposition 1 & 2] the linking form satisfies the identity b_M(x, x) = w_2(x) where we regard w_2(x) as an element of \{0, 1/2\} \subset \Qq/\Zz.

For example, the Wu-manifold X_{-1} has H_2(X_{-1}) = \Zz_2, non-trivial w_2 and h(X_{-1}) = 1.

An abstract non-singular, anti-symmetric linking form b \co H \times H \rightarrow \Qq/\Zz on a finite group H is a bi-linear function such that
Tex syntax error
and
Tex syntax error
for all
Tex syntax error
if and only if
Tex syntax error
. By [Wall1963] such linking forms are classified up to isomorphism by the homomorphism H \rightarrow \Zz_2, x \mapsto b(x, x). Moreover H must be isomorphic to
Tex syntax error
or
Tex syntax error
for some finite group T with
Tex syntax error
if
Tex syntax error
generates the \Zz_2 summand. In particular the second Stiefel-Whitney class of a 5-manifold
Tex syntax error
determines the isomorphism class of the linking form
Tex syntax error
and we see that the torsion subgroup of
Tex syntax error
is of the form
Tex syntax error
if
Tex syntax error
or
Tex syntax error
if
Tex syntax error
in which case the \Zz_2 summand is an orthogonal summand of
Tex syntax error
.

3 Classification

We first present the most economical classifications of \mathcal{M}^{\Spin}_5(e) and \mathcal{M}_5(e). Let {\mathcal Ab}^{T \oplus T \oplus *} be the set of isomorphism classes finitely generated abelian groups G with torsion subgroup TG \cong H \oplus H \oplus C where C is trivial or C \cong \Zz_2 and write {\mathcal Ab}^{T \oplus T} and {\mathcal Ab}^{T \oplus T \oplus \Zz_2} for the obvious subsets.

Theorem 3.1 [Smale1962,]. There is a bijective correspondence
\displaystyle \mathcal{M}_5^{\Spin}(e) \rightarrow {\mathcal Ab}^{T\oplus T}, \quad [M] \mapsto [H_2(M)].

Theorem 3.2 [Barden1965]. The mapping

\displaystyle \mathcal{M}_{5}(e) \rightarrow {\mathcal Ab}^{T \oplus T \oplus *} \times (\Nn \cup \{ \infty \}) , \quad [M] \mapsto ([H_2(M)], h(M))

is an injection onto the subset of pairs ([G], n) where [G] \in {\mathcal Ab}^{T \oplus T \oplus \Zz_2} if and only if n = 1.

The above theorems follow from the following theorem of Barden and the classification of anti-symmetric linking forms.

Theorem 3.3 [Barden1965, Theorem 2.2]. Let M_0 and M_1 be simply-connected, closed, smooth 5-manifolds and let A\co H_2(M_0) \cong H_2(M_1) be an isomorphism preserving the linking form and the second Stiefel-Whitney class. Then A is realised by a diffeomorphism.

This theorem can re-phrased in categorical language as follows: let \mathcal{Q}_5(e) be a small category, in fact groupoid, with objects (G, b, w) where G is a finitely generated abelian group, b \co TG \times TG \to \Qq/\Zz is a anti-symmetric non-singular linking form and w\co G \to \Zz_2 is a homomorphism such that w(x) = b(x, x) for all x \in TG. The morphisms of \mathcal{W}_5(e) are isomorphisms of abelian groups commuting with both w and b.

Now let \widetilde{\mathcal{M}}_5(e) be a small category, actually groupoid, with objects simply-connected, closed, smooth 5-manifolds and morphisms isotopy diffeomorphisms. Let (b, w_2) \co \widetilde{\mathcal{M}}_5(e) \to \mathcal{Q}_5(e) be the funtor which maps
Tex syntax error
to (H_2(M), b_M, w_2(M)) and f \co M_0 \cong M_1 to the induced map on H_2.

Theorem 3.4 [Barden1965]. The functor

\displaystyle  (b, w_2)\co \widetilde{\mathcal{M}}_5(e) \to \mathcal{Q}_5(e)

is a detecting functor. That is, it is surjective on objects and M_0 \cong M_1 if and only if (b, w_2)(M_0) \cong (b, w_2)(M_1).

3.1 Enumeration

We give Barden's enumeration of the set \mathcal{M}^{}_5(e), [Barden1965, Theorem 2.3].

  • X_0 \coloneq S^5, M_\infty\coloneq S^2 \times S^3, X_\infty\coloneq S^2 \times_{\gamma} S^3, X_{-1} \coloneq \SU_3/\SO_3.
  • For 1 < k < \infty, M_k = M_{\Zz_k} is the Spin manifold with H_2(M) = \Zz_k \oplus \Zz_k constructed above.
  • For 1 < j < \infty let X_j = M_{(\Zz_{2^j}, 1)} constructed above be the non-Spin manifold with H_2(X_j) \cong \Zz_{2^j} \oplus \Zz_{2^j}.

With this notation [Barden1965, Theorem 2.3] states that a complete list of diffeomorphism classes of simply-connected 5-manifolds is given by

\displaystyle  X_{j, k_1, \dots , k_n} = X_j \sharp M_{k_1} \sharp \dots \sharp M_{k_n}

where -1 \leq j \leq \infty, 1 < k_i, k_i divides k_{i+1} or k_{i+1} = \infty and \sharp denotes the connected sum of oriented manifolds. The manifold X_{j', k_1', \dots k_n'} is diffeomorphic to X_{j, k_1, \dots, k_n} if and only if (j', k'_1, \dots, k'_n) = (j, k_1, \dots, k_n).

An alternative complete enumeration is obtained by writing \mathcal{M}_5(e) as a disjoint union

\displaystyle  \mathcal{M}_5(e) = \mathcal{M}_5^{\Spin}(e) \sqcup \mathcal{M}_5^{w_2, = \partial}(e) \sqcup \mathcal{M}_5^{w_2,\neq \partial}(e)
where the last two sets denote the diffeomorphism classes of non-Spinable 5-manifolds which are respectively boundaries and not boundaries. Then
\displaystyle  \mathcal{M}_5^{\Spin}(e) = \{ [M_G] \}, ~~\mathcal{M}_5^{w_2, = \partial}(e) = \{ [M_{(G, \omega)}] \} ~~\text{and}~~ \mathcal{M}_5^{w_2, \neq \partial}(e) = \{ [ X_{-1} \sharp M_G] \}.

4 Further discussion

  • As the invariants which classify closed, oriented 5-manifolds are homotopy invariants, we see that the same classification holds up to homotopy, homeomorphism and piecewise linear homeomorphism.
  • The classification of simply-connected Spin 5-manifolds was one of the first applications of the h-cobordism theorem.
  • By the construction above every simply-connected, closed, smooth, Spin 5-manifold embedds into \Rr^6.
  • As the invariants for -M are isomorphic to the invariants of
    Tex syntax error
    we see that every smooth 5-manifold admits an orientation reversing diffeomorphism: i.e. all 5-manifolds are smoothly amphicheiral.

4.1 Bordism groups

As \mathcal{M}_5^{\Spin}(e) = \{[M_G]\} and M_G = \partial N_G we see that every closed, Spin 5-manifold bounds a Spin 6-manifold. Hence the bordism group \Omega_5^{\Spin} vanishes.

The bordism group \Omega_5^{\SO} is isomorphic to \Zz_2 and is detected by the Stiefel-Whitney number \langle w_2(M)w_3(M), [M] \rangle \in \Zz_2. The Wu-manifold has cohomology groups

\displaystyle H^*(X_{-1}; \Zz_2) = \Zz_2, 0, \Zz_2, \Zz_2, 0, \Zz_2
and w_2(X_{-1}) \neq 0. It follows that w_3(X_{-1}) = \Sq^1(w_2(X_{-1})) \neq 0 and that \langle w_2(X_{-1})w_3(X_{-1}), [X_{-1}] \rangle \neq 0. We see that [X_{-1}] is the generator of \Omega_5^{\SO} and that a closed, smooth 5-manifold
Tex syntax error
is not a boundary if and only if it is diffeomorphic to X_{-1} \sharp M_0 where M_0 is a Spin manifold.
  • !!! Add references here.

4.2 Curvature and contact structures

  • Every manifold \sharp_r(S^2 \times S^3) admits a metric of positive Ricci curvature [Boyer&Galicki2006].

4.3 Mapping class groups

Let \pi_0\Diff_{+}(M) denote the group of isotopy classes of orientation preserving diffeomorphisms f\co M \cong M and let \Aut(H_2(M)) be the group of isomorphisms of
Tex syntax error
preserving the linking form and the second Stiefel-Whitney class. Applying the second statement of Barden's classification above

we obtain an exact sequence

\displaystyle 0 \rightarrow \pi_0\SDiff(M) \rightarrow \pi_0\Diff_+(M) \rightarrow \Aut(H_2(M)) \rightarrow 0

where \pi_0\SDiff(M) is the group of isotopy classes of diffeomorphisms inducing the identity on H_*(M).

  • Open problem: as of writing there is no computation of \pi_0\SDiff(M) for a general simply-connected 5-manifold.
  • The isotopy group \pi_0\Diff_{+}(S^5) is known to be the trivial group [[[#|]]].
  • In the homotopy category, \mathcal{E}_{+}(M), the group of homotopy classes of orientation preserving homotopy equivalences of
    Tex syntax error
    , has been extensively investigated by [Baues&Buth1996] and is already seen to be relatively complex.

5 References

\rightarrow \pi_0\SDiff(M) \rightarrow \pi_0\Diff_+(M) \rightarrow \Aut(H_2(M)) \rightarrow 0$$ where $\pi_0\SDiff(M)$ is the group of isotopy classes of diffeomorphisms inducing the identity on $H_*(M)$. * Open problem: as of writing there is no computation of $\pi_0\SDiff(M)$ for a general simply-connected 5-manifold. * The isotopy group $\pi_0\Diff_{+}(S^5)$ is known to be the trivial group {{cite|}}. * In the homotopy category, $\mathcal{E}_{+}(M)$, the group of homotopy classes of orientation preserving homotopy equivalences of $M$, has been extensively investigated by {{cite|Baues&Buth1996}} and is already seen to be relatively complex.
== References == * {{bibitem|Baues&Buth1996}} * {{bibitem|Barden1965}} * {{bibitem|Boyer&Galicki2006}} * {{bibitem|Smale1962}} * {{bibitem|Thomas1986}} * {{bibitem|Wall1962}} * {{bibitem|Wall1963}} [[Category:Manifolds]] [[Category:Orientable]] {{MediaWiki:Stub}}\mathcal{M}_{5}(e) be the set of diffeomorphism classes of closed, oriented, smooth, simply-connected 5-manifolds
Tex syntax error
and let \mathcal{M}_5^{\Spin}(e)\subset \mathcal{M}_5(e) be the subset of diffeomorphism classes of spinable manifolds. In this article we report the calculation of \mathcal{M}_5^{\Spin}(e) first obtained in [Smale1962] and of \mathcal{M}_{5}(e) first obtained in general in [Barden1965].

Contents

1 Constructions and examples

We first list some familiar 5-manifolds using Barden's notation:

  • X_0 \coloneq S^5
  • M_\infty \coloneq S^2 \times S^3
  • X_\infty \coloneq S^2 \times_{\gamma} S^3, the total space of the non-trivial S^3-bundle over S^2
  • X_{-1} \coloneq \SU_3/\SO_3, the Wu-manifold, is the homogeneous space obtained from the standadard inclusion of \SO_3 \rightarrow SU_3.
  • Next we present a construction of Spin 5-manifolds. Note that all homology groups are with integer coefficients. Given a finitely generated abelian group G, let X_G denote the degree 2 Moore space with H_2(X_G) = G. The space X_G may be realised as a finite CW-complex and so there is an embedding X_G\to\Rr^6. Let N(G) be a regular neighbourhood of X_G\subset\Rr^6 and let M_G be the boundary of N(G). Then M_G is a closed, smooth, simply-connected, spinable 5-manifold with H_2(M_G)\cong G \oplus TG where TG is the torsion subgroup of G. For example, M_{\Zz^r} \cong \sharp_r S^2 \times S^3 where \sharp_r denotes the r-fold connected sum.
  • For the non-Spin case let (G, w) be a pair with w\co G \to\Zz_2 a surjective homomorphism and G as above. We shall construct a non-Spin 5-manifold M_{(G, w)} with H_2(M_{(G, w)}) \cong G \oplus TG and second Stiefel-Whitney class w_2 given by w composed with the projection G \oplus TG \to G. If (G, w) = (\Zz, 1) let N_{(\Zz, 1)} be the non-trivial D^4-bundle over S^2 with boundary \partial N_{(\Zz, 1)} = M_{(\Zz, 1)} = X_{\infty}. If (G, w) = (\Zz, 1) \oplus (\Zz^r, 0) let N_{(G, w)} be the boundary connected sum N_{(\Zz, 1)} \natural_r S^2 \times D^4 with boundary M_{(G, w)} = X_{\infty} \sharp_r S^2 \times S^3. In the general case, present G = F/i(R) where i \co R \to F is an injective homomorphism between free abelian groups. Lift (G, w) to (F, \bar w) and observe that there is a canonical identification F = H_2(M_{(F, \bar w)}). If \{r_1, \dots, r_n \} is a basis for R note that each i(r_i) \in H_2(M_{(F, \bar w)}) is represented by a an embedded 2-sphere with trivial normal bundle. Let N_{(G, w)} be the manifold obtained by attaching 3-handles to N_{(F, \bar w)} along spheres representing i(r_i) and let M_{(G, w)} = \partial N_{(G, w)}. One may check that M_{(G, w)} is a non-Spin manifold as described above.
  • Reference for the Barden construction as twisted doubles.
  • !!! To do: determine which 1-connected 5-manifolds appear as Brieskorn varieties.

2 Invariants

Consider the following invariants of a closed simply-connected 5-manifold
Tex syntax error
.
  • Tex syntax error
    be the second integral homology group of
    Tex syntax error
    , with torsion subgroup TH_2(M).
  • w_2 \co H_2(M) \rightarrow \Zz_2, the homomorphism defined by evaluation with the second Stiefel-Whitney class of
    Tex syntax error
    , w_2 \in H^2(M; \Zz_2).
  • h(M) \in \Nn \cup \{\infty\}, the smallest extended natural number r such that x^{2^r} = e and x \in w_2^{-1}(1). If
    Tex syntax error
    is Spin we set h(M) = 0.
  • b_M \co TH_2(M) \times TH_2(M) \rightarrow \Qq/\Zz, the linking form of
    Tex syntax error
    which is a non-singular anti-symmetric bi-linear pairing on TH_2(M).

By [Wall1962, Proposition 1 & 2] the linking form satisfies the identity b_M(x, x) = w_2(x) where we regard w_2(x) as an element of \{0, 1/2\} \subset \Qq/\Zz.

For example, the Wu-manifold X_{-1} has H_2(X_{-1}) = \Zz_2, non-trivial w_2 and h(X_{-1}) = 1.

An abstract non-singular, anti-symmetric linking form b \co H \times H \rightarrow \Qq/\Zz on a finite group H is a bi-linear function such that
Tex syntax error
and
Tex syntax error
for all
Tex syntax error
if and only if
Tex syntax error
. By [Wall1963] such linking forms are classified up to isomorphism by the homomorphism H \rightarrow \Zz_2, x \mapsto b(x, x). Moreover H must be isomorphic to
Tex syntax error
or
Tex syntax error
for some finite group T with
Tex syntax error
if
Tex syntax error
generates the \Zz_2 summand. In particular the second Stiefel-Whitney class of a 5-manifold
Tex syntax error
determines the isomorphism class of the linking form
Tex syntax error
and we see that the torsion subgroup of
Tex syntax error
is of the form
Tex syntax error
if
Tex syntax error
or
Tex syntax error
if
Tex syntax error
in which case the \Zz_2 summand is an orthogonal summand of
Tex syntax error
.

3 Classification

We first present the most economical classifications of \mathcal{M}^{\Spin}_5(e) and \mathcal{M}_5(e). Let {\mathcal Ab}^{T \oplus T \oplus *} be the set of isomorphism classes finitely generated abelian groups G with torsion subgroup TG \cong H \oplus H \oplus C where C is trivial or C \cong \Zz_2 and write {\mathcal Ab}^{T \oplus T} and {\mathcal Ab}^{T \oplus T \oplus \Zz_2} for the obvious subsets.

Theorem 3.1 [Smale1962,]. There is a bijective correspondence
\displaystyle \mathcal{M}_5^{\Spin}(e) \rightarrow {\mathcal Ab}^{T\oplus T}, \quad [M] \mapsto [H_2(M)].

Theorem 3.2 [Barden1965]. The mapping

\displaystyle \mathcal{M}_{5}(e) \rightarrow {\mathcal Ab}^{T \oplus T \oplus *} \times (\Nn \cup \{ \infty \}) , \quad [M] \mapsto ([H_2(M)], h(M))

is an injection onto the subset of pairs ([G], n) where [G] \in {\mathcal Ab}^{T \oplus T \oplus \Zz_2} if and only if n = 1.

The above theorems follow from the following theorem of Barden and the classification of anti-symmetric linking forms.

Theorem 3.3 [Barden1965, Theorem 2.2]. Let M_0 and M_1 be simply-connected, closed, smooth 5-manifolds and let A\co H_2(M_0) \cong H_2(M_1) be an isomorphism preserving the linking form and the second Stiefel-Whitney class. Then A is realised by a diffeomorphism.

This theorem can re-phrased in categorical language as follows: let \mathcal{Q}_5(e) be a small category, in fact groupoid, with objects (G, b, w) where G is a finitely generated abelian group, b \co TG \times TG \to \Qq/\Zz is a anti-symmetric non-singular linking form and w\co G \to \Zz_2 is a homomorphism such that w(x) = b(x, x) for all x \in TG. The morphisms of \mathcal{W}_5(e) are isomorphisms of abelian groups commuting with both w and b.

Now let \widetilde{\mathcal{M}}_5(e) be a small category, actually groupoid, with objects simply-connected, closed, smooth 5-manifolds and morphisms isotopy diffeomorphisms. Let (b, w_2) \co \widetilde{\mathcal{M}}_5(e) \to \mathcal{Q}_5(e) be the funtor which maps
Tex syntax error
to (H_2(M), b_M, w_2(M)) and f \co M_0 \cong M_1 to the induced map on H_2.

Theorem 3.4 [Barden1965]. The functor

\displaystyle  (b, w_2)\co \widetilde{\mathcal{M}}_5(e) \to \mathcal{Q}_5(e)

is a detecting functor. That is, it is surjective on objects and M_0 \cong M_1 if and only if (b, w_2)(M_0) \cong (b, w_2)(M_1).

3.1 Enumeration

We give Barden's enumeration of the set \mathcal{M}^{}_5(e), [Barden1965, Theorem 2.3].

  • X_0 \coloneq S^5, M_\infty\coloneq S^2 \times S^3, X_\infty\coloneq S^2 \times_{\gamma} S^3, X_{-1} \coloneq \SU_3/\SO_3.
  • For 1 < k < \infty, M_k = M_{\Zz_k} is the Spin manifold with H_2(M) = \Zz_k \oplus \Zz_k constructed above.
  • For 1 < j < \infty let X_j = M_{(\Zz_{2^j}, 1)} constructed above be the non-Spin manifold with H_2(X_j) \cong \Zz_{2^j} \oplus \Zz_{2^j}.

With this notation [Barden1965, Theorem 2.3] states that a complete list of diffeomorphism classes of simply-connected 5-manifolds is given by

\displaystyle  X_{j, k_1, \dots , k_n} = X_j \sharp M_{k_1} \sharp \dots \sharp M_{k_n}

where -1 \leq j \leq \infty, 1 < k_i, k_i divides k_{i+1} or k_{i+1} = \infty and \sharp denotes the connected sum of oriented manifolds. The manifold X_{j', k_1', \dots k_n'} is diffeomorphic to X_{j, k_1, \dots, k_n} if and only if (j', k'_1, \dots, k'_n) = (j, k_1, \dots, k_n).

An alternative complete enumeration is obtained by writing \mathcal{M}_5(e) as a disjoint union

\displaystyle  \mathcal{M}_5(e) = \mathcal{M}_5^{\Spin}(e) \sqcup \mathcal{M}_5^{w_2, = \partial}(e) \sqcup \mathcal{M}_5^{w_2,\neq \partial}(e)
where the last two sets denote the diffeomorphism classes of non-Spinable 5-manifolds which are respectively boundaries and not boundaries. Then
\displaystyle  \mathcal{M}_5^{\Spin}(e) = \{ [M_G] \}, ~~\mathcal{M}_5^{w_2, = \partial}(e) = \{ [M_{(G, \omega)}] \} ~~\text{and}~~ \mathcal{M}_5^{w_2, \neq \partial}(e) = \{ [ X_{-1} \sharp M_G] \}.

4 Further discussion

  • As the invariants which classify closed, oriented 5-manifolds are homotopy invariants, we see that the same classification holds up to homotopy, homeomorphism and piecewise linear homeomorphism.
  • The classification of simply-connected Spin 5-manifolds was one of the first applications of the h-cobordism theorem.
  • By the construction above every simply-connected, closed, smooth, Spin 5-manifold embedds into \Rr^6.
  • As the invariants for -M are isomorphic to the invariants of
    Tex syntax error
    we see that every smooth 5-manifold admits an orientation reversing diffeomorphism: i.e. all 5-manifolds are smoothly amphicheiral.

4.1 Bordism groups

As \mathcal{M}_5^{\Spin}(e) = \{[M_G]\} and M_G = \partial N_G we see that every closed, Spin 5-manifold bounds a Spin 6-manifold. Hence the bordism group \Omega_5^{\Spin} vanishes.

The bordism group \Omega_5^{\SO} is isomorphic to \Zz_2 and is detected by the Stiefel-Whitney number \langle w_2(M)w_3(M), [M] \rangle \in \Zz_2. The Wu-manifold has cohomology groups

\displaystyle H^*(X_{-1}; \Zz_2) = \Zz_2, 0, \Zz_2, \Zz_2, 0, \Zz_2
and w_2(X_{-1}) \neq 0. It follows that w_3(X_{-1}) = \Sq^1(w_2(X_{-1})) \neq 0 and that \langle w_2(X_{-1})w_3(X_{-1}), [X_{-1}] \rangle \neq 0. We see that [X_{-1}] is the generator of \Omega_5^{\SO} and that a closed, smooth 5-manifold
Tex syntax error
is not a boundary if and only if it is diffeomorphic to X_{-1} \sharp M_0 where M_0 is a Spin manifold.
  • !!! Add references here.

4.2 Curvature and contact structures

  • Every manifold \sharp_r(S^2 \times S^3) admits a metric of positive Ricci curvature [Boyer&Galicki2006].

4.3 Mapping class groups

Let \pi_0\Diff_{+}(M) denote the group of isotopy classes of orientation preserving diffeomorphisms f\co M \cong M and let \Aut(H_2(M)) be the group of isomorphisms of
Tex syntax error
preserving the linking form and the second Stiefel-Whitney class. Applying the second statement of Barden's classification above

we obtain an exact sequence

\displaystyle 0 \rightarrow \pi_0\SDiff(M) \rightarrow \pi_0\Diff_+(M) \rightarrow \Aut(H_2(M)) \rightarrow 0

where \pi_0\SDiff(M) is the group of isotopy classes of diffeomorphisms inducing the identity on H_*(M).

  • Open problem: as of writing there is no computation of \pi_0\SDiff(M) for a general simply-connected 5-manifold.
  • The isotopy group \pi_0\Diff_{+}(S^5) is known to be the trivial group [[[#|]]].
  • In the homotopy category, \mathcal{E}_{+}(M), the group of homotopy classes of orientation preserving homotopy equivalences of
    Tex syntax error
    , has been extensively investigated by [Baues&Buth1996] and is already seen to be relatively complex.

5 References

Personal tools
Namespaces
Variants
Actions
Navigation
Interaction
Toolbox