Algebraic mapping cone

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 14: Line 14:
$$
$$
Every book on homological algebra contains this definition. A good source is for example \cite{Weibel1994}.
+
Every book on homological algebra contains this definition, except for the sign conventions in the differentials!
+
For example, it is possible to have
+
$$
+
\partial_{Cone(f)}=
+
\left( \begin{array}{cc}
+
\partial_E & 0 \\
+
(-)^kf & \partial_F
+
\end{array} \right) : Cone(f)_k\rightarrow Cone(f)_{k-1}.
+
$$
+
+
+
+
A good source is for example \cite{Weibel1994}.
</wikitex>
</wikitex>
== References ==
== References ==
{{#RefList:}}
{{#RefList:}}

Revision as of 15:27, 6 June 2012

Definition

Let E \xrightarrow{f} F be a map of chain complexes. Define the algebraic mapping cone of f as a chain complex Cone(f) given in degree k by

\displaystyle  Cone(f)_k=E_{k-1}\oplus F_k

with differential

\displaystyle  \partial_{Cone(f)}= \left( \begin{array}{cc} -\partial_E & 0 \\ f & \partial_F  \end{array} \right) : Cone(f)_k\rightarrow Cone(f)_{k-1}.

Every book on homological algebra contains this definition, except for the sign conventions in the differentials! For example, it is possible to have

\displaystyle  \partial_{Cone(f)}= \left( \begin{array}{cc} \partial_E & 0 \\ (-)^kf & \partial_F  \end{array} \right) : Cone(f)_k\rightarrow Cone(f)_{k-1}.



A good source is for example [Weibel1994].

References

Personal tools
Namespaces
Variants
Actions
Navigation
Interaction
Toolbox