Wu class

From Manifold Atlas
(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
(Applications)
m (Relation to Stiefel-Whitney classes)
(11 intermediate revisions by one user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Authors|Knapp}}{{MediaWiki:Being reviewed}}
+
{{Authors|Karlheinz Knapp}}
==Introduction==
==Introduction==
<wikitex>;
<wikitex>;
Line 7: Line 7:
<wikitex>;
<wikitex>;
Let $M$ be a closed topological $n$-manifold, $[M]\in H_{n}(M;\Zz/2)$ its fundamental class, $Sq^{k}$ the $k$-th Steenrod square and $$\left\langle \cdot~,~\cdot \right\rangle:H^{i}(M;\Zz/2)\times H_{i}(M;\Zz /2)\longrightarrow \Zz/2$$ the usual Kronecker pairing. This pairing, together with the Poincaré duality isomorphism $a\mapsto a\cap \lbrack M]$, induces isomorphisms
Let $M$ be a closed topological $n$-manifold, $[M]\in H_{n}(M;\Zz/2)$ its fundamental class, $Sq^{k}$ the $k$-th Steenrod square and $$\left\langle \cdot~,~\cdot \right\rangle:H^{i}(M;\Zz/2)\times H_{i}(M;\Zz /2)\longrightarrow \Zz/2$$ the usual Kronecker pairing. This pairing, together with the Poincaré duality isomorphism $a\mapsto a\cap \lbrack M]$, induces isomorphisms
\begin{equation} \textup{Hom}(H^{n-k}(M;\Zz/2), \Zz/2) \cong H_{n-k}(M;\Zz /2)\cong H^{k}(M;\Zz/2), \end{equation}
+
$$ \textup{Hom}(H^{n-k}(M;\Zz/2), \Zz/2) \cong H_{n-k}(M;\Zz /2)\cong H^{k}(M;\Zz/2), $$
under which the homomorphism $x\mapsto \left\langle Sq^{k}(x),[M]\right\rangle $ from $H^{n-k}(M;\Zz/2)$ to $\Zz/2$ corresponds to a well defined cohomology class $v_{k}\in H^{k}(M;\Zz/2)$. This cohomology class is called the $k$-th Wu class of $M$ (\cite[§11]{Milnor&Stasheff1974}). We may rewrite its definition equivalently as an identity
under which the homomorphism $x\mapsto \left\langle Sq^{k}(x),[M]\right\rangle $ from $H^{n-k}(M;\Zz/2)$ to $\Zz/2$ corresponds to a well defined cohomology class $v_{k}\in H^{k}(M;\Zz/2)$. This cohomology class is called the $k$-th Wu class of $M$ (\cite[§11]{Milnor&Stasheff1974}). We may rewrite its definition equivalently as an identity
\begin{equation} \label{W1} \left\langle v_{k}\cup x,[M]\right\rangle =\left\langle Sq^{k}(x),[M]\right\rangle \quad \quad \text{ for all }x\in H^{n-k}(M;\Zz/2).
\begin{equation} \label{W1} \left\langle v_{k}\cup x,[M]\right\rangle =\left\langle Sq^{k}(x),[M]\right\rangle \quad \quad \text{ for all }x\in H^{n-k}(M;\Zz/2).
\end{equation} Define the total Wu class $$v\in H^{\ast }(M;\Zz/2)=H^{0}(M;\Zz/2)\oplus H^{1}(M;\Zz /2)\oplus ....\oplus H^{n}(M;\Zz/2),$$
+
\end{equation} Define the total Wu class $$v\in H^{\ast }(M;\Zz/2)=H^{0}(M;\Zz/2)\oplus H^{1}(M;\Zz /2)\oplus ... \oplus H^{n}(M;\Zz/2),$$
as the formal sum
as the formal sum
\begin{equation} v:=1+v_{1}+v_{2}+...+v_{n}. \end{equation}
+
$$ v:=1+v_{1}+v_{2}+...+v_{n}. $$
Using the total Steenrod square, $$Sq:=Sq^{0}+Sq^{1}+Sq^{2}+ \dots \colon H^{\ast}(M;\Zz /2)\longrightarrow H^{\ast }(M;\Zz/2),$$ equation (\ref{W1}) translates into the following formula
Using the total Steenrod square, $$Sq:=Sq^{0}+Sq^{1}+Sq^{2}+ \dots \colon H^{\ast}(M;\Zz /2)\longrightarrow H^{\ast }(M;\Zz/2),$$ equation (\ref{W1}) translates into the following formula
\begin{equation} \label{W2} \left\langle v\cup x,[M]\right\rangle =\left\langle Sq(x),[M]\right\rangle \quad \quad \text{for all} x\in H^{\ast }(M;\Zz/2), \end{equation}
\begin{equation} \label{W2} \left\langle v\cup x,[M]\right\rangle =\left\langle Sq(x),[M]\right\rangle \quad \quad \text{for all} x\in H^{\ast }(M;\Zz/2), \end{equation}
Line 24: Line 24:
{{beginthm|Theorem|}}
{{beginthm|Theorem|}}
The total Stiefel-Whitney class of $M$, $$w=w(M):=1+w_{1}(M)+w_{2}(M)+...+w_{n}(M),$$ is given by
The total Stiefel-Whitney class of $M$, $$w=w(M):=1+w_{1}(M)+w_{2}(M)+...+w_{n}(M),$$ is given by
\begin{equation} w(M)=Sq(v), \end{equation}
+
$$ w(M)=Sq(v), $$
or equivalently \begin{equation} w_{k}(M)=\sum_{i=0}Sq^{i}(v_{k-i}). \end{equation}
+
or equivalently
+
$$ w_{k}(M)=\sum_{i=0}Sq^{i}(v_{k-i}).$$
{{endthm}}
{{endthm}}
For a proof see \cite[§11]{Milnor&Stasheff1974}. Since $Sq$ is a ring automorphism of $$H^{\ast \ast }(X;\Zz/2):=\prod_{i\geq 0}H^{i}(X;\Zz/2),$$ $Sq^{-1}$ is defined on $H^{\ast \ast }(M;\Zz/2)=H^{\ast }(M;\Zz/2)$ and we may write
For a proof see \cite[§11]{Milnor&Stasheff1974}. Since $Sq$ is a ring automorphism of $$H^{\ast \ast }(X;\Zz/2):=\prod_{i\geq 0}H^{i}(X;\Zz/2),$$ $Sq^{-1}$ is defined on $H^{\ast \ast }(M;\Zz/2)=H^{\ast }(M;\Zz/2)$ and we may write
$$ v=Sq^{-1}(w(M)). $$ The formula $w(M)=Sq(v)$ may be used to extend the definition of the Stiefel-Whitney classes to the class of topological manifolds.
+
$$ v=Sq^{-1}(w(M)). $$ The formula $w(M)=Sq(v)$ may be used to extend the definition of the Stiefel-Whitney classes to Poincaré complexes.
</wikitex>
</wikitex>
+
==An example==
==An example==
<wikitex>;
<wikitex>;
The following example is taken from \cite[§11]{Milnor&Stasheff1974}. If $H^{\ast }(M;\Zz/2)$ is of the form $\Zz/2[x]/(x^{dm+1}),$ where $x\in H^{d}(X;\Zz/2),$ $d\geq 1,$ $n=d\cdot m$, for example if $M = \mathbb{C}P^m$, then
The following example is taken from \cite[§11]{Milnor&Stasheff1974}. If $H^{\ast }(M;\Zz/2)$ is of the form $\Zz/2[x]/(x^{dm+1}),$ where $x\in H^{d}(X;\Zz/2),$ $d\geq 1,$ $n=d\cdot m$, for example if $M = \mathbb{C}P^m$, then
\begin{equation} v=(1+x+x^{2}+x^{4}+\dots)^{m+1}~~\text{and}~~w(M)=(1+x)^{m+1} \end{equation} with
+
$$ v=(1+x+x^{2}+x^{4}+\dots)^{m+1}~~\text{and}~~w(M)=(1+x)^{m+1} $$
\begin{equation} Sq(x)=x+x^{2} \quad \text{and} \quad Sq^{-1}(x)=x+x^{2}+x^{4}+ \dots . \end{equation}
+
with
+
$$Sq(x)=x+x^{2} \quad \text{and} \quad Sq^{-1}(x)=x+x^{2}+x^{4}+ \dots~.$$
</wikitex>
</wikitex>
+
==A generalization==
==A generalization==
<wikitex>;
<wikitex>;
The following example is taken from {{cite|Atiyah&Hirzebruch1961}}. Let $\lambda $ be a natural ring automorphism of $H^{\ast \ast }(X;\Zz/2)$ and $\Phi _{\xi }$ the Thom isomorphism of a real vector bundle $\xi $ on $X$. Define
The following example is taken from {{cite|Atiyah&Hirzebruch1961}}. Let $\lambda $ be a natural ring automorphism of $H^{\ast \ast }(X;\Zz/2)$ and $\Phi _{\xi }$ the Thom isomorphism of a real vector bundle $\xi $ on $X$. Define
\begin{equation} \underline{\lambda }=\underline{\lambda }(\xi ):=\Phi _{\xi }^{-1}\circ \lambda \circ \Phi _{\xi }(1)~~\text{and}~~\textup{Wu}(\lambda ,\xi ):=\lambda ^{-1}\circ \underline{\lambda }=\lambda ^{-1}\circ \Phi _{\xi }^{-1}\circ \lambda \circ \Phi _{\xi }(1). <label>W5</label>
+
$$ \underline{\lambda }=\underline{\lambda }(\xi ):=\Phi _{\xi }^{-1}\circ \lambda \circ \Phi _{\xi }(1)~~\text{and}~~\textup{Wu}(\lambda ,\xi ):=\lambda ^{-1}\circ \underline{\lambda }=\lambda ^{-1}\circ \Phi _{\xi }^{-1}\circ \lambda \circ \Phi _{\xi }(1). $$
\end{equation}
+
If $\lambda =Sq$, then $\underline{\lambda }=w$ is the total Stiefel-Whitney classes $w(\xi )$ of $\xi $ (\cite[§8]{Milnor&Stasheff1974}) and with $\xi =\tau M,$ the tangent bundle of $X=M$, we have $\textup{Wu}(Sq,\tau M)=v$, the total Wu class of $M$. In general $\xi \mapsto \underline{\lambda }(\xi )$ and $\xi \mapsto \textup{Wu}(\lambda ,\xi )$ define multiplicative characteristic classes, translating Whitney sum into cup product, i.e. they satisfy a Whitney product type formula
If $\lambda =Sq$, then $\underline{\lambda }=w$ is the total Stiefel-Whitney classes $w(\xi )$ of $\xi $ (\cite[§8]{Milnor&Stasheff1974}) and with $\xi =\tau M,$ the tangent bundle of $X=M$, we have $\textup{Wu}(Sq,\tau M)=v$, the total Wu class of $M$. In general $\xi \mapsto \underline{\lambda }(\xi )$ and $\xi \mapsto \textup{Wu}(\lambda ,\xi )$ define multiplicative characteristic classes, translating Whitney sum into cup product, i.e. they satisfy a Whitney product type formula \begin{equation} \underline{\lambda }(\xi \oplus \eta )=\underline{\lambda }(\xi )\cup \underline{\lambda }(\eta )\text{ \ and \ }\textup{Wu}(\lambda ,\xi \oplus \eta )=\textup{Wu}(\lambda ,\xi )\cup \textup{Wu}(\lambda ,\eta ). \end{equation}
+
$$ \underline{\lambda }(\xi \oplus \eta )=\underline{\lambda }(\xi )\cup \underline{\lambda }(\eta )\quad \text{ and } \quad \textup{Wu}(\lambda ,\xi \oplus \eta )=\textup{Wu}(\lambda ,\xi )\cup \textup{Wu}(\lambda ,\eta ). $$
Such a characteristic class is determined by a power series $f(x) \in \Zz/2[[x]]$, which is given by its value on the universal line bundle. The generalized Wu class $\textup{Wu}(\lambda ,\xi )$ is defined as a commutator class, thus measuring how $\lambda $ and $\Phi _{\xi }$ commute. This is similar to the situation considered in the (differential) Riemann-Roch formulas, in which the interaction between the Chern character and the Thom isomorphism in $K$ -Theory and rational cohomology is formulated. This relation is more than only formal: Let $T_{i}$ be the $i$-th Todd polynomial, then $2^{i}\cdot T_{i}$ is a rational polynomial with denominators prime to $2,$ hence its reduction to mod $2$ cohomology is well defined. Then Atiyah and Hirzebruch proved:
Such a characteristic class is determined by a power series $f(x) \in \Zz/2[[x]]$, which is given by its value on the universal line bundle. The generalized Wu class $\textup{Wu}(\lambda ,\xi )$ is defined as a commutator class, thus measuring how $\lambda $ and $\Phi _{\xi }$ commute. This is similar to the situation considered in the (differential) Riemann-Roch formulas, in which the interaction between the Chern character and the Thom isomorphism in $K$ -Theory and rational cohomology is formulated. This relation is more than only formal: Let $T_{i}$ be the $i$-th Todd polynomial, then $2^{i}\cdot T_{i}$ is a rational polynomial with denominators prime to $2,$ hence its reduction to mod $2$ cohomology is well defined. Then Atiyah and Hirzebruch proved:
{{beginthm|Theorem|[{{cite|Atiyah&Hirzebruch1961}}]}}
+
{{beginthm|Theorem|{{cite|Atiyah&Hirzebruch1961}}}}
\begin{equation} \textup{Wu}(Sq,\xi )=\sum_{i\geq 0}2^{i}\cdot T_{i}(w_{1}(\xi ),w_{2}(\xi ), \dots ,w_{i}(\xi )) \quad \text{in}~~H^{\ast \ast }(X;\Zz/2). \end{equation}
+
$$\textup{Wu}(Sq,\xi )=\sum_{i\geq 0}2^{i}\cdot T_{i}(w_{1}(\xi ),w_{2}(\xi ), \dots ,w_{i}(\xi )) \quad \text{in}~~H^{\ast \ast }(X;\Zz/2). $$
{{endthm}}
{{endthm}}
The proof is by comparing the power series belonging to the multiplicative characteristic classes on both sides of the equation, which turn out to be $ x/Sq^{-1}(x)=1+\sum_{j\geq 0}x^{2^{j}}.$ For a continuous map $f:M\rightarrow N$ between closed differentiable manifolds the analogue of the Riemann-Roch formula is
The proof is by comparing the power series belonging to the multiplicative characteristic classes on both sides of the equation, which turn out to be $ x/Sq^{-1}(x)=1+\sum_{j\geq 0}x^{2^{j}}.$ For a continuous map $f:M\rightarrow N$ between closed differentiable manifolds the analogue of the Riemann-Roch formula is
\begin{equation} f_{!}(\lambda (x)\cup \textup{Wu}(\lambda ^{-1},\tau M))=\lambda (f_{!}(x))\cup \textup{Wu}(\lambda ^{-1},\tau N). \end{equation}
+
$$ f_{!}(\lambda (x)\cup \textup{Wu}(\lambda ^{-1},\tau M))=\lambda (f_{!}(x))\cup \textup{Wu}(\lambda ^{-1},\tau N). $$
Here $f_{!}$ is the Umkehr map of $f$ defined by $f_{\ast }$ via Poincaré duality. In the case $f:M\rightarrow \ast$, this reduces to $\left\langle \textup{Wu}(\lambda ,\tau M)\cup x,[M]\right\rangle =\left\langle \lambda (x),[M]\right\rangle ,$ generalizing (\ref{W2}).
Here $f_{!}$ is the Umkehr map of $f$ defined by $f_{\ast }$ via Poincaré duality. In the case $f:M\rightarrow \ast$, this reduces to $\left\langle \textup{Wu}(\lambda ,\tau M)\cup x,[M]\right\rangle =\left\langle \lambda (x),[M]\right\rangle ,$ generalizing (\ref{W2}).
</wikitex>
</wikitex>
+
==Applications==
==Applications==
<wikitex>;
<wikitex>;
<ol>
<ol>
<li> The definition of the total Wu class $v$ and $w=Sq(v)$ show, that the Stiefel-Whitney classes of a smooth manifold are invariants of its homotopy type.
<li> The definition of the total Wu class $v$ and $w=Sq(v)$ show, that the Stiefel-Whitney classes of a smooth manifold are invariants of its homotopy type.
<li> Since the Stiefel-Whitney classes of a closed $n$-manifold determine its un-oriented bordism class \cite[Théorém IV.10]{Thom1954}, a corollary of (1) is: Homotopy equivalent manifolds are unoriented bordant.
+
<li> Since the Stiefel-Whitney classes of a closed $n$-manifold determine its un-oriented bordism class \cite[Théorém IV.10]{Thom1954}, a corollary of (1) is: Homotopy equivalent manifolds are un-oriented bordant.
<li> Inserting the Stiefel-Whitney classes of $M$ for $x$ in
<li> Inserting the Stiefel-Whitney classes of $M$ for $x$ in
$$ \left\langle v\cup x,[M]\right\rangle =\left\langle Sq(x),[M]\right\rangle, $$
$$ \left\langle v\cup x,[M]\right\rangle =\left\langle Sq(x),[M]\right\rangle, $$
and using $v=Sq^{-1}(w)$ one gets relations between Stiefel-Whitney numbers of $n$-manifolds. It is a result of Dold ({{cite|Dold1956}}) that all relations between Stiefel-Whitney numbers of $n$-manifolds are obtained in this way.
and using $v=Sq^{-1}(w)$ one gets relations between Stiefel-Whitney numbers of $n$-manifolds. It is a result of Dold ({{cite|Dold1956}}) that all relations between Stiefel-Whitney numbers of $n$-manifolds are obtained in this way.
<li> Conditions on the Wu classes $v_{s}$ for nonbounding manifolds are given in {{cite|Stong&Yoshida1987}}. 5. For an appearance of the Wu class in surgery theory see \cite{Madsen&Milgram1979|Ch. 4}.<\ol>
+
<li> Conditions on the Wu classes $v_{s}$ for nonbounding manifolds are given in {{cite|Stong&Yoshida1987}}.
+
<li> For an appearance of the Wu class in surgery theory see \cite{Madsen&Milgram1979|Ch. 4}.</ol>
+
</wikitex>
=== Remarks ===
=== Remarks ===
+
<wikitex>;
# Most of the above has analogues for odd primes, e.g. see {{cite|Atiyah&Hirzebruch1961}}.
# Most of the above has analogues for odd primes, e.g. see {{cite|Atiyah&Hirzebruch1961}}.
# Not directly related to the Wu class is Wu's explicit formula for the action of Steenrod squares on the Stiefel-Whitney classes of a vector bundle $\xi $ (see \cite[§8]{Milnor&Stasheff1974}):
# Not directly related to the Wu class is Wu's explicit formula for the action of Steenrod squares on the Stiefel-Whitney classes of a vector bundle $\xi $ (see \cite[§8]{Milnor&Stasheff1974}):
\begin{equation} Sq^{k}(w_{m}(\xi ))=w_{k}\cup w_{m}+\binom{k-m}{1}w_{k-1}\cup w_{m+1}+ \dots + \binom{k-m}{k}w_{0}\cup w_{m+k} \end{equation} where $\binom{x}{i}=x(x-1)\dots(x-i+1)/i!.$
+
$$ Sq^{k}(w_{m}(\xi ))=w_{k}\cup w_{m}+\binom{k-m}{1}w_{k-1}\cup w_{m+1}+ \dots + \binom{k-m}{k}w_{0}\cup w_{m+k} $$
+
where $\binom{x}{i}=x(x-1)\dots(x-i+1)/i!.$
</wikitex>
</wikitex>
== References ==
== References ==
{{#RefList:}}
{{#RefList:}}
+
== External links ==
+
* [http://ncatlab.org/nlab/show/Wu+class Wu class in nLab]
+
* [[Wikipedia:Stiefel-Whitney_class#Wu_classes|Wu class]] in the Wikipedia page on Stiefel-Whitney classes
[[Category:Definitions]]
[[Category:Definitions]]

Latest revision as of 04:11, 3 February 2021

An earlier version of this page was published in the Definitions section of the Bulletin of the Manifold Atlas: screen, print.

You may view the version used for publication as of 15:43, 18 February 2014 and the changes since publication.

The user responsible for this page is Karlheinz Knapp. No other user may edit this page at present.

Contents

1 Introduction

The Wu class of a manifold M is a characteristic class allowing a computation of the Stiefel-Whitney classes of M by knowing only H^{\ast}(M;\Zz/2) and the action of the Steenrod squares.

2 Definition

Let M be a closed topological n-manifold, [M]\in H_{n}(M;\Zz/2) its fundamental class, Sq^{k} the k-th Steenrod square and
\displaystyle \left\langle \cdot~,~\cdot \right\rangle:H^{i}(M;\Zz/2)\times H_{i}(M;\Zz /2)\longrightarrow \Zz/2
the usual Kronecker pairing. This pairing, together with the Poincaré duality isomorphism a\mapsto a\cap \lbrack M], induces isomorphisms
\displaystyle  \textup{Hom}(H^{n-k}(M;\Zz/2), \Zz/2) \cong H_{n-k}(M;\Zz /2)\cong H^{k}(M;\Zz/2),

under which the homomorphism x\mapsto \left\langle Sq^{k}(x),[M]\right\rangle from H^{n-k}(M;\Zz/2) to \Zz/2 corresponds to a well defined cohomology class v_{k}\in H^{k}(M;\Zz/2). This cohomology class is called the k-th Wu class of M ([Milnor&Stasheff1974, §11]). We may rewrite its definition equivalently as an identity

(1)\left\langle v_{k}\cup x,[M]\right\rangle =\left\langle Sq^{k}(x),[M]\right\rangle \quad \quad \text{ for all }x\in H^{n-k}(M;\Zz/2).
Define the total Wu class
\displaystyle v\in H^{\ast }(M;\Zz/2)=H^{0}(M;\Zz/2)\oplus H^{1}(M;\Zz /2)\oplus ... \oplus H^{n}(M;\Zz/2),

as the formal sum

\displaystyle  v:=1+v_{1}+v_{2}+...+v_{n}.
Using the total Steenrod square,
\displaystyle Sq:=Sq^{0}+Sq^{1}+Sq^{2}+ \dots \colon H^{\ast}(M;\Zz /2)\longrightarrow H^{\ast }(M;\Zz/2),
equation (1) translates into the following formula
(2)\left\langle v\cup x,[M]\right\rangle =\left\langle Sq(x),[M]\right\rangle \quad \quad \text{for all} x\in H^{\ast }(M;\Zz/2),

which may also be used as a definition of the total Wu class of M. From the definition it is clear that the Wu class is defined even for a Poincaré complex M.

3 Relation to Stiefel-Whitney classes

From now on all manifolds are supposed to be smooth. The following theorem of Wu Wen-Tsun ([Wu1950]) allows a computation of the Stiefel-Whitney classes w_{i}(M) of M using only H^{\ast }(M;\Zz/2) and the action of the Steenrod squares:

Theorem 3.1.

The total Stiefel-Whitney class of M,
\displaystyle w=w(M):=1+w_{1}(M)+w_{2}(M)+...+w_{n}(M),
is given by
\displaystyle  w(M)=Sq(v),

or equivalently

\displaystyle  w_{k}(M)=\sum_{i=0}Sq^{i}(v_{k-i}).
For a proof see [Milnor&Stasheff1974, §11]. Since Sq is a ring automorphism of
\displaystyle H^{\ast \ast }(X;\Zz/2):=\prod_{i\geq 0}H^{i}(X;\Zz/2),
Sq^{-1} is defined on H^{\ast \ast }(M;\Zz/2)=H^{\ast }(M;\Zz/2) and we may write
\displaystyle  v=Sq^{-1}(w(M)).
The formula w(M)=Sq(v) may be used to extend the definition of the Stiefel-Whitney classes to Poincaré complexes.

4 An example

The following example is taken from [Milnor&Stasheff1974, §11]. If H^{\ast }(M;\Zz/2) is of the form \Zz/2[x]/(x^{dm+1}), where x\in H^{d}(X;\Zz/2), d\geq 1, n=d\cdot m, for example if M = \mathbb{C}P^m, then

\displaystyle  v=(1+x+x^{2}+x^{4}+\dots)^{m+1}~~\text{and}~~w(M)=(1+x)^{m+1}

with

\displaystyle Sq(x)=x+x^{2} \quad \text{and} \quad Sq^{-1}(x)=x+x^{2}+x^{4}+ \dots~.

5 A generalization

The following example is taken from [Atiyah&Hirzebruch1961]. Let \lambda be a natural ring automorphism of H^{\ast \ast }(X;\Zz/2) and \Phi _{\xi } the Thom isomorphism of a real vector bundle \xi on X. Define

\displaystyle  \underline{\lambda }=\underline{\lambda }(\xi ):=\Phi _{\xi }^{-1}\circ \lambda \circ \Phi _{\xi }(1)~~\text{and}~~\textup{Wu}(\lambda ,\xi ):=\lambda ^{-1}\circ \underline{\lambda }=\lambda ^{-1}\circ \Phi _{\xi }^{-1}\circ \lambda \circ \Phi _{\xi }(1).

If \lambda =Sq, then \underline{\lambda }=w is the total Stiefel-Whitney classes w(\xi ) of \xi ([Milnor&Stasheff1974, §8]) and with \xi =\tau M, the tangent bundle of X=M, we have \textup{Wu}(Sq,\tau M)=v, the total Wu class of M. In general \xi \mapsto \underline{\lambda }(\xi ) and \xi \mapsto \textup{Wu}(\lambda ,\xi ) define multiplicative characteristic classes, translating Whitney sum into cup product, i.e. they satisfy a Whitney product type formula

\displaystyle  \underline{\lambda }(\xi \oplus \eta )=\underline{\lambda }(\xi )\cup \underline{\lambda }(\eta )\quad \text{ and } \quad \textup{Wu}(\lambda ,\xi \oplus \eta )=\textup{Wu}(\lambda ,\xi )\cup \textup{Wu}(\lambda ,\eta ).

Such a characteristic class is determined by a power series f(x) \in \Zz/2[[x]], which is given by its value on the universal line bundle. The generalized Wu class \textup{Wu}(\lambda ,\xi ) is defined as a commutator class, thus measuring how \lambda and \Phi _{\xi } commute. This is similar to the situation considered in the (differential) Riemann-Roch formulas, in which the interaction between the Chern character and the Thom isomorphism in K -Theory and rational cohomology is formulated. This relation is more than only formal: Let T_{i} be the i-th Todd polynomial, then 2^{i}\cdot T_{i} is a rational polynomial with denominators prime to 2, hence its reduction to mod 2 cohomology is well defined. Then Atiyah and Hirzebruch proved:

Theorem 5.1 [Atiyah&Hirzebruch1961].

\displaystyle \textup{Wu}(Sq,\xi )=\sum_{i\geq 0}2^{i}\cdot T_{i}(w_{1}(\xi ),w_{2}(\xi ), \dots ,w_{i}(\xi )) \quad \text{in}~~H^{\ast \ast }(X;\Zz/2).

The proof is by comparing the power series belonging to the multiplicative characteristic classes on both sides of the equation, which turn out to be x/Sq^{-1}(x)=1+\sum_{j\geq 0}x^{2^{j}}. For a continuous map f:M\rightarrow N between closed differentiable manifolds the analogue of the Riemann-Roch formula is

\displaystyle  f_{!}(\lambda (x)\cup \textup{Wu}(\lambda ^{-1},\tau M))=\lambda (f_{!}(x))\cup \textup{Wu}(\lambda ^{-1},\tau N).

Here f_{!} is the Umkehr map of f defined by f_{\ast } via Poincaré duality. In the case f:M\rightarrow \ast, this reduces to \left\langle \textup{Wu}(\lambda ,\tau M)\cup x,[M]\right\rangle =\left\langle \lambda (x),[M]\right\rangle , generalizing (2).

6 Applications

  1. The definition of the total Wu class v and w=Sq(v) show, that the Stiefel-Whitney classes of a smooth manifold are invariants of its homotopy type.
  2. Since the Stiefel-Whitney classes of a closed n-manifold determine its un-oriented bordism class [Thom1954, Théorém IV.10], a corollary of (1) is: Homotopy equivalent manifolds are un-oriented bordant.
  3. Inserting the Stiefel-Whitney classes of M for x in
    \displaystyle  \left\langle v\cup x,[M]\right\rangle =\left\langle Sq(x),[M]\right\rangle,

    and using v=Sq^{-1}(w) one gets relations between Stiefel-Whitney numbers of n-manifolds. It is a result of Dold ([Dold1956]) that all relations between Stiefel-Whitney numbers of n-manifolds are obtained in this way.

  4. Conditions on the Wu classes v_{s} for nonbounding manifolds are given in [Stong&Yoshida1987].
  5. For an appearance of the Wu class in surgery theory see [Madsen&Milgram1979, Ch. 4].

6.1 Remarks

  1. Most of the above has analogues for odd primes, e.g. see [Atiyah&Hirzebruch1961].
  2. Not directly related to the Wu class is Wu's explicit formula for the action of Steenrod squares on the Stiefel-Whitney classes of a vector bundle \xi (see [Milnor&Stasheff1974, §8]):
\displaystyle  Sq^{k}(w_{m}(\xi ))=w_{k}\cup w_{m}+\binom{k-m}{1}w_{k-1}\cup w_{m+1}+ \dots + \binom{k-m}{k}w_{0}\cup w_{m+k}

where \binom{x}{i}=x(x-1)\dots(x-i+1)/i!.

7 References

8 External links

Personal tools
Namespaces
Variants
Actions
Navigation
Interaction
Toolbox