Concordance implies isotopy for smooth structures on 3-manifolds?

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
(Created page with " <!-- COMMENT: To achieve a unified layout, along with using the template below, please OBSERVE the following: besides, $...$ and $$...$$, you should use two environments: ...")
Line 13: Line 13:
== Problem ==
== Problem ==
<wikitex>;
<wikitex>;
A $3$-manifold has a smooth structure which is essentially unique. One question is what does ``essentially unique" mean.
In high dimensions you can classify smooth structures either up to concordance or up to isotopy. In high dimensions concordance implies isotopy.
If you have a topological manifold $M^n$ and a smooth manifold $W^{n+1}$ homeomorphic to $M \times I$, you can ask if that smooth manifold $W$ is diffeomorphic to a product,
$$W \xrightarrow{diffeo} \partial_+ W \times I$$
This ``concordance implies isotopy" theorem of Kirby-Siebenmann and Hirsch is:
\begin{itemize}
\item true in high dimensions, $n \geq 5$.
If you have a topological manifold $M^n$, you can classify smooth structures as homotopy classes of maps
$$\mathcal{S}^{TOP/O}(M^n) = [M^n, TOP/O]$$
The structure set $\mathcal{S}^{TOP/O}(M^n)$ is the set of classes of smoothings on $M^n$. But it is important to decide what is meant by the ``structure" and there are two possible equivalence relations: concordance or isotopy.
A smoothing is a homeomorphism from a smooth manifold $\Sigma$ to $M.$
$$\Sigma \xrightarrow{homeo} M.$$
Two smoothings $\Sigma_0 \xrightarrow{homeo} M^n$ and $\Sigma_1 \xrightarrow{homeo} M$ are \textit{concordant} if there is a smooth manifold $W^{n+1}$ and a homeomorphism to $M \times I$ that restricts to these two smoothings.
\medskip
Two smoothings $\Sigma_0 \xrightarrow{homeo} M$ and $\Sigma_1 \xrightarrow{homeo} M$ are isotopic if there is a smooth manifold $\Sigma$ and a level-preserving homeomorphism $H: \Sigma \times I \to M \times I$,
$$(H(s, t) = (F(s, t), t))$$
inducing $\Sigma_i \xrightarrow{homeo} M \times \{ i \}$ for $i = 0, 1.$
\begin{theorem} If dim $M \geq 5$, then concordant structures are isotopic (and hence diffeomorphic).
\end{theorem}
\item false for simply-connected $4$-manifolds by the failure of the $h$-cobordism theorem. Cappell and Shanneson proved in the non-simply connected case that there are counterexamples to the $h$-cobordism theorem.
\item we don't know the answer for $n=3$.
\end{itemize}

Revision as of 06:28, 8 January 2019


Personal tools
Namespaces
Variants
Actions
Navigation
Interaction
Toolbox