Embeddings of manifolds with boundary: classification

From Manifold Atlas
Jump to: navigation, search

The users responsible for this page are: Mikhail Fedorov, Garaev Timur. No other users may edit this page at present.

This page has not been refereed. The information given here might be incomplete or provisional.

Contents

1 Introduction

In this page we present results on embeddings of manifolds with non-empty boundary into Euclidean space. In \S5 we introduce an invariant of embedding of a n-manifold in (n-1)-space for even n. In \S7 which is independent from \S4, \S5 and \S6 we state generalisations of theorems from \S2 to highly-connected manifolds.

For a general introduction to embeddings as well as the notation and conventions used on this page, we refer to [Skopenkov2016c, \S1, \S3]. In those pages mostly results for closed manifolds are stated.

If the category is omitted, then we assume the smooth (DIFF) category. Denote \mathrm{Emb}^mN the set of all embeddings f\colon N\to\mathbb R^m up to isotopy. We denote by \mathrm{lk} the linking coefficient [Seifert&Threlfall1980, \S 77] of two disjoint cycles.

We state the simplest results. These results can be deduced from the Haefliger-Weber deleted product criterion [Skopenkov2006, \S 5], see [Haefliger1963, 6.4], [Skopenkov2002, Theorem 1.1\alpha\partial] for the DIFF case and [Skopenkov2002, Theorem 1.3\alpha\partial] for the PL case. For some results we present direct proofs, which are easier than deduction from this criterion.

We do not claim the references we give are references to original proofs.

2 Embedding and unknotting theorems

Theorem 2.1. Assume that N is a compact connected n-manifold.

(a) Then N embeds into \mathbb R^{2n}.

(b) If N has non-empty boundary, then N embeds into \mathbb R^{2n-1}.

Part (a) is well-known strong Whitney embedding theorem. The first proof of (b) presented below is essentially contained in [Hirsch1961a, Theorem 4.6] for the Diff case, and in references for Theorem 7.1 below or in [Horvatic1971, Theorem 5.2] for the PL case.

Theorem 2.2. Assume that N is a compact connected n-manifold and either

(a) m \ge 2n+1 \ge 5 or

(b) N has non-empty boundary and m\geq 2n.

Then any two embeddings of N into \mathbb R^m are isotopic.

Part (a) is Whitney-Wu Unknotting Theorem, see [Skopenkov2016c, \S 2, Theorems 2.1, 2.2]. Part (b) in the case n>2 is proved in [Edwards1968, \S 4, Corollary 5]. The case n=1 is clear. The case n=2 can be proved using the ideas presented below.

The inequality in part (b) is sharp by Proposition 4.1.

These basic results can be generalized to highly-connected manifolds (see \S7). In particular, both parts of Theorem 2.1 are special cases of Theorem 7.2.

All theorems for manifolds with non-empty boundary stated in \S2 and \S7 can be proved using

  • analogous results for immersions of manifolds stated in \S9, and general position ideas, see e.g. the first proof of Theorem 2.1.b in \S3.
  • handle decomposition, see e.g. the second proof of Theorem 2.1.b in \S3.

Observe that the `handle decomposition' proof is essentially a `straightening' of the `immersion' proof because the required results on immersions are proved using handle decomposition.

3 Proofs of Theorem 2.1.b and Theorem 2.2.b

In this section we work only in smooth category. The first proof of Theorem 2.1.b uses immersions, while the second does not.

First proof of Theorem 2.1.b. By the strong Whitney immersion theorem there exist an immersion g\colon N\to\mathbb R^{2n-1}. Since N is connected and has non-empty boundary, it follows that N collapses to an (n-1)-dimensional subcomplex X\subset N of some triangulation of N. Since 2(n-1) < 2n-1, by general position we may assume that g|_{X} is an embedding. Since g is an immersion, it follows that X has a sufficiently small tubular neighbourhood M\supset X such that g|_{M} is embedding. Since tubular neighbourhood is unique up to homeomorphism, there exists a homeomorphism h\colon N\to M. The composition g\circ h is an embedding of N.
\square

For the second proof we need some lemmas.

Lemma 3.1. [Wall1966] Assume that N is a closed connected n-manifold. Then N_0 have handle decomposition with indices of attaching maps at most n-1.

Lemma 3.2. Assume that U is a compact n-manifold, \phi:\partial D^i\times D^{n-i}\to \partial U is an embedding with i\leq n-1, and f:U \to \mathbb R^{m} is an embedding.

(a) If m=2n-1, then there is an extension of f to an embedding of U\cup_{\phi} D^i\times D^{n-i}.

(b) Assume also that there is an embedding g : D^i\times 0 \to \mathbb R^m such that f\phi = g on \partial D^i \times 0. Suppose that on g(D^i\times 0) there is a field of n-i linear independed normal vectors whose restriction to f(\partial D^i\times 0) is tangent to f(U). Then f\cup g extends to a embedding U \cup_{\phi} D^i\times D^{n-i} \to\ \mathbb R^m.

Second proof of Theorem 2.1.b assuming Lemma 3.1 and Lemma 3.2.(a). By Lemma 3.1.(a) there is a handle decomposition of N_0 with attaching maps \phi_1,\ldots,\phi_s of indices at most n-1. Denote by U^l the manifold obtained from \emptyset by the attaching first l handles. Take any embedding F_1:U^1 \cong D^n\to \R^{2n-1}. Let us define an embedding F_l of U^l using an embedding F_{l-1} of U^{l-1}. Since the index i of \phi_l is smaller than n, by Lemma 3.2 there is extension of F_{l-1} to an embedding F_l:U^{l-1}\cup_{\phi_l} D^i\times D^{n-i}\to\R^{2n-1}, where U^l=U^{l-1}\cup_{\phi_l} D^i\times D^{n-i}.
\square
Proof of Lemma 3.2.(a) assuming Lemma 3.2.(b). Since i+n\leq 2n-1 and 2i+1\leq 2n-1, by general position there is an embedding g: D^i\times 0\to \mathbb R^{2n-1} such that f\phi = g on \partial D^i \times 0 and f(\mbox{Int} U) has a finite number of intersections points with g(\mbox{Int} D^i\times 0). Then by an isotopy g_t, where g_0=g, fixed on \partial D^i\times 0 we can "push out" the self-intersection points toward \partial U so that g_1(\mbox{Int} D^i\times 0) does not intersect f(\mbox{Int} U). Then f\cup g_1 is an embedding.

Denote by A the (n-i)\times n matrix whose rightmost (n-i)\times (n-i) block is the identity matrix, and whose other elements are zeros. Denote by v the field of n-i normal vectors on \partial D^i\times 0\subset D^i\times D^{n-i} such that the k-th vector has coordinates equal to the k-th row in A. Then the vector field d\phi (v)= (d\phi (v_1),\ldots , d\phi (v_{n-i})) is tangent to \partial U. For x\in g_1(\partial D^i\times 0) denote by v'(x) the projection of df(d\phi(v(x))) to the intersection of normal space to g_1(\partial D^i\times 0) at x, and tangent space to f(\partial U) at x. Since i-1<2n-1 - (n-i), it follows that \pi_{i-1}(V_{2n-1, n-i})=0. Hence there is an extension of v' to an linearly independent field of vectors normal to g_1(D^i\times 0). Then by Lemma 3.2.(b) there is an extension of f\cup g_1 to an embedding of U \cup_{\phi} D^i\times D^{n-i}.

\square

In the proof of Theorem 2.2 we will use Lemma 3.1 and Lemma 3.3.(a).

Lemma 3.3. Assume that U is a compact n-manifold, \phi:\partial D^i\times D^{n-i}\to \partial U is an embedding with i\leq n-1, f_0, f_1: U\cup_{\phi} D^i\times D^{n-i}\to \mathbb{R}^m are embeddings and F:U\times [0, 1]\to \mathbb{R}^m\times [0, 1] is a concordance between f_0|_U and f_1|_U.

(a) If m\geq  2n, then there is an extension of F to a concordance between f_0 and f_1.

(b) Assume also that there is a concordance G:D^i\times 0\times [0, 1]:\mathbb{R}^m\times [0, 1] between f_0|_{D^i\times 0} and f_1|_{D^i\times 0}, and on G(D^i\times 0\times [0, 1]) there is a field of n-i linear independent normal vectors whose restrictions to G(\partial D^i\times 0\times [0, 1]), to G(D^i\times 0\times 0), and to G(D^i\times 0\times 1) are tangent to
\displaystyle F(U\times [0, 1])\quad\text{to}\quad f_0(D^i\times D^{n-i})\times 0,\quad\text{and to}\quad f_1(D^i\times D^{n-i})\times 1,
respectively. Then F\cup G extends to a concordance between f_0 and f_1.
Proof of the Theorem 2.2 assuming Lemma 3.1 and Lemma 3.3.(a). Denote by f_0, f_1 any two embeddings of N_0 into \mathbb{R}^m. By the Concordance Implies Isotopy Theorem it suffices to prove that there is a concordance between f_0 and f_1. In order to prove that observe that by Lemma 3.1 there is a handle decomposition of N_0 with attaching maps of indices at most n-1. Denote by U^l the manifold obtained from U^0=\emptyset by the attaching the first l handles, starting with? U^1\cong D^n. Define a concordance F_l:U^l\times [0, 1] \to \mathbb R^m \times [0, 1] recursively. Take any concordance F_1:U^1\times [0, 1] \to \mathbb R^m \times [0, 1] between f_0|_{U^1} and f_1|_{U^1}. Let us define a concordance F_l between f_0|_{U^l} and f_1|_{U^l} using a concordance F_{l-1} of U^{l-1} between f_0|_{U^{l-1}} and f_1|_{U^{l-1}}. For this denote by \phi:\partial D^i\times D^{n-i}\to \partial U^{l-1} the l-th attaching map. Since i\leq n-1, by Lemma 3.3.(a) there is an extension of F_{l-1} to a concordance
\displaystyle F_{l}:U^{l}\times [0, 1]\to\mathbb{R}^m\times [0, 1]
between the restriction of f_0 and f_1 to U^{l}=U^{l-1}\cup_\phi D^i\times D^{n-i}.
\square
Proof of Lemma 3.3.(a) assuming Lemma 3.3.(b). In the following text we identify D^i\times D^{n-i}\times [0, 1] and D^i\times [0, 1]\times D^{n-i}. Define map
\displaystyle \bar{\phi}:\partial (D^i\times [0, 1])\times D^{n-i}\to \partial U\times[0, 1]\cup_{\phi\times 0} D^i\times D^{n-i}\times 0 \cup_{\phi\times 1} D^i\times D^{n-i}\times 1
by the formula:
Tex syntax error
Since
\displaystyle \dim(D^i\times 0\times [0, 1]) + \dim (U\times [0, 1])\leq (i+1)+(n+1)\quad\text{and}\quad 2\dim(D^i\times 0\times [0, 1])+1\leq 2n+1\leq m+1,
by general position there is an embedding
\displaystyle G: D^i\times 0\times [0, 1]\to \mathbb R^m\times [0, 1]
such that F\bar{\phi} = G on \partial (D^i \times 0\times [0, 1]) and F(\mbox{Int} (U\times [0, 1])) has a finite number of intersection points with G(\mbox{Int}( D^i\times 0\times [0, 1])). Then by an isotopy G_t, where G_0=G, fixed on \partial (D^i\times 0\times [0, 1]) we can "push out" the self-intersection points toward F(\partial (U\times [0, 1])) so that G_1(D^i\times 0\times [0, 1]) does not intersect G(U\times [0, 1]). Then F\cup G_1 is an concordance between the restrictions of f_0 and f_1 on U\cup_{\phi|_{\partial D^i\times 0}} D^i\times 0.

Denote by A the (n-i)\times (n+1) matrix whose rightmost (n-i)\times (n-i) submatrix is the identity matrix, and whose other elements are zeroes. Denote by v the field of n-i normal vectors on \partial (D^i\times 0\times [0, 1])\subset D^i\times D^{n-i}\times [0, 1] whose k-th vector has coordinates equal to the k-th row in A. Then d\bar{\phi} (v)= (d\bar{\phi} (v_1),\ldots , d\bar{\phi} (v_{n-i})) is the vector field tangent to \bar{\phi}(\partial (D^i\times [0, 1])\times D^{n-i}). For x\in G_1(\partial (D^i\times 0\times [0, 1]) denote by v'(x) the projection of d(F\cup f_0\cup f_1)d\phi (v(x)) to the intersection of normal space to G_1(D^i\times 0\times [0, 1]) at x, and tangent space to F(\partial(U\times [0, 1])) at x. Since i<m+1-(n-i), it follows that \pi_{i}(V_{m+1, n-i})=0. Hence there is an extension of v' to a linear independent field of vectors normal to G_1(D^i\times 0\times [0, 1]). Then by Lemma 3.3.(b) there is an extension of F\cup G_1 to a concordance (U \cup_{\phi} D^i\times D^{n-i})\times [0, 1].

\square


4 Example of non-isotopic embeddings

The following example is folklore.

Example 4.1. Let N=S^k\times [0, 1] be the cylinder over S^k.

(a) Then there exist non-isotopic embeddings of N into \mathbb R^{2k+1}.

(b) Then for each a\in\mathbb Z there exist an embedding f\colon N\to\mathbb R^{2k+1} such that \mathrm{lk}(f(S^k\times 0), f(S^k\times 1))=a.

(c) Then l\colon \mathrm{Emb}^{2k+1}N\to\mathbb Z defined by the formula l([f]) = \mathrm{lk}(f(S^k\times 0), f(S^k\times 1)) is well-defined and is a bijection for k\geqslant2.

Proof. Proof of part (b). Informally speaking by twisting a ribbon one can obtain arbitrary value of linking coefficient. Let h\colon S^k\to S^k be a map of degree a. (To prove part (a) it is sufficient to take as h the identity map of S^k as a map of degree one and the constant map as a map of degree zero.) Define g\colon S^k\times [0, 1] \to D^{k+1}\times S^k by the formula g(x, t) = (x, h(x)t).

Let f=\mathrm i\circ g, where \mathrm i = \mathrm i_{2k+1, k}\colon D^{k+1}\times S^k \to \mathbb R^{2k+1} is the standard embedding.Thus \mathrm{lk}(f(S^k\times0), f(S^k\times1)) = a.

Proof of part (c). Clearly l is well-defined. By (b) l is surjective. Now take any two embeddings f_1, f_2 such that l([f_1]) = l([f_2]). Each embedding of a cylinder gives an embedding of a sphere with a normal field. Moreover, isotopic embeddings of cylinders gives isotopic embeddings of spheres with normal fields.

Since k\geqslant 2 Unknotting Spheres Theorem implies that there exists an isotopy of f_1|_{S^k\times 0} and f_2|_{S^k\times 0}. Thus we can assume f_1|_{S^k\times 0} = f_2|_{S^k\times 0}. Since l([f_1]) = l([f_2]) it follows that normal fields on f_1(S^k\times 0) and f_2(S^k\times 0) are homotopic in class of normal fields. This implies f_1 and f_2 are isotopic.
\square
(a): Embeddings f_1 (top) and f_2 (bottom); (b): the vector field depicts the difference s_i-f_i, i=1,2, so the ends of the vector field define the section s_i; (c): embedding s_ix\sqcup f_iy; (d): embedding s_iy\sqcup f_ix.

Denote 1_k:=(1,0,\ldots,0)\in S^k.

Example 4.2. Let N=S^k\times S^1. Assume k>2. Then there exists a bijection l\colon\mathrm{Emb}^{2k+1}N_0\to\mathbb Z defined by the formula l([f])=\mathrm{lk}(S^k\times1_1, S^k\times-1_1).

The surjectivity of l is given analogously to Proposition 4.1(b). The injectivity of l follows from forgetful bijection \mathrm{Emb}^{2k+1}N_0\to\mathrm{Emb}^{2k+1}S_k\times[0,1] between embeddings of N_0 and a cylinder.

This example shows that Theorem 7.4 fails for k=0.

Example 4.3. Let N=S^k_a\times S^1 \# S^k_b\times S^1 be the connected sum of two tori. Then there exists a surjection l\colon\mathrm{Emb}^{2k+1}N_0\to\mathbb Z defined by the formula l([f])=\mathrm{lk}(f(S^k_a\times1_1), f(S^k_b\times1_1)).

To prove the surjectivity of l it is sufficient to take linked k-spheres in \mathbb R^{2k+1} and consider an embedded boundary connected sum of ribbons containing these two spheres.

Example 4.4. (a) Let N_0 be the punctured 2-torus containing the meridian x and the parallel y of the torus. For each embedding f\colon N_0\to\mathbb R^3 denote by s the normal field of \epsilon-length vectors to f(N_0) defined by orientation on N_0 (see figure (b)). Then there exists a surjection l\colon\mathrm{Emb}^3 N_0\to\mathbb Z defined by the formula l([f])=\mathrm{lk}(f(x), s(y)).

(b) Let f_1,f_2\colon N_0\to\R^3 be two embeddings shown on figure (a). Figure (c) shows that l(f_1)=1 and l(f_2)=0 which proves the intuitive fact that f_1 and f_2 are not isotopic. (Notice that the restrictions of f_1 and f_2 on x\cup y are isotopic!) If we use the opposite normal vector field s'=-s, the values of l(f_1) and l(f_2) will change but will still be different (see figure (d)).

5 Seifert linking form

For a simpler invariant see [Skopenkov2022] and references therein.

In this section assume that

  • N is any closed orientable connected n-manifold,
  • f\colon N_0 \to \mathbb R^{2n-1} is any embedding,
  • if the (co)homology coefficients are omitted, then they are \mathbb Z,
  • n is even and H_1(N) is torsion free (these two assumptions are not required in Lemma \ref{lmm::saeki}).

By N_0 we denote the closure of the complement in N to an closed n-ball. Thus \partial N_0 is the (n-1)-sphere.

Lemma 5.1. There exists a nowhere vanishing normal vector field to f(N_0).

This is essentially a folklore result, see an unpublished update of [Tonkonog2010] and [Fedorov2021, Lemma 5.1], cf. [Saeki1999, Lemma 4.1].

Denote by x, y two disjoint (n-1)-cycles in N_0 with integer coefficients. Denote

\displaystyle L(f)(x,y) = \mathrm{lk}(f(x), s(y)) + \mathrm{lk}(s(x), f(y)),

where s is a nowhere vanishing normal field to f(N_0) and s(x), s(y) are the results of the shift of f(x), f(y) by s.

Lemma 5.2 (L is well-defined). The integer L(f)(x, y):

  • is well-defined, i.e., does not change when s is replaced by s',
  • does not change when x or y are changed to homologous cycles and,
  • does not change when f is changed to an isotopic embedding.

The first bullet was stated and proved in unpublished update of [Tonkonog2010] and in [Fedorov2021, Lemma 5.3], other two bullets are simple.

Lemma 5.2 implies that L(f) generates a bilinear form

\displaystyle L(f):H_{n-1}(N_0)\times H_{n-1}(N_0)\to\Z

denoted by the same letter and called Seifert linking form.

Denote by \rho_2 \colon H_*(N)\to H_*(N;\mathbb Z_2) the reduction modulo 2. Define the dual to Stiefel-Whitney class \mathrm{PD}\bar w_{n-2}(N_0)\in H_2(N_0, \partial N_0; \mathbb Z_2) to be the class of the cycle on which two general position normal fields to f(N_0) are linearly dependent.

Lemma 5.3. For every X, Y \in H_{n-1}(N_0) the following equality holds:

\displaystyle \rho_2L(f)(X, Y) = \mathrm{PD}\bar w_{n-2}(N_0)\cap\rho_2X\cap\rho_2Y.

This Lemma was stated in a unpublished update of [Tonkonog2010]; a proof is presented in [Fedorov2021, Lemma 6.1] using the idea from that update. See also an analogous lemma for closed manifolds in [Crowley&Skopenkov2016, Lemma 2.2].

6 Classification theorems

Here we state classification results that are neither unknotting nor embeddability theorems for manifolds with boundary.

Let N be a closed orientable connected n-manifold. By N_0 we denote the complement in N to an open n-ball. Thus \partial N_0 is the (n-1)-sphere. For a free Abelian group A, let B_n^∗A be the group of bilinear forms \phi \colon A \times A \to \mathbb Z such that \phi(x, y) = (−1)^n \phi(y, x) and \phi(x, x) is even for each x (the second condition automatically holds for n odd).

Definition 6.1. For each even n define an invariant W\Lambda\colon\mathrm{Emb}^{2n-1}N_0\to H_1(N;\mathbb Z_2). For each embedding f\colon N_0\to\mathbb R^{2n-1} construct any PL embedding g\colon N\to\mathbb R^{2n} by adding a cone over f(\partial N_0). Now let W\Lambda([f]) = W(g), where W is Whitney invariant, [Skopenkov2016e, \S5].

Lemma 6.2. The invariant W\Lambda is well-defined for n\ge4.

Proof. Note that Unknotting Spheres Theorem implies that \partial N_0 unknots in \mathbb R^{2n}. Thus f|_{\partial N_0} can be extended to embedding of an n-ball B^n into \mathbb R^{2n}. Unknotting Spheres Theorem implies that n-sphere unknots in \mathbb R^{2n}. Thus all extensions of f are isotopic in PL category. Note also that if f and g are isotopic then their extensions are isotopic as well. And Whitney invariant W is invariant for PL embeddings.

\square

Definition 6.3 of G:\mathrm{Emb}^{2n-1}N_0\to B_n^*H_{n-1}(N) if n is even and H_1(N) is torsion-free. Take a collection \{f_z\}_{z\in H_1(N;\Z_{(n-1)})}\subset \mathrm{Emb}^{2n-1} N_0 such that W\Lambda(f_z)=z. For each f such that W\Lambda(f)=z define

\displaystyle  G(f)(x,y):=\frac{1}{2}\left(L(f)(x,y)-L(f_z)(x,y)\right)

where x,y\in H_{n-1}(N_0).

Note also that G depends on choice of collection \{f_z\}. The following Theorems hold for any choice of \{f_z\}.

Theorem 6.4. Let N be a closed connected orientable n-manifold with H_1(N) torsion-free, n\ge 4, n even. The map

\displaystyle  G\times W\Lambda:\ \mathrm{Emb}^{2n-1}N_0\to B_n^* H_{n-1}(N) \times H_1(N;\Z_{2}),

is one-to-one.

Lemma 6.5. For each even n\in H_{n-1}(N) and each x the following equality holds: W\Lambda(f)\cap \rho_2(x) = \rho_2\left(\frac{1}{2}L(f)(x, x) - \frac{1}{2}L(f_0)(x, x)\right).

An equivalemt statement of Theorem 6.4:

Theorem 6.6. Let N be a closed connected orientable n-manifold with H_1(N) torsion-free, n\ge 4, n even. Then

(a) The map L: \mathrm{Emb}^{2n-1}N_0\to B_n^*H_{n-1}(N) is an injection.

(b) The image of L consists of all symmetric bilinear forms \phi:H_{n-1}(N)\times H_{n-1}(N)\to \Z such that \rho_2\phi(x,y)= \bar w_2(N_0)\cap\rho_2(x\cap y). Here \bar w_2(N_0) is the normal Stiefel-Whitney class.

This is the main Theorem of [Tonkonog2010]

7 A generalization to highly-connected manifolds

For simplicity in this paragraph we consider only punctured manifolds, see \S8 for a generalization.

Denote by N a closed n-manifold. By N_0 denote the complement in N to an open n-ball. Thus \partial N_0 is the (n-1)-sphere.

Theorem 7.1. Assume that N is a closed k-connected n-manifold.

(a) If n\geq 2k+3, then N embeds into \mathbb R^{2n-k}.

(b) If n\geq 2k+2 and k\geq0, then N_0 embeds into \mathbb R^{2n-k-1}.

Part (a) is proved in [Haefliger1961, Existence Theorem (a)] for the Diff case and in [Penrose&Whitehead&Zeeman1961, Theorem 1.1], [Irwin1965, Corollary 1.3] for PL case.

Part (b) is proved in [Hirsch1961a, Corollary 4.2] for the Diff case and in [Penrose&Whitehead&Zeeman1961, Theorem 1.2] for the PL case.

Theorem 7.2. Assume that N is a closed k-connected n-manifold.

(a) If m \ge 2n - k + 1 and n\ge2k + 2, then any two embeddings of N into \mathbb R^m are isotopic.

(b) If m \ge 2n - k and n\ge k + 3 and (n, k) \notin \{(5, 2), (4, 1)\} then any two embeddings of N_0 into \mathbb R^m are isotopic.

Part (a) is Theorem 2.4 of the survey [Skopenkov2016c, \S 2], and is proved in [Zeeman1963, Corollary 2 of Theorem 24 in Chapter 8] and [Haefliger1961, Existence Theorem (b) in p. 47].

Part (b) is proved in [Hudson1969, Theorem 10.3] for the PL case, using concordance implies isotopy theorem.

For k>1 part (b) is a corollary of Theorem 7.4 below. For k=0 part (b) coincides with Theorem 2.2b.

Proof of Theorem 7.2(b) for k=1. By Theorem 9.6 below every two immersions of N_0 into \mathbb R^{2n-1} are regulary homotopic. Hence for every two embeddings f,g\colon N_0\to\mathbb R^{2n-1} there exist an immersion F\colon N_0\times[0,1]\to\mathbb R^{2n-1}\times[0,1] such that F(x, 0) = (f(x), 0) and F(x, 1)=(g(x), 1) for each x\in N_0. It follows from Theorem 8.3 that N_0 collapses to an (n-2)-dimensional subcomplex X\subset N_0 of some triangulation of N_0. By general position we may assume that F|_{X\times[0,1]} is an embedding, because 2(n-1) < 2n. Since F is an immersion, it follows that X has a sufficiently small regular neighbourhood M\supset X such that F|_{M\times[0,1]} is an embedding. Since regular neighbourhood is unique up to homeomorphism, there exists a homeomorphism h\colon N_0\to M. It is clear that f is isotopic to f\circ h and g is isotopic to g\circ h. Thus, the restriction F|_{M\times[0,1]} is a concordance of f\circ h and g\circ h. By concordance implies isotopy Theorem f and g are isotopic.
\square

Conjecture 7.3. Assume that N is a closed 1-connected 4-manifold. Then any two embeddings of N_0 in \mathbb R^7 are isotopic.

We may hope to get around the restrictions of Theorem 8.3 using the deleted product criterion.

Theorem 7.4. Assume N is a closed k-connected n-manifold. Then for each k\ge1 there exists a bijection

\displaystyle  W_0'\colon \mathrm{Emb}^{2n-k-1}(N_0)\to H_{k+1}(N;\mathbb Z_{(n-k-1)}),

where \mathbb Z_{(s)} denote \mathbb Z for s even and \mathbb Z_2 for s odd.

For definition of W_0' and the proof of the latter Theorem see [Skopenkov2010, Lemma 2.2(W_0')]. The latter theorem was essentially proven in [Vrabec1989, Theorem 2.1]. Latter Theorem is essentially known result. Compare to the Theorem 6.6, which describes \mathrm{Emb}^{2n-1}(N_0) and differs from the general case.

8 Comments on non-spherical boundary

Theorem 8.1. Assume that N is a compact k-connected n-manifold, \partial N\neq\emptyset, (N, \partial N) is k-connected and k< n - 3. Then N embeds into \mathbb R^{2n-k-1}.

This is [Wall1965, Theorem on p.567].

Proof. By Theorem 9.5 below there exists an immersion f\colon N\to\mathbb R^{2n-k-1}. Since N is k-connected it follows from Theorem 8.3 that N collapses to an (n-k-1)-dimensional subcomplex X\subset N of some triangulation of N. By general position we may assume that f|_X is an embedding, because 2(n-k) < 2n-k-1. Since f is an immersion, it follows that X has a sufficiently small regular neighbourhood M\supset X such that f|_{M} is an embedding. Since regular neighbourhood is unique up to homeomorphism, there exists a homeomorphism h\colon N\to M. It is clear that f\circ h is an embedding.
\square

Theorem 8.2. Assume that N is a n-manifold. If N has (n-k-1)-dimensional spine, \partial N \neq \emptyset, m \ge 2n - k, then any two embeddings of N into \mathbb R^m are isotopic.

Proof is similar to the proof of theorem 7.2.

For a compact connected n-manifold with boundary, the property of having an (n − k − 1)-dimensional spine is close to k-connectedness. Indeed, the following theorem holds.

Theorem 8.3. Every compact connected n-manifold N with boundary for which (N, \partial N) is k-connected, \pi_1(\partial N)=0, k + 3 \le n and (n, k) \notin \{(5, 2), (4, 1)\}, has an (n − k − 1)-dimensional spine.

For this result see [Wall1964a, Theorem 5.5] and [Horvatic1969, Lemma 5.1 and Remark 5.2]. See also valuable remarks in [Levine&Lidman2018] and [Skopenkov2019].

9 Comments on immersions

Theorem 9.1.[Smale-Hirsch; [Hirsch1959] and [Haefliger&Poenaru1964]] The space of immersions of a manifold in \R^m is homotopy equivalent to the space of linear monomorphisms from TM to \R^m.

Theorem 9.2.[[Hirsch1959, Theorem 6.4]] If N is immersible in \R^{m+r} with a normal r/var/www/vhost/map.mpim-bonn.mpg.de/tmp/AppWikiTex/tex_ly64eP-field, then N is immersible in \R^m.

Theorem 9.3. Every n-manifold N with non-empty boundary is immersible in \R^{2n-1}.

Theorem 9.4.[Whitney; [Hirsch1961a, Theorem 6.6]] Every n-manifold N is immersible in \R^{2n-1}.

Denote by V_{m,n} is Stiefel manifold of n-frames in \R^m.

Theorem 9.5. Suppose N is a n-manifold with non-empty boudary, (N,\partial N) is k-connected. Then N is immersible in \R^m for each m\geq2n-k-1.

Proof. It suffices to show that exists an immersion of N in \mathbb R^{2n-k-1}. It suffices to show that exists a linear monomorphism from TM to \mathbb R^{2n-k-1}. Let us construct such a linear monomorphism by skeleta of N. It is clear that a linear monomorphism exists on 0-skeleton of N.

The obstruction to extend the linear monomorphism from (r-1)-skeleton to r-skeleton lies in H_{n-r}(N, \partial N; \pi_{r-1}(V_{2n-k-1,n})).

For r=1,\ldots,n-k-1 we know \pi_{r-1}(V_{2n-k-1, n}) = 0. For r=n-k,\ldots, n we have H_{n-r}(N, \partial N; *) = 0 since (N, \partial N) is k-connected and has non-empty boundary.

Thus the obstruction is always zero and such linear monomorphism exists.

\square

Theorem 9.6. Suppose N is a connected n-manifold with non-empty boudary, (N, \partial N) is k-connected and m\geq2n-k. Then every two immersions of N in \R^m are regulary homotopic.

Proof. It suffies to show that exists homomotphism of any two linear monomorphisms from TM to \mathbb R^{2n-k}. Lets cunstruct such homotopy on each r-skeleton of N. It is clear that homotopy exists on 0-skeleton of N.

The obstruction to extend the homotopy from (r-1)-skeleton to r-skeleton lies in H_{n-r}(N, \partial N; \pi_r(V_{2n-k, n})).

For r=1,\ldots,n-k-1 we know \pi_r(V_{2n-k, n}) = 0. For r=n-k,\ldots, n we have H_{n-r}(N, \partial N; *) = 0 since (N, \partial N) is k-connected and N has non-empty boundary.

Thus the obstruction is always zero and such homotopy of linear monomorphisms exists.

\square

10 References

Personal tools
Namespaces
Variants
Actions
Navigation
Interaction
Toolbox