Petrie conjecture

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
(Progress to date)
(Problem)
Line 5: Line 5:
In the case where $M$ is [[Fake complex projective spaces|homotopy equivalent to $\CP^n$]], $M \simeq \CP^n$, Petrie {{cite|Petrie1972}} restricted his attention to smooth actions of the Lie group
In the case where $M$ is [[Fake complex projective spaces|homotopy equivalent to $\CP^n$]], $M \simeq \CP^n$, Petrie {{cite|Petrie1972}} restricted his attention to smooth actions of the Lie group
$S^1 = \{z \in \mathbb{C} \ \colon \ |z| = 1\}$, and posed the following conjecture.
+
$S^1 = \{z \in \mathbb{C} \ \colon \ |z| = 1\}$, and proved that if $S^1$ acts smoothly on $M$ with isolated fixed points, then the Potrjagin classes of $M$ are determined by the representations of
+
$S^1$ at the fixed points.
{{beginthm|Conjecture|{{cite|Petrie1972}}}}
{{beginthm|Conjecture|{{cite|Petrie1972}}}}

Revision as of 23:40, 2 December 2010

This page has not been refereed. The information given here might be incomplete or provisional.

Contents

1 Problem

If a compact Lie group G acts smoothly and non-trivially on a closed smooth manifold M, what constraints does this place on the topology of M in general and on the Pontrjagin classes of M in particular?

In the case where M is homotopy equivalent to \CP^n, M \simeq \CP^n, Petrie [Petrie1972] restricted his attention to smooth actions of the Lie group S^1 = \{z \in \mathbb{C} \ \colon \ |z| = 1\}, and proved that if S^1 acts smoothly on M with isolated fixed points, then the Potrjagin classes of M are determined by the representations of S^1 at the fixed points.

Conjecture 1.1 [Petrie1972]. Suppose that S^1 acts smoothly and non-trivially on a closed smooth 2n-manifold M \simeq \CP^n. Then the total Pontrjagin class p(M) of M agrees with that of \CP^n, i.e.,

p(M) = (1+x^2)^{n+1} for a generator x of H^2(M; \mathbb{Z}).

2 Progress to date

As of November 30, 2010, the Petrie conjecture has not been confirmed in general. However, it has been proven in the following special cases.

  • Petrie [Petrie1973] has verified his conjecture under the assumption that the action of S^1 on M \simeq \mathbb{C}P^n extends to a smooth action of the torus T^n.
  • By the work of [Dejter1976], the Petrie conjecture is true if \dim M = 6, i.e., M \simeq \CP^3, and more generaly, if \dim M \leq 6.
  • According to [Hattori1978], the Petrie conjecture holds if M admits an invariant almost complex structure with the first Chern class c_1(M) = (n+1)x.
  • Other special cases where the Petrie conjecture holds are described by [Wang1975], [Yoshida1975/76], [Iberkleid1978], and [Muslin1978].
  • By [Tsukada&Washiyama1979] and [Masuda1981], the Petrie conjecture is true if the fixed point set consists of three or four connected components.
  • Masuda [Masuda1983] proved the Petrie conjecture by assuming that the action of S^1 on M extends to a specific smooth action of T^k for k \geq 2.
  • It follows from [James1985] that the Petrie conjecture is true if \dim M = 8, i.e., M \simeq \CP^4.
  • The work of [Dessai2002] confirms the Petrie conjecture if the action of S^1 on M extends to an appropriate smooth action of Pin(2) and \dim M \leq 22.
  • According to [Dessai&Wilking2004], the Petrie conjecture holds if the action of S^1 on M extends to a smooth action of the torus T^k and \dim M \leq 8k-4.

3 Further discussion

A symplectic version of the Petrie conjecture is discussed in the article of [Tolman2010].

4 References

Personal tools
Namespaces
Variants
Actions
Navigation
Interaction
Toolbox