Complete intersections

From Manifold Atlas
(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
(Construction and examples)
m (Construction and examples)
(10 intermediate revisions by one user not shown)
Line 3: Line 3:
<wikitex>;
<wikitex>;
Let $f_1, \dots, f_k$ be complex, homogeneous polynomials of degree $d_1, \dots, d_k$ in $n+k+1$ complex variables $z = (z_1, \dots, z_{n+k+1})$. Define
Let $f_1, \dots, f_k$ be complex, homogeneous polynomials of degree $d_1, \dots, d_k$ in $n+k+1$ complex variables $z = (z_1, \dots, z_{n+k+1})$. Define
$$ X(f_1, \dots, f_k) \coloneq \{ [z] \in \CP^{n+k} | f_i(z) = 0 \text{~for~} i = 1, \dots, k\}.$$
+
$$ X(f_1, \dots, f_k) \coloneq \{ [z] \in \CP^{n+k} \,|\, f_i(z) = 0 ~\text{for}~ i = 1, \dots, k\}.$$
The set $X(f_1, \dots f_k)$ is an [[Wikipedia:Algebraic_variety|algebraic variety]]. It is non-singular if for all $j$ with $0 \leq j \leq n+k$ the affine function
The set $X(f_1, \dots f_k)$ is an [[Wikipedia:Algebraic_variety|algebraic variety]]. It is non-singular if for all $j$ with $0 \leq j \leq n+k$ the affine function
$$ \Cc^{n+k} \to \Cc^{k}, ~~~ (z_1, \dots, z_{n+k}) \longmapsto (f_1^j(z_1, \dots, z_{n+k}), \dots, f_k^j(z_1, \dots, z_{n+k}))$$
$$ \Cc^{n+k} \to \Cc^{k}, ~~~ (z_1, \dots, z_{n+k}) \longmapsto (f_1^j(z_1, \dots, z_{n+k}), \dots, f_k^j(z_1, \dots, z_{n+k}))$$
Line 46: Line 46:
<!-- -->
<!-- -->
{{beginthm|Proposition|{{cite|Libgober&Wood1981}}}}
{{beginthm|Proposition|{{cite|Libgober&Wood1981}}}}
If $n \geq 3$ is even, then $\lambda : H^n \times H^n \to \Zz$ is indefinate unless $X_n({\underline{d}}) = X_n(1), X_n(2)$ or $X_n(2,2)$.
+
If $n \geq 3$ is even, then $\lambda : H^n \times H^n \to \Zz$ is indefinite unless $X_n({\underline{d}}) = X_n(1), X_n(2)$ or $X_n(2,2)$.
{{endthm}}
{{endthm}}
</wikitex>
</wikitex>
Line 77: Line 77:
{{endthm}}
{{endthm}}
<!---->
<!---->
Note that we regard $p_i(X_n(\underline{d}_\epsilon), \epsilon = 1, 2$ as multiplies of $x^{2i}$ in order to view $p_i(X_n({\underline{d}}_\epsilon))$ as an element of $\Zz$.
+
Note that we regard $p_i(X_n(\underline{d}_\epsilon)), \epsilon = 1, 2$ as multiplies of $x^{2i}$ in order to view $p_i(X_n({\underline{d}}_\epsilon))$ as an element of $\Zz$.
<!--In particular, when $n = 4j$, $p_j(X_n({\underline{d}}) \in H^{4j}(X_n({\underline{d}}))$ is pulled back via $i^*$ from $H^{4j}(\mathbb{C}P^{n+k})$.-->
+
<!--In particular, when $n = 4j$, $p_j(X_n({\underline{d}})) \in H^{4j}(X_n({\underline{d}}))$ is pulled back via $i^*$ from $H^{4j}(\mathbb{C}P^{n+k})$.-->
</wikitex>
</wikitex>
=== Classification in low dimensions ===
=== Classification in low dimensions ===
Line 84: Line 84:
* For $n=1$ the Sullivan Conjecture holds by the classification of [[Surface|surfaces]].
* For $n=1$ the Sullivan Conjecture holds by the classification of [[Surface|surfaces]].
* For $n=2$ the topological Sullivan Conjecture holds for $n=2$ by applying {{cite|Freedman1982}}. The Sullivan Conjecture fails smoothly by {{cite|Ebeling1990}} and {{cite|Libgober&Wood1990}}.
* For $n=2$ the topological Sullivan Conjecture holds for $n=2$ by applying {{cite|Freedman1982}}. The Sullivan Conjecture fails smoothly by {{cite|Ebeling1990}} and {{cite|Libgober&Wood1990}}.
* For $n=3$ the Sullivan Conjecture holds by {{cite|Wall1966}} and {{cite|Jupp1973}}. See the page [[Simply-connected_6-manifolds|simply-connected 6-manifolds]].
+
* For $n=3$ the Sullivan Conjecture holds by {{cite|Wall1966}} and {{cite|Jupp1973}}. See the page [[6-manifolds: 1-connected|6-manifolds: 1-connected]].
* For $n = 4$ the topological Sullivan Conjecture is true {{cite|Fang&Klaus1996}}. Hence by smoothing theory the smooth conjecture, which is still open in general, holds up to connected sum with the exotic 8-sphere.
+
* For $n = 4$ the topological Sullivan Conjecture is true {{cite|Fang&Klaus1996}}. Indeed, Fang and Klaus prove that the smooth conjecture, which is still open in general, holds up to connected sum with a homotopy 8-sphere.
* For $n = 5, 6$ and $7$ the topological Sullivan Conjecture is true {{cite|Fang&Wang2009}}.
* For $n = 5, 6$ and $7$ the topological Sullivan Conjecture is true {{cite|Fang&Wang2009}}.
</wikitex>
</wikitex>
Line 110: Line 110:
=== Classification up to homotopy ===
=== Classification up to homotopy ===
<wikitex>
+
<wikitex>;
Recall that the [[Wikipedia:Signature_(topology)|signature]] of, $\sigma(X_n(\underline{d}))$, of $X_n(\underline{d})$ is the signature of its intersection form. If $n$ is odd $\sigma(X_n(\underline{d}))=0$ and if $n$ is even $\sigma(X_n(\underline{d}))$ can be computed from the $p_j(X_n(\underline{d}))$ via Hirzebruch's [[Wikipedia:Hirzebruch_signature_theorem#L_genus_and_the_Hirzebruch_signature_theorem|signature theorem]].
Recall that the [[Wikipedia:Signature_(topology)|signature]] of, $\sigma(X_n(\underline{d}))$, of $X_n(\underline{d})$ is the signature of its intersection form. If $n$ is odd $\sigma(X_n(\underline{d}))=0$ and if $n$ is even $\sigma(X_n(\underline{d}))$ can be computed from the $p_j(X_n(\underline{d}))$ via Hirzebruch's [[Wikipedia:Hirzebruch_signature_theorem#L_genus_and_the_Hirzebruch_signature_theorem|signature theorem]].
{{beginthm|Theorem|{{cite|Libgober&Wood1982}} and {{cite|Fang1997}}}} Let $X_n(\underline{d}_1)$ and $X_n(\underline{d}_2)$ be complete intersections with the same total degree $d$. Suppose that $\nu_p(d) = 0$ if $p \leq (n+3)/2$. If $n \neq 2$ then $X_n(\underline{d}_1)$ and $X_n(\underline{d}_2)$ are homotopy equivalent if and only if they have the same signature and Euler characteristic.
{{beginthm|Theorem|{{cite|Libgober&Wood1982}} and {{cite|Fang1997}}}} Let $X_n(\underline{d}_1)$ and $X_n(\underline{d}_2)$ be complete intersections with the same total degree $d$. Suppose that $\nu_p(d) = 0$ if $p \leq (n+3)/2$. If $n \neq 2$ then $X_n(\underline{d}_1)$ and $X_n(\underline{d}_2)$ are homotopy equivalent if and only if they have the same signature and Euler characteristic.
Line 130: Line 130:
== Further discussion ==
== Further discussion ==
+
<wikitex>;
+
{{beginthm|Conjecture|Hartshorne}} Every smooth algebraic variety of dimension n which is embedded in $\CP^{r}$ is isomorphic to a complete intersection, if $3n>2r$.
+
{{endthm}}
+
</wikitex>
=== Splitting theorems ===
=== Splitting theorems ===
<wikitex>;
<wikitex>;
Line 137: Line 141:
== References ==
== References ==
{{#RefList:}}
{{#RefList:}}
+
== External links ==
+
* The Wikipedia page about [[Wikipedia:Complete intersection|complete intersections]]
[[Category:Manifolds]]
[[Category:Manifolds]]
[[Category:Orientable]]
+
<!-- [[Category:Orientable]] -->

Latest revision as of 06:28, 7 January 2020

This page has not been refereed. The information given here might be incomplete or provisional.

Contents

[edit] 1 Construction and examples

Let f_1, \dots, f_k be complex, homogeneous polynomials of degree d_1, \dots, d_k in n+k+1 complex variables z = (z_1, \dots, z_{n+k+1}). Define

\displaystyle  X(f_1, \dots, f_k) \coloneq \{ [z] \in \CP^{n+k} \,|\, f_i(z) = 0 ~\text{for}~ i = 1, \dots, k\}.

The set X(f_1, \dots f_k) is an algebraic variety. It is non-singular if for all j with 0 \leq j \leq n+k the affine function

\displaystyle  \Cc^{n+k} \to \Cc^{k}, ~~~ (z_1, \dots, z_{n+k}) \longmapsto (f_1^j(z_1, \dots, z_{n+k}), \dots, f_k^j(z_1, \dots, z_{n+k}))

where f_i^j = f_1(z_1, \dots, z_{j-1}, 1, z_{j+1}, \dots, z_{n+k}), has (0, \dots , 0) as a regular value. In this case X(f_1, \dots f_k) is a smooth, complex variety and in particular defines a closed, smooth, oriented dimensional manifold of real dimension 2n. This is called a complete intersection.

By a theorem of Thom [???] the diffeomorphism type of X(f_1, \dots, f_k) depends only upon the multi-degree, \underline{d} = (d_1, \dots, d_k), and we write X_n(\underline{d}) for X(f_1, \dots, f_k).

For example:

  • X_n(1, \dots, 1) = \CP^{n},
  • X_1(d_1, \dots, d_k) = F_{g} the oriented surface of genus g = 1-(d/2)(k+2 - \sum_{j=1}^k d_j),
  • X_2(4) is a complex K3 surface,
  • X_3(5) is a Calabi-Yau 3-fold.

[edit] 2 Invariants

By the Lefschetz hyperplane theorem the inclusion i: X_n(\underline{d}) \to \mathbb{C}P^{n+k} is an n-connected map. Hence:

  • if n > 1 then \pi_1(X_n(\underline{d})) = \{ e \},
  • H^{2i+1}(X_n({\underline{d}})) = 0 if 2i+1 \neq n,
  • H^{2i}(X_n({\underline{d}})) \cong \Zz for all i \leq n unless 2i=n.
  • H^{n}(X_n({\underline{d}})) \cong \Zz^{\chi(\underline{d})-n} where \chi(\underline{d}) is the Euler characteristic of X_n({\underline{d}}) which we discuss further below.
  • When
    Tex syntax error
    is even x^{n/2} generates a summand of H^n(X_n(\underline{d}).

Note that here and throughout integer coefficients are use for (co)homology.

[edit] 2.1 Cohomology ring

Let L be the canonical line bundle over \mathbb{C}P^{n+k} and let x \in H^2(X_n({\underline{d}})) be defined by x = i^*(c_1(L)) where c_1(L) is the first Chern class of L. Let [X_n({\underline{d}})] \in H_{2n}(X_n({\underline{d}})) denote the fundamental class of X_n({\underline{d}}) and let d = d_1 d_2 \dots d_k be the product of all degrees, called the total degree. We have the following useful identity [???]

\displaystyle \langle x^n, [X_n({\underline{d}})] \rangle = d.

Let n = 2m or 2m+1 and consider the graded ring

\displaystyle H^*(n, d) :=\Zz[x, y]/\{x^{m+1} = dy, y^2 = 0 \}
where the dimensions of x and y are 2 and 2m+2 respectively. Let H^n = H^n(X_n(\underline{d}), considered as a graded ring in dimension
Tex syntax error
  • If
    Tex syntax error
    is odd:
    • the ring H^*(X_n(\underline{d})) is determined by
      Tex syntax error
      , d and e(\underline{d}),
    • there is a short exact sequence 0 \to H^*(n, d) \to H^*(X_n(\underline{d})) \to H^n \to 0,
    • the intersection form \lambda : H^n\times H^n \to \Zz is of course skew hyperbolic.
  • If
    Tex syntax error
    is even:
    • the ring H^*(H_n(\underline{d})) is determined by
      Tex syntax error
      , d and the pair ((H^n, \lambda), x^{n/2}):
    • there is a short exact sequence 0 \to H^*(n, d) \to H^*(X_n(\underline{d})) \to H^n/(x^{n/2}) \to 0.
    • Some properties of ((H^n, \lambda), x^{n/2}) are described below.

Proposition 2.1 [Libgober&Wood1981]. If n \geq 3 is even, then \lambda : H^n \times H^n \to \Zz is indefinite unless X_n({\underline{d}}) = X_n(1), X_n(2) or X_n(2,2).

[edit] 2.2 Characteristic classes

The stable tangent bundle of \CP^n is isomorphic to (n+1)L, [Milnor&Stasheff1974], and the normal bundle of the inclusion i : X_n({\underline{d}}) \to \CP^{n+k} is given by the identity [???]

\displaystyle \nu(i) \cong i^*(L^{d_1} \oplus \dots \oplus L^{d_k})

where L^{d_j} = L \otimes \dots \otimes L denotes the d_j-fold tensor product of L with itself. From this one deduces that the stable tangent bundle of X_n({\underline{d}}), \tau(X_n({\underline{d}})), satisfies the equation

\displaystyle  \tau(X_n({\underline{d}})) \oplus i^*(L^{d_1} \oplus \dots \oplus L^{d_k}) \cong i^*((n+k+1)L).

It follows immediately that the total Chern class and the total Pontrjagin class of X_n({\underline{d}}) are given by

\displaystyle  c(X_n({\underline{d}})) = (1+x)^{n+k+1}\prod_{j=1}^k(1+d_jx)^{-1} \in H^{2*}(X_n(\underline{d});\Zz),
\displaystyle  p(X_n({\underline{d}})) = (1-x^2)^{n+k+1}\prod_{j=1}^k(1-d_j^2x^2)^{-1} \in H^{4*}(X_n(\underline{d});\Zz).

Moreover, the Euler class and Euler characteristic of X_n(\underline{d}) is given by

\displaystyle  e(X_n({\underline{d}})) = c_n(X_n({\underline{d}})), ~~~ \chi(\underline{d}) = \langle e(X_n(\underline{d}), [X_n(\underline{d})]\rangle.


[edit] 3 Classification

The smooth classification of complete intersections for n \neq 2 is organised by the following conjecture, often called the Sullivan Conjecture after Dennis Sullivan.

Conjecture 3.1. For n \neq 2, complete intersections X_n({{\underline{d}}_1}) and X_n({{\underline{d}}_2}) are diffeomorphic if and only if all of the following conditions hold

  • d_1 = d_2,
  • P_i(X_n({{\underline{d}}_1})) = P_i(X_n({{\underline{d}}_2})) \in \Zz,
  • e(X_n({{\underline{d}}_1})) = e(X_n({{\underline{d}}_2})).

Note that we regard p_i(X_n(\underline{d}_\epsilon)), \epsilon = 1, 2 as multiplies of x^{2i} in order to view p_i(X_n({\underline{d}}_\epsilon)) as an element of \Zz.

[edit] 3.1 Classification in low dimensions

  • For n=1 the Sullivan Conjecture holds by the classification of surfaces.
  • For n=2 the topological Sullivan Conjecture holds for n=2 by applying [Freedman1982]. The Sullivan Conjecture fails smoothly by [Ebeling1990] and [Libgober&Wood1990].
  • For n=3 the Sullivan Conjecture holds by [Wall1966] and [Jupp1973]. See the page 6-manifolds: 1-connected.
  • For n = 4 the topological Sullivan Conjecture is true [Fang&Klaus1996]. Indeed, Fang and Klaus prove that the smooth conjecture, which is still open in general, holds up to connected sum with a homotopy 8-sphere.
  • For n = 5, 6 and 7 the topological Sullivan Conjecture is true [Fang&Wang2009].

[edit] 3.2 Further classification theorems

We now discuss further classification results for complete intersections. Let d = \prod_{p}p^{\nu_p(d)} where p is prime.

Theorem 3.2 [Traving1985]. If n \geq 3 and \nu_p(d) \geq ((2n+1)/2(p-1) + 1) for all p such that p(p-1) \leq n+1 then the Sullivan Conjecture holds.

Traving's proof uses modified surgery: see [Kreck1999, Section 8] for a summary.

Theorem 3.3 [Fang1997]. If n \geq 3 and \nu_p(d) = 0 for all p such that p \leq (n+3)/2 then the topological Sullivan Conjecture holds.

Fang's proof proceeds by extending results of [Libgober&Wood1982] on the homotopy classification of complete intersections where
Tex syntax error
is even to the case of
Tex syntax error
odd. He then solves the homeomorphism classification by exhibiting characteristic varieties for complete intersections and using them to calculate classical surgery obstructions. In particular he proves

Theorem 3.4 [Fang1997]. Let X_n(\underline{d}_1) and X_n(\underline{d}_2) be homotopy equivalent complete intersections. If d is odd and n \neq 2^i - 2 for all i \in \Zz then X_n(\underline{d}_1) and X_n(\underline{d}_2) are homeomorphic to each other if and only if their Pontrjagin classes agree.

[edit] 3.3 Classification up to homotopy

Recall that the signature of, \sigma(X_n(\underline{d})), of X_n(\underline{d}) is the signature of its intersection form. If
Tex syntax error
is odd \sigma(X_n(\underline{d}))=0 and if
Tex syntax error
is even \sigma(X_n(\underline{d})) can be computed from the p_j(X_n(\underline{d})) via Hirzebruch's signature theorem.

Theorem 3.5 [Libgober&Wood1982] and [Fang1997]. Let X_n(\underline{d}_1) and X_n(\underline{d}_2) be complete intersections with the same total degree d. Suppose that \nu_p(d) = 0 if p \leq (n+3)/2. If n \neq 2 then X_n(\underline{d}_1) and X_n(\underline{d}_2) are homotopy equivalent if and only if they have the same signature and Euler characteristic.

Finally we summarise theorems of [Astey&Gitler&Micha&Pastor2003]. Define \mathcal{L}_p(\underline{d}) to be the unordered sequence

\displaystyle  (\nu_p(d_1), \dots, \nu_p(d_k))

obtained by removing entries where \nu_p(d_j) = 0 and write \underline{d}_1 \sim \underline{d}_2 if \mathcal{L}_p(\underline{d}_1) = \mathcal{L}_p(\underline{d}_2) for all primes p.

Theorem 3.6 [Astey&Gitler&Micha&Pastor2003]. If \underline{d}_1 \sim \underline{d}_2 and n > 2 then X_n(\underline{d}_1) is homotopy equivalent to X_n(\underline{d}_2) if and only if they have the same Euler characteristic and signature.

In contrast to the results of Fang and Ligober and Wood which hold when
Tex syntax error
is small relative to the primes dividing d, the above theorem leads to a homotopy classification which holds when
Tex syntax error
is large relative to d. If \nu_p(d) < 2 for all p then define N_d : = 3 otherwise let
\displaystyle  N_d := \mathrm{Max} \{ 2(p_i-1)p_i^{[(\nu_{p}(d)-2)/2]} | \nu_{p}(d) \geq 2 \}.

Theorem 3.7 [Astey&Gitler&Micha&Pastor2003]. If X_n(\underline{d}_1) and X_n(\underline{d}_2) have the same multidegree d and n \geq N_d then X_n(\underline{d}_1) and X_n(\underline{d}_2) are homotopy equivalent if and only if they have the same signature and Euler characteritic.

[edit] 4 Further discussion

Conjecture 4.1 Hartshorne. Every smooth algebraic variety of dimension n which is embedded in \CP^{r} is isomorphic to a complete intersection, if 3n>2r.

[edit] 4.1 Splitting theorems


[edit] 5 References

[edit] 6 External links

\leq j \leq n+k$ the affine function $$ \Cc^{n+k} \to \Cc^{k}, ~~~ (z_1, \dots, z_{n+k}) \longmapsto (f_1^j(z_1, \dots, z_{n+k}), \dots, f_k^j(z_1, \dots, z_{n+k}))$$ where $f_i^j = f_1(z_1, \dots, z_{j-1}, 1, z_{j+1}, \dots, z_{n+k})$, has $(0, \dots , 0)$ as a regular value. In this case $X(f_1, \dots f_k)$ is a smooth, complex variety and in particular defines a closed, smooth, oriented dimensional manifold of real dimension n$. This is called a complete intersection. By a theorem of Thom {{cite|???}} the diffeomorphism type of $X(f_1, \dots, f_k)$ depends only upon the multi-degree, $\underline{d} = (d_1, \dots, d_k)$, and we write $X_n(\underline{d})$ for $X(f_1, \dots, f_k)$. For example: * $X_n(1, \dots, 1) = \CP^{n}$, * $X_1(d_1, \dots, d_k) = F_{g}$ the oriented [[Surface|surface]] of [[Wikipedia:Genus_(mathematics)#Orientable_surface|genus]] $g = 1-(d/2)(k+2 - \sum_{j=1}^k d_j)$, * $X_2(4)$ is a complex [[Wikipedia:K3_suface|K3]] surface, * $X_3(5)$ is a [[Wikipedia:Calabi-Yau|Calabi-Yau]] 3-fold. == Invariants == ; By the [[Wikipedia:Lefschetz_hyperplane_theorem|Lefschetz hyperplane theorem]] the inclusion $i: X_n(\underline{d}) \to \mathbb{C}P^{n+k}$ is an [[Wikipedia:N-connected#n-connected_map|n-connected]] map. Hence: * if n > 1 then $\pi_1(X_n(\underline{d})) = \{ e \}$, * $H^{2i+1}(X_n({\underline{d}})) = 0$ if i+1 \neq n$, * $H^{2i}(X_n({\underline{d}})) \cong \Zz$ for all $i \leq n$ unless i=n$. * $H^{n}(X_n({\underline{d}})) \cong \Zz^{\chi(\underline{d})-n}$ where $\chi(\underline{d})$ is the [[Wikipedia:Euler_characteristic|Euler characteristic]] of $X_n({\underline{d}})$ which we discuss further below. * When $n$ is even $x^{n/2}$ generates a summand of $H^n(X_n(\underline{d})$. Note that here and throughout integer coefficients are use for (co)homology. === Cohomology ring === ; Let $L$ be the [[Wikipedia:Canonical_line_bundle|canonical line bundle]] over $\mathbb{C}P^{n+k}$ and let $x \in H^2(X_n({\underline{d}}))$ be defined by $x = i^*(c_1(L))$ where $c_1(L)$ is the [[Wikipedia:Chern_class|first Chern class]] of $L$. Let $[X_n({\underline{d}})] \in H_{2n}(X_n({\underline{d}}))$ denote the fundamental class of $X_n({\underline{d}})$ and let $d = d_1 d_2 \dots d_k$ be the product of all degrees, called the total degree. We have the following useful identity {{cite|???}} $$\langle x^n, [X_n({\underline{d}})] \rangle = d.$$ Let $n = 2m$ or m+1$ and consider the graded ring $$H^*(n, d) :=\Zz[x, y]/\{x^{m+1} = dy, y^2 = 0 \}$$ where the dimensions of $x$ and $y$ are $ and m+2$ respectively. Let $H^n = H^n(X_n(\underline{d})$, considered as a graded ring in dimension $n$ * If $n$ is odd: ** the ring $H^*(X_n(\underline{d}))$ is determined by $n$, $d$ and $e(\underline{d})$, ** there is a short exact sequence be complex, homogeneous polynomials of degree d_1, \dots, d_k in n+k+1 complex variables z = (z_1, \dots, z_{n+k+1}). Define

\displaystyle  X(f_1, \dots, f_k) \coloneq \{ [z] \in \CP^{n+k} \,|\, f_i(z) = 0 ~\text{for}~ i = 1, \dots, k\}.

The set X(f_1, \dots f_k) is an algebraic variety. It is non-singular if for all j with 0 \leq j \leq n+k the affine function

\displaystyle  \Cc^{n+k} \to \Cc^{k}, ~~~ (z_1, \dots, z_{n+k}) \longmapsto (f_1^j(z_1, \dots, z_{n+k}), \dots, f_k^j(z_1, \dots, z_{n+k}))

where f_i^j = f_1(z_1, \dots, z_{j-1}, 1, z_{j+1}, \dots, z_{n+k}), has (0, \dots , 0) as a regular value. In this case X(f_1, \dots f_k) is a smooth, complex variety and in particular defines a closed, smooth, oriented dimensional manifold of real dimension 2n. This is called a complete intersection.

By a theorem of Thom [???] the diffeomorphism type of X(f_1, \dots, f_k) depends only upon the multi-degree, \underline{d} = (d_1, \dots, d_k), and we write X_n(\underline{d}) for X(f_1, \dots, f_k).

For example:

  • X_n(1, \dots, 1) = \CP^{n},
  • X_1(d_1, \dots, d_k) = F_{g} the oriented surface of genus g = 1-(d/2)(k+2 - \sum_{j=1}^k d_j),
  • X_2(4) is a complex K3 surface,
  • X_3(5) is a Calabi-Yau 3-fold.

[edit] 2 Invariants

By the Lefschetz hyperplane theorem the inclusion i: X_n(\underline{d}) \to \mathbb{C}P^{n+k} is an n-connected map. Hence:

  • if n > 1 then \pi_1(X_n(\underline{d})) = \{ e \},
  • H^{2i+1}(X_n({\underline{d}})) = 0 if 2i+1 \neq n,
  • H^{2i}(X_n({\underline{d}})) \cong \Zz for all i \leq n unless 2i=n.
  • H^{n}(X_n({\underline{d}})) \cong \Zz^{\chi(\underline{d})-n} where \chi(\underline{d}) is the Euler characteristic of X_n({\underline{d}}) which we discuss further below.
  • When
    Tex syntax error
    is even x^{n/2} generates a summand of H^n(X_n(\underline{d}).

Note that here and throughout integer coefficients are use for (co)homology.

[edit] 2.1 Cohomology ring

Let L be the canonical line bundle over \mathbb{C}P^{n+k} and let x \in H^2(X_n({\underline{d}})) be defined by x = i^*(c_1(L)) where c_1(L) is the first Chern class of L. Let [X_n({\underline{d}})] \in H_{2n}(X_n({\underline{d}})) denote the fundamental class of X_n({\underline{d}}) and let d = d_1 d_2 \dots d_k be the product of all degrees, called the total degree. We have the following useful identity [???]

\displaystyle \langle x^n, [X_n({\underline{d}})] \rangle = d.

Let n = 2m or 2m+1 and consider the graded ring

\displaystyle H^*(n, d) :=\Zz[x, y]/\{x^{m+1} = dy, y^2 = 0 \}
where the dimensions of x and y are 2 and 2m+2 respectively. Let H^n = H^n(X_n(\underline{d}), considered as a graded ring in dimension
Tex syntax error
  • If
    Tex syntax error
    is odd:
    • the ring H^*(X_n(\underline{d})) is determined by
      Tex syntax error
      , d and e(\underline{d}),
    • there is a short exact sequence 0 \to H^*(n, d) \to H^*(X_n(\underline{d})) \to H^n \to 0,
    • the intersection form \lambda : H^n\times H^n \to \Zz is of course skew hyperbolic.
  • If
    Tex syntax error
    is even:
    • the ring H^*(H_n(\underline{d})) is determined by
      Tex syntax error
      , d and the pair ((H^n, \lambda), x^{n/2}):
    • there is a short exact sequence 0 \to H^*(n, d) \to H^*(X_n(\underline{d})) \to H^n/(x^{n/2}) \to 0.
    • Some properties of ((H^n, \lambda), x^{n/2}) are described below.

Proposition 2.1 [Libgober&Wood1981]. If n \geq 3 is even, then \lambda : H^n \times H^n \to \Zz is indefinite unless X_n({\underline{d}}) = X_n(1), X_n(2) or X_n(2,2).

[edit] 2.2 Characteristic classes

The stable tangent bundle of \CP^n is isomorphic to (n+1)L, [Milnor&Stasheff1974], and the normal bundle of the inclusion i : X_n({\underline{d}}) \to \CP^{n+k} is given by the identity [???]

\displaystyle \nu(i) \cong i^*(L^{d_1} \oplus \dots \oplus L^{d_k})

where L^{d_j} = L \otimes \dots \otimes L denotes the d_j-fold tensor product of L with itself. From this one deduces that the stable tangent bundle of X_n({\underline{d}}), \tau(X_n({\underline{d}})), satisfies the equation

\displaystyle  \tau(X_n({\underline{d}})) \oplus i^*(L^{d_1} \oplus \dots \oplus L^{d_k}) \cong i^*((n+k+1)L).

It follows immediately that the total Chern class and the total Pontrjagin class of X_n({\underline{d}}) are given by

\displaystyle  c(X_n({\underline{d}})) = (1+x)^{n+k+1}\prod_{j=1}^k(1+d_jx)^{-1} \in H^{2*}(X_n(\underline{d});\Zz),
\displaystyle  p(X_n({\underline{d}})) = (1-x^2)^{n+k+1}\prod_{j=1}^k(1-d_j^2x^2)^{-1} \in H^{4*}(X_n(\underline{d});\Zz).

Moreover, the Euler class and Euler characteristic of X_n(\underline{d}) is given by

\displaystyle  e(X_n({\underline{d}})) = c_n(X_n({\underline{d}})), ~~~ \chi(\underline{d}) = \langle e(X_n(\underline{d}), [X_n(\underline{d})]\rangle.


[edit] 3 Classification

The smooth classification of complete intersections for n \neq 2 is organised by the following conjecture, often called the Sullivan Conjecture after Dennis Sullivan.

Conjecture 3.1. For n \neq 2, complete intersections X_n({{\underline{d}}_1}) and X_n({{\underline{d}}_2}) are diffeomorphic if and only if all of the following conditions hold

  • d_1 = d_2,
  • P_i(X_n({{\underline{d}}_1})) = P_i(X_n({{\underline{d}}_2})) \in \Zz,
  • e(X_n({{\underline{d}}_1})) = e(X_n({{\underline{d}}_2})).

Note that we regard p_i(X_n(\underline{d}_\epsilon)), \epsilon = 1, 2 as multiplies of x^{2i} in order to view p_i(X_n({\underline{d}}_\epsilon)) as an element of \Zz.

[edit] 3.1 Classification in low dimensions

  • For n=1 the Sullivan Conjecture holds by the classification of surfaces.
  • For n=2 the topological Sullivan Conjecture holds for n=2 by applying [Freedman1982]. The Sullivan Conjecture fails smoothly by [Ebeling1990] and [Libgober&Wood1990].
  • For n=3 the Sullivan Conjecture holds by [Wall1966] and [Jupp1973]. See the page 6-manifolds: 1-connected.
  • For n = 4 the topological Sullivan Conjecture is true [Fang&Klaus1996]. Indeed, Fang and Klaus prove that the smooth conjecture, which is still open in general, holds up to connected sum with a homotopy 8-sphere.
  • For n = 5, 6 and 7 the topological Sullivan Conjecture is true [Fang&Wang2009].

[edit] 3.2 Further classification theorems

We now discuss further classification results for complete intersections. Let d = \prod_{p}p^{\nu_p(d)} where p is prime.

Theorem 3.2 [Traving1985]. If n \geq 3 and \nu_p(d) \geq ((2n+1)/2(p-1) + 1) for all p such that p(p-1) \leq n+1 then the Sullivan Conjecture holds.

Traving's proof uses modified surgery: see [Kreck1999, Section 8] for a summary.

Theorem 3.3 [Fang1997]. If n \geq 3 and \nu_p(d) = 0 for all p such that p \leq (n+3)/2 then the topological Sullivan Conjecture holds.

Fang's proof proceeds by extending results of [Libgober&Wood1982] on the homotopy classification of complete intersections where
Tex syntax error
is even to the case of
Tex syntax error
odd. He then solves the homeomorphism classification by exhibiting characteristic varieties for complete intersections and using them to calculate classical surgery obstructions. In particular he proves

Theorem 3.4 [Fang1997]. Let X_n(\underline{d}_1) and X_n(\underline{d}_2) be homotopy equivalent complete intersections. If d is odd and n \neq 2^i - 2 for all i \in \Zz then X_n(\underline{d}_1) and X_n(\underline{d}_2) are homeomorphic to each other if and only if their Pontrjagin classes agree.

[edit] 3.3 Classification up to homotopy

Recall that the signature of, \sigma(X_n(\underline{d})), of X_n(\underline{d}) is the signature of its intersection form. If
Tex syntax error
is odd \sigma(X_n(\underline{d}))=0 and if
Tex syntax error
is even \sigma(X_n(\underline{d})) can be computed from the p_j(X_n(\underline{d})) via Hirzebruch's signature theorem.

Theorem 3.5 [Libgober&Wood1982] and [Fang1997]. Let X_n(\underline{d}_1) and X_n(\underline{d}_2) be complete intersections with the same total degree d. Suppose that \nu_p(d) = 0 if p \leq (n+3)/2. If n \neq 2 then X_n(\underline{d}_1) and X_n(\underline{d}_2) are homotopy equivalent if and only if they have the same signature and Euler characteristic.

Finally we summarise theorems of [Astey&Gitler&Micha&Pastor2003]. Define \mathcal{L}_p(\underline{d}) to be the unordered sequence

\displaystyle  (\nu_p(d_1), \dots, \nu_p(d_k))

obtained by removing entries where \nu_p(d_j) = 0 and write \underline{d}_1 \sim \underline{d}_2 if \mathcal{L}_p(\underline{d}_1) = \mathcal{L}_p(\underline{d}_2) for all primes p.

Theorem 3.6 [Astey&Gitler&Micha&Pastor2003]. If \underline{d}_1 \sim \underline{d}_2 and n > 2 then X_n(\underline{d}_1) is homotopy equivalent to X_n(\underline{d}_2) if and only if they have the same Euler characteristic and signature.

In contrast to the results of Fang and Ligober and Wood which hold when
Tex syntax error
is small relative to the primes dividing d, the above theorem leads to a homotopy classification which holds when
Tex syntax error
is large relative to d. If \nu_p(d) < 2 for all p then define N_d : = 3 otherwise let
\displaystyle  N_d := \mathrm{Max} \{ 2(p_i-1)p_i^{[(\nu_{p}(d)-2)/2]} | \nu_{p}(d) \geq 2 \}.

Theorem 3.7 [Astey&Gitler&Micha&Pastor2003]. If X_n(\underline{d}_1) and X_n(\underline{d}_2) have the same multidegree d and n \geq N_d then X_n(\underline{d}_1) and X_n(\underline{d}_2) are homotopy equivalent if and only if they have the same signature and Euler characteritic.

[edit] 4 Further discussion

Conjecture 4.1 Hartshorne. Every smooth algebraic variety of dimension n which is embedded in \CP^{r} is isomorphic to a complete intersection, if 3n>2r.

[edit] 4.1 Splitting theorems


[edit] 5 References

[edit] 6 External links

\to H^*(n, d) \to H^*(X_n(\underline{d})) \to H^n \to 0,$ ** the intersection form $\lambda : H^n\times H^n \to \Zz$ is of course skew hyperbolic. * If $n$ is even: ** the ring $H^*(H_n(\underline{d}))$ is determined by $n$, $d$ and the pair $((H^n, \lambda), x^{n/2})$: ** there is a short exact sequence be complex, homogeneous polynomials of degree d_1, \dots, d_k in n+k+1 complex variables z = (z_1, \dots, z_{n+k+1}). Define

\displaystyle  X(f_1, \dots, f_k) \coloneq \{ [z] \in \CP^{n+k} \,|\, f_i(z) = 0 ~\text{for}~ i = 1, \dots, k\}.

The set X(f_1, \dots f_k) is an algebraic variety. It is non-singular if for all j with 0 \leq j \leq n+k the affine function

\displaystyle  \Cc^{n+k} \to \Cc^{k}, ~~~ (z_1, \dots, z_{n+k}) \longmapsto (f_1^j(z_1, \dots, z_{n+k}), \dots, f_k^j(z_1, \dots, z_{n+k}))

where f_i^j = f_1(z_1, \dots, z_{j-1}, 1, z_{j+1}, \dots, z_{n+k}), has (0, \dots , 0) as a regular value. In this case X(f_1, \dots f_k) is a smooth, complex variety and in particular defines a closed, smooth, oriented dimensional manifold of real dimension 2n. This is called a complete intersection.

By a theorem of Thom [???] the diffeomorphism type of X(f_1, \dots, f_k) depends only upon the multi-degree, \underline{d} = (d_1, \dots, d_k), and we write X_n(\underline{d}) for X(f_1, \dots, f_k).

For example:

  • X_n(1, \dots, 1) = \CP^{n},
  • X_1(d_1, \dots, d_k) = F_{g} the oriented surface of genus g = 1-(d/2)(k+2 - \sum_{j=1}^k d_j),
  • X_2(4) is a complex K3 surface,
  • X_3(5) is a Calabi-Yau 3-fold.

[edit] 2 Invariants

By the Lefschetz hyperplane theorem the inclusion i: X_n(\underline{d}) \to \mathbb{C}P^{n+k} is an n-connected map. Hence:

  • if n > 1 then \pi_1(X_n(\underline{d})) = \{ e \},
  • H^{2i+1}(X_n({\underline{d}})) = 0 if 2i+1 \neq n,
  • H^{2i}(X_n({\underline{d}})) \cong \Zz for all i \leq n unless 2i=n.
  • H^{n}(X_n({\underline{d}})) \cong \Zz^{\chi(\underline{d})-n} where \chi(\underline{d}) is the Euler characteristic of X_n({\underline{d}}) which we discuss further below.
  • When
    Tex syntax error
    is even x^{n/2} generates a summand of H^n(X_n(\underline{d}).

Note that here and throughout integer coefficients are use for (co)homology.

[edit] 2.1 Cohomology ring

Let L be the canonical line bundle over \mathbb{C}P^{n+k} and let x \in H^2(X_n({\underline{d}})) be defined by x = i^*(c_1(L)) where c_1(L) is the first Chern class of L. Let [X_n({\underline{d}})] \in H_{2n}(X_n({\underline{d}})) denote the fundamental class of X_n({\underline{d}}) and let d = d_1 d_2 \dots d_k be the product of all degrees, called the total degree. We have the following useful identity [???]

\displaystyle \langle x^n, [X_n({\underline{d}})] \rangle = d.

Let n = 2m or 2m+1 and consider the graded ring

\displaystyle H^*(n, d) :=\Zz[x, y]/\{x^{m+1} = dy, y^2 = 0 \}
where the dimensions of x and y are 2 and 2m+2 respectively. Let H^n = H^n(X_n(\underline{d}), considered as a graded ring in dimension
Tex syntax error
  • If
    Tex syntax error
    is odd:
    • the ring H^*(X_n(\underline{d})) is determined by
      Tex syntax error
      , d and e(\underline{d}),
    • there is a short exact sequence 0 \to H^*(n, d) \to H^*(X_n(\underline{d})) \to H^n \to 0,
    • the intersection form \lambda : H^n\times H^n \to \Zz is of course skew hyperbolic.
  • If
    Tex syntax error
    is even:
    • the ring H^*(H_n(\underline{d})) is determined by
      Tex syntax error
      , d and the pair ((H^n, \lambda), x^{n/2}):
    • there is a short exact sequence 0 \to H^*(n, d) \to H^*(X_n(\underline{d})) \to H^n/(x^{n/2}) \to 0.
    • Some properties of ((H^n, \lambda), x^{n/2}) are described below.

Proposition 2.1 [Libgober&Wood1981]. If n \geq 3 is even, then \lambda : H^n \times H^n \to \Zz is indefinite unless X_n({\underline{d}}) = X_n(1), X_n(2) or X_n(2,2).

[edit] 2.2 Characteristic classes

The stable tangent bundle of \CP^n is isomorphic to (n+1)L, [Milnor&Stasheff1974], and the normal bundle of the inclusion i : X_n({\underline{d}}) \to \CP^{n+k} is given by the identity [???]

\displaystyle \nu(i) \cong i^*(L^{d_1} \oplus \dots \oplus L^{d_k})

where L^{d_j} = L \otimes \dots \otimes L denotes the d_j-fold tensor product of L with itself. From this one deduces that the stable tangent bundle of X_n({\underline{d}}), \tau(X_n({\underline{d}})), satisfies the equation

\displaystyle  \tau(X_n({\underline{d}})) \oplus i^*(L^{d_1} \oplus \dots \oplus L^{d_k}) \cong i^*((n+k+1)L).

It follows immediately that the total Chern class and the total Pontrjagin class of X_n({\underline{d}}) are given by

\displaystyle  c(X_n({\underline{d}})) = (1+x)^{n+k+1}\prod_{j=1}^k(1+d_jx)^{-1} \in H^{2*}(X_n(\underline{d});\Zz),
\displaystyle  p(X_n({\underline{d}})) = (1-x^2)^{n+k+1}\prod_{j=1}^k(1-d_j^2x^2)^{-1} \in H^{4*}(X_n(\underline{d});\Zz).

Moreover, the Euler class and Euler characteristic of X_n(\underline{d}) is given by

\displaystyle  e(X_n({\underline{d}})) = c_n(X_n({\underline{d}})), ~~~ \chi(\underline{d}) = \langle e(X_n(\underline{d}), [X_n(\underline{d})]\rangle.


[edit] 3 Classification

The smooth classification of complete intersections for n \neq 2 is organised by the following conjecture, often called the Sullivan Conjecture after Dennis Sullivan.

Conjecture 3.1. For n \neq 2, complete intersections X_n({{\underline{d}}_1}) and X_n({{\underline{d}}_2}) are diffeomorphic if and only if all of the following conditions hold

  • d_1 = d_2,
  • P_i(X_n({{\underline{d}}_1})) = P_i(X_n({{\underline{d}}_2})) \in \Zz,
  • e(X_n({{\underline{d}}_1})) = e(X_n({{\underline{d}}_2})).

Note that we regard p_i(X_n(\underline{d}_\epsilon)), \epsilon = 1, 2 as multiplies of x^{2i} in order to view p_i(X_n({\underline{d}}_\epsilon)) as an element of \Zz.

[edit] 3.1 Classification in low dimensions

  • For n=1 the Sullivan Conjecture holds by the classification of surfaces.
  • For n=2 the topological Sullivan Conjecture holds for n=2 by applying [Freedman1982]. The Sullivan Conjecture fails smoothly by [Ebeling1990] and [Libgober&Wood1990].
  • For n=3 the Sullivan Conjecture holds by [Wall1966] and [Jupp1973]. See the page 6-manifolds: 1-connected.
  • For n = 4 the topological Sullivan Conjecture is true [Fang&Klaus1996]. Indeed, Fang and Klaus prove that the smooth conjecture, which is still open in general, holds up to connected sum with a homotopy 8-sphere.
  • For n = 5, 6 and 7 the topological Sullivan Conjecture is true [Fang&Wang2009].

[edit] 3.2 Further classification theorems

We now discuss further classification results for complete intersections. Let d = \prod_{p}p^{\nu_p(d)} where p is prime.

Theorem 3.2 [Traving1985]. If n \geq 3 and \nu_p(d) \geq ((2n+1)/2(p-1) + 1) for all p such that p(p-1) \leq n+1 then the Sullivan Conjecture holds.

Traving's proof uses modified surgery: see [Kreck1999, Section 8] for a summary.

Theorem 3.3 [Fang1997]. If n \geq 3 and \nu_p(d) = 0 for all p such that p \leq (n+3)/2 then the topological Sullivan Conjecture holds.

Fang's proof proceeds by extending results of [Libgober&Wood1982] on the homotopy classification of complete intersections where
Tex syntax error
is even to the case of
Tex syntax error
odd. He then solves the homeomorphism classification by exhibiting characteristic varieties for complete intersections and using them to calculate classical surgery obstructions. In particular he proves

Theorem 3.4 [Fang1997]. Let X_n(\underline{d}_1) and X_n(\underline{d}_2) be homotopy equivalent complete intersections. If d is odd and n \neq 2^i - 2 for all i \in \Zz then X_n(\underline{d}_1) and X_n(\underline{d}_2) are homeomorphic to each other if and only if their Pontrjagin classes agree.

[edit] 3.3 Classification up to homotopy

Recall that the signature of, \sigma(X_n(\underline{d})), of X_n(\underline{d}) is the signature of its intersection form. If
Tex syntax error
is odd \sigma(X_n(\underline{d}))=0 and if
Tex syntax error
is even \sigma(X_n(\underline{d})) can be computed from the p_j(X_n(\underline{d})) via Hirzebruch's signature theorem.

Theorem 3.5 [Libgober&Wood1982] and [Fang1997]. Let X_n(\underline{d}_1) and X_n(\underline{d}_2) be complete intersections with the same total degree d. Suppose that \nu_p(d) = 0 if p \leq (n+3)/2. If n \neq 2 then X_n(\underline{d}_1) and X_n(\underline{d}_2) are homotopy equivalent if and only if they have the same signature and Euler characteristic.

Finally we summarise theorems of [Astey&Gitler&Micha&Pastor2003]. Define \mathcal{L}_p(\underline{d}) to be the unordered sequence

\displaystyle  (\nu_p(d_1), \dots, \nu_p(d_k))

obtained by removing entries where \nu_p(d_j) = 0 and write \underline{d}_1 \sim \underline{d}_2 if \mathcal{L}_p(\underline{d}_1) = \mathcal{L}_p(\underline{d}_2) for all primes p.

Theorem 3.6 [Astey&Gitler&Micha&Pastor2003]. If \underline{d}_1 \sim \underline{d}_2 and n > 2 then X_n(\underline{d}_1) is homotopy equivalent to X_n(\underline{d}_2) if and only if they have the same Euler characteristic and signature.

In contrast to the results of Fang and Ligober and Wood which hold when
Tex syntax error
is small relative to the primes dividing d, the above theorem leads to a homotopy classification which holds when
Tex syntax error
is large relative to d. If \nu_p(d) < 2 for all p then define N_d : = 3 otherwise let
\displaystyle  N_d := \mathrm{Max} \{ 2(p_i-1)p_i^{[(\nu_{p}(d)-2)/2]} | \nu_{p}(d) \geq 2 \}.

Theorem 3.7 [Astey&Gitler&Micha&Pastor2003]. If X_n(\underline{d}_1) and X_n(\underline{d}_2) have the same multidegree d and n \geq N_d then X_n(\underline{d}_1) and X_n(\underline{d}_2) are homotopy equivalent if and only if they have the same signature and Euler characteritic.

[edit] 4 Further discussion

Conjecture 4.1 Hartshorne. Every smooth algebraic variety of dimension n which is embedded in \CP^{r} is isomorphic to a complete intersection, if 3n>2r.

[edit] 4.1 Splitting theorems


[edit] 5 References

[edit] 6 External links

\to H^*(n, d) \to H^*(X_n(\underline{d})) \to H^n/(x^{n/2}) \to 0$. ** Some properties of $((H^n, \lambda), x^{n/2})$ are described below. {{beginthm|Proposition|{{cite|Libgober&Wood1981}}}} If $n \geq 3$ is even, then $\lambda : H^n \times H^n \to \Zz$ is indefinate unless $X_n({\underline{d}}) = X_n(1), X_n(2)$ or $X_n(2,2)$. {{endthm}}
=== Characteristic classes === ; The stable tangent bundle of $\CP^n$ is isomorphic to $(n+1)L$, {{cite|Milnor&Stasheff1974}}, and the [[Wikipedia:Normal_bundle#General_definition|normal bundle]] of the inclusion $i : X_n({\underline{d}}) \to \CP^{n+k}$ is given by the identity {{cite|???}} $$\nu(i) \cong i^*(L^{d_1} \oplus \dots \oplus L^{d_k})$$ where $L^{d_j} = L \otimes \dots \otimes L$ denotes the $d_j$-fold [[Wikipedia:Vector_bundle#Operations_on_vector_bundles|tensor product]] of $L$ with itself. From this one deduces that the stable [[Wikipedia:Tangent_bundle|tangent bundle]] of $X_n({\underline{d}})$, $\tau(X_n({\underline{d}}))$, satisfies the equation $$ \tau(X_n({\underline{d}})) \oplus i^*(L^{d_1} \oplus \dots \oplus L^{d_k}) \cong i^*((n+k+1)L).$$ It follows immediately that the total [[Wikipedia:Chern_class|Chern class]] and the total [[Wikipedia:Pontrjagin_class|Pontrjagin class]] of $X_n({\underline{d}})$ are given by $$ c(X_n({\underline{d}})) = (1+x)^{n+k+1}\prod_{j=1}^k(1+d_jx)^{-1} \in H^{2*}(X_n(\underline{d});\Zz),$$ $$ p(X_n({\underline{d}})) = (1-x^2)^{n+k+1}\prod_{j=1}^k(1-d_j^2x^2)^{-1} \in H^{4*}(X_n(\underline{d});\Zz).$$ Moreover, the [[Wikipedia:Euler_class|Euler class]] and Euler characteristic of $X_n(\underline{d})$ is given by $$ e(X_n({\underline{d}})) = c_n(X_n({\underline{d}})), ~~~ \chi(\underline{d}) = \langle e(X_n(\underline{d}), [X_n(\underline{d})]\rangle.$$ == Classification== ; The smooth classification of complete intersections for $n \neq 2$ is organised by the following conjecture, often called the Sullivan Conjecture after Dennis Sullivan. {{beginthm|Conjecture}} For $n \neq 2$, complete intersections $X_n({{\underline{d}}_1})$ and $X_n({{\underline{d}}_2})$ are diffeomorphic if and only if all of the following conditions hold * $d_1 = d_2$, * $P_i(X_n({{\underline{d}}_1})) = P_i(X_n({{\underline{d}}_2})) \in \Zz$, * $e(X_n({{\underline{d}}_1})) = e(X_n({{\underline{d}}_2}))$. {{endthm}} Note that we regard $p_i(X_n(\underline{d}_\epsilon), \epsilon = 1, 2$ as multiplies of $x^{2i}$ in order to view $p_i(X_n({\underline{d}}_\epsilon))$ as an element of $\Zz$. === Classification in low dimensions === ; * For $n=1$ the Sullivan Conjecture holds by the classification of [[Surface|surfaces]]. * For $n=2$ the topological Sullivan Conjecture holds for $n=2$ by applying {{cite|Freedman1982}}. The Sullivan Conjecture fails smoothly by {{cite|Ebeling1990}} and {{cite|Libgober&Wood1990}}. * For $n=3$ the Sullivan Conjecture holds by {{cite|Wall1966}} and {{cite|Jupp1973}}. See the page [[Simply-connected_6-manifolds|simply-connected 6-manifolds]]. * For $n = 4$ the topological Sullivan Conjecture is true {{cite|Fang&Klaus1996}}. Hence by smoothing theory the smooth conjecture, which is still open in general, holds up to connected sum with the exotic 8-sphere. * For $n = 5, 6$ and $ the topological Sullivan Conjecture is true {{cite|Fang&Wang2009}}. === Further classification theorems === ; We now discuss further classification results for complete intersections. Let $d = \prod_{p}p^{\nu_p(d)}$ where $p$ is prime. {{beginthm|Theorem|{{cite|Traving1985}}}} If $n \geq 3$ and $\nu_p(d) \geq ((2n+1)/2(p-1) + 1)$ for all $p$ such that $p(p-1) \leq n+1$ then the Sullivan Conjecture holds. {{endthm}} Traving's proof uses modified surgery: see {{cite|Kreck1999|Section 8}} for a summary. {{beginthm|Theorem|{{cite|Fang1997}}}} If $n \geq 3$ and $\nu_p(d) = 0$ for all $p$ such that $p \leq (n+3)/2$ then the topological Sullivan Conjecture holds. {{endthm}} Fang's proof proceeds by extending results of {{cite|Libgober&Wood1982}} on the homotopy classification of complete intersections where $n$ is even to the case of $n$ odd. He then solves the homeomorphism classification by exhibiting characteristic varieties for complete intersections and using them to calculate classical surgery obstructions. In particular he proves {{beginthm|Theorem|{{cite|Fang1997}}}} Let $X_n(\underline{d}_1)$ and $X_n(\underline{d}_2)$ be homotopy equivalent complete intersections. If $d$ is odd and $n \neq 2^i - 2$ for all $i \in \Zz$ then $X_n(\underline{d}_1)$ and $X_n(\underline{d}_2)$ are homeomorphic to each other if and only if their Pontrjagin classes agree. {{endthm}} === Classification up to homotopy === Recall that the [[Wikipedia:Signature_(topology)|signature]] of, $\sigma(X_n(\underline{d}))$, of $X_n(\underline{d})$ is the signature of its intersection form. If $n$ is odd $\sigma(X_n(\underline{d}))=0$ and if $n$ is even $\sigma(X_n(\underline{d}))$ can be computed from the $p_j(X_n(\underline{d}))$ via Hirzebruch's [[Wikipedia:Hirzebruch_signature_theorem#L_genus_and_the_Hirzebruch_signature_theorem|signature theorem]]. {{beginthm|Theorem|{{cite|Libgober&Wood1982}} and {{cite|Fang1997}}}} Let $X_n(\underline{d}_1)$ and $X_n(\underline{d}_2)$ be complete intersections with the same total degree $d$. Suppose that $\nu_p(d) = 0$ if $p \leq (n+3)/2$. If $n \neq 2$ then $X_n(\underline{d}_1)$ and $X_n(\underline{d}_2)$ are homotopy equivalent if and only if they have the same signature and Euler characteristic. {{endthm}} Finally we summarise theorems of {{cite|Astey&Gitler&Micha&Pastor2003}}. Define $\mathcal{L}_p(\underline{d})$ to be the unordered sequence $$ (\nu_p(d_1), \dots, \nu_p(d_k))$$ obtained by removing entries where $\nu_p(d_j) = 0$ and write $\underline{d}_1 \sim \underline{d}_2$ if $\mathcal{L}_p(\underline{d}_1) = \mathcal{L}_p(\underline{d}_2)$ for all primes $p$. {{beginthm|Theorem|{{cite|Astey&Gitler&Micha&Pastor2003}}}} If $\underline{d}_1 \sim \underline{d}_2$ and $n > 2$ then $X_n(\underline{d}_1)$ is homotopy equivalent to $X_n(\underline{d}_2)$ if and only if they have the same Euler characteristic and signature. {{endthm}} In contrast to the results of Fang and Ligober and Wood which hold when $n$ is small relative to the primes dividing $d$, the above theorem leads to a homotopy classification which holds when $n$ is large relative to $d$. If $\nu_p(d) < 2$ for all p then define $N_d : = 3$ otherwise let $$ N_d := \mathrm{Max} \{ 2(p_i-1)p_i^{[(\nu_{p}(d)-2)/2]} | \nu_{p}(d) \geq 2 \}.$$ {{beginthm|Theorem|{{cite|Astey&Gitler&Micha&Pastor2003}}}} If $X_n(\underline{d}_1)$ and $X_n(\underline{d}_2)$ have the same multidegree $d$ and $n \geq N_d$ then $X_n(\underline{d}_1)$ and $X_n(\underline{d}_2)$ are homotopy equivalent if and only if they have the same signature and Euler characteritic. {{endthm}} == Further discussion == === Splitting theorems === ; == References == {{#RefList:}} [[Category:Manifolds]] [[Category:Orientable]]f_1, \dots, f_k be complex, homogeneous polynomials of degree d_1, \dots, d_k in n+k+1 complex variables z = (z_1, \dots, z_{n+k+1}). Define

\displaystyle  X(f_1, \dots, f_k) \coloneq \{ [z] \in \CP^{n+k} \,|\, f_i(z) = 0 ~\text{for}~ i = 1, \dots, k\}.

The set X(f_1, \dots f_k) is an algebraic variety. It is non-singular if for all j with 0 \leq j \leq n+k the affine function

\displaystyle  \Cc^{n+k} \to \Cc^{k}, ~~~ (z_1, \dots, z_{n+k}) \longmapsto (f_1^j(z_1, \dots, z_{n+k}), \dots, f_k^j(z_1, \dots, z_{n+k}))

where f_i^j = f_1(z_1, \dots, z_{j-1}, 1, z_{j+1}, \dots, z_{n+k}), has (0, \dots , 0) as a regular value. In this case X(f_1, \dots f_k) is a smooth, complex variety and in particular defines a closed, smooth, oriented dimensional manifold of real dimension 2n. This is called a complete intersection.

By a theorem of Thom [???] the diffeomorphism type of X(f_1, \dots, f_k) depends only upon the multi-degree, \underline{d} = (d_1, \dots, d_k), and we write X_n(\underline{d}) for X(f_1, \dots, f_k).

For example:

  • X_n(1, \dots, 1) = \CP^{n},
  • X_1(d_1, \dots, d_k) = F_{g} the oriented surface of genus g = 1-(d/2)(k+2 - \sum_{j=1}^k d_j),
  • X_2(4) is a complex K3 surface,
  • X_3(5) is a Calabi-Yau 3-fold.

[edit] 2 Invariants

By the Lefschetz hyperplane theorem the inclusion i: X_n(\underline{d}) \to \mathbb{C}P^{n+k} is an n-connected map. Hence:

  • if n > 1 then \pi_1(X_n(\underline{d})) = \{ e \},
  • H^{2i+1}(X_n({\underline{d}})) = 0 if 2i+1 \neq n,
  • H^{2i}(X_n({\underline{d}})) \cong \Zz for all i \leq n unless 2i=n.
  • H^{n}(X_n({\underline{d}})) \cong \Zz^{\chi(\underline{d})-n} where \chi(\underline{d}) is the Euler characteristic of X_n({\underline{d}}) which we discuss further below.
  • When
    Tex syntax error
    is even x^{n/2} generates a summand of H^n(X_n(\underline{d}).

Note that here and throughout integer coefficients are use for (co)homology.

[edit] 2.1 Cohomology ring

Let L be the canonical line bundle over \mathbb{C}P^{n+k} and let x \in H^2(X_n({\underline{d}})) be defined by x = i^*(c_1(L)) where c_1(L) is the first Chern class of L. Let [X_n({\underline{d}})] \in H_{2n}(X_n({\underline{d}})) denote the fundamental class of X_n({\underline{d}}) and let d = d_1 d_2 \dots d_k be the product of all degrees, called the total degree. We have the following useful identity [???]

\displaystyle \langle x^n, [X_n({\underline{d}})] \rangle = d.

Let n = 2m or 2m+1 and consider the graded ring

\displaystyle H^*(n, d) :=\Zz[x, y]/\{x^{m+1} = dy, y^2 = 0 \}
where the dimensions of x and y are 2 and 2m+2 respectively. Let H^n = H^n(X_n(\underline{d}), considered as a graded ring in dimension
Tex syntax error
  • If
    Tex syntax error
    is odd:
    • the ring H^*(X_n(\underline{d})) is determined by
      Tex syntax error
      , d and e(\underline{d}),
    • there is a short exact sequence 0 \to H^*(n, d) \to H^*(X_n(\underline{d})) \to H^n \to 0,
    • the intersection form \lambda : H^n\times H^n \to \Zz is of course skew hyperbolic.
  • If
    Tex syntax error
    is even:
    • the ring H^*(H_n(\underline{d})) is determined by
      Tex syntax error
      , d and the pair ((H^n, \lambda), x^{n/2}):
    • there is a short exact sequence 0 \to H^*(n, d) \to H^*(X_n(\underline{d})) \to H^n/(x^{n/2}) \to 0.
    • Some properties of ((H^n, \lambda), x^{n/2}) are described below.

Proposition 2.1 [Libgober&Wood1981]. If n \geq 3 is even, then \lambda : H^n \times H^n \to \Zz is indefinite unless X_n({\underline{d}}) = X_n(1), X_n(2) or X_n(2,2).

[edit] 2.2 Characteristic classes

The stable tangent bundle of \CP^n is isomorphic to (n+1)L, [Milnor&Stasheff1974], and the normal bundle of the inclusion i : X_n({\underline{d}}) \to \CP^{n+k} is given by the identity [???]

\displaystyle \nu(i) \cong i^*(L^{d_1} \oplus \dots \oplus L^{d_k})

where L^{d_j} = L \otimes \dots \otimes L denotes the d_j-fold tensor product of L with itself. From this one deduces that the stable tangent bundle of X_n({\underline{d}}), \tau(X_n({\underline{d}})), satisfies the equation

\displaystyle  \tau(X_n({\underline{d}})) \oplus i^*(L^{d_1} \oplus \dots \oplus L^{d_k}) \cong i^*((n+k+1)L).

It follows immediately that the total Chern class and the total Pontrjagin class of X_n({\underline{d}}) are given by

\displaystyle  c(X_n({\underline{d}})) = (1+x)^{n+k+1}\prod_{j=1}^k(1+d_jx)^{-1} \in H^{2*}(X_n(\underline{d});\Zz),
\displaystyle  p(X_n({\underline{d}})) = (1-x^2)^{n+k+1}\prod_{j=1}^k(1-d_j^2x^2)^{-1} \in H^{4*}(X_n(\underline{d});\Zz).

Moreover, the Euler class and Euler characteristic of X_n(\underline{d}) is given by

\displaystyle  e(X_n({\underline{d}})) = c_n(X_n({\underline{d}})), ~~~ \chi(\underline{d}) = \langle e(X_n(\underline{d}), [X_n(\underline{d})]\rangle.


[edit] 3 Classification

The smooth classification of complete intersections for n \neq 2 is organised by the following conjecture, often called the Sullivan Conjecture after Dennis Sullivan.

Conjecture 3.1. For n \neq 2, complete intersections X_n({{\underline{d}}_1}) and X_n({{\underline{d}}_2}) are diffeomorphic if and only if all of the following conditions hold

  • d_1 = d_2,
  • P_i(X_n({{\underline{d}}_1})) = P_i(X_n({{\underline{d}}_2})) \in \Zz,
  • e(X_n({{\underline{d}}_1})) = e(X_n({{\underline{d}}_2})).

Note that we regard p_i(X_n(\underline{d}_\epsilon)), \epsilon = 1, 2 as multiplies of x^{2i} in order to view p_i(X_n({\underline{d}}_\epsilon)) as an element of \Zz.

[edit] 3.1 Classification in low dimensions

  • For n=1 the Sullivan Conjecture holds by the classification of surfaces.
  • For n=2 the topological Sullivan Conjecture holds for n=2 by applying [Freedman1982]. The Sullivan Conjecture fails smoothly by [Ebeling1990] and [Libgober&Wood1990].
  • For n=3 the Sullivan Conjecture holds by [Wall1966] and [Jupp1973]. See the page 6-manifolds: 1-connected.
  • For n = 4 the topological Sullivan Conjecture is true [Fang&Klaus1996]. Indeed, Fang and Klaus prove that the smooth conjecture, which is still open in general, holds up to connected sum with a homotopy 8-sphere.
  • For n = 5, 6 and 7 the topological Sullivan Conjecture is true [Fang&Wang2009].

[edit] 3.2 Further classification theorems

We now discuss further classification results for complete intersections. Let d = \prod_{p}p^{\nu_p(d)} where p is prime.

Theorem 3.2 [Traving1985]. If n \geq 3 and \nu_p(d) \geq ((2n+1)/2(p-1) + 1) for all p such that p(p-1) \leq n+1 then the Sullivan Conjecture holds.

Traving's proof uses modified surgery: see [Kreck1999, Section 8] for a summary.

Theorem 3.3 [Fang1997]. If n \geq 3 and \nu_p(d) = 0 for all p such that p \leq (n+3)/2 then the topological Sullivan Conjecture holds.

Fang's proof proceeds by extending results of [Libgober&Wood1982] on the homotopy classification of complete intersections where
Tex syntax error
is even to the case of
Tex syntax error
odd. He then solves the homeomorphism classification by exhibiting characteristic varieties for complete intersections and using them to calculate classical surgery obstructions. In particular he proves

Theorem 3.4 [Fang1997]. Let X_n(\underline{d}_1) and X_n(\underline{d}_2) be homotopy equivalent complete intersections. If d is odd and n \neq 2^i - 2 for all i \in \Zz then X_n(\underline{d}_1) and X_n(\underline{d}_2) are homeomorphic to each other if and only if their Pontrjagin classes agree.

[edit] 3.3 Classification up to homotopy

Recall that the signature of, \sigma(X_n(\underline{d})), of X_n(\underline{d}) is the signature of its intersection form. If
Tex syntax error
is odd \sigma(X_n(\underline{d}))=0 and if
Tex syntax error
is even \sigma(X_n(\underline{d})) can be computed from the p_j(X_n(\underline{d})) via Hirzebruch's signature theorem.

Theorem 3.5 [Libgober&Wood1982] and [Fang1997]. Let X_n(\underline{d}_1) and X_n(\underline{d}_2) be complete intersections with the same total degree d. Suppose that \nu_p(d) = 0 if p \leq (n+3)/2. If n \neq 2 then X_n(\underline{d}_1) and X_n(\underline{d}_2) are homotopy equivalent if and only if they have the same signature and Euler characteristic.

Finally we summarise theorems of [Astey&Gitler&Micha&Pastor2003]. Define \mathcal{L}_p(\underline{d}) to be the unordered sequence

\displaystyle  (\nu_p(d_1), \dots, \nu_p(d_k))

obtained by removing entries where \nu_p(d_j) = 0 and write \underline{d}_1 \sim \underline{d}_2 if \mathcal{L}_p(\underline{d}_1) = \mathcal{L}_p(\underline{d}_2) for all primes p.

Theorem 3.6 [Astey&Gitler&Micha&Pastor2003]. If \underline{d}_1 \sim \underline{d}_2 and n > 2 then X_n(\underline{d}_1) is homotopy equivalent to X_n(\underline{d}_2) if and only if they have the same Euler characteristic and signature.

In contrast to the results of Fang and Ligober and Wood which hold when
Tex syntax error
is small relative to the primes dividing d, the above theorem leads to a homotopy classification which holds when
Tex syntax error
is large relative to d. If \nu_p(d) < 2 for all p then define N_d : = 3 otherwise let
\displaystyle  N_d := \mathrm{Max} \{ 2(p_i-1)p_i^{[(\nu_{p}(d)-2)/2]} | \nu_{p}(d) \geq 2 \}.

Theorem 3.7 [Astey&Gitler&Micha&Pastor2003]. If X_n(\underline{d}_1) and X_n(\underline{d}_2) have the same multidegree d and n \geq N_d then X_n(\underline{d}_1) and X_n(\underline{d}_2) are homotopy equivalent if and only if they have the same signature and Euler characteritic.

[edit] 4 Further discussion

Conjecture 4.1 Hartshorne. Every smooth algebraic variety of dimension n which is embedded in \CP^{r} is isomorphic to a complete intersection, if 3n>2r.

[edit] 4.1 Splitting theorems


[edit] 5 References

[edit] 6 External links

Personal tools
Namespaces
Variants
Actions
Navigation
Interaction
Toolbox