Talk:Microbundles (Ex)
Marek Kaluba (Talk | contribs) (WiP) |
Marek Kaluba (Talk | contribs) |
||
Line 23: | Line 23: | ||
To prove that the second condition is satisfied we need to use local chart around $x$. | To prove that the second condition is satisfied we need to use local chart around $x$. | ||
− | Choose $U$ to be one of the open sets coming from atlas of $M$ and let $\phi\colon U\to \mathbb{R}^n$ be associated chart. The obvious | + | Choose $U$ to be one of the open sets coming from atlas of $M$ and let $\phi\colon U\to \mathbb{R}^n$ be associated chart. The obvious choice for neighbourhood $V\subset M\times M$ is to take $U\times U$. The first naive candidate for $h\colon V=U\times U\to U\times\mathbb{R}^n$ would be map $\id\times \phi$. However such $h$ fails to make the following diagram commute |
$$ | $$ | ||
\xymatrix{ | \xymatrix{ | ||
Line 50: | Line 50: | ||
{{endthm|Definition}} | {{endthm|Definition}} | ||
− | In our case | + | In our case we have |
− | + | $$ | |
− | + | \xymatrix{ | |
+ | U \ar[d]^{\Delta_M}\ar[r]^{s_0}& V \ar[d]^{p_2}\\ | ||
+ | U\times U\ar[r]^{p_1} \ar[ur]^{H} & U,} | ||
+ | $$ | ||
+ | where $V\subset TM$ is an open neighbourhood of the zero section. Because of the vector bundle structure we may identify $V\cong U\times \mathbb{R}^n$ via local trivialisation. | ||
{{endproof}} | {{endproof}} | ||
</wikitex> | </wikitex> |
Revision as of 19:42, 29 May 2012
Let us begin with the definition of microbundle.
Definition 0.1.
An


- for all
there exist open neigbourhood
and an open neighbourhood
of
and a homeomorphism
Moreover, the homeomorphism above must make the following diagram commute:
![\displaystyle \xymatrix{ U \ar[d]^{i}\ar[r]& U\times\mathbb{R}^n \ar[d]^{p_1}\\ V\ar[r]^{j} \ar[ur]^{h} & U,}](/images/math/d/3/e/d3e5c205b907accbb9ef7119904cef31.png)
where is projection on the first factor and
is included as a
-section in
.
Exercise 0.2 [Milnor1964, Lemma 2.1].
Let be a topological manifold. Show that
is a microbundle.
Proof.
Let be a topological manifold. Then the composition
sends
, so the first condition in the definition is satisfied.
To prove that the second condition is satisfied we need to use local chart around .
Choose
to be one of the open sets coming from atlas of
and let
be associated chart. The obvious choice for neighbourhood
is to take
. The first naive candidate for
would be map
. However such
fails to make the following diagram commute
![\displaystyle \xymatrix{ U \ar[d]^{\Delta_M}\ar[r]^{\id\times \{0\}}& U\times\mathbb{R}^n \ar[d]^{p_1}\\ V\ar[r]^{p_1} \ar[ur]^{h} & U,}](/images/math/c/2/a/c2ad860511c07d854b43c6c4c6eef162.png)
since is mapped to
and
doesn't necessarily be
(well, it depends on our definition of an atlas of a manifold?). We need just a small adjustment:
.

Exercise 0.3 [Milnor1964, Theorem 2.2].
Let be a (paracompact!) smooth manifold. Show that
and
are isomorphic microbundles.
Proof.
We have two concurring definitions of micro-tangent bundle. The first is given by the exercise above, the second by forgeting about the vector bundle structure on and treating it just as a microbundle
where
is the zero section.
However to show that these two definition agree we need a notion of microbundle isomorphism.
Definition 0.4.
Two microbundles ,
over the same space
are isomorphic if there exist neighbourhoods
of
and
of
and a homeomorphism
making the following diagram commute.
![\displaystyle \xymatrix{ U \ar[d]^{i_1}\ar[r]^{i_2}& V_2 \ar[d]^{p_2}\\ V_1\ar[r]^{p_1} \ar[ur]^{H} & U,}](/images/math/8/e/1/8e1facd3e8d7d7b22c3a1b8918c692a5.png)
In our case we have
![\displaystyle \xymatrix{ U \ar[d]^{\Delta_M}\ar[r]^{s_0}& V \ar[d]^{p_2}\\ U\times U\ar[r]^{p_1} \ar[ur]^{H} & U,}](/images/math/d/a/c/dacaeb07164a1ae26a4a5bc454543993.png)
where is an open neighbourhood of the zero section. Because of the vector bundle structure we may identify
via local trivialisation.



- for all
there exist open neigbourhood
and an open neighbourhood
of
and a homeomorphism
Moreover, the homeomorphism above must make the following diagram commute:
![\displaystyle \xymatrix{ U \ar[d]^{i}\ar[r]& U\times\mathbb{R}^n \ar[d]^{p_1}\\ V\ar[r]^{j} \ar[ur]^{h} & U,}](/images/math/d/3/e/d3e5c205b907accbb9ef7119904cef31.png)
where is projection on the first factor and
is included as a
-section in
.
Exercise 0.2 [Milnor1964, Lemma 2.1].
Let be a topological manifold. Show that
is a microbundle.
Proof.
Let be a topological manifold. Then the composition
sends
, so the first condition in the definition is satisfied.
To prove that the second condition is satisfied we need to use local chart around .
Choose
to be one of the open sets coming from atlas of
and let
be associated chart. The obvious choice for neighbourhood
is to take
. The first naive candidate for
would be map
. However such
fails to make the following diagram commute
![\displaystyle \xymatrix{ U \ar[d]^{\Delta_M}\ar[r]^{\id\times \{0\}}& U\times\mathbb{R}^n \ar[d]^{p_1}\\ V\ar[r]^{p_1} \ar[ur]^{h} & U,}](/images/math/c/2/a/c2ad860511c07d854b43c6c4c6eef162.png)
since is mapped to
and
doesn't necessarily be
(well, it depends on our definition of an atlas of a manifold?). We need just a small adjustment:
.

Exercise 0.3 [Milnor1964, Theorem 2.2].
Let be a (paracompact!) smooth manifold. Show that
and
are isomorphic microbundles.
Proof.
We have two concurring definitions of micro-tangent bundle. The first is given by the exercise above, the second by forgeting about the vector bundle structure on and treating it just as a microbundle
where
is the zero section.
However to show that these two definition agree we need a notion of microbundle isomorphism.
Definition 0.4.
Two microbundles ,
over the same space
are isomorphic if there exist neighbourhoods
of
and
of
and a homeomorphism
making the following diagram commute.
![\displaystyle \xymatrix{ U \ar[d]^{i_1}\ar[r]^{i_2}& V_2 \ar[d]^{p_2}\\ V_1\ar[r]^{p_1} \ar[ur]^{H} & U,}](/images/math/8/e/1/8e1facd3e8d7d7b22c3a1b8918c692a5.png)
In our case we have
![\displaystyle \xymatrix{ U \ar[d]^{\Delta_M}\ar[r]^{s_0}& V \ar[d]^{p_2}\\ U\times U\ar[r]^{p_1} \ar[ur]^{H} & U,}](/images/math/d/a/c/dacaeb07164a1ae26a4a5bc454543993.png)
where is an open neighbourhood of the zero section. Because of the vector bundle structure we may identify
via local trivialisation.



- for all
there exist open neigbourhood
and an open neighbourhood
of
and a homeomorphism
Moreover, the homeomorphism above must make the following diagram commute:
![\displaystyle \xymatrix{ U \ar[d]^{i}\ar[r]& U\times\mathbb{R}^n \ar[d]^{p_1}\\ V\ar[r]^{j} \ar[ur]^{h} & U,}](/images/math/d/3/e/d3e5c205b907accbb9ef7119904cef31.png)
where is projection on the first factor and
is included as a
-section in
.
Exercise 0.2 [Milnor1964, Lemma 2.1].
Let be a topological manifold. Show that
is a microbundle.
Proof.
Let be a topological manifold. Then the composition
sends
, so the first condition in the definition is satisfied.
To prove that the second condition is satisfied we need to use local chart around .
Choose
to be one of the open sets coming from atlas of
and let
be associated chart. The obvious choice for neighbourhood
is to take
. The first naive candidate for
would be map
. However such
fails to make the following diagram commute
![\displaystyle \xymatrix{ U \ar[d]^{\Delta_M}\ar[r]^{\id\times \{0\}}& U\times\mathbb{R}^n \ar[d]^{p_1}\\ V\ar[r]^{p_1} \ar[ur]^{h} & U,}](/images/math/c/2/a/c2ad860511c07d854b43c6c4c6eef162.png)
since is mapped to
and
doesn't necessarily be
(well, it depends on our definition of an atlas of a manifold?). We need just a small adjustment:
.

Exercise 0.3 [Milnor1964, Theorem 2.2].
Let be a (paracompact!) smooth manifold. Show that
and
are isomorphic microbundles.
Proof.
We have two concurring definitions of micro-tangent bundle. The first is given by the exercise above, the second by forgeting about the vector bundle structure on and treating it just as a microbundle
where
is the zero section.
However to show that these two definition agree we need a notion of microbundle isomorphism.
Definition 0.4.
Two microbundles ,
over the same space
are isomorphic if there exist neighbourhoods
of
and
of
and a homeomorphism
making the following diagram commute.
![\displaystyle \xymatrix{ U \ar[d]^{i_1}\ar[r]^{i_2}& V_2 \ar[d]^{p_2}\\ V_1\ar[r]^{p_1} \ar[ur]^{H} & U,}](/images/math/8/e/1/8e1facd3e8d7d7b22c3a1b8918c692a5.png)
In our case we have
![\displaystyle \xymatrix{ U \ar[d]^{\Delta_M}\ar[r]^{s_0}& V \ar[d]^{p_2}\\ U\times U\ar[r]^{p_1} \ar[ur]^{H} & U,}](/images/math/d/a/c/dacaeb07164a1ae26a4a5bc454543993.png)
where is an open neighbourhood of the zero section. Because of the vector bundle structure we may identify
via local trivialisation.
