Immersion
(→Definition) |
|||
(22 intermediate revisions by one user not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
− | {{Authors|Ulrich Koschorke | + | {{Authors|Ulrich Koschorke}} |
==Definition== | ==Definition== | ||
<wikitex>; | <wikitex>; | ||
Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
{{beginthm|Definition}} | {{beginthm|Definition}} | ||
$ f $ is a ''local immersion at a point'' $x \in M$ if there exist open neighbourhoods $U$ of $x$ and $V$ of $f(x)$ in $M$ and $N$, resp., such that $f(U) \subset V $ and: | $ f $ is a ''local immersion at a point'' $x \in M$ if there exist open neighbourhoods $U$ of $x$ and $V$ of $f(x)$ in $M$ and $N$, resp., such that $f(U) \subset V $ and: | ||
− | # there is a CAT | + | # there is a CAT-isomorphism $h : V \rightarrow \mathring{B}^n $ (i.e. both $h$ and $h^{-1}$ are CAT-maps) which maps $f(U)$ onto $\mathring{B}^n \cap (\R^m \times \lbrace 0 \rbrace) = \mathring{B}^m$; and |
# $h \circ f $ yields a CAT-isomorphism from $U$ onto $\mathring{B}^m $. | # $h \circ f $ yields a CAT-isomorphism from $U$ onto $\mathring{B}^m $. | ||
We call f an ''immersion'' (and we write $ f : M \looparrowright N $) if $f$ is a local immersion at every point $ x \in M$. | We call f an ''immersion'' (and we write $ f : M \looparrowright N $) if $f$ is a local immersion at every point $ x \in M$. | ||
{{endthm}} | {{endthm}} | ||
− | Thus an immersion looks locally like the inclusion $\R^m \subset \R^n $ of Euclidean spaces. It allows us to visualize a given manifold $M$ in a possibly more familar setting such as $N = \R^n $. E.g. the projective plane $\RP^2 $ can be visualized in $\R^3 $ with the help of | + | |
+ | Thus an immersion looks locally like the inclusion $\R^m \subset \R^n $ of Euclidean spaces. It allows us to visualize a given manifold $M$ in a possibly more familar setting such as $N = \R^n $. E.g. the projective plane $\RP^2 $ can be visualized in $\R^3 $ with the help of the [[Wikipedia:Boy's suface|''Boy's surface'']], the image of a $C^{\infty}$-immersion: see for example the page on [[2-manifolds#Non-orientable surfaces|surfaces]].<!-- (beautiful illustrations can be found in the internet). --> | ||
The following two questions play an important role. | The following two questions play an important role. | ||
#''Existence'': Given $M$ and $N$, is there any immersion $ M \looparrowright N $ at all? | #''Existence'': Given $M$ and $N$, is there any immersion $ M \looparrowright N $ at all? | ||
Line 18: | Line 19: | ||
</wikitex> | </wikitex> | ||
− | ==The smooth case | + | ==The smooth case == |
<wikitex>; | <wikitex>; | ||
− | This section is about the category of smooth, i.e. $C^{\infty}$, manifolds and maps. It follows from the inverse function theorem that a smooth map $f : M \rightarrow N $ between smooth manifolds is a local immersion at $ x \in M$ precisely if the tangent map $(Tf)_x : T_xM \rightarrow T_{f(x)}(N) $ is injective. Thus $f$ is a smooth immersion if and only if it induces a vector bundle ''mono''morphism $Tf : TM \rightarrow TN $. E.g. the figure $\heartsuit$ cannot be the image of a smooth immersion, due to the two sharp corners which don't allow a | + | This section is about the category of smooth, i.e. $C^{\infty}$, manifolds and maps. It follows from the inverse function theorem that a smooth map $f : M \rightarrow N $ between smooth manifolds is a local immersion at $ x \in M$ precisely if the tangent map $(Tf)_x : T_xM \rightarrow T_{f(x)}(N) $ is injective. Thus $f$ is a smooth immersion if and only if it induces a vector bundle ''mono''morphism $Tf : TM \rightarrow TN $. E.g. the figure $\heartsuit$ cannot be the image of a smooth immersion, due to the two sharp corners which don't allow a well-defined tangent line. However there exists a smooth immersion $f : S^1 \looparrowright \Rr^2 $ with image the figure $\infty$. |
− | {{beginthm|Theorem| | + | {{beginthm|Theorem|\cite{Hirsch1959}, \cite{Smale1959a}, Phillips 1967}}\label{thm:2.1} |
If (i) $m < n$, or if (ii) $M$ is open and $m=n$, then the map | If (i) $m < n$, or if (ii) $M$ is open and $m=n$, then the map | ||
\begin{equation} T : \textup{Imm}(M,N) \rightarrow \textup{Mono}(TM,TN), \quad f \rightarrow Tf, \end{equation} | \begin{equation} T : \textup{Imm}(M,N) \rightarrow \textup{Mono}(TM,TN), \quad f \rightarrow Tf, \end{equation} | ||
− | is a weak homotopy equivalence. Here the | + | is a weak homotopy equivalence. Here the space, $\textup{Imm}(M, N)$, of all smooth immersions $f : M \looparrowright N $ and $\textup{Mono}(TM, TN)$, the space of all vector bundle monomorphisms $ \varphi : TM \rightarrow TN $, are endowed respectively with the $ C^{\infty}$-topology and the compact-open topology. |
{{endthm}} | {{endthm}} | ||
Line 47: | Line 48: | ||
{{beginrem|Example|}}\label{exa:2.4} | {{beginrem|Example|}}\label{exa:2.4} | ||
− | The real projective space $\RP^m$ cannot be immersed into $\R^{2m-2}$ if $ m = 2^k$. This follows from an easy calculation using Stiefel | + | The real projective space $\RP^m$ cannot be immersed into $\R^{2m-2}$ if $ m = 2^k$. This follows from an easy calculation using Stiefel-Whitney classes: see, \cite{Milnor&Stasheff1974|Theorem 4,8}. |
{{endrem}} | {{endrem}} | ||
{{beginrem|Definition|}}\label{defn:2.5} | {{beginrem|Definition|}}\label{defn:2.5} | ||
− | Two immersions $f, g : M \looparrowright N $ are | + | Two immersions $f, g : M \looparrowright N $ are ''regularly homotopic'' if there exists a ''smooth map'' $F : M \times I \rightarrow N $ which with $f_t(x) := F(x,t) $ satisfies the following: |
# $f_0 = f, \quad f_1 = g $; | # $f_0 = f, \quad f_1 = g $; | ||
# $f_t$ is a immersion for all $t \in I $. | # $f_t$ is a immersion for all $t \in I $. | ||
Line 60: | Line 61: | ||
{{endthm}} | {{endthm}} | ||
− | {{beginrem|Example|$ M = S^m, N = \R^n $ | + | {{beginrem|Example|$M = S^m, N = \R^n$, \cite{Smale1959a}}}\label{exa:2.7} |
− | The regular homotopy classes of immersions $f: S^m \looparrowright \R^n, \ m<n $, are in one | + | The regular homotopy classes of immersions $f: S^m \looparrowright \R^n, \ m<n $, are in one-to-one correspondance with the elements of the homotopy group $\pi_m(V_{n,m})$, where $V_{n,m}$ is the Stiefel manifold of $m$-frames in $\R^n$. In particular, all immersions $ S^2 \looparrowright \R^3 $ are regularly homotopic (since $\pi_2(V_{3,2}) = 0 $). E. g. the standard inclusion $ f_0 : S^2 \subset \R^3 $ is regularly homotopic to $ -f_0$; i. e. you can ''turn the sphere inside out'' in $\R^3$, with possible self-intersections but without creating any crease. |
+ | {{endrem}} | ||
+ | {{beginrem|Remark}} | ||
+ | The Smale-Hirsch theorem makes existence and classification problems accessible to standard methods of algebraic topology such as classical obstruction theorem (cf. e.g. {{cite|Steenrod1951}}), characteristic classes (cf. e.g. {{cite|Milnor&Stasheff1974}}), Postnikov towers, the singularity method (cf. e.g. {{cite|Koschorke1981}}) etc.: see \cite{Smale1963} for the state of the art in 1963. | ||
{{endrem}} | {{endrem}} | ||
</wikitex> | </wikitex> | ||
− | == | + | |
+ | ==Self intersections== | ||
<wikitex>; | <wikitex>; | ||
− | It is a characteristic feature of immersions | + | It is a characteristic feature of immersions - as compared to embeddings - that $r$-tuple selfintersections may occur for some $r \geq 2$, i. e. points in $N$ which are the image of at least $r$ distinct elements of M (e. g. the double point in the figure 8<!-- FIXME \ref{} --> |
− | immersion $ f : S^1 \looparrowright \R^2$ with image $\infty$). Generically the locus of r | + | immersion $ f : S^1 \looparrowright \R^2$ with image $\infty$). Generically the locus of r-tuple points of a smooth immersion $ f: M^m \looparrowright N^n $ is an immersed ($ n- r(n-m) $)-dimensional manifold in $N$. Its properties may yield a variety of interesting invariants which link immersions to other concepts of topology. E. g. let $\theta(f) $ denote the $\mod{2} $ number of ($n+1$)-tuple points of a selftransverse immersion $ f: M^n \looparrowright \R^{n+1} $. |
{{beginthm|Theorem|\cite{Eccles1981} }}\label{thm:3.1} | {{beginthm|Theorem|\cite{Eccles1981} }}\label{thm:3.1} | ||
− | Given a natural number $ n \equiv 1(4) $, there is an $n$ | + | Given a natural number $ n \equiv 1(4) $, there is an $n$-dimensional closed smooth manifold $M^n$ and an immersion $ f : M^n \looparrowright \R^{n+1} $ satisfying $\ \theta(f) = 1 $ if and only if there exists a framed ($n+1$)-dimensional manifold with Kervaire invariant $1$. |
{{endthm}} | {{endthm}} | ||
According to \cite{Hill&Hopkins&Ravenel2009} (and previous authors) this holds precisely when $ n=1, 5, 13, 29, 61 $ or possibly $125$. If $ n \neq 1 $ and $n = 1(4)$ the manifold $M$ in question cannot be orientable (cf. \cite{Eccles1981}). Thus the figure 8 immersion $ f : S^1 \looparrowright \R^2 $ plays a rather special role here. | According to \cite{Hill&Hopkins&Ravenel2009} (and previous authors) this holds precisely when $ n=1, 5, 13, 29, 61 $ or possibly $125$. If $ n \neq 1 $ and $n = 1(4)$ the manifold $M$ in question cannot be orientable (cf. \cite{Eccles1981}). Thus the figure 8 immersion $ f : S^1 \looparrowright \R^2 $ plays a rather special role here. | ||
</wikitex> | </wikitex> | ||
+ | |||
== References == | == References == | ||
{{#RefList:}} | {{#RefList:}} | ||
+ | == External links == | ||
+ | * The Encyclopedia of Mathematics article on an [http://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/index.php/Immersion_of_a_manifold immersion of manifold] | ||
+ | * The Wikipedia page about [[Wikipedia:Immersion_(mathematics)|immersions]] | ||
[[Category:Definitions]] | [[Category:Definitions]] |
Latest revision as of 14:15, 16 May 2013
An earlier version of this page was published in the Definitions section of the Bulletin of the Manifold Atlas: screen, print. You may view the version used for publication as of 12:15, 16 May 2013 and the changes since publication. |
The user responsible for this page is Ulrich Koschorke. No other user may edit this page at present. |
Contents |
1 Definition
We work in a fixed category CAT of topological, piecewise linear, -differentiable or real analytic manifolds (second countable, Hausdorff, without boundary) and maps between them. denotes the open unit ball in .
Let be such a map between manifolds of the indicated dimensions .
Definition 1.1. is a local immersion at a point if there exist open neighbourhoods of and of in and , resp., such that and:
- there is a CAT-isomorphism (i.e. both and are CAT-maps) which maps onto ; and
- yields a CAT-isomorphism from onto .
We call f an immersion (and we write ) if is a local immersion at every point .
Thus an immersion looks locally like the inclusion of Euclidean spaces. It allows us to visualize a given manifold in a possibly more familar setting such as . E.g. the projective plane can be visualized in with the help of the Boy's surface, the image of a -immersion: see for example the page on surfaces. The following two questions play an important role.
- Existence: Given and , is there any immersion at all?
- Classification: How many `essentially different´ immersions exist?
2 The smooth case
This section is about the category of smooth, i.e. , manifolds and maps. It follows from the inverse function theorem that a smooth map between smooth manifolds is a local immersion at precisely if the tangent map is injective. Thus is a smooth immersion if and only if it induces a vector bundle monomorphism . E.g. the figure cannot be the image of a smooth immersion, due to the two sharp corners which don't allow a well-defined tangent line. However there exists a smooth immersion with image the figure .
Theorem 2.1 [Hirsch1959], [Smale1959a], Phillips 1967. If (i) , or if (ii) is open and , then the map
is a weak homotopy equivalence. Here the space, , of all smooth immersions and , the space of all vector bundle monomorphisms , are endowed respectively with the -topology and the compact-open topology.
Remark 2.2. For a good exposition of Theorem 2.1 see [Adachi1993, pp.87 and 93].
Corollary 2.3. Under the assumptions of theorem 2.1 there exists an immersion if and only if there is a vector bundle monomorphism from the tangent bundle of to . E. g. if is parallelizable (i. e. ) then .
Theorem 2.4 [Whitney1944a] . If then there exists an immersion (E. g. any surface can be immersed into ).
Remark 2.5. See also e.g. [Adachi1993, p. 86ff].
Theorem 2.4 is best possible as long as we put no restrictions on .
Example 2.6. The real projective space cannot be immersed into if . This follows from an easy calculation using Stiefel-Whitney classes: see, [Milnor&Stasheff1974, Theorem 4,8].
Definition 2.7. Two immersions are regularly homotopic if there exists a smooth map which with satisfies the following:
- ;
- is a immersion for all .
Corollary 2.8. Assume . Two immersions are regularly homotopic if and only if their tangent maps are homotopic through vector bundle monomorphisms.
Example 2.9 , [Smale1959a]. The regular homotopy classes of immersions , are in one-to-one correspondance with the elements of the homotopy group , where is the Stiefel manifold of -frames in . In particular, all immersions are regularly homotopic (since ). E. g. the standard inclusion is regularly homotopic to ; i. e. you can turn the sphere inside out in , with possible self-intersections but without creating any crease.
Remark 2.10. The Smale-Hirsch theorem makes existence and classification problems accessible to standard methods of algebraic topology such as classical obstruction theorem (cf. e.g. [Steenrod1951]), characteristic classes (cf. e.g. [Milnor&Stasheff1974]), Postnikov towers, the singularity method (cf. e.g. [Koschorke1981]) etc.: see [Smale1963] for the state of the art in 1963.
3 Self intersections
It is a characteristic feature of immersions - as compared to embeddings - that -tuple selfintersections may occur for some , i. e. points in which are the image of at least distinct elements of M (e. g. the double point in the figure 8 immersion with image ). Generically the locus of r-tuple points of a smooth immersion is an immersed ()-dimensional manifold in . Its properties may yield a variety of interesting invariants which link immersions to other concepts of topology. E. g. let denote the number of ()-tuple points of a selftransverse immersion .
Theorem 3.1 [Eccles1981] . Given a natural number , there is an -dimensional closed smooth manifold and an immersion satisfying if and only if there exists a framed ()-dimensional manifold with Kervaire invariant .
According to [Hill&Hopkins&Ravenel2009] (and previous authors) this holds precisely when or possibly . If and the manifold in question cannot be orientable (cf. [Eccles1981]). Thus the figure 8 immersion plays a rather special role here.
4 References
- [Adachi1993] M. Adachi, Embeddings and immersions, Translated from the Japanese by Kiki Hudson. Translations of Mathematical Monographs, 124. Providence, RI: American Mathematical Society (AMS), 1993. MR1225100 (95a:57039) Zbl 0810.57001
- [Eccles1981] P. J. Eccles, Codimension one immersions and the Kervaire invariant one problem, Math. Proc. Cambridge Philos. Soc. 90 (1981), no.3, 483–493. MR628831 (83c:57015) Zbl 0479.57016
- [Hill&Hopkins&Ravenel2009] M. A. Hill, M. J. Hopkins and D. C. Ravenel, On the non-existence of elements of Kervaire invariant one, (2009). Available at the arXiv:0908.3724.
- [Hirsch1959] M. W. Hirsch, Immersions of manifolds, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 93 (1959), 242–276. MR0119214 (22 #9980) Zbl 0118.18603
- [Koschorke1981] U. Koschorke, Vector fields and other vector bundle morphisms-a singularity approach, Springer, 1981. MR611333 (82i:57026) Zbl 0459.57016
- [Milnor&Stasheff1974] J. W. Milnor and J. D. Stasheff, Characteristic classes, Princeton University Press, Princeton, N. J., 1974. MR0440554 (55 #13428) Zbl 1079.57504
- [Smale1959a] S. Smale, The classification of immersions of spheres in Euclidean spaces, Ann. of Math. (2) 69 (1959), 327–344. MR0105117 (21 #3862) Zbl 0089.18201
- [Smale1963] S. Smale, A survey of some recent developments in differential topology, Bull. Amer. Math. Soc. 69 (1963), 131–145. MR0144351 (26 #1896) Zbl 0133.16507
- [Steenrod1951] N. Steenrod, The topology of fibre bundles., (Princeton Mathematical Series No. 14.) Princeton: Princeton University Press. VIII, 224 p. , 1951. MR1688579 (2000a:55001) Zbl 0054.07103
- [Whitney1944a] H. Whitney, The singularities of a smooth -manifold in -space, Ann. of Math. (2) 45 (1944), 247–293. MR0010275 (5,274a) Zbl 0063.08238
5 External links
- The Encyclopedia of Mathematics article on an immersion of manifold
- The Wikipedia page about immersions
Let be such a map between manifolds of the indicated dimensions .
Definition 1.1. is a local immersion at a point if there exist open neighbourhoods of and of in and , resp., such that and:
- there is a CAT-isomorphism (i.e. both and are CAT-maps) which maps onto ; and
- yields a CAT-isomorphism from onto .
We call f an immersion (and we write ) if is a local immersion at every point .
Thus an immersion looks locally like the inclusion of Euclidean spaces. It allows us to visualize a given manifold in a possibly more familar setting such as . E.g. the projective plane can be visualized in with the help of the Boy's surface, the image of a -immersion: see for example the page on surfaces. The following two questions play an important role.
- Existence: Given and , is there any immersion at all?
- Classification: How many `essentially different´ immersions exist?
2 The smooth case
This section is about the category of smooth, i.e. , manifolds and maps. It follows from the inverse function theorem that a smooth map between smooth manifolds is a local immersion at precisely if the tangent map is injective. Thus is a smooth immersion if and only if it induces a vector bundle monomorphism . E.g. the figure cannot be the image of a smooth immersion, due to the two sharp corners which don't allow a well-defined tangent line. However there exists a smooth immersion with image the figure .
Theorem 2.1 [Hirsch1959], [Smale1959a], Phillips 1967. If (i) , or if (ii) is open and , then the map
is a weak homotopy equivalence. Here the space, , of all smooth immersions and , the space of all vector bundle monomorphisms , are endowed respectively with the -topology and the compact-open topology.
Remark 2.2. For a good exposition of Theorem 2.1 see [Adachi1993, pp.87 and 93].
Corollary 2.3. Under the assumptions of theorem 2.1 there exists an immersion if and only if there is a vector bundle monomorphism from the tangent bundle of to . E. g. if is parallelizable (i. e. ) then .
Theorem 2.4 [Whitney1944a] . If then there exists an immersion (E. g. any surface can be immersed into ).
Remark 2.5. See also e.g. [Adachi1993, p. 86ff].
Theorem 2.4 is best possible as long as we put no restrictions on .
Example 2.6. The real projective space cannot be immersed into if . This follows from an easy calculation using Stiefel-Whitney classes: see, [Milnor&Stasheff1974, Theorem 4,8].
Definition 2.7. Two immersions are regularly homotopic if there exists a smooth map which with satisfies the following:
- ;
- is a immersion for all .
Corollary 2.8. Assume . Two immersions are regularly homotopic if and only if their tangent maps are homotopic through vector bundle monomorphisms.
Example 2.9 , [Smale1959a]. The regular homotopy classes of immersions , are in one-to-one correspondance with the elements of the homotopy group , where is the Stiefel manifold of -frames in . In particular, all immersions are regularly homotopic (since ). E. g. the standard inclusion is regularly homotopic to ; i. e. you can turn the sphere inside out in , with possible self-intersections but without creating any crease.
Remark 2.10. The Smale-Hirsch theorem makes existence and classification problems accessible to standard methods of algebraic topology such as classical obstruction theorem (cf. e.g. [Steenrod1951]), characteristic classes (cf. e.g. [Milnor&Stasheff1974]), Postnikov towers, the singularity method (cf. e.g. [Koschorke1981]) etc.: see [Smale1963] for the state of the art in 1963.
3 Self intersections
It is a characteristic feature of immersions - as compared to embeddings - that -tuple selfintersections may occur for some , i. e. points in which are the image of at least distinct elements of M (e. g. the double point in the figure 8 immersion with image ). Generically the locus of r-tuple points of a smooth immersion is an immersed ()-dimensional manifold in . Its properties may yield a variety of interesting invariants which link immersions to other concepts of topology. E. g. let denote the number of ()-tuple points of a selftransverse immersion .
Theorem 3.1 [Eccles1981] . Given a natural number , there is an -dimensional closed smooth manifold and an immersion satisfying if and only if there exists a framed ()-dimensional manifold with Kervaire invariant .
According to [Hill&Hopkins&Ravenel2009] (and previous authors) this holds precisely when or possibly . If and the manifold in question cannot be orientable (cf. [Eccles1981]). Thus the figure 8 immersion plays a rather special role here.
4 References
- [Adachi1993] M. Adachi, Embeddings and immersions, Translated from the Japanese by Kiki Hudson. Translations of Mathematical Monographs, 124. Providence, RI: American Mathematical Society (AMS), 1993. MR1225100 (95a:57039) Zbl 0810.57001
- [Eccles1981] P. J. Eccles, Codimension one immersions and the Kervaire invariant one problem, Math. Proc. Cambridge Philos. Soc. 90 (1981), no.3, 483–493. MR628831 (83c:57015) Zbl 0479.57016
- [Hill&Hopkins&Ravenel2009] M. A. Hill, M. J. Hopkins and D. C. Ravenel, On the non-existence of elements of Kervaire invariant one, (2009). Available at the arXiv:0908.3724.
- [Hirsch1959] M. W. Hirsch, Immersions of manifolds, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 93 (1959), 242–276. MR0119214 (22 #9980) Zbl 0118.18603
- [Koschorke1981] U. Koschorke, Vector fields and other vector bundle morphisms-a singularity approach, Springer, 1981. MR611333 (82i:57026) Zbl 0459.57016
- [Milnor&Stasheff1974] J. W. Milnor and J. D. Stasheff, Characteristic classes, Princeton University Press, Princeton, N. J., 1974. MR0440554 (55 #13428) Zbl 1079.57504
- [Smale1959a] S. Smale, The classification of immersions of spheres in Euclidean spaces, Ann. of Math. (2) 69 (1959), 327–344. MR0105117 (21 #3862) Zbl 0089.18201
- [Smale1963] S. Smale, A survey of some recent developments in differential topology, Bull. Amer. Math. Soc. 69 (1963), 131–145. MR0144351 (26 #1896) Zbl 0133.16507
- [Steenrod1951] N. Steenrod, The topology of fibre bundles., (Princeton Mathematical Series No. 14.) Princeton: Princeton University Press. VIII, 224 p. , 1951. MR1688579 (2000a:55001) Zbl 0054.07103
- [Whitney1944a] H. Whitney, The singularities of a smooth -manifold in -space, Ann. of Math. (2) 45 (1944), 247–293. MR0010275 (5,274a) Zbl 0063.08238
5 External links
- The Encyclopedia of Mathematics article on an immersion of manifold
- The Wikipedia page about immersions