Self-maps of simply connected manifolds

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
(Created page with '<!-- COMMENT: To achieve a unified layout, along with using the template below, please OBSERVE the following: besides, $...$ and $$...$$, you should use two environments: - Fo…')
Line 13: Line 13:
== Question ==
== Question ==
<wikitex>;
<wikitex>;
+
Let us call an oriented closed connected manifold _flexible_ if it admits a self-map
+
that has non-trivial degree (i.e., degree not equal to 1, 0, or -1).
+
{{beginthm|Question}}
{{beginthm|Question}}
Does there exist a closed simply connected manifold that has no self-map
+
Do there exist closed simply connected manifolds (of non-zero dimension)
of degree not equal to 1, 0, or -1?
+
that are not flexible?
{{endthm}}
{{endthm}}
</wikitex>
</wikitex>
== Related work ==
+
== Examples and partial answers ==
<wikitex>
+
<wikitex>;
...
+
* Of course, all spheres are flexible.
+
* ...
</wikitex>
</wikitex>

Revision as of 22:23, 9 March 2010

Contents

1 Question

Let us call an oriented closed connected manifold _flexible_ if it admits a self-map that has non-trivial degree (i.e., degree not equal to 1, 0, or -1).

Question 1.1.

 Do there exist closed simply connected manifolds (of non-zero dimension) 
 that are not flexible?

2 Examples and partial answers

 * Of course, all spheres are flexible. 
 * ...

3 Possible strategies

 ...

4 Further discussion

 ...

5 References

Personal tools
Namespaces
Variants
Actions
Navigation
Interaction
Toolbox