# Super manifolds: an incomplete survey

(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
 An earlier version of this page was published in the Bulletin of the Manifold Atlas: screen, print. You may view the version used for publication as of 09:56, 1 April 2011 and the changes since publication.

We present an incomplete survey on some basic notions of super manifolds which may serve as a short introduction to this subject. Almost all the material is taken from the beautiful survey article on super manifolds [Deligne&Morgan1999]. Standard references also include [Leites1980], [Berezin1987], [Manin1988] or [Voronov1991]. The material below is a prerequisite to our papers [Hohnhold&Kreck&Stolz&Teichner2010] and [Stolz&Teichner2008].

## 1 Super Algebra

Let us begin by explaining briefly what super means in an algebraic context, working with the ground field of real numbers. The monoidal category of super vector spaces, with tensor products, is by definition the same as the monoidal category of
Tex syntax error
$We present an incomplete survey on some basic notions of super manifolds which may serve as a short introduction to this subject. Almost all the material is taken from the beautiful survey article on super manifolds \cite{Deligne&Morgan1999}. Standard references also include \cite{Leites1980}, \cite{Berezin1987}, \cite{Manin1988} or \cite{Voronov1991}. The material below is a prerequisite to our papers \cite{Hohnhold&Kreck&Stolz&Teichner2010} and \cite{Stolz&Teichner2008}. ==Super Algebra== ; Let us begin by explaining briefly what ''super'' means in an algebraic context, working with the ground field of real numbers. The monoidal category of ''super vector spaces'', with tensor products, is by definition the same as the monoidal category of \Z/2-graded vector spaces, with the graded tensor product. As a consequence, a super algebra is simply a monoidal object in this category and is hence the same thing as a \Z/2-graded algebra. For example, the endomorphism ring \End(V) of a super vector space V inherits a natural \Z/2-grading from that of V. The distinction between these notions only arises from the choice of symmetry operators \sigma=\sigma_{V,W} : V\otimes W \overset{\cong}{\longrightarrow} W \otimes V. There are two standard choices, yielding two very different ''symmetric'' monoidal categories. For super vector spaces one has \sigma(v\otimes w) = (-1)^{|v|\cdot |w|} w\otimes v , where |v| is the \Z/2-degree of a homogenous vector v\in V. For \Z/2-graded vector spaces the signs would be omitted. This basic difference is sometimes summarized as the \bullet '''Sign rule:''' Commuting two odd quantities yields a sign -1. As a consequence, a super algebra is ''commutative'' if for all homogenenous a,b \in A we have ab = (-1)^{|a| |b|} ba , a very different notion than a commutative \Z/2-graded algebra. The standard examples of commutative super algebras are the exterior algebras \Lambda^*(\R^q). As we shall see, the generators of \Lambda^*(\R^q) yield the so-called odd coordinates on super manifolds; these anti-commute and hence are useful when trying to describe physical systems involving Fermions. Super algebras also arise naturally in algebraic topology: for every space X, the cohomology ring H^*(X;\R) is a commutative super algebra. Let A be a commutative super algebra. The ''derivations'' of A are endomorphisms D \in \End(A) satisfying the Leibniz rule: Whenever we write formulas involving the degree |.| of certain elements, we implicitly assume that these elements are homogenous. D(a\cdot b) = Da \cdot b + (-1)^{|D| |a|} a \cdot Db. \Der A is a super Lie algebra with respect to the bracket operation [D,E] := DE - (-1)^{|D| |E|}ED This means that the following axioms are satisfied for L=\Der A. {{beginrem|Definition}} A ''super Lie algebra'' is a super vector space L together with a ''Lie bracket'' [\cdot, \cdot]: L\otimes L\to L that is skew symmetric [ D,E ] + (-1)^{|D| |E|} [ E,D ] = 0 and satisfies the ''Jacobi identity'' [D, [ E,F ]] + (-1)^{|D| (|E| + |F|)} [ E, [F,D ]] + (-1)^{|F| (|D| + |E|)} [ F, [ D,E ]] = 0. Note that we cyclically permuted the 3 symbols and put down the signs according to the above sign rule. {{endrem}} ==Super Manifolds== ; We will define super manifolds as ringed spaces following \cite{Deligne&Morgan1999}. By a morphism we will always mean a map of ringed spaces. The local model for a super manifold of dimension p|q is \R^p equipped with the sheaf \cO_{\R^{p|q}} of commutative super \R-algebras U \mapsto C^\infty(U) \otimes \Lambda^*(\R^q). {{beginrem|Definition}} A ''super manifold'' M of dimension p|q is a pair (|M|,\cO_M) consisting of a (Hausdorff and second countable) topological space |M| together with a sheaf of commutative super \R-algebras \cO_M that is locally isomorphic to (\R^{p},\cO_{\R^{p|q}}). A morphism f=(|f|,F) between super manifolds M,N is defined to be a continuous map |f|:|M|\to |N|, together with a map F of sheaves covering |f|. More precisely, for every open subset U\subseteq |N| there are algebra maps F(U): \cO_N(U) \ra \cO_M(|f|^{-1}(U)) that are compatible with the restriction maps of the two sheaves. In the future we shall write f^* for F and we denote this category of super manifolds by \SMan. {{endrem}} To every super manifold M there is an associated ''reduced manifold'' M^{red}:=(|M|,\cO_M / \Nil) obtained by dividing out the ideal of nilpotent functions. By construction, this gives a smooth manifold structure on the underlying topological space |M| and there is an inclusion of super manifolds M^{red} \into M. Note that the sheaf of ideals \Nil \subset \cO_M is generated by odd functions. Other geometric super objects can be defined in a similar way. For example, replacing \R by \C and C^\infty by analytic functions one obtains ''complex (analytic) super manifolds''. There is also an important notion of ''cs manifolds''. These are spaces equipped with sheaves of commutative super \C-algebras that locally look like \cO_{\R^{p|q}}\otimes \C. One relevance of ''cs'' manifolds is that they appear naturally as the smooth super manifolds underlying complex analytic super manifolds. In our work, cs manifolds are essential to define the notion of a ''unitary'' field theory but this is not relevant for the current discussion. {{beginrem|Example}} Let E be a real vector bundle of fiber dimension q over the ordinary manifold X^p and \Lambda^*(E^*) the associated algebra bundle of alternating multilinear forms on E. Then its sheaf of sections gives a super manifold (X, \Gamma (\Lambda^*E^*)) of dimension p|q, denoted by \Pi E. In the current ''smooth'' setting, Marjorie Batchelor proved in \cite{Batchelor1979} that every super manifold is isomorphic to one of this type (this is not true for analytic super manifolds). More precisely, let \BM denote the category of real vector bundles over smooth manifolds, and for M\in \SMan, consider the vector bundle J(M) over M^{red} with sheaf of sections \Nil / \Nil^2. Then the functors \Pi : \BM \to \SMan \quad \text{ and } \quad J: \SMan \to \BM come equipped with natural isomorphisms J \circ \Pi(E) \cong E but there are only ''non-natural'' isomorphisms \Pi\circ J(M) \cong M, coming from a choice of a partition of unity. In other words, these functors induce a bijection on isomorphism classes of objects and inclusions on morphisms but they are not equivalences of categories because there are many more morphims in \SMan than the linear bundle maps coming from \BM. {{endrem}} The following proposition gives two extremely useful ways of looking at morphisms between super manifolds. We shall use the notation C^\infty(M):=\cO_M(M) for the algebra of (global) functions on a super manifold M. {{beginthm|Proposition|}} For S,M\in \SMan, the functor C^\infty induces natural bijections \SMan(S,M) \cong \Alg(C^\infty(M), C^\infty(S)). If M \subseteq \R^{p|q} is an open super submanifold (a \text{domain}), \SMan(S,M) is in bijective correspondence with those (f_1,...,f_p,\eta_1,...,\eta_q) in (C^\infty(S)^{ev})^p \times (C^\infty(S)^{odd})^q that satisfy (|f_1|(s),...,|f_p|(s)) \in |M| \subseteq \R^{p} \text{ for all } s \in |S|. The f_i, \eta_j are called the coordinates of \phi\in \SMan(S,M) defined by f_i = \phi^*(x_i) \quad \text{ and } \quad \eta_j = \phi^*(\theta_j), where x_1,...,x_p,\theta_q,...,\theta_p are coordinates on M\subseteq \R^{p|q}. Moreover, by the first part we see that f_i \in C^\infty(S)^{ev} = \SMan(S,\R) and hence |f_i| \in \Man(|S|, \R). {{endthm}} The proof of the first part is based on the existence of partitions of unity for super manifolds, so it is false in analytic settings. The second part always holds and is proved in [[[#{{anchorencode:Leites1980}}|Leites1980]]]{{#RefAdd:Leites1980}}. ==The Functor of Points== ; Since sheaves are generally difficult to work with, one often thinks of super manifolds in terms of their S-points, i.e. instead of M itself one considers the morphism sets \SMan(S,M), where S varies over all super manifolds S. More formally, embed the category \SMan of super manifolds in the category of contravariant functors from \SMan to \Sset by Y:\SMan \ra \Fun(\SMan^{op},\Sset), \quad Y(M) = ( \> S \mapsto \SMan(S,M) \> ). This Yoneda embedding is fully faithful and identifies \SMan with the the category of ''representable'' functors, defined to be those in the image of Y. We will sometimes refer to an arbitrary functor F:\SMan^{op}\to \Sset as a ''generalized super manifold''. Note that Proposition \ref{prop:coords} makes it easy to describe the morphism sets \SMan (S,M). We'd also like to point out that the functor of points approach is closely related to computations involving additional odd quantities (the odd coordinates of S as opposed to those of M) in many physics papers. ==Super Lie Groups== ; These are simply group objects in \SMan. According to the functor of points approach, such a group object in \SMan can be described by giving a functor G : \SMan^{op} \to \Group such that the composition with the forgetful functor \Group \to \Sset is representable. {{beginrem|Example|}} The simplest super Lie group is the additive group structure on \R^{p|q}. It is given by the following composition law on \SMan(S,\R^{p|q}), obviously natural in S: (f_1,...,\eta_q) \times (h_1,...,\psi_q) \mapsto (f_1 + h_1,...,\eta_q + \psi_q) . The ''super general linear group'' GL(p|q) is defined by GL(p|q)(S) := \text{Aut}_{\cO_S}(\cO_S^{p|q}) \cong \Aut_{C^\infty(S)} (C^\infty(S)^{p|q}) , where A^{p|q} denotes the A-module freely generated by p even and q odd generators. We need to check that this is representable. We claim that GL(p|q)(\_) is represented by the open super submanifold G \subset \R^{p^2 + q^2| 2pq} characterized by |G| = \{ \> x \in \R^{p^2 + q^2} \> | \> x \in GL_p \times GL_q \> \}. This follows directly from proposition \ref{prop:coords} using that a map between super algebras is invertible if and only if it is invertible modulo nilpotent elements. {{endrem}} ==Super Vector Bundles== ; A (super) vector bundle over a super manifold M is a locally free sheaf \mathcal{E} of \cO_M-modules of dimension p|q. The most basic example of a super vector bundle is the ''tangent bundle'' of a super manifold M^{p|q}. It is the sheaf of \cO_M-modules \mathcal{T} M defined by \mathcal{T} M(U) := \Der {\cO_M (U)} . \mathcal{T} M is locally free of dimension p|q: If x_1,...,\theta_q are local coordinates on M, then a local basis is given by \partial_{x_1},...,\partial_{\theta_q}. Note that there is also a linear fibre bundle TM\to M with structure group GL(p|q), where TM is a super manifold of dimension p|2q. More generally, any vector bundle \mathcal{E} over M has a ''total space'' E\in \SMan that comes with a projection map \pi:E\to M. It can be most easily described in terms of its S-points E(S)= \{ (f,g) \ \mid\ f\in\SMan(S,M), g \in f^*(\mathcal{E}^{ev}(M)) \}. So g is an even global section of the pullback bundle on S and the projection \pi comes from forgetting this datum. To prove that this functor \SMan^{op}\to \Sset is representable one uses the local triviality of \mathcal{E} and Proposition \ref{prop:coords}. It follows by construction that the typical fibre of the projection \pi is \R^{p|q} and the structure group is GL(p|q). There is an important operation of ''parity reversal'' on the category of vector bundles over M. It is an involution \Pi : \Vect_M\ra \Vect_M that takes a vector bundle E with grading involution \alpha to (E,-\alpha). This means that even and odd parts are exchanged. To define \Pi on morphisms it is easiest to give it as \Pi(E)=\epsilon_{0|1}\otimes E, where \epsilon_{0|1} is the trivial bundle of dimension -graded vector spaces, with the graded tensor product. As a consequence, a super algebra is simply a monoidal object in this category and is hence the same thing as a
Tex syntax error
$\Z/2$-graded algebra. For example, the endomorphism ring $\End(V)$$\End(V)$ of a super vector space $V$$V$ inherits a natural
Tex syntax error
$\Z/2$-grading from that of $V$$V$. The distinction between these notions only arises from the choice of symmetry operators
Tex syntax error

There are two standard choices, yielding two very different symmetric monoidal categories. For super vector spaces one has

$\displaystyle \sigma(v\otimes w) = (-1)^{|v|\cdot |w|} w\otimes v ,$
where $|v|$$|v|$ is the
Tex syntax error
$\Z/2$-degree of a homogenous vector $v\in V$$v\in V$. For
Tex syntax error
$\Z/2$-graded vector spaces the signs would be omitted. This basic difference is sometimes summarized as the

$\bullet$$\bullet$ Sign rule: Commuting two odd quantities yields a sign $-1$$-1$.

As a consequence, a super algebra is commutative if for all homogenenous $a,b \in A$$a,b \in A$ we have
$\displaystyle ab = (-1)^{|a| |b|} ba ,$
a very different notion than a commutative
Tex syntax error
$\Z/2$-graded algebra. The standard examples of commutative super algebras are the exterior algebras
Tex syntax error
$\Lambda^*(\R^q)$. As we shall see, the generators of
Tex syntax error
$\Lambda^*(\R^q)$ yield the so-called odd coordinates on super manifolds; these anti-commute and hence are useful when trying to describe physical systems involving Fermions. Super algebras also arise naturally in algebraic topology: for every space $X$$X$, the cohomology ring
Tex syntax error
$H^*(X;\R)$ is a commutative super algebra. Let $A$$A$ be a commutative super algebra. The derivations of $A$$A$ are endomorphisms
Tex syntax error
$D \in \End(A)$ satisfying the Leibniz rule: [1]

$\displaystyle D(a\cdot b) = Da \cdot b + (-1)^{|D| |a|} a \cdot Db.$
Tex syntax error
$\Der A$ is a super Lie algebra with respect to the bracket operation
$\displaystyle [D,E] := DE - (-1)^{|D| |E|}ED$
This means that the following axioms are satisfied for
Tex syntax error
$L=\Der A$.
Definition 1.1. A super Lie algebra is a super vector space $L$$L$ together with a Lie bracket $[\cdot, \cdot]: L\otimes L\to L$$[\cdot, \cdot]: L\otimes L\to L$ that is skew symmetric
$\displaystyle [ D,E ] + (-1)^{|D| |E|} [ E,D ] = 0$
and satisfies the Jacobi identity
$\displaystyle [D, [ E,F ]] + (-1)^{|D| (|E| + |F|)} [ E, [F,D ]] + (-1)^{|F| (|D| + |E|)} [ F, [ D,E ]] = 0.$

Note that we cyclically permuted the 3 symbols and put down the signs according to the above sign rule.

## 2 Super Manifolds

We will define super manifolds as ringed spaces following [Deligne&Morgan1999]. By a morphism we will always mean a map of ringed spaces. The local model for a super manifold of dimension $p|q$$p|q$ is
Tex syntax error
$\R^p$ equipped with the sheaf
Tex syntax error
$\cO_{\R^{p|q}}$ of commutative super
Tex syntax error
$\R$-algebras
Tex syntax error
$U \mapsto C^\infty(U) \otimes \Lambda^*(\R^q)$.
Definition 2.1. A super manifold $M$$M$ of dimension $p|q$$p|q$ is a pair
Tex syntax error
$(|M|,\cO_M)$ consisting of a (Hausdorff and second countable) topological space $|M|$$|M|$ together with a sheaf of commutative super
Tex syntax error
$\R$-algebras
Tex syntax error
$\cO_M$ that is locally isomorphic to
Tex syntax error
$(\R^{p},\cO_{\R^{p|q}})$. A morphism $f=(|f|,F)$$f=(|f|,F)$ between super manifolds $M,N$$M,N$ is defined to be a continuous map $|f|:|M|\to |N|$$|f|:|M|\to |N|$, together with a map $F$$F$ of sheaves covering $|f|$$|f|$. More precisely, for every open subset $U\subseteq |N|$$U\subseteq |N|$ there are algebra maps
Tex syntax error
that are compatible with the restriction maps of the two sheaves. In the future we shall write $f^*$$f^*$ for $F$$F$ and we denote this category of super manifolds by
Tex syntax error
$\SMan$.
To every super manifold $M$$M$ there is an associated reduced manifold
$\displaystyle M^{red}:=(|M|,\cO_M / \Nil)$
obtained by dividing out the ideal of nilpotent functions. By construction, this gives a smooth manifold structure on the underlying topological space $|M|$$|M|$ and there is an inclusion of super manifolds
Tex syntax error
$M^{red} \into M$. Note that the sheaf of ideals
Tex syntax error
$\Nil \subset \cO_M$ is generated by odd functions. Other geometric super objects can be defined in a similar way. For example, replacing
Tex syntax error
$\R$ by $\C$$\C$ and $C^\infty$$C^\infty$ by analytic functions one obtains complex (analytic) super manifolds. There is also an important notion of cs manifolds. These are spaces equipped with sheaves of commutative super $\C$$\C$-algebras that locally look like
Tex syntax error
$\cO_{\R^{p|q}}\otimes \C$. One relevance of cs manifolds is that they appear naturally as the smooth super manifolds underlying complex analytic super manifolds. In our work, cs manifolds are essential to define the notion of a unitary field theory but this is not relevant for the current discussion.

Example 2.2.

Let $E$$E$ be a real vector bundle of fiber dimension $q$$q$ over the ordinary manifold $X^p$$X^p$ and $\Lambda^*(E^*)$$\Lambda^*(E^*)$ the associated algebra bundle of alternating multilinear forms on $E$$E$. Then its sheaf of sections gives a super manifold $(X, \Gamma (\Lambda^*E^*))$$(X, \Gamma (\Lambda^*E^*))$ of dimension $p|q$$p|q$, denoted by $\Pi E$$\Pi E$. In the current smooth setting, Marjorie Batchelor proved in [Batchelor1979] that every super manifold is isomorphic to one of this type (this is not true for analytic super manifolds). More precisely, let
Tex syntax error
$\BM$ denote the category of real vector bundles over smooth manifolds, and for
Tex syntax error
$M\in \SMan$, consider the vector bundle $J(M)$$J(M)$ over $M^{red}$$M^{red}$ with sheaf of sections
Tex syntax error
$\Nil / \Nil^2$. Then the functors
Tex syntax error
come equipped with natural isomorphisms $J \circ \Pi(E) \cong E$$J \circ \Pi(E) \cong E$ but there are only non-natural isomorphisms $\Pi\circ J(M) \cong M$$\Pi\circ J(M) \cong M$, coming from a choice of a partition of unity. In other words, these functors induce a bijection on isomorphism classes of objects and inclusions on morphisms but they are not equivalences of categories because there are many more morphims in
Tex syntax error
$\SMan$ than the linear bundle maps coming from
Tex syntax error
$\BM$.
The following proposition gives two extremely useful ways of looking at morphisms between super manifolds. We shall use the notation
Tex syntax error
$C^\infty(M):=\cO_M(M)$ for the algebra of (global) functions on a super manifold $M$$M$.

Proposition 2.3.

For
Tex syntax error
$S,M\in \SMan$, the functor $C^\infty$$C^\infty$ induces natural bijections
Tex syntax error
If
Tex syntax error
$M \subseteq \R^{p|q}$ is an open super submanifold (a $\text{domain}$$\text{domain}$),
Tex syntax error
$\SMan(S,M)$ is in bijective correspondence with those $(f_1,...,f_p,\eta_1,...,\eta_q)$$(f_1,...,f_p,\eta_1,...,\eta_q)$ in $(C^\infty(S)^{ev})^p \times (C^\infty(S)^{odd})^q$$(C^\infty(S)^{ev})^p \times (C^\infty(S)^{odd})^q$ that satisfy
Tex syntax error
The $f_i$$f_i$, $\eta_j$$\eta_j$ are called the coordinates of
Tex syntax error
$\phi\in \SMan(S,M)$ defined by
$\displaystyle f_i = \phi^*(x_i) \quad \text{ and } \quad \eta_j = \phi^*(\theta_j),$
where $x_1,...,x_p,\theta_q,...,\theta_p$$x_1,...,x_p,\theta_q,...,\theta_p$ are coordinates on
Tex syntax error
$M\subseteq \R^{p|q}$. Moreover, by the first part we see that
Tex syntax error
$f_i \in C^\infty(S)^{ev} = \SMan(S,\R)$ and hence $|f_i| \in \Man(|S|, \R)$$|f_i| \in \Man(|S|, \R)$.

The proof of the first part is based on the existence of partitions of unity for super manifolds, so it is false in analytic settings. The second part always holds and is proved in [Leites1980].

## 3 The Functor of Points

Since sheaves are generally difficult to work with, one often thinks of super manifolds in terms of their $S$$S$-points, i.e. instead of $M$$M$ itself one considers the morphism sets
Tex syntax error
$\SMan(S,M)$, where $S$$S$ varies over all super manifolds $S$$S$. More formally, embed the category
Tex syntax error
$\SMan$ of super manifolds in the category of contravariant functors from
Tex syntax error
$\SMan$ to
Tex syntax error
$\Sset$ by
Tex syntax error
This Yoneda embedding is fully faithful and identifies
Tex syntax error
$\SMan$ with the the category of representable functors, defined to be those in the image of
Tex syntax error
$Y$. We will sometimes refer to an arbitrary functor
Tex syntax error
$F:\SMan^{op}\to \Sset$ as a generalized super manifold. Note that Proposition 2.3 makes it easy to describe the morphism sets
Tex syntax error
$\SMan (S,M)$. We'd also like to point out that the functor of points approach is closely related to computations involving additional odd quantities (the odd coordinates of $S$$S$ as opposed to those of $M$$M$) in many physics papers.

## 4 Super Lie Groups

These are simply group objects in
Tex syntax error
$\SMan$. According to the functor of points approach, such a group object in
Tex syntax error
$\SMan$ can be described by giving a functor $G : \SMan^{op} \to \Group$$G : \SMan^{op} \to \Group$ such that the composition with the forgetful functor $\Group \to \Sset$$\Group \to \Sset$ is representable.

Example 4.1. The simplest super Lie group is the additive group structure on $\R^{p|q}$$\R^{p|q}$. It is given by the following composition law on $\SMan(S,\R^{p|q})$$\SMan(S,\R^{p|q})$, obviously natural in $S$$S$:

$\displaystyle (f_1,...,\eta_q) \times (h_1,...,\psi_q) \mapsto (f_1 + h_1,...,\eta_q + \psi_q) .$

The super general linear group $GL(p|q)$$GL(p|q)$ is defined by

$\displaystyle GL(p|q)(S) := \text{Aut}_{\cO_S}(\cO_S^{p|q}) \cong \Aut_{C^\infty(S)} (C^\infty(S)^{p|q}) ,$
where $A^{p|q}$$A^{p|q}$ denotes the $A$$A$-module freely generated by $p$$p$ even and $q$$q$ odd generators. We need to check that this is representable. We claim that $GL(p|q)(\_)$$GL(p|q)(\_)$ is represented by the open super submanifold $G \subset \R^{p^2 + q^2| 2pq}$$G \subset \R^{p^2 + q^2| 2pq}$ characterized by
$\displaystyle |G| = \{ \> x \in \R^{p^2 + q^2} \> | \> x \in GL_p \times GL_q \> \}.$

This follows directly from proposition 2.3 using that a map between super algebras is invertible if and only if it is invertible modulo nilpotent elements.

## 5 Super Vector Bundles

A (super) vector bundle over a super manifold $M$$M$ is a locally free sheaf $\mathcal{E}$$\mathcal{E}$ of
Tex syntax error
$\cO_M$-modules of dimension $p|q$$p|q$. The most basic example of a super vector bundle is the tangent bundle of a super manifold $M^{p|q}$$M^{p|q}$. It is the sheaf of
Tex syntax error
$\cO_M$-modules $\mathcal{T} M$$\mathcal{T} M$ defined by
$\displaystyle \mathcal{T} M(U) := \Der {\cO_M (U)} .$

$\mathcal{T} M$$\mathcal{T} M$ is locally free of dimension $p|q$$p|q$: If $x_1,...,\theta_q$$x_1,...,\theta_q$ are local coordinates on $M$$M$, then a local basis is given by $\partial_{x_1},...,\partial_{\theta_q}$$\partial_{x_1},...,\partial_{\theta_q}$. Note that there is also a linear fibre bundle $TM\to M$$TM\to M$ with structure group $GL(p|q)$$GL(p|q)$, where $TM$$TM$ is a super manifold of dimension $2p|2q$$2p|2q$. More generally, any vector bundle $\mathcal{E}$$\mathcal{E}$ over $M$$M$ has a total space $E\in \SMan$$E\in \SMan$ that comes with a projection map $\pi:E\to M$$\pi:E\to M$. It can be most easily described in terms of its $S$$S$-points

$\displaystyle E(S)= \{ (f,g) \ \mid\ f\in\SMan(S,M), g \in f^*(\mathcal{E}^{ev}(M)) \}.$

So $g$$g$ is an even global section of the pullback bundle on $S$$S$ and the projection $\pi$$\pi$ comes from forgetting this datum. To prove that this functor $\SMan^{op}\to \Sset$$\SMan^{op}\to \Sset$ is representable one uses the local triviality of $\mathcal{E}$$\mathcal{E}$ and Proposition 2.3. It follows by construction that the typical fibre of the projection $\pi$$\pi$ is $\R^{p|q}$$\R^{p|q}$ and the structure group is $GL(p|q)$$GL(p|q)$.

There is an important operation of parity reversal on the category of vector bundles over $M$$M$. It is an involution
$\displaystyle \Pi : \Vect_M\ra \Vect_M$
that takes a vector bundle $E$$E$ with grading involution $\alpha$$\alpha$ to $(E,-\alpha)$$(E,-\alpha)$. This means that even and odd parts are exchanged. To define $\Pi$$\Pi$ on morphisms it is easiest to give it as $\Pi(E)=\epsilon_{0|1}\otimes E$$\Pi(E)=\epsilon_{0|1}\otimes E$, where $\epsilon_{0|1}$$\epsilon_{0|1}$ is the trivial bundle of dimension $0|1$$0|1$ (aka the constant sheaf of free
Tex syntax error
$\cO_M$-modules).

One can define the super Lie algebra $\fg$$\fg$ of a super Lie group $G$$G$ as follows. A vector field $\xi \in \mathcal{T} G$$\xi \in \mathcal{T} G$ is called left-invariant if $\xi$$\xi$ is related to itself under the left-translation by all $f: S \to G$$f: S \to G$:

$\displaystyle S \times G \stackrel{f \times \id}{\longrightarrow} G \times G \overset{\mu} \longrightarrow G .$

Here we interpret $\xi$$\xi$ as a vertical vector field on $S \times G$$S \times G$ in the obvious way. The super Lie algebra $\fg$$\fg$ consists of all left-invariant vector fields on $G$$G$. Pulling back via the unit $e: \pt\to G$$e: \pt\to G$ defines an isomorphism $\fg \cong T_eG$$\fg \cong T_eG$, in particular, the vector space dimension of $\fg$$\fg$ is $p|q$$p|q$.

## 6 Footnotes

1. Whenever we write formulas involving the degree $|.|$$|.|$ of certain elements, we implicitly assume that these elements are homogenous.